Ne pleur pas,Alfred. J'ai besoin de tout mon courage pour mourir a vingt ans.

Fractal 😊😊

❤❤🎉

Great

Nice ❤

Great Emmy Noether.

❤

fuj strc si to nekam

NICE ONE KEEP GOING ‼️

Nice animation but even at 1/4 the speed it goes way too fast...

❤️

Great a sir keep it up😊😊

I was interested with mathematics but unfortunately it is strictly connected with politics 😂

YOU CALL IT MATHS, I SAY IT'S POETRY OF LOGICAL REASONINGS. YOU SAY IT'S A SUBJECT, I SAY IT'S THE LANGUAGE OF UNIVERSE. MATH IS MY L💚VE AND IT WOULD ALWAYS BE💕 MY LOVE.

Bruh you're doing great job I just loves your content don't feel low by the reach I am sure if you do your best you'll reach the mathy audience of india ❤🎉

شکريہ استاد محترم

The lecture was delivered in a dynamic way, making it memorable. Amazing job!

❤❤❤❤

Excellently presented!

Open math circle always provide outstanding concepts I love it❤

Euler's polyhedron formula is a fundamental theorem in geometry, describing the relationship between the number of vertices (V), edges (E), and faces (F) of a convex polyhedron. It is expressed as: V - E + F = 2 This equation holds true for all convex polyhedra, such as cubes, pyramids, and tetrahedrons. The formula reveals that no matter the complexity of a polyhedron, as long as it is convex, the number of vertices minus the number of edges plus the number of faces will always equal 2. This is a key result in the field of topology. The formula was discovered by the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler in the 18th century and has since become a cornerstone of geometric theory. It not only applies to 3D shapes but also provides insight into the structure of more complex surfaces, connecting geometry with other areas of mathematics like graph theory and topology. Euler’s formula is valuable for understanding polyhedra in mathematical contexts, but it also plays a role in fields such as architecture, 3D modeling, and network design, where the relationship between structure and form is crucial. Disclaimer : All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in this video belong to their respective copyright owners and this page does not claim any right over them. Regards 🦋

« Al khawarizmi », which name is Musa, didn’t invent « algebra ». The Babylonian did, 2600 years earlier, in 1800 BC

It is not possible to find a general formula for polynomial of degree higher than four that containing only Arithmetical operations & Radicals.

History of algebra is history of great minds who uses theirs natural gift naturally ❤❤

A lover, a poat, a friend, a fighter, most of all a mathematician all this just 20 year of age.

Sir AOA Sir mujhe bhi aap ka session join krna hai Kia treqaakaar hai?

Please translate عربى

I think 35

Poor duelist.

Greate initiative sir❤

Wonderful initiative

well done !

Very good

Interesting... thanks

Awesome.

braavo! bravo im crying! im tearing up im crying. bravo. She died so young.

Great sir

ij

It was a great talk indeed!!

On David Hilbert’s “On the Infinite” (Über das Unendliche) ♾️ Having previously heaped praise on Cantor’s set theory, Hilbert proceeds to point out all the contradictions that are inherent in that theory, seemingly totally oblivious to the incongruity of his stance: “In the joy of discovering new and important results, mathematicians paid too little attention to the validity of their deductive methods. For, simply as a result of employing definitions and deductive methods which had become customary, contradictions began gradually to appear. These contradictions, the so-called paradoxes of set theory, though at first scattered, became progressively more acute and more serious. In particular, a contradiction discovered by Zermelo and Russell had a downright catastrophic effect when it became known throughout the world of mathematics. … Too many different remedies for the paradoxes were offered, and the methods proposed to clarify them were too variegated. Admittedly, the present state of affairs where we run up against the paradoxes is intolerable. Just think, the definitions and deductive methods which everyone learns, teaches, and uses in mathematics, the paragon of truth and certitude, lead to absurdities! If mathematical thinking is defective, where are we to find truth and certitude?” And after pointing out that mathematics has immersed itself into a quagmire of self-inflicted contradictions, he offers his view of how the problem might be resolved: “There is, however, a completely satisfactory way of avoiding the paradoxes without betraying our science. The desires and attitudes which help us find this way and show us what direction to take are these: Wherever there is any hope of salvage, we will carefully investigate fruitful definitions and deductive methods. We will nurse them, strengthen them, and make them useful. No one shall drive us out of the paradise which Cantor has created for us. We must establish throughout mathematics the same certitude for our deductions as exists in ordinary elementary number theory, which no one doubts and where contradictions and paradoxes arise only through our own carelessness.” This emotive proclamation “No one shall drive us out of the paradise …” sits very uneasily alongside his concomitant claim that every cause of any contradiction in Cantor’s set theory will be rooted out without compunction. It indicates very clearly a strong desire to retain aspects of that theory that are emotionally appealing. It is not far-fetched to suggest that this emotional attachment led to the turning of a blind eye to the possibility that the notion of a number larger than any limitlessly large number might be indicative of a fundamental problem worth investigating in depth. It is worth noting Hilbert’s intense antagonism to any criticism of Cantor’s set theoretical ideas. One of the prominent critics in Hilbert’s time was Henri Poincaré. Although Hilbert did praise Poincaré’s mathematical creativity in general, he denounced Poincaré for criticizing the “fruitful scientific approach of Cantor” and lambasted Poincaré for not producing any new ideas in this Cantorian realm, objecting that Poincaré only “dictated prohibitions”. That’s remarkably ironic. The most glaring irony is that the contradictions of Cantorian set theory were the direct result of too much freedom, and every attempt to devise axioms to prevent the contradictions amounts to nothing other than prohibitions on what one can do with Cantorian sets. - www.jamesrmeyer.com/infinite/hilbert-uber-das-unendliche

Great work sir for math Lovers

Hollywood has made many blockbusters based on or about physicists and not nearly enough about mathematicians.

Good discussion by the way.

I thought he died in the hospital after the duel

Promo SM 🙈

Here’s the full interview: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fmaraoBrp5yIorssi=Uo83PTRhTsWpaQSC

Algebra is the word derived from al jabr which is itself taken from a sanskrit word madhava pi calculation on value of pi is the great example of he knows algebra which dealing with unknowns

Representing knots with mathematical concepts on board is very impressive.

Good effort to make general public aware with these deep and interesting cocepts of mathematics.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/omjUhHyXa7mjipIsi=5osXaKCpsQ13bIVz