God Guru Matapita bless True and me 🙏 ॐ नमः शिवाय bless

how do you keep it from slipping down?

Short but sweet. Thank you. I was stepping too far forward, and that was causing some balance issues. Thank you.

How much this one

'promo sm'

You need to show a realistic situation with an old person with weak arms and legs. Using a young nurse for your video dodges the problem.

Lucy Meszaros died on Saturday 2nd December 2023. It took at least an hour and twenty minutes of choking on her own vomit, calling "Darling" before she took her last breath. She was frightened and alone. I was prevented from turning her on her side or sitting her up, which would have saved her life. Two main factors prevented me from saving Lucy's life: (1- ) The collaborative conspiring actions between Cheltenham General hospitals senior Tivolli ward staff and the hospitals legal department, resulting in a fabricated allegation. Since 2018 they have attempted to prevent me from exposing pure neglect, covert DNAR's and covert ReSPECT forms. (2 - ) - The complete and utter farce of an 'investigation' led by a detective from Gloucestershire constabulary, that could have been completed within 24 hours. It's now taken over 4 months, and still continuing after Lucy's avoidable death. Lucy had faecal impaction and faecal leakage from her vaginal area (some type of 'infrequent fistula), clearly causing repeated infections that were not treated when they should have been. This wasn't wasn't resolved by Gloucestershire NHS in over 6 years. They kept saying that because she had MS, she had a "poor quality of life" and "wouldn't tolerate treatment or operation", so how did she survive urosepsis over 30 times AS WELL AS many infection-induced strokes, heart attacks and a cardiac arrest !! THE FABRICATED ALLEGATION IS: Quote - "we THINK" he "MAY have inserted a finger into either her bottom or vagina" on 17th July whilst doing her personal care'. (By the way, our carer (Sarah) was with Lucy all day, as she was for many of the days, to avoid the usual staff neglect on Lucy). It's a case where there is nothing whatsoever to back up their lie, it's one persons word against mine and our carers. And even IF (I reiterate 'IF') this had of happened, and IF 'concerns' were genuine, there wouldn't have even been any 'evidence to 'investigate' anyway, because; (1) - We and carers obviously use medical gloves when providing personal care. and; (2) - police don't have DNA. Any person even with half the brains of a peanut could see that this is a fabricated lie. Four other relevant points of concern: (1) - Why didn't they raise it on 17th July? (2) - Why on earth would staff continue to allow me unsupervised, to provide Lucy's personal care in hospital for the remainder of the admission (17th to 26th July) ? if they genuinely thought this was true why didn't they either prevent me or place a staff member in there to supervise? (3) - Why would they discharge my vulnerable wife into my care in our own home, and leave her in my care if they genuinely believed what was alleged? Why risk something like this behind closed doors with no safeguarding preventative method in place? (4) - Why didn't the police arrest me and begin their 'investigation' until 4th August? What probable gave them the sick idea is from when I asked for a nurse to come see what me and Lucy's carer keep telling them about faeces leaking from the vagina. The nurse did come, but she gave me a dirty snooty look as if it was an indecent request. It was not. I wanted it documented as 'evidenced by staff' so that a doctor could not refuse, as usual, to take it seriously. Gloucester Royal hospital, Cheltenham General hospitals, Rapid Response 'prescriber', Cheltenham community District Nurses and GP's frequently consistently disregarded urosepsis until the infections became so bad that Lucy had numerous seizures, strokes, heart attacks and even a cardiac arrest. (disregarded at LEAST 30 times in six years). Several of these seizures, strokes and heart attacks happened whilst actually IN hospital. When Lucy has been in hospital they have refused to acknowledge that her bowel care needs to be taken seriously. Frequency, type and consistency (loose/firm) needs to be monitored and documented. (They have either refused or not bothered, even with repeated requests). If she hasn't opened her bowels after two days she needs suppositories. If nothing after three days she needs an enema. (They have either refused or not bothered). Failure to do this will result in her faecal impaction causing more faecal leakage through the vaginal area, fighting against the IV antibiotics and causing the infection to return with a vengeance. It's happened time after time for the past 5/6 years. They disregard it and say, 'But she's had She was discharged unsafely on many occasions, suffering from all the above. Even within as little as 12 hours and having to be blue-lighted back to hospital A&E or IV antibiotics at home with Rapid Response (who incidentally) often disregarded how ill she was and several times had to have paramedics on the same days as RR said 'her symptoms are not concerning'. There had also been a particular discharge where she was collected whilst unconscious by Ezec patient transport and arrived home STILL unconscious. The drivers were told "This is how she is". When we refuted this they rang the ward and said they were going to take her back to hospital. They were told "No - we don't have any beds". A district nurse (Louise) was here, rang 999 quoting "heart attack" and paramedics arrived. (Lucy actually went for THREE months the first time of vomiting faecal fluid and blood in before ANYONE took serious notice. Even the GP, who's clothes she projectile vomited on didn't escalate it for hospital investigation). These 'people' who are supposed to be 'caring' have often alleged that I am "intimidating and aggressive" to hospital staff. But my behaviour has actually been the opposite. I have audio and 'secret camera' footage that evidence my behaviour for each time I went into either of those hospitals. I have always been polite, respectful, even humble and apologetic with these 'people' when raising my concerns. Now if they think that I'm "intimidating and aggressive" purely because I have to keep repeating myself, raising the same concerns over and over, the same that they keep disregarding - then they obviously should not be in the job if hearing concerns makes feel so inadequate. Even in worst case scenario's, I have never sworn, never raised my voice, never insulted them and never shown assertion. I have raised concerns (which has been EVERY time Lucy has been in hospital and left in wet & soiled pads, sore and sometimes bleeding from it, unkempt, All they have to do is acknowledge, address and resolve those concerns. Do not leave vulnerable people in soiled and wet pads and do not withhold treatment just because somebody is disabled... The root cause of these infections was faecal impaction resulting in faecal leakage from Lucy's vagina and faecal vomiting from 2016/17. Cheltenham GP's and district nurses have witnessed this, as well as faecal leakage from her vagina, with their own eyes. At times Lucy would also vomit faecal fluid and blood, which two Cheltenham GP's witnessed whilst standing in her bedroom. District Nurses used to manage her bowels to prevent impaction. But after they were reported by a new member of their team for using the same black and mouldy bowel irrigation equipment for approximately 8 months without changing bag or tube, they refused to continue with Lucy's bowel care. They said "Lucy cannot mentally or physically tolerate it". They also made false statements that Lucy has a poor quality of life. What a coincidence. That was a bare-faced lie and a retaliation tactic. The only poor quality of life was when and because THEY and other professionals disregarded how ill Lucy was when she had infection that led to urosepsis. A few weeks ago the district nursing team suddenly decided that Lucy miraculously doesn't need bowel care any more. Their 'decision' came extremely soon after they were reported for TOTAL incompetence to a GP by our carer. Was this yet another coincidence?? NO - it was yet another lie and retaliation tactic. Both hospitals have authorised covert, behind my back, DNACPR decisions and covert ReSPECT forms that are meant to document a patients wishes and feelings - Hospitals have no right to complete these forms without patient (and family or LPA) involvement. They are aware that I am Lasting Power of Attorney, yet they've done this at least three times, willfully breaking the law, with no discussion or consultation with me or Lucy. There are many video's evidencing that Lucy DID have a reasonable quality of life, also how she was when she didn't have ignored infections, which these judgmental self opinionated 'people' refuted in continued devious attempts to collaborate and protect themselves. Many video's and audio recordings also evidence the extremely poor quality of 'care' from hospital 'caring' professionals These also evidence the many blatant lies these people have, and are telling - to hide their neglect, abuse and willful lack of Duty of Care and professional responsibility. Follow the link, and please share on as many social media outlets as you can. THIS - could just as easily happen to somebody that YOU care for. Don't be mistaken into thinking that all 'care' professionals have compassion and honesty. facebook.com/carerswantcompetence kzbin.info/www/bejne/iWjapICKZct0m8U

Lucy Meszaros died on Saturday 2nd December 2023. It took at least an hour and twenty minutes of choking on her own vomit, calling "Darling" before she took her last breath. She was frightened and alone. I was prevented from turning her on her side or sitting her up, which would have saved her life. Two main factors prevented me from saving Lucy's life: (1- ) The collaborative conspiring actions between Cheltenham General hospitals senior Tivolli ward staff and the hospitals legal department, resulting in a fabricated allegation. Since 2018 they have attempted to prevent me from exposing pure neglect, covert DNAR's and covert ReSPECT forms. (2 - ) - The complete and utter farce of an 'investigation' led by a detective from Gloucestershire constabulary, that could have been completed within 24 hours. It's now taken over 4 months, and still continuing after Lucy's avoidable death. Lucy had faecal impaction and faecal leakage from her vaginal area (some type of 'infrequent fistula), clearly causing repeated infections that were not treated when they should have been. This wasn't wasn't resolved by Gloucestershire NHS in over 6 years. They kept saying that because she had MS, she had a "poor quality of life" and "wouldn't tolerate treatment or operation", so how did she survive urosepsis over 30 times AS WELL AS many infection-induced strokes, heart attacks and a cardiac arrest !! THE FABRICATED ALLEGATION IS: Quote - "we THINK" he "MAY have inserted a finger into either her bottom or vagina" on 17th July whilst doing her personal care'. (By the way, our carer (Sarah) was with Lucy all day, as she was for many of the days, to avoid the usual staff neglect on Lucy). It's a case where there is nothing whatsoever to back up their lie, it's one persons word against mine and our carers. And even IF (I reiterate 'IF') this had of happened, and IF 'concerns' were genuine, there wouldn't have even been any 'evidence to 'investigate' anyway, because; (1) - We and carers obviously use medical gloves when providing personal care. and; (2) - police don't have DNA. Any person even with half the brains of a peanut could see that this is a fabricated lie. Four other relevant points of concern: (1) - Why didn't they raise it on 17th July? (2) - Why on earth would staff continue to allow me unsupervised, to provide Lucy's personal care in hospital for the remainder of the admission (17th to 26th July) ? if they genuinely thought this was true why didn't they either prevent me or place a staff member in there to supervise? (3) - Why would they discharge my vulnerable wife into my care in our own home, and leave her in my care if they genuinely believed what was alleged? Why risk something like this behind closed doors with no safeguarding preventative method in place? (4) - Why didn't the police arrest me and begin their 'investigation' until 4th August? What probable gave them the sick idea is from when I asked for a nurse to come see what me and Lucy's carer keep telling them about faeces leaking from the vagina. The nurse did come, but she gave me a dirty snooty look as if it was an indecent request. It was not. I wanted it documented as 'evidenced by staff' so that a doctor could not refuse, as usual, to take it seriously. Gloucester Royal hospital, Cheltenham General hospitals, Rapid Response 'prescriber', Cheltenham community District Nurses and GP's frequently consistently disregarded urosepsis until the infections became so bad that Lucy had numerous seizures, strokes, heart attacks and even a cardiac arrest. (disregarded at LEAST 30 times in six years). Several of these seizures, strokes and heart attacks happened whilst actually IN hospital. When Lucy has been in hospital they have refused to acknowledge that her bowel care needs to be taken seriously. Frequency, type and consistency (loose/firm) needs to be monitored and documented. (They have either refused or not bothered, even with repeated requests). If she hasn't opened her bowels after two days she needs suppositories. If nothing after three days she needs an enema. (They have either refused or not bothered). Failure to do this will result in her faecal impaction causing more faecal leakage through the vaginal area, fighting against the IV antibiotics and causing the infection to return with a vengeance. It's happened time after time for the past 5/6 years. They disregard it and say, 'But she's had She was discharged unsafely on many occasions, suffering from all the above. Even within as little as 12 hours and having to be blue-lighted back to hospital A&E or IV antibiotics at home with Rapid Response (who incidentally) often disregarded how ill she was and several times had to have paramedics on the same days as RR said 'her symptoms are not concerning'. There had also been a particular discharge where she was collected whilst unconscious by Ezec patient transport and arrived home STILL unconscious. The drivers were told "This is how she is". When we refuted this they rang the ward and said they were going to take her back to hospital. They were told "No - we don't have any beds". A district nurse (Louise) was here, rang 999 quoting "heart attack" and paramedics arrived. (Lucy actually went for THREE months the first time of vomiting faecal fluid and blood in before ANYONE took serious notice. Even the GP, who's clothes she projectile vomited on didn't escalate it for hospital investigation). These 'people' who are supposed to be 'caring' have often alleged that I am "intimidating and aggressive" to hospital staff. But my behaviour has actually been the opposite. I have audio and 'secret camera' footage that evidence my behaviour for each time I went into either of those hospitals. I have always been polite, respectful, even humble and apologetic with these 'people' when raising my concerns. Now if they think that I'm "intimidating and aggressive" purely because I have to keep repeating myself, raising the same concerns over and over, the same that they keep disregarding - then they obviously should not be in the job if hearing concerns makes feel so inadequate. Even in worst case scenario's, I have never sworn, never raised my voice, never insulted them and never shown assertion. I have raised concerns (which has been EVERY time Lucy has been in hospital and left in wet & soiled pads, sore and sometimes bleeding from it, unkempt, All they have to do is acknowledge, address and resolve those concerns. Do not leave vulnerable people in soiled and wet pads and do not withhold treatment just because somebody is disabled... The root cause of these infections was faecal impaction resulting in faecal leakage from Lucy's vagina and faecal vomiting from 2016/17. Cheltenham GP's and district nurses have witnessed this, as well as faecal leakage from her vagina, with their own eyes. At times Lucy would also vomit faecal fluid and blood, which two Cheltenham GP's witnessed whilst standing in her bedroom. District Nurses used to manage her bowels to prevent impaction. But after they were reported by a new member of their team for using the same black and mouldy bowel irrigation equipment for approximately 8 months without changing bag or tube, they refused to continue with Lucy's bowel care. They said "Lucy cannot mentally or physically tolerate it". They also made false statements that Lucy has a poor quality of life. What a coincidence. That was a bare-faced lie and a retaliation tactic. The only poor quality of life was when and because THEY and other professionals disregarded how ill Lucy was when she had infection that led to urosepsis. A few weeks ago the district nursing team suddenly decided that Lucy miraculously doesn't need bowel care any more. Their 'decision' came extremely soon after they were reported for TOTAL incompetence to a GP by our carer. Was this yet another coincidence?? NO - it was yet another lie and retaliation tactic. Both hospitals have authorised covert, behind my back, DNACPR decisions and covert ReSPECT forms that are meant to document a patients wishes and feelings - Hospitals have no right to complete these forms without patient (and family or LPA) involvement. They are aware that I am Lasting Power of Attorney, yet they've done this at least three times, willfully breaking the law, with no discussion or consultation with me or Lucy. There are many video's evidencing that Lucy DID have a reasonable quality of life, also how she was when she didn't have ignored infections, which these judgmental self opinionated 'people' refuted in continued devious attempts to collaborate and protect themselves. Many video's and audio recordings also evidence the extremely poor quality of 'care' from hospital 'caring' professionals These also evidence the many blatant lies these people have, and are telling - to hide their neglect, abuse and willful lack of Duty of Care and professional responsibility. Follow the link, and please share on as many social media outlets as you can. THIS - could just as easily happen to somebody that YOU care for. Don't be mistaken into thinking that all 'care' professionals have compassion and honesty. facebook.com/carerswantcompetence kzbin.info/www/bejne/iWjapICKZct0m8U

Lucy Meszaros died on Saturday 2nd December 2023. It took at least an hour and twenty minutes of choking on her own vomit, calling "Darling" before she took her last breath. She was frightened and alone. I was prevented from turning her on her side or sitting her up, which would have saved her life. Two main factors prevented me from saving Lucy's life: (1- ) The collaborative conspiring actions between Cheltenham General hospitals senior Tivolli ward staff and the hospitals legal department, resulting in a fabricated allegation. Since 2018 they have attempted to prevent me from exposing pure neglect, covert DNAR's and covert ReSPECT forms. (2 - ) - The complete and utter farce of an 'investigation' led by a detective from Gloucestershire constabulary, that could have been completed within 24 hours. It's now taken over 4 months, and still continuing after Lucy's avoidable death. Lucy had faecal impaction and faecal leakage from her vaginal area (some type of 'infrequent fistula), clearly causing repeated infections that were not treated when they should have been. This wasn't wasn't resolved by Gloucestershire NHS in over 6 years. They kept saying that because she had MS, she had a "poor quality of life" and "wouldn't tolerate treatment or operation", so how did she survive urosepsis over 30 times AS WELL AS many infection-induced strokes, heart attacks and a cardiac arrest !! THE FABRICATED ALLEGATION IS: Quote - "we THINK" he "MAY have inserted a finger into either her bottom or vagina" on 17th July whilst doing her personal care'. (By the way, our carer (Sarah) was with Lucy all day, as she was for many of the days, to avoid the usual staff neglect on Lucy). It's a case where there is nothing whatsoever to back up their lie, it's one persons word against mine and our carers. And even IF (I reiterate 'IF') this had of happened, and IF 'concerns' were genuine, there wouldn't have even been any 'evidence to 'investigate' anyway, because; (1) - We and carers obviously use medical gloves when providing personal care. and; (2) - police don't have DNA. Any person even with half the brains of a peanut could see that this is a fabricated lie. Four other relevant points of concern: (1) - Why didn't they raise it on 17th July? (2) - Why on earth would staff continue to allow me unsupervised, to provide Lucy's personal care in hospital for the remainder of the admission (17th to 26th July) ? if they genuinely thought this was true why didn't they either prevent me or place a staff member in there to supervise? (3) - Why would they discharge my vulnerable wife into my care in our own home, and leave her in my care if they genuinely believed what was alleged? Why risk something like this behind closed doors with no safeguarding preventative method in place? (4) - Why didn't the police arrest me and begin their 'investigation' until 4th August? What probable gave them the sick idea is from when I asked for a nurse to come see what me and Lucy's carer keep telling them about faeces leaking from the vagina. The nurse did come, but she gave me a dirty snooty look as if it was an indecent request. It was not. I wanted it documented as 'evidenced by staff' so that a doctor could not refuse, as usual, to take it seriously. Gloucester Royal hospital, Cheltenham General hospitals, Rapid Response 'prescriber', Cheltenham community District Nurses and GP's frequently consistently disregarded urosepsis until the infections became so bad that Lucy had numerous seizures, strokes, heart attacks and even a cardiac arrest. (disregarded at LEAST 30 times in six years). Several of these seizures, strokes and heart attacks happened whilst actually IN hospital. When Lucy has been in hospital they have refused to acknowledge that her bowel care needs to be taken seriously. Frequency, type and consistency (loose/firm) needs to be monitored and documented. (They have either refused or not bothered, even with repeated requests). If she hasn't opened her bowels after two days she needs suppositories. If nothing after three days she needs an enema. (They have either refused or not bothered). Failure to do this will result in her faecal impaction causing more faecal leakage through the vaginal area, fighting against the IV antibiotics and causing the infection to return with a vengeance. It's happened time after time for the past 5/6 years. They disregard it and say, 'But she's had She was discharged unsafely on many occasions, suffering from all the above. Even within as little as 12 hours and having to be blue-lighted back to hospital A&E or IV antibiotics at home with Rapid Response (who incidentally) often disregarded how ill she was and several times had to have paramedics on the same days as RR said 'her symptoms are not concerning'. There had also been a particular discharge where she was collected whilst unconscious by Ezec patient transport and arrived home STILL unconscious. The drivers were told "This is how she is". When we refuted this they rang the ward and said they were going to take her back to hospital. They were told "No - we don't have any beds". A district nurse (Louise) was here, rang 999 quoting "heart attack" and paramedics arrived. (Lucy actually went for THREE months the first time of vomiting faecal fluid and blood in before ANYONE took serious notice. Even the GP, who's clothes she projectile vomited on didn't escalate it for hospital investigation). These 'people' who are supposed to be 'caring' have often alleged that I am "intimidating and aggressive" to hospital staff. But my behaviour has actually been the opposite. I have audio and 'secret camera' footage that evidence my behaviour for each time I went into either of those hospitals. I have always been polite, respectful, even humble and apologetic with these 'people' when raising my concerns. Now if they think that I'm "intimidating and aggressive" purely because I have to keep repeating myself, raising the same concerns over and over, the same that they keep disregarding - then they obviously should not be in the job if hearing concerns makes feel so inadequate. Even in worst case scenario's, I have never sworn, never raised my voice, never insulted them and never shown assertion. I have raised concerns (which has been EVERY time Lucy has been in hospital and left in wet & soiled pads, sore and sometimes bleeding from it, unkempt, All they have to do is acknowledge, address and resolve those concerns. Do not leave vulnerable people in soiled and wet pads and do not withhold treatment just because somebody is disabled... The root cause of these infections was faecal impaction resulting in faecal leakage from Lucy's vagina and faecal vomiting from 2016/17. Cheltenham GP's and district nurses have witnessed this, as well as faecal leakage from her vagina, with their own eyes. At times Lucy would also vomit faecal fluid and blood, which two Cheltenham GP's witnessed whilst standing in her bedroom. District Nurses used to manage her bowels to prevent impaction. But after they were reported by a new member of their team for using the same black and mouldy bowel irrigation equipment for approximately 8 months without changing bag or tube, they refused to continue with Lucy's bowel care. They said "Lucy cannot mentally or physically tolerate it". They also made false statements that Lucy has a poor quality of life. What a coincidence. That was a bare-faced lie and a retaliation tactic. The only poor quality of life was when and because THEY and other professionals disregarded how ill Lucy was when she had infection that led to urosepsis. A few weeks ago the district nursing team suddenly decided that Lucy miraculously doesn't need bowel care any more. Their 'decision' came extremely soon after they were reported for TOTAL incompetence to a GP by our carer. Was this yet another coincidence?? NO - it was yet another lie and retaliation tactic. Both hospitals have authorised covert, behind my back, DNACPR decisions and covert ReSPECT forms that are meant to document a patients wishes and feelings - Hospitals have no right to complete these forms without patient (and family or LPA) involvement. They are aware that I am Lasting Power of Attorney, yet they've done this at least three times, willfully breaking the law, with no discussion or consultation with me or Lucy. There are many video's evidencing that Lucy DID have a reasonable quality of life, also how she was when she didn't have ignored infections, which these judgmental self opinionated 'people' refuted in continued devious attempts to collaborate and protect themselves. Many video's and audio recordings also evidence the extremely poor quality of 'care' from hospital 'caring' professionals These also evidence the many blatant lies these people have, and are telling - to hide their neglect, abuse and willful lack of Duty of Care and professional responsibility. Follow the link, and please share on as many social media outlets as you can. THIS - could just as easily happen to somebody that YOU care for. Don't be mistaken into thinking that all 'care' professionals have compassion and honesty. facebook.com/carerswantcompetence kzbin.info/www/bejne/iWjapICKZct0m8U

Lucy Meszaros died on Saturday 2nd December 2023. It took at least an hour and twenty minutes of choking on her own vomit, calling "Darling" before she took her last breath. She was frightened and alone. I was prevented from turning her on her side or sitting her up, which would have saved her life. Two main factors prevented me from saving Lucy's life: (1- ) The collaborative conspiring actions between Cheltenham General hospitals senior Tivolli ward staff and the hospitals legal department, resulting in a fabricated allegation. Since 2018 they have attempted to prevent me from exposing pure neglect, covert DNAR's and covert ReSPECT forms. (2 - ) - The complete and utter farce of an 'investigation' led by a detective from Gloucestershire constabulary, that could have been completed within 24 hours. It's now taken over 4 months, and still continuing after Lucy's avoidable death. Lucy had faecal impaction and faecal leakage from her vaginal area (some type of 'infrequent fistula), clearly causing repeated infections that were not treated when they should have been. This wasn't wasn't resolved by Gloucestershire NHS in over 6 years. They kept saying that because she had MS, she had a "poor quality of life" and "wouldn't tolerate treatment or operation", so how did she survive urosepsis over 30 times AS WELL AS many infection-induced strokes, heart attacks and a cardiac arrest !! THE FABRICATED ALLEGATION IS: Quote - "we THINK" he "MAY have inserted a finger into either her bottom or vagina" on 17th July whilst doing her personal care'. (By the way, our carer (Sarah) was with Lucy all day, as she was for many of the days, to avoid the usual staff neglect on Lucy). It's a case where there is nothing whatsoever to back up their lie, it's one persons word against mine and our carers. And even IF (I reiterate 'IF') this had of happened, and IF 'concerns' were genuine, there wouldn't have even been any 'evidence to 'investigate' anyway, because; (1) - We and carers obviously use medical gloves when providing personal care. and; (2) - police don't have DNA. Any person even with half the brains of a peanut could see that this is a fabricated lie. Four other relevant points of concern: (1) - Why didn't they raise it on 17th July? (2) - Why on earth would staff continue to allow me unsupervised, to provide Lucy's personal care in hospital for the remainder of the admission (17th to 26th July) ? if they genuinely thought this was true why didn't they either prevent me or place a staff member in there to supervise? (3) - Why would they discharge my vulnerable wife into my care in our own home, and leave her in my care if they genuinely believed what was alleged? Why risk something like this behind closed doors with no safeguarding preventative method in place? (4) - Why didn't the police arrest me and begin their 'investigation' until 4th August? What probable gave them the sick idea is from when I asked for a nurse to come see what me and Lucy's carer keep telling them about faeces leaking from the vagina. The nurse did come, but she gave me a dirty snooty look as if it was an indecent request. It was not. I wanted it documented as 'evidenced by staff' so that a doctor could not refuse, as usual, to take it seriously. Gloucester Royal hospital, Cheltenham General hospitals, Rapid Response 'prescriber', Cheltenham community District Nurses and GP's frequently consistently disregarded urosepsis until the infections became so bad that Lucy had numerous seizures, strokes, heart attacks and even a cardiac arrest. (disregarded at LEAST 30 times in six years). Several of these seizures, strokes and heart attacks happened whilst actually IN hospital. When Lucy has been in hospital they have refused to acknowledge that her bowel care needs to be taken seriously. Frequency, type and consistency (loose/firm) needs to be monitored and documented. (They have either refused or not bothered, even with repeated requests). If she hasn't opened her bowels after two days she needs suppositories. If nothing after three days she needs an enema. (They have either refused or not bothered). Failure to do this will result in her faecal impaction causing more faecal leakage through the vaginal area, fighting against the IV antibiotics and causing the infection to return with a vengeance. It's happened time after time for the past 5/6 years. They disregard it and say, 'But she's had She was discharged unsafely on many occasions, suffering from all the above. Even within as little as 12 hours and having to be blue-lighted back to hospital A&E or IV antibiotics at home with Rapid Response (who incidentally) often disregarded how ill she was and several times had to have paramedics on the same days as RR said 'her symptoms are not concerning'. There had also been a particular discharge where she was collected whilst unconscious by Ezec patient transport and arrived home STILL unconscious. The drivers were told "This is how she is". When we refuted this they rang the ward and said they were going to take her back to hospital. They were told "No - we don't have any beds". A district nurse (Louise) was here, rang 999 quoting "heart attack" and paramedics arrived. (Lucy actually went for THREE months the first time of vomiting faecal fluid and blood in before ANYONE took serious notice. Even the GP, who's clothes she projectile vomited on didn't escalate it for hospital investigation). These 'people' who are supposed to be 'caring' have often alleged that I am "intimidating and aggressive" to hospital staff. But my behaviour has actually been the opposite. I have audio and 'secret camera' footage that evidence my behaviour for each time I went into either of those hospitals. I have always been polite, respectful, even humble and apologetic with these 'people' when raising my concerns. Now if they think that I'm "intimidating and aggressive" purely because I have to keep repeating myself, raising the same concerns over and over, the same that they keep disregarding - then they obviously should not be in the job if hearing concerns makes feel so inadequate. Even in worst case scenario's, I have never sworn, never raised my voice, never insulted them and never shown assertion. I have raised concerns (which has been EVERY time Lucy has been in hospital and left in wet & soiled pads, sore and sometimes bleeding from it, unkempt, All they have to do is acknowledge, address and resolve those concerns. Do not leave vulnerable people in soiled and wet pads and do not withhold treatment just because somebody is disabled... The root cause of these infections was faecal impaction resulting in faecal leakage from Lucy's vagina and faecal vomiting from 2016/17. Cheltenham GP's and district nurses have witnessed this, as well as faecal leakage from her vagina, with their own eyes. At times Lucy would also vomit faecal fluid and blood, which two Cheltenham GP's witnessed whilst standing in her bedroom. District Nurses used to manage her bowels to prevent impaction. But after they were reported by a new member of their team for using the same black and mouldy bowel irrigation equipment for approximately 8 months without changing bag or tube, they refused to continue with Lucy's bowel care. They said "Lucy cannot mentally or physically tolerate it". They also made false statements that Lucy has a poor quality of life. What a coincidence. That was a bare-faced lie and a retaliation tactic. The only poor quality of life was when and because THEY and other professionals disregarded how ill Lucy was when she had infection that led to urosepsis. A few weeks ago the district nursing team suddenly decided that Lucy miraculously doesn't need bowel care any more. Their 'decision' came extremely soon after they were reported for TOTAL incompetence to a GP by our carer. Was this yet another coincidence?? NO - it was yet another lie and retaliation tactic. Both hospitals have authorised covert, behind my back, DNACPR decisions and covert ReSPECT forms that are meant to document a patients wishes and feelings - Hospitals have no right to complete these forms without patient (and family or LPA) involvement. They are aware that I am Lasting Power of Attorney, yet they've done this at least three times, willfully breaking the law, with no discussion or consultation with me or Lucy. There are many video's evidencing that Lucy DID have a reasonable quality of life, also how she was when she didn't have ignored infections, which these judgmental self opinionated 'people' refuted in continued devious attempts to collaborate and protect themselves. Many video's and audio recordings also evidence the extremely poor quality of 'care' from hospital 'caring' professionals These also evidence the many blatant lies these people have, and are telling - to hide their neglect, abuse and willful lack of Duty of Care and professional responsibility. Follow the link, and please share on as many social media outlets as you can. THIS - could just as easily happen to somebody that YOU care for. Don't be mistaken into thinking that all 'care' professionals have compassion and honesty. facebook.com/carerswantcompetence kzbin.info/www/bejne/iWjapICKZct0m8U

Lucy Meszaros died on Saturday 2nd December 2023. It took at least an hour and twenty minutes of choking on her own vomit, calling "Darling" before she took her last breath. She was frightened and alone. I was prevented from turning her on her side or sitting her up, which would have saved her life. Two main factors prevented me from saving Lucy's life: (1- ) The collaborative conspiring actions between Cheltenham General hospitals senior Tivolli ward staff and the hospitals legal department, resulting in a fabricated allegation. Since 2018 they have attempted to prevent me from exposing pure neglect, covert DNAR's and covert ReSPECT forms. (2 - ) - The complete and utter farce of an 'investigation' led by a detective from Gloucestershire constabulary, that could have been completed within 24 hours. It's now taken over 4 months, and still continuing after Lucy's avoidable death. Lucy had faecal impaction and faecal leakage from her vaginal area (some type of 'infrequent fistula), clearly causing repeated infections that were not treated when they should have been. This wasn't wasn't resolved by Gloucestershire NHS in over 6 years. They kept saying that because she had MS, she had a "poor quality of life" and "wouldn't tolerate treatment or operation", so how did she survive urosepsis over 30 times AS WELL AS many infection-induced strokes, heart attacks and a cardiac arrest !! THE FABRICATED ALLEGATION IS: Quote - "we THINK" he "MAY have inserted a finger into either her bottom or vagina" on 17th July whilst doing her personal care'. (By the way, our carer (Sarah) was with Lucy all day, as she was for many of the days, to avoid the usual staff neglect on Lucy). It's a case where there is nothing whatsoever to back up their lie, it's one persons word against mine and our carers. And even IF (I reiterate 'IF') this had of happened, and IF 'concerns' were genuine, there wouldn't have even been any 'evidence to 'investigate' anyway, because; (1) - We and carers obviously use medical gloves when providing personal care. and; (2) - police don't have DNA. Any person even with half the brains of a peanut could see that this is a fabricated lie. Four other relevant points of concern: (1) - Why didn't they raise it on 17th July? (2) - Why on earth would staff continue to allow me unsupervised, to provide Lucy's personal care in hospital for the remainder of the admission (17th to 26th July) ? if they genuinely thought this was true why didn't they either prevent me or place a staff member in there to supervise? (3) - Why would they discharge my vulnerable wife into my care in our own home, and leave her in my care if they genuinely believed what was alleged? Why risk something like this behind closed doors with no safeguarding preventative method in place? (4) - Why didn't the police arrest me and begin their 'investigation' until 4th August? What probable gave them the sick idea is from when I asked for a nurse to come see what me and Lucy's carer keep telling them about faeces leaking from the vagina. The nurse did come, but she gave me a dirty snooty look as if it was an indecent request. It was not. I wanted it documented as 'evidenced by staff' so that a doctor could not refuse, as usual, to take it seriously. Gloucester Royal hospital, Cheltenham General hospitals, Rapid Response 'prescriber', Cheltenham community District Nurses and GP's frequently consistently disregarded urosepsis until the infections became so bad that Lucy had numerous seizures, strokes, heart attacks and even a cardiac arrest. (disregarded at LEAST 30 times in six years). Several of these seizures, strokes and heart attacks happened whilst actually IN hospital. When Lucy has been in hospital they have refused to acknowledge that her bowel care needs to be taken seriously. Frequency, type and consistency (loose/firm) needs to be monitored and documented. (They have either refused or not bothered, even with repeated requests). If she hasn't opened her bowels after two days she needs suppositories. If nothing after three days she needs an enema. (They have either refused or not bothered). Failure to do this will result in her faecal impaction causing more faecal leakage through the vaginal area, fighting against the IV antibiotics and causing the infection to return with a vengeance. It's happened time after time for the past 5/6 years. They disregard it and say, 'But she's had She was discharged unsafely on many occasions, suffering from all the above. Even within as little as 12 hours and having to be blue-lighted back to hospital A&E or IV antibiotics at home with Rapid Response (who incidentally) often disregarded how ill she was and several times had to have paramedics on the same days as RR said 'her symptoms are not concerning'. There had also been a particular discharge where she was collected whilst unconscious by Ezec patient transport and arrived home STILL unconscious. The drivers were told "This is how she is". When we refuted this they rang the ward and said they were going to take her back to hospital. They were told "No - we don't have any beds". A district nurse (Louise) was here, rang 999 quoting "heart attack" and paramedics arrived. (Lucy actually went for THREE months the first time of vomiting faecal fluid and blood in before ANYONE took serious notice. Even the GP, who's clothes she projectile vomited on didn't escalate it for hospital investigation). These 'people' who are supposed to be 'caring' have often alleged that I am "intimidating and aggressive" to hospital staff. But my behaviour has actually been the opposite. I have audio and 'secret camera' footage that evidence my behaviour for each time I went into either of those hospitals. I have always been polite, respectful, even humble and apologetic with these 'people' when raising my concerns. Now if they think that I'm "intimidating and aggressive" purely because I have to keep repeating myself, raising the same concerns over and over, the same that they keep disregarding - then they obviously should not be in the job if hearing concerns makes feel so inadequate. Even in worst case scenario's, I have never sworn, never raised my voice, never insulted them and never shown assertion. I have raised concerns (which has been EVERY time Lucy has been in hospital and left in wet & soiled pads, sore and sometimes bleeding from it, unkempt, All they have to do is acknowledge, address and resolve those concerns. Do not leave vulnerable people in soiled and wet pads and do not withhold treatment just because somebody is disabled... The root cause of these infections was faecal impaction resulting in faecal leakage from Lucy's vagina and faecal vomiting from 2016/17. Cheltenham GP's and district nurses have witnessed this, as well as faecal leakage from her vagina, with their own eyes. At times Lucy would also vomit faecal fluid and blood, which two Cheltenham GP's witnessed whilst standing in her bedroom. District Nurses used to manage her bowels to prevent impaction. But after they were reported by a new member of their team for using the same black and mouldy bowel irrigation equipment for approximately 8 months without changing bag or tube, they refused to continue with Lucy's bowel care. They said "Lucy cannot mentally or physically tolerate it". They also made false statements that Lucy has a poor quality of life. What a coincidence. That was a bare-faced lie and a retaliation tactic. The only poor quality of life was when and because THEY and other professionals disregarded how ill Lucy was when she had infection that led to urosepsis. A few weeks ago the district nursing team suddenly decided that Lucy miraculously doesn't need bowel care any more. Their 'decision' came extremely soon after they were reported for TOTAL incompetence to a GP by our carer. Was this yet another coincidence?? NO - it was yet another lie and retaliation tactic. Both hospitals have authorised covert, behind my back, DNACPR decisions and covert ReSPECT forms that are meant to document a patients wishes and feelings - Hospitals have no right to complete these forms without patient (and family or LPA) involvement. They are aware that I am Lasting Power of Attorney, yet they've done this at least three times, willfully breaking the law, with no discussion or consultation with me or Lucy. There are many video's evidencing that Lucy DID have a reasonable quality of life, also how she was when she didn't have ignored infections, which these judgmental self opinionated 'people' refuted in continued devious attempts to collaborate and protect themselves. Many video's and audio recordings also evidence the extremely poor quality of 'care' from hospital 'caring' professionals These also evidence the many blatant lies these people have, and are telling - to hide their neglect, abuse and willful lack of Duty of Care and professional responsibility. Follow the link, and please share on as many social media outlets as you can. THIS - could just as easily happen to somebody that YOU care for. Don't be mistaken into thinking that all 'care' professionals have compassion and honesty. facebook.com/carerswantcompetence kzbin.info/www/bejne/iWjapICKZct0m8U

Gloucestershire Royal and Cheltenham General Hospitals have authorised not one, but several COVERT (deviously secret) Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on this lady. The most recent COVERT DNACPR was on 23rd July. We cannot identify her due to legal reasons so if you do recognise her and wish to comment, please refer to her as 'P'. She has Multiple Sclerosis, large kidney stones since 2019, and an untreated fistula (poo leaking from vaxinal area since 2017) that causes repeated urosepsis infections. Operations to resolve a fistula and remove kidney stones are not complicated or difficult but hospital Dr’s have consistently refused to treat her because she has MS. We can evidence that prior to her most recent hospital discharge, on 26th July a Registrar and ward sisters blatantly ignored a GP’s telephone confirmation that she still has "high infection in her urine". They intentionally disregarded the warning and declared her "medically and clinically fit for discharge". (This has been a consistent failure of Glos hospital for the past six years). The following day she had the first of two infection-induced life-threatening seizures/rigors. Since the most recent unsafe failed discharge she has had several GP home visits, three positive for urine infection results, courses of oral antibiotics and she’s now being treated with IV Teicoplanin antibiotic and IV fluid by Rapid Response. She is booked for re-admission to the same hospital for an operation on 7th Sept to remove the previously untreated kidney stones, but her life is seriously at risk because the decision-makers seem intent on refusing resuscitation should it be necessary. Paramedics have frequently been disgusted at Chelt hospital incompetence and agreed that it's in her best interests to have IV antibiotics at home to give her the best chance of survival before her operation. They always judgementally assess her ‘quality of life’ for their covert DNACPR’s at times when she is seriously ill with urosepsis and clearly, whilst cognitive and physical function is impaired by the infection. They purposely and frequently don’t even hold the legally required discussion/consultation with family or Power of Attorney. This is illegal. They make statements like; “I can see that she has a poor quality of life” whilst she is seriously ill after being blue-lighted to hospital. A COVERT 'Do Not Resuscitate' was secretly and deviously authorised. He is LPA for Health & Welfare. These Storm Troopers have a legal obligation to consult with him before such action is taken. There were also two COVERT ReSPECT forms and three COVERT Deprivation of Liberty. No assessments, no discussions, nothing... Just secrecy and dishonest behaviour from senior ward staff, a Registrar and a consultant (not believed to be J.O.). He threatened them with the Public Guardian and Court of Protection. Their retaliation now is to accuse him of sexually assaulting his wife whilst in the hospital. The allegation is worder as "We 'THINK' he 'MAY' have". Why did they wait for 10 days to file the allegation? Why did they allow him to continue with providing personal care in the hospital? Why did they discharge her into his care at home? Because they are lying, conniving, devious, collaborating scared little rats. (A formal agency carer was in the room at the SAME TIME as this is supposed to have happened, as she was commissioned to provide all aspects of (all day) care, because the patient wasn't getting it from ward staff). There are daily recordings throughout (from beginning to end) this latest admission. which will eventually be published. facebook.com/carerswantcompetence

This is interesting.

Lm

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Meanwhile people still waiting in ambulances.

This is all assuming that you can actually get inside a hospital.

Why can’t nhs live video calling

Dwerryhouse is absolutely of joke who can’t read barium swallow x-ray properly where he and his team left me to die My new surgeon finally told me exactly what was going on whilst struggling for 3 years claiming everything was okay what a joke the upper gi surgeons I had a fundoplication done and fluid is getting stuck in my oesophagus for 2-5 minutes I want a full explanation from Debbie and Simon dwerryhouse on how you’ve left me to rot away Simon dwerryhouse is no good surgeon amoungest Oliver old Simon Higgs mark vipond Shame on Gloucestershire Hospital

Food drinks song Niisan cars HITS 2011 2001 2021 #####$$$$$$$$$()))))

I work for Glouchester hospital , this videos is really helpful

Brilliant!!!

There is no sound xx

i am a hemodialysis nurse in the philippines hope to work soon in the UK🙏🙏🙏

Thanks

I am BS Renal Dialysis Technologist Graduated as a paramedic can I apply for Nephrology Nurse job please let me guide thanks 👍

How to get carrier at this such valuable hospital plz

I am BS Nephrology Nurse ( Dialysis Nurse) how to get job at this hospital.

I thought she was Allie sherlock the singer but thank you for the info i will take care of myself

I seem to have arthritis in my fingers / hands, so if the feeding tube connector (from the bag) is very tightly connected to the PEG Tube, is there a tool to help disconnect the feeding tube connector? Please let me know. Thank you.

bo'ohw'o'wo'er

Nhs upper gi is a disgrace

aou2v vum.fyi

Very bad Hospital in the uk

Hi

Beautiful.

🥰🥰🥰🥰

This is beautiful. 😢

❤

Lies.. And my dad died a few weeks ago at home. My daughters in labour & you don't answer your phone. To busy doing tick tock.. I want you all charged. Blocked my social account gloucestershire live blocked me in April... Shame on you all for your lies & Propaganda.... Child trafficking matters to Where's my family? Your not getting away with it. I have my footage for courts. You put died of covid and it was neglected cancer age 65

Very help video

Does she sing too? What happened to the Irish accent?

Shameful bunch of people, hiding the truth. Satan's minions.

OK...that's 1.....now find 1 million more

Okaaaay, we’ll be following the rules, but why don’t you get transparent as well ? Why don’t you fit cameras in your hospital wards, connected to a parent controlled KZbin channel, so that we can see how many COVID patients are treated and how many die ? I’m sure you’ve got nothing to hide, and everyone else will have to shut up.

Fake

A woman arrested for filming a hospital. It was empty.