Sean O'Neill

Пікірлер

@DexterHaven 5 күн бұрын

The counterintuitive twist is that a huge planet with 5 times the earth mass will have a gravitational force qua acceleration almost half the size of the earth's. How can this be? It is less dense, and the distance to the center of the planet is greater.

@BinBakuti 11 күн бұрын

Thanks 👍

@AstronomerRob 2 ай бұрын

I ❤ photons! 😄🌻🏖🌄

@mythicalvinny 4 ай бұрын

how do you find V2 if you were given P2 and T2?

@cooperpenny 7 ай бұрын

Hi Sean....can you calculate the reduction of temperature expected for compressed air @100 psig & 70'F. which is pressure regulated down to exit thru an orifice at 15 psig???

@gabrielantunesdesouza699 7 ай бұрын

I has fail because The unit of measure. Tks

@ggxsky4811 Жыл бұрын

Can We conserve total mass in a curve applying this relationship

@halaanbar-ko1ez Жыл бұрын

great explanation , thankyou

@arcticf0x710 Жыл бұрын

brilliant. thank you so much.

@justincain4634 Жыл бұрын

It would be helpful if there was a video on how to integrate v^2 and the maxwell-boltzmann distribution since root mean square velocity is equal to the square root[average of v^2]. Gaussian techniques need to be used, apparently, and there are no examples on the Internet.

@Wasoska Жыл бұрын

Omg yassss thankyouuuu

@parisanasiri7432 Жыл бұрын

Very helpful ,thanks

@hbasyraff7973 Жыл бұрын

what happened to 6KJ and 4KJ energy??can i get an explanation

@silversurfer_ss6411 Жыл бұрын

So literally all assumptions to make this up. Got it

@katecone2295 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for the great video.

@destroya3303 Жыл бұрын

I thought this would discuss the actual origin of what Lorentz was thinking about and trying to solve. Instead this seems like a thought experiment to explain how the Lorentz transformation is used in special relativity.

@zhanggodfather8053 Жыл бұрын

such a great course

@jacobvandijk6525 Жыл бұрын

@ 0:28 Looking at a pipe and being able to watch both apertures at the same time is nothing less than a miracle ;-)

@woohoohooie Жыл бұрын

What would you do if you wanted to do the same but for a gas mixture e.g. 50% Ammonia - 50% Nitrogen?

@johnburghardt7700 2 жыл бұрын

Beta as v/c is the tangent of the angle he's calling beta, which is why beta times delta X sub 0 p equals delta t sub 0 p

@sorush5462008 2 жыл бұрын

Me sitting through this whole video realizing that my chances of getting head are literally zero. :(

@divyeshparmar4809 2 жыл бұрын

thanks man

@jackshea6787 2 жыл бұрын

what if W/m is not given?

@MEHEDIHASANBME- 2 жыл бұрын

When given data Pressure and Temperature then how find the value of index?

@MrDeyvid34 2 жыл бұрын

Holy, thanks brother, just what i needed

@blessingmakuyana7767 2 жыл бұрын

muukumhanya mdhara relax

@shawnelgert8704 2 жыл бұрын

This is quite a funny video. Thanks for the math laugh. Using a thermodynamics problem to explain to someone how to bend down and tie their shoes. If they don't already know how to interpolate linearly they will never/shouldn't be working in thermodynamics. I clicked the wrong link to get to this video and couldn't stop listening.

@codyphillips9627 2 жыл бұрын

Great video. In my PhD right now and this helped out so much

@grandhivenkatachalapathira1588 2 жыл бұрын

Great video, May I know exact reason for temperature drop after pressure reduction when its enthalphy is same?

@jaykim4349 8 ай бұрын

Expansion. If the factor by which the pressure drops is smaller than the factor by which the specific volume increases, the internal energy term naturally needs to fall ( h = u + Pv). Joule-Thomson effect. Liquids usually have the opposite effect where the temperature rises after pressure drop since the volume remains nearly constant which means that the internal energy must increase in order for isenthalpic assumption to hold.

@eftuna.630 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you

@temapoporo7919 2 жыл бұрын

thank you so much for your help.

@jvdlee6153 2 жыл бұрын

This video fails to address if we take Hi at partial pressure. For this low pressure difference it might not matter, but for a case with significant pressure difference (lets say high total pressure and tiny fraction of specie i), this is very relevant. Please explain...

@jim_rev9335 2 жыл бұрын

@Q114-m8r 2 жыл бұрын

is 5778 correct ?

@tesfayebarza1423 2 жыл бұрын

thanks a lot

@sameernaveed1 2 жыл бұрын

As this produuce a good estimate

@manishkumarmeena6501 2 жыл бұрын

Pdv is workdone is closed system, this cannot be used to represent work done in open system

@will1222 2 жыл бұрын

Good stuff, Sam!

@rivaswheatley1588 2 жыл бұрын

learned more in this 6 minute video than the past two weeks of my class, thank you sir!

@DeadPeople1000 2 жыл бұрын

Bruh, I feel so called out: "I left some room in the recording right there in case anybody had to groan out loud" 💀 Thanks for the help with this one!

@jacmac225 10 ай бұрын

so real. soooo so so real.

@bibobryle5029 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@sameerUNO10100 2 жыл бұрын

great vid

@honeydavis5568 2 жыл бұрын

It's now been broken... m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYmzZp2vlL2ff9U

@enricop.1813 3 жыл бұрын

If dA is smaller than zero and Ma is smaller than unity, how can dV ∝ - dA / (1 - Ma²) be smaller than zero as well?

@kiloizoldyk7064 3 жыл бұрын

u over complicate things man , keep it simple

@executorarktanis2323 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Sir for the clean explanation of isentropic processes

@jimenaguizado2902 3 жыл бұрын

hello I am Adela and I am from panama

@muhammadsyamimarnie7878 3 жыл бұрын

👌👌👌👌👍👍👍

@dmitryveksler7968 3 жыл бұрын

Hi, I agree with the previous commenter. The solution is incorrect. In your solution, in case of an air bubble (i.e. an object with the negligibly small mass), the acceleration would be close to infinity. But the correct answer is 2g. The problem is with you using the equation obtained from the Archimedes' principle, while it is only true for a non moving and non accelerating object.

@krystalvang9659 3 жыл бұрын

tx good video

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер