5 жыл бұрын
5 жыл бұрын
6 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@K-aR-Oh 3 күн бұрын
Bro driving around Silent Hill
@Ramzes945 26 күн бұрын
Where in Italy is this man?
@user-ts5qx4zj4u Ай бұрын
Ciao, does this golf has ADBLUE system?
@Mike-pb9rz Ай бұрын
@@user-ts5qx4zj4u No, the 2016 Volkswagen Golf 7 with the 1.6 turbo diesel engine does not have an AdBlue system
@Mike-pb9rz Ай бұрын
Volkswagen Golf 7 2016 with the 2.0 turbo diesel engine typically has an AdBlue system
@jiminygrille4954 3 ай бұрын
about to order my E220d. Did you order the air suspension & the all wheel steering? Cause I´m not sure if I really need it. My old W212 and the W213 I still have didn´t have air suspension and yet it was still comfy as hell.
@emilioscy 3 ай бұрын
We have one at home (E- Class 2024, W214) without the airmatic and the rear-axle steering, the ride is buttery smooth on a good road, but when things get a little rough let's say when hitting a pot hole, you can feel the tremble a bit on the cabin, but not a big deal. With the airmatic this can be prevented, but overall the ride quality is like crusing on clouds. Also mind due, that airmatic is starting to show problems after the 100.000 km mark. Hope that helps.
@BigdisplacementI6 2 ай бұрын
@@emilioscy I want airmatic 😅. I'm Canadian and the E450 with AS is $95k. I wish it had 17" low profile tires too.... 😢
@shawyonsharifi3394 3 ай бұрын
Price tag?
@HansImWald 3 ай бұрын
I have a W213 E 220d 4 Matic All-Terrain and I really like it. The new verion looks awesome, but the materials look really cheap.
@ahogQ 4 ай бұрын
Not as good as previous generation. Too much cheap plastic and they didn't even bother to integrate the tablet into the dashboard like they did in the previous model. You can see the post-covid and post war cost cutting.
@derbigpr500 4 ай бұрын
Hyperscreen should be banned, it ruins the interior and everyone who specs it is blind.
@TheZettpatrick 4 ай бұрын
Danke dafür! Wie empfindest du die Bedienung, zb Sender wechseln, lauter/leiser im Vergleich zum w213? Wird ja gejammert, wegen dem Fehlen physischer Tasten... Danke, Patrick, s213 vormopf
@adidkjf 4 ай бұрын
Interieur is such a huge downgrade compared to the previous model, its a shame...
@labidifaycal3185 4 ай бұрын
Absolutely true🎉
@juanchapman1604 5 ай бұрын
"PromoSM" 😴
@mss531 5 ай бұрын
Live it without the superscreen!
@kaanucar22 5 ай бұрын
Wasn't completely satisfied with the latest models of Mercedes but this one is just so perfect. A very nice combination of the traditional with the modern. Thanks for the video!
@olgaolga7822 5 ай бұрын
Nice car 🤩🤩🤩! Thanks for the video. I hope you are intent to make video with the consumption test for this car.
@poguerogue 5 ай бұрын
19:00 and onwards... people seem to easily forget how phenomenal Italy's nature truly is. I got my E300e in February. Owned the previous generation E220d and do not understand the people hating on the new look. The only gripe I have is the ambient lighting strip on top of the dashboard. The windshield reflection is truly horrible and does not become such an expensive vehicle.
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
Congratulations on your E300e! It's great to hear that you've upgraded from the previous generation E220d. Regarding the new look, it's understandable that opinions vary. However, I'm glad to share a tip regarding your concern about the ambient lighting strip on the dashboard. Many may not realize that the brightness and tone of the strip can often be adjusted or minimized in settings. This adjustment could potentially alleviate the issue with windshield reflection that you mentioned. It's always helpful to explore the customization options available in such high-end vehicles to optimize your driving experience. Enjoy your new ride!
@poguerogue 5 ай бұрын
@@Mike-pb9rzI adjusted it day one - can you believe that with even the dimmest setting, there is still a reflection..
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
@@poguerogue I noticed that too! It's quite surprising that even at the lowest setting, the reflection still persists on the glass
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
@@japanwatchconnection It seems like nowadays, every car uses excessive interior lighting, leading to a homogenized appearance across different models
@pongo1969 5 ай бұрын
I don't like the interior at all. I prefer the E Class of the 10s
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
I understand your sentiment. It's true that modern cars often share design elements, which can sometimes diminish the uniqueness of each model. Many feel nostalgic for the distinctiveness of past eras, like the E-Class of the 2010s😊
@xe3000 5 ай бұрын
Ein sehr hässliches KFZ, innen sowie außen
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
Ja, Geschmäcker sind verschieden. Manche mögen das Design des Fahrzeugs nicht, aber andere könnten es vielleicht schätzen. Am Ende ist es eine Frage der persönlichen Vorlieben😀
@joanheintz8306 5 ай бұрын
How is the sound with no burmester
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
it's good but with burmester better😂
@joanheintz8306 5 ай бұрын
@@Mike-pb9rz yes for sure but is it like normal or pretty good 😂
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
Burmester-9/10; no burmester-7/10😂
@joanheintz8306 5 ай бұрын
@@Mike-pb9rz oh so it’s okay great then well enjoy your car and I love your spec
@Game.Guy13 5 ай бұрын
Nice video and nice car!
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
Thank you!☺️
@rayandhulimi8035 5 ай бұрын
Why that EQ symbol is not appear? 🤔
@Mike-pb9rz 5 ай бұрын
Where should this symbol appear?
@pandeleabogdan-vlad7429 5 ай бұрын
😍
@roteroktober360 6 ай бұрын
if you want good fuel economy then avoid having AWD
@pikapika3 4 ай бұрын
whats that version
@fiestaboy089 7 ай бұрын
Interesting video. I use the Golf VI 1.6 TDI (CAYC) 4motion and can fill up to 60 liters. But I also push it to the limit and drive further when the display shows “0 kilometers”. I've had the Golf for 2 years now, had to make a total of 45 refueling stops and have driven 47,898 km with it. That's an average of 1064.4 kilometers per tank (I drive over 1000 kilometers per tank!). According to the "Spritmonitor", my Golf consumes 5.46 liters / 100 km. I like it :D.
@Dar.o 8 ай бұрын
great Video! the best video I've ever seen about fuel consumption. It was very pleasant to watch and in a short video the real consumption was shown.
@mathsteacher888i 10 ай бұрын
памʼятаю це авто)
@mathsteacher888i 10 ай бұрын
😀найс!
@mathsteacher888i 10 ай бұрын
дякую
@mathsteacher888i 10 ай бұрын
@slipperyslope3912 Жыл бұрын
Fill the neck and you'll get another 250km. 😀
@nikolayvasilev1123 Жыл бұрын
Renault engine
@user-ti2dq2wz2w 4 ай бұрын
Уверен?
@toyotacorollaaltis8613 3 ай бұрын
I think its still Mercedes since didn’t they manufacture it first and then Renault used it or is it the other way around?
@AL197845w34832479823 Жыл бұрын
12 kms is not a test....
@P_Petr Жыл бұрын
Hi, where was start and finish of your trip? Because is different, if you drive on flat or at mountain. Thank you :) . I was started at Prague and finish was at Pula with my Škoda Rapid 1.0 TSI 81Kw and board computer show me 4,5L/100Km with average speed 90Km/h but reality was 4,7L/100Km but it is so good too :)
@aviationserviceswings8020 Жыл бұрын
I also have a car like this, its fuel consumption is amazing, but according to my experience, it can be even less at an outside temperature of 18-20 degrees C. Thanks for the great video
@kam8165 Жыл бұрын
Maybe it's because I always drive 120km/h+ because I'm always in the 6L/100km range with the VW Jetta 1.6tdi
@365offline Жыл бұрын
Me too 130 140 150kmh with ac on From 5 to 6L its for me
@ynotnilknarf39 Жыл бұрын
you have the calculation incorrect. There are 4.5461 litres in a Gallon Actual consumption = 62.735mpg My 2001 B5.5 1.9 Passat Estate can achieve that but only during the summer
@johnwet6969 Жыл бұрын
OBC is lying too much. Strange. Usually figures from OBC are almost same as they’re in reality. Is this Euro 6 engine?
@Mike-pb9rz Жыл бұрын
Yes, this is Euro 6. I don't know why the car computer is lying, but it's not just for Volkswagen. I will try to do the same test with the other cars soon
@SainzPatrol Жыл бұрын
Very nice video Mike 👍
@rejsendemac Жыл бұрын
Fuel consumption is always less in the summer when it's 27 degrees C due to the lower air density. 😅 Still pretty good for a big car...
@Aluzcz Жыл бұрын
I'm curious if the consumption would ve better with the 7 speed dsg.
@zdravkozivkovic6951 Жыл бұрын
Pa naravno da bi,i to osetno.
@barbosa7797 6 ай бұрын
Mine does 4.9l/100km in a mix straight/mountain
@ddcdesign6719 Жыл бұрын
I drove with a single tank from Pretoria (Hatfield) to Cape Town (Fish Hoek)
@connory6741 Жыл бұрын
My mk3 1.2 TSI 110 fabia hatch can get better overall mpg and can go further on less fuel.
@MizuRino Жыл бұрын
Skoda octavia 1.9 tdi comp says 4,5 L/100 km, but in reality it was 6,5 L/100 km. Computers = liars.
@TonyAngelino. 5 ай бұрын
My golf 7 1.6 tdi 7.7 litre urban only
@Ninoumelko 2 жыл бұрын
MOTEUR RENAULT POURQUOI PAS APRES TOUT
@DIRTY-bd9mj 4 ай бұрын
Fiable économique
@Mr11ESSE111 2 жыл бұрын
in mine peugeot 207 hdi with 109hp are actually opposite , computer trip sayed 4,9liter and reality was 4,5liter
@Yayane_ 2 жыл бұрын
I have this 1.6 TDI in my Polo 6R, stage 1, can do 1050km on 15" wheels, 900/950 on 17. 110 to 130km/h with a 5 speed manual gearbox. Really happy with this model !
@Levitator07 2 жыл бұрын
Your video is a work of art mate!
@user-es7ur2xk4o 2 жыл бұрын
Not bad!
@Ares18888xy 2 жыл бұрын
Highway 140kmh?
@fghjfghgj 2 жыл бұрын
110 km/h? whats the point lol
@nasermhd7566 2 жыл бұрын
Very accurate freeway fuel consumption video thank you. For the same quantity of fuel how many kilometers do you get City drive? Would you care do another video City drive full tank. Thank you.