Academic professors are shifty cunning sophisticated whitewashing liars . They indirectly avoid questions as in this video.

This is an amazing presentation on radar technology! Thank you!

This is an amazing presentation on radar technology! Thank you!

mmh development of radar by the British indicates good faith to defend from attacks, not, they could very well have sabotaged radar research

Wow this was a fascinating talk, thx

3 is never a coincidence 😉

My understanding is heavyside put the Maxwell equations in the form we most often see. Maxwell came up with the ideas and heavyside put them in a form that could be handled in a more practical sense.

Karen vass says hello!

Great talk. But where this leads is so obvious. As Newton said, "Blind metaphysical necessity, which is certainly the same always and every where, could produce no variety of things. All that diversity of natural things which we find, suited to different times and places, could arise from nothing but the ideas and will of a Being necessarily existing."

If you make about ypothesis know random directions and the numbers of pieces and the volume of vessel you can know better about not exactly 😊❤

You must know the ditections of pieces and the empty volume between them ❤😊

definitely, the density is different. that is rediculous.

What about chemistry

well ,we would have had aircraft

The radio was invented by a handful of people, Tesla and Marconi being big players.

Any degree can be a stepping stone to a life of crime. Computer science? Phone people at home and tell them you're from "Microsoft Technical Department" and you've detected a virus in their computer ...

Everyone always says maths leads to careers but I've never seen anyone actually explain all these different jobs

Too bad mathematics already debunked evolution.

Dodged the entire point paper, Wigner was getting at the lack of reason BEHIND why mathematics works reasonably and effectively, he doesn't state that it works unreasonably, but that there's no reason behind the effectiveness of mathematics (atheistic view), i.e. a happy accident. Whereas theists suggest an intelligent designer who uses mathematics and physical laws as a blueprint for the observable universe, much as an architect uses calculations and dimensions as a blueprint for a building or house. It is up to the reader to suggest which seems more probable, "happy accident" or "intelligent designer".

I want mathematician

Sounds like german radar was weak? Why flak was pointed so good? Half of allied losses was cause of flak fire.

I'm still in school, but I'm questioning whether I go into a maths degree or a physics/science degree. I enjoy both, but I'm not quite sure which one is more broad and which one will give me more opportunity after i graduate. Which one would be more broad?

What to do with a mathematics degree? For one, write software. That is the biggest one. Mathematicians make the best computer programmers. Just make sure that you apply at an engineering company and not some boring applications house.

The Fnglish invented radar in Februar 1935. Others invented it much earlier !

The narrator did not mention Christian Hulsmeyer. Hulsmeyer enabled the major progress !

LOL seriously? 1935? it was invented by the germans in the 1880s ...

Not Marconi but Tesla is thr inventor of Radio. In 1943 US supreme court ruled that all of Marconi’s patents got invalid and awarded the patents for radio to Tesla.

Why would anyone on earth want to torture themselves with majoring in math.

*nothing*

3^12 + 3^1 3^12.0023143684277 3^10 + 3^9 3^12.0023143684277 The full proof can be found in my hebrew books on website Www.indiebook.co.il משוואות יהודה ביטון 1 משוואות יהודה ביטון 2

That's odd B.Wallace busting his balls with a 5 and 6 ton torpex bomb to bust dams and blast a battle ship to save there kingdom and they had nuclear weapon secrets and technology.

LEGEND

"Meet the mathematicians" could also be the name of a sitcom which I'd watch. I'm glad to have found an audio referencing the great original article.

If here is somebody who went to Caltech can he/she say is it good

I love having a BS in math, and I do math as a hobby all of the time as evidenced by my videos, but for the most part employers and HR departments aren't looking for math degrees. I'm not crazy about that, but those seem to be the facts. If you want something a large pool of employers are looking for, you're better off with a computer science, accounting, or engineering degree. The second I got engaged I went back to school for an accounting degree.

Yeah but like... Just get a degree in theoretical physics. It's like... Practical math. In that it carries purpose.. Right?

loved the joke. haha that's a good one

I have a bachelors degree in mathematics. TBH, it’s useless.

I love math. I love learning it. I love researching mathmatical anamalies. I really dont know what to do with a mathematics degree though.

Jungle conclusions.... chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/threelly-ai-for-youtube/dfohlnjmjiipcppekkbhbabjbnikkibo

Good shit... chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/threelly-ai-for-youtube/dfohlnjmjiipcppekkbhbabjbnikkibo

Watch a 30 mins video in 3 mins. The BEST extension in google chrome store. chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/threelly-ai-for-youtube/dfohlnjmjiipcppekkbhbabjbnikkibo

good talk

Project E.D.E.T(Excellent Development of Elementary Teachers)

Thumbs up for Maxwell and the Scots. But You Englishers ... Always 50 years behind.

You need do Masters after in practical subject like finance or real estate investment or investment management plus develop better people skills.

This video explains why math is a good minor

This is the most interesting “history of maths” discussion I have ever heard. Call Netflix at once, make your movie, all would be nerds across the world need your articulate descriptions as a call to arms! Thank you very much for this lecture.

A complete dodge (in 7 parts no less) of Wigner's unreasonable effectiveness monograph. Wigner suggests that we shouldn't continually discover a world that has been PREDICTED WITH GREATS SPECIFICITY BY MATH! Why? Because math is descriptive not prescriptive. We should be able to describe past events not predict future ones. Unless Galileo and Newton are correct in their assumption that we are just discovering How God designed the universe. The theist enjoys a considerable advantage over the naturalist in explaining the uncanny success of mathematics. For the theist has a ready explanation of the applicability of mathematics to the physical world: God has created it according to a certain blueprint that He had in mind. The world exhibits the mathematical structure it does because God has chosen to create it according to the abstract model in His mind. Wigner, not being a theist, suggests that it is just an ridiculously happy accident. But we do t solve this by invoking chaos theory.

Interesting.