ยังห่างไกลความจริงนัก

Primary numbers work as a celluar automata. Juni 2024.

In 2005, Đàm Thanh Sơn in collaborative effort, demonstrated the AdS/CFT correspondence, could be used to understand some aspects of a Quark-Gluon plasma by describing it in the language of string theory. The Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence, is one of the most interesting things to have come from string theory. Đàm Thanh Sơn and team were able to describe the quark gluon plasma in terms of black holes (having black body radiation, sometimes known as Hawking radiation) and can be calculated in five-dimensional spacetime. The black hole information paradox and the firewall paradox long known as shown having something, not fully understood but known to exist, effects that arise from quantum entanglement, that are related to deeper issues fundamental to existence, demanding being explained as known phenomenon, and also require being demonstrated, in any attempt to provide a method of unification in General Relativity to Quantum Mechanics. The grand unified theory that Einstein, once quoted as saying, as being his ultimate ambition and something that exists in Physics, likening it to a great ambition or the biggest goal in all of Physics, something yet to be realised, and something he would not live long enough to see being achieved. The same natural limits are given to everybody. Time and its effects at relativistic speeds, something he explained better than anybody, changing the World and our understanding of everything, although two facts remained that he could never change. The first, is experienced by us all collectively and we live in our experiences, throughout the natural course of our lives. The other, is this discussion. Any entropic force (force with macro-scale homogeneity), something that may arise as a being subject to and relating to quantum levels of disorder. Not a product of a fundamental interaction. We can find other known methods of relating to Einstein's equations. Notably through LQG or (Loop Quantum Gravity).the primary aim being to reconcile general relativity to quantum mechanics, and perhaps more importantly, without any requirement of establishing a background dependant version of spacetime, unlike as is the case in string theory or in with regard to the case of CMB serving as the cosmic frame of reference, made in General Relativity. Gravity is not a fundamental force but an emergent phenomenon. It is resulting from the statistical behaviour of microscopic degrees of freedom, reprocessed having been encoded onto the boundary of a 2D mirror, a projection of a holographic screen. As with a black hole’s surface area depending on its entropy, as described by John Archibald Wheeler’s student Jacob Bekenstein, demonstrated in the 1970s. The information contained inside of a 3D space, can be contained on its boundaries. Reconstructing everything back to a standard 3D picture of space, from images encoded to 2D mirrors. Like the idea that spacetime also exists as having a memory, expressed regarding Einstein and General Relativity. Gerard ’t Hooft and Leonard Susskind, shared their insight of a 3D boundary, arising from the boundary of one that is 2D, which was presented in proposal of the “holographic principle”. in 1990 and in 1995, Juan Maldacena developed the holographic idea to show the quantum math describing physics in three spatial dimensions without gravity can be equivalent to the math describing a four-dimensional space with gravity. The equivalence of two different mathematical descriptions is commonly known as a "duality" and considers the quantum superposition of disconnected spacetimes. To become parts that exist as being identities of a an established connection to classical spacetime, a formula was generalized as a covariant, having been formed from the Ryu-Takayanagi conjecture, made in 2007, and further being ultimately being presented by work from Mark Van Raamsdonk in 2010. Here we find ourselves arrive at a very profound statement, showing that indeed, it is not only possible that we can connect several spacetimes by entanglement, made in degrees of freedom, but we are also able to tear this down by disentangling. The intrinsic quantum phenomenon of entanglement, playing a central role in the emergence of classical spacetime geometry. The EPR paper of 1935, by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, shows that entanglement appears phenomena, known as being faster than light, instantaneous. Once we know the properties of a single quantum state, we know the entire systems quantum states, relating to any entangled particle in that group. It is not possible to be described independently of the same state, the product of all states interdependent, including when that particle group is separated over an extremely large distance, or on a cosmic scale. This progress report, is all that is now really complete!

Erik should examine tossing pairs of dice of different masses against a backwall with some backspin. There is a threshold mass for where Inertia overcomes the Elasticity of the layout and you get real x, y, z, variance. All it takes is a dice accelerator. ;)

great talk, the best explanation of the practical difference of frequentist vs. Bayesian approaches

Gravity doesn't suck, it blows.

is he basically saying that acceleration is increasing mass, and that "mass" creates "gravity" and that "gravity" is dark energy?

Erik, the Quantum Information you're referring to is generated by the GRAVITATIONAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION. But Quantum Information alone cannot cause Gravity to emerge from it. It needs to be three Quantum Mechanical X-Factors to cause Gravity to emerge from it. The Trinity "X-Factors" are: 1. Quantum Gravitation (that causes acceleration/force); 2. Quantum Gravitational Entanglement (that transmit instant information faster than the speed of light); and 3. Gravitational Quantum Computation (that generates quantum information codes using Rhu Bit as opposed to Q Bit). There are two types of Quantum Computer. The one that use Q Bit and the other one is the quantum computer that uses Rhu Bit or R Bit that I have invented in Singapore as a result of my 30-year-long Basic Research on Quantum Gravity. Introducing the Ultimate Quantum Computing - The biggest and the most powerful Computer System in the entire Universe- The Universe itself. Quantum Entanglement is not only at microscopic or subatomic scale but it is also true at macroscopic scale up to a cosmic scale. This is proven by the empirical Theory of Quantum Gravitation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Gravitational Quantum Computation for the entire Universe. These are the TRINITY (3-in-1) Equations and Codes For QUANTUM GRAVITATION, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL ENTANGLEMENT and GRAVITATIONAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION - The HOLY GRAILS of Physics: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement = 0 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α 2. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement = 1 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α 3. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement = 01 or 10 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical laws and physical/mathematical Trinity God Equations that are predictive, precise and does no collapse even in high energies of Big Bang and singularity of Black Hole. FYI: Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Computational Gravitation- the biggest and most powerful Computer Software Program and Hardware in the Universe and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement in Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; and 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State. More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE. Alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA to arrive at the published paper on Quantum Gravity. Most recently, additional two well respected scientific journals namely NATURE and the AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY APS Physical Review Journals have officially invited this author to submit manuscripts on his Research on Quantum Gravity for publication for PRX QUANTUM in preparation for a celebration for International Year of Quantum IYQ 2025 to showcase the best papers of the year. Quantum Gravitation is governed by and follow the Trinity Laws, Mathematics and Physics of Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement. We now have a new Laws of Physics which are the heart of the Quantum Theory of Gravity published in London. Paris and Zurich last December 2022 as follows: 1. First Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Gravitation: “The greater mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational Field causes a downward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” - Roel Real Rovira Equation for Quantum Gravity, and Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α Where: QG is Quantum Gravity in Rovira (value of downward acceleration force due to quantum gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in greater mass density of Quantum Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↓α is the Resultant Downward Acceleration of Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. 2. Second Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Anti-Gravity. “The lesser mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational Field causes an upward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” -Roel Real Rovira Equation for Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α Where: QAG is Quantum Anti-Gravity in Rovira (value of upward acceleration force due to quantum anti-gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in lesser mass density of Quantum Anti-Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↑α is the Resultant Upward Acceleration of Anti-Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. 3. Third Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Law of Quantum Neutral Gravitation. “The equal mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects and the Quantum Gravitational Field causes a zero acceleration or floating or hoovering of the gravitating Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field, instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” - Roel real Rovira Equation for Quantum Neutral Gravity and Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α Where: QNG is Quantum Neutral Gravity in Rovira (value of zero acceleration force due to quantum neutral gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in equal mass density of Quantum Neutral Gravitating Objects to the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↑↓0α is the Resultant zero acceleration or non-acceleration of Neutral Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. For more detailed information on these 3-in-1 Trinity Laws and Equations for Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation, and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - The Real True Nature of Quantum Gravitation, look it up at the two scientific journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE or google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA.

Nonsense!! Give a single testable prediction using current technology. He can't!

Speaking of talking and thinking about things... Linguists talk about "computations". Can these formulas show us the mathematics of language? edit Would love to see a long conversation between Wolfram and Chomsky.

they tem can kiss my a z z

Stephen, the Universe is indeed computational, programmed and powered by tripartite Gravity manifested by Quantum Gravitation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Quantum Gravitational Computation. With totally new kind of physics and mathematics, I have solved the conundrum of quantum gravity after 30 years of basic research in Singapore. We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical laws and physical/mathematical equations that are predictive and precise. FYI: Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement in Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; and 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State. More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE or alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA.

Erik, Quantum Gravity is Trinity manifested by Quantum Gravitation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Quantum Gravitational Computation . With totally new kind of physics and mathematics, I have solved the conundrum of quantum gravity after 30 years of basic research in Singapore. We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical laws and physical/mathematical equations that are predictive and precise. FYI: Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement in Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; and 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State. More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE or alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA.

Look more into photons and scattering

Quantum information, Quantum entanglement, Are, fundamental, underlying of Reality. Quantum Mind emerge.. Collection, Pattern of QuInfo and QuEntang. Quantum Body emerge.. Std.Model emerge, DNA, Protein synthesis. Mind and Body entanglement.. Consciousness emerge. Spacetime emerge.. Mass.. Energy.. Wave fn. Decoherence. Mathematics Emerge.. Intrinsic in the fabric of the emergence. Holographic principal..information Conservation, Energy conservation

@9:00 entropy does not cause these forces. Electromagnetism is causing the polymer to contract and thermal energy permits it to transition through a few energy barriers. Same with his "entropic gravity". He seems to have taken a few too many LSDs and really swallowed holism and emergence memes. It is not that these notions have no place in scientific explanations, but you have to be careful about what is fundamental and what truly is a more collective phenomenon that cannot be reduced to Hamiltonian time evolution. There are few such systems in nature, that are genuinely _strongly_ emergent, and perhaps only one known to us. (!)

It seems that Eric Verlinde is on the right track to explain the universe as an expanding entity without the need for a big bang, if he can show that it's missing entropy (as calculated from quantum mechanics) can be shown to be due to emergent gravity, and that the energy associated with it can eliminate the need for dark dark energy and that the accelerations associated with emerging gravity can eliminate the need for dark matter. If he does he can expect a Nobel prize in the future. It sounds like he's ahead of Sir Roger Penrose (anti-de sitter space) and Neil Turok in that they are still looking for something that will eliminate the need for the big bang. I wish him well and will be following the progress he and other physicists working in the same direction are making.

This theory I find one of most promising ones. Human observation capabilities are very very limited. It is like observing a shadow without being able to see its cause. Therefor basically it remains just a state of information.

10:40 14:10 paper

The spirit molecules are in an uproar over this dimensional FREAK!

By the way, this can be generalized to the case where you're optimizing a set of n vectors under the constraint that they're orthonormal. Then you compute all the gradients, project the resulting search vector onto the tangent surface by orthogonalizing all the gradients to all the vectors, and then diagonalize the matrix of scalar products between pairs of the gradients to find a coordinate system in which the gradients pair up with the vectors to form n hyperplanes in which you can rotate while exactly satisfying the constraints and still travelling in the direction of maximal change to first order; the angles by which you rotate in the hyperplanes are multiples of a single parameter (with the multipliers determined by the eigenvalues), so this is again reduced to a one-dimensional search.

It is amazing how simple and straight forward this is. Granted I still need to learn more about it to speak his language. But explaining the universe as a model of computation makes so much more sense, and aligns with other cosmologies so much easier then the standard model of physics. Using a model of computation allows to you to hold all models of human experience!

He gets the flow of things....

Can the direction of RG flow be opposite in de Sitter spacetime, contrary to AdS space case? 16:26

Wild and exciting perspective. Mr Wolfram is onto something, but it appears we'll need new brains to work effectively in this new simplicity.

the number of possible pasts equals the number of live historians…‽

“For every fact there is an infinity of hypotheses. ” ― Robert M. Pirsig (1928-2016)

“For every fact there is an infinity of hypotheses. ” ― Robert M. Pirsig (1928-2016)

Deep respect!

I need to review your presentation more closely, but this is easily one of the most interesting hypotheses I've seen in many years. I especially like your focus on finite-first physics since so much of our math is based on infinitely detailed, energy-indifferent generalizations of phenomena from _classical_ physics. One issue that came to mind, but which I did not immediately see, is: How do you approach the wave collapse issue?

Great!

The guy's a waffling fraud. ffs don't lend him any money because I ..."strongly suspect ... a lot of Technical difficulties" [will result in] "efficient computational ... quantum dynamics" ... discretely [resulting in a funding] "black hole" [disappearing your money over the event horizon]

it's an algorithmic rule that defines it's own geometry, it doesn't necessarily have a geometric solution, ok, i shut up now :)

all rules are the same in that way

i can compute the amplitude of the probably of a result in the center column

I think you should base your computations on spherical 4πr² symmetry forming and breaking, this can form statistical entropy with the possibility for greater complexity to arise. Light photon ∆E=hf energy is continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons. Kinetic energy is the energy of what is actually ‘happening’. The dynamic geometry of this process forms an uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future continuously unfolding relative to the electron probability cloud of the atoms and the wavelength of the light. The wave particle duality of light and matter (electrons) is forming a blank canvas that we interact with relative to the energy and momentum of our actions. This forms a constant of action in space and time that we see mathematically as the Planck constant h/2π.

Serious shortcoming in this discussion. To quote R. Penrose, "Consciousness is non computational". A donkey can be categorized as something in physical space. We can approach our knowledge of the donkey only in increments lasting an infinity of time since the entire universe is embedded in any part within it. Thus, we are looking for an object "in-itself", but there's only one way to reach the limit of "turtles-all-the-way-down" (by tapping into and merging with Pure Consciousness Itself Without-an-Object). This can be done by transcending the realm of computation and thought. Access "Mahamritunjaya mantra - Sacred Choir" and listen to it for 5 min per day for at least two weeks. This is a door between physical and branching space that takes us beyond the realm of both. In that realm, you will realize the ultimate Substance of the universe: Pure Consciousness or Brahman. The whole universe is That Ground of Pure Being, Sat-Chit-Ananda..

Fake physics. Do not believe this guy he is a charlatan.

Application of rewriting rule = renormalization group flow

This seems a little handwavy imho.

Interesting. Definitely a genius. There must be a concept for computational restraints on the universe itself and as described it has to have something to do with C. That is one of the most amazing results of this experiment. The math seems to be hard to find right now, but hopefully that will change in the future. The emergent properties could simply be a byproduct of the assumption of space acting as particles. It is almost surely the case, or otherwise the old idea of ether would not be revisited. I think the math must prove sufficiently enough that the emergent properties related to qt and gr are not related to the basic geometry of the hyper-graph that results. Basically if I turn the cartesian coordinate system into a hyper graph, then I will have general relativity in there too. The geometry must be emergent itself. Cheers to this man that has strained his brain enough to model a system that I have always wanted to make for myself but did not have the technical requirements to do so.

the crystal have memory effects is similar to the water crystal claims having memory effects that Brian Josephson considers legitimate. Water is negentropic as a macroquantum molecule.

Not a new idea, but I think a very compelling one. To dismiss it is to admit to not knowing, imo. I consider it a chicken and egg problem. If we take something as conceptually simple as magnetic force, attraction and repulsion, we can inquire as to the origin of the rule. It seems counterintuitive to believe the rules of organization arose from a chaos of charged and neutral particles. To posit the rules that govern the organization of atomic and molecular structures from a chaos of particles could be seen to hint at the scientific blasphemy of design.

As a non-scientist, I can't follow this. Which is not to diss it in any way. I think he's really onto something, and if you're an undergrad or grad physics student, it's probably amazing. I'd like to be able to grasp it somehow. Unfortunately, I'll have to wait until somebody besides Verlinde explains it in a youtube meant for laypeople.

How is it possible that this deeply profound and amazingly succinct and explanatory video has only had 2400 views in four months? Dr. Wolfram’s insights are a giant step in our understanding of the nature of the universe and what we call reality.

Eric Smith is awesome!

the relationship between a homogeneous system, and heterogenous system, which are two contradictory states of a system, are equivalent through transformations occurring over time, making it possible to connect them through a kind of Noether's Theorm, and isomorphism. Just imagine an all white (homogenous) 10x10 grid, and a random (heterogenous)10x10 grid. To go from one state to the other, requires a transformation or a rule that the pixels in the grid follow to get to the next state. Since any state can potentially take only 1 transformation (a transform that requires 100 simultaneous operations), then it is one such hard proof that there is a universality between all the possible permutations of states. Time becomes the variable, rather then the system. The system is "the same" just being transformed over time. You can then generically classify that relationship as "system evolution" Another thing : Universal Heat Death is fundamentally flawed for the following reason. There exists no system that can actually be at an equilibrium that doesn't exhibit a structured predictable pattern, meaning there will always exist information, and the question is at what scale can that information actually be utilized, by an observer that is comparable to the scale of the system. Let's just assume that the universe were made of 0's and 1's. a truly random string of 0's and 1's : 00111101101000101 obviously has some structure. There are a series of predictable patterns (1111, 000, 101) meaning this random string of numbers is not devoid of information. it ALWAYS has information. If you take every computational bit to be unique (DEFKMABLGHJIN etc...), then the information content is not only always there, but it is maximal at all times...because in a random string of symbols, there are no symbols it can relate to based on repeatability, then what gives context to what symbols mean, are what symbols they are next to. In that above sequence, "K" means nothing to the letter "D" until "D" recognizes that K is next to the letters F and M... So when D asks a question about F, he knows that K is next to F. Based on the connection between each unique element, then observers of this universe will interpret it exactly as that, based on it's relationship structure in this case how it's orientation in space relative to one another...K is next to M, M is next to A and so on...and this means something for observers in the universe, just at a scale that encompasses the entire universe. It's likely that, the universe is like the second case, where all computational elements are unique, like in the wolfram model of physics. In such a universe, "heat death" doesn't really have a meaning because the universe is always at a maximal state of information, and in some sense you can't interfere with that. It's like...You can move letter B next to letter E, so that the new sequence is DBEFKMALGHJIN...the sequence still remains maximally random...but the relationship that B has is changed (It's now next to D and E instead of A and L), and this matters for the observers in this system. In other words there is ALWAYS a conservation law of the information, energy and whatever at any given configuration of this universe and its the observers in that universe that are deciding exactly what the "state" of the universe is. **In both scenarios Heat Death does not truly exist in any information theoretic sense. Folks assume that equilibrium, where the universe is maximally homogeneous at all scales is the same as heat death, but this is not true... like shown above, maximal randomness always has by just virtue of statics, patterns...and in the opposing case where the universe is made of unique elements, then it is ALWAYS at maximal information content which doesn't undergo Heat Death.**

My proposed, amended Invisible/Holographic Principle of the Multiverse is a dual track pair of inverse principles. A duality within a duality. The Holographic Principle works in and only applies to indivudual universes. The complete Invisible/Holographic Principle works on and past the cosmic curtain of observation, out into the multiverse.

i think the better way to explain it is the basic construct that is used in lambda calculus can be used as key tool where the basic propositional calculus or predicate calculus where logic can be used as an computation where and and nand and xnor gate can be used to compute any thing from strings or numbers or anything but the basic construct which is not being any of the wolfram video please tell it in another video if iam wrong be kind and correct me where the schools teach computers as pure number system but functional programming and cellular automata tells that gates and every thing used in computation is a function but dont even try to open the mathematical portal from here because the inversion is not allowed as function in lambda calculus but in group theory it does switching a number and getting a answer is thought in many schools but composition of function which does the magic makes Turing complete from gta to arithmetic and even word-processing is done by considering everything and a function and construct are developed and a higher grammar is used in computation even 1 2 3 and even everything is an function from true and false are also function which are developed but how the cellular automata is related the rules are related to lambda calculus and physics the rules emanate from simple rules but not hard encoded or is inside the code and after the graphs develop emanate and develop the computational algorithm and theory is enumerated no video in you tube tells this basic information correctly i guess if i am wrong please correct me i never shy away to learn even i fail

"If we waited long enough for dark energy to dominate the universe we would live in a a de Sitter space. But for right now we have other components as well" Hey don't sound so disappointed