What did Karl Popper reject?
3:55
What is Franz Kafka known for?
4:36
Did Carl Jung believe in God?
1:38
Why did Hypatia not marry?
7:22
3 ай бұрын
Was Amelia Earhart EVER Found?
5:56
Why was Bertrand Russell jailed?
11:24
Пікірлер
@andreahoehmann1939
@andreahoehmann1939 Ай бұрын
Can the enemies of open society invoke Popper when they call those who want to stop them propagators of hate and cancel them?
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
It is possible. Don't you think?
@andreahoehmann1939
@andreahoehmann1939 Ай бұрын
@ChroniclesofLegends That is absolutely possible. The world I grew up in knew one reality and many untruths. Today, many worlds exist, each with its own realities, and anything that does not belong to it is condemned to hell by the followers of each world.
@aisforapple2494
@aisforapple2494 Ай бұрын
Sounds to me like he wants to have his cake and eat it too! There is no such thing as "free will".
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
What then do we operate on? Organized will?
@aisforapple2494
@aisforapple2494 Ай бұрын
@ChroniclesofLegends If it were actual "free will", I could do anything I wish, regardless of the restrictions placed upon me.
@ukaszwojtalik8198
@ukaszwojtalik8198 Ай бұрын
just perfect
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
Thank you for joining us here.
@SkepticalSpectrum
@SkepticalSpectrum Ай бұрын
Nope
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
How do you mean?
@markwrede8878
@markwrede8878 Ай бұрын
The myth of capitalist virtue, which he endorsed, is unfalsifiable, although Adam Smith confirmed capitalism to be the crime of extortion.
@joe-y4o5y
@joe-y4o5y Ай бұрын
Rather than confront the weakness of our own positions, we demonize our opponent. Since few if any are perfect, we have a sentilla of truth that we use to destroy the other.
@JavierGomez-lv5mq
@JavierGomez-lv5mq Ай бұрын
This is one of the myriads of thought outputs which focus on systems more than on humans. We will never change anything substantially in a global manner within societies until we go away from these views and into the complexity of reality and human beings. This view from Popper is one of thousands of mechanical views which reduce the world into a neatly simplified space, just to see that the actions and learnings from this are truly negligible in the real world impacts. Until this changes and we can take these lessons to expand on them rather than discussing them ad nauseum, the exact same problems that humanity has had for thousands of years will perpetuate themselves. Check out how chillingly up to date is Aeschylus' play The Suppliant Maidens. It is similar to the trolley problem, instead of asking how we can minimize situations that will come to decisions that will kill people over time, we are fixed on a "solution" of a situation that we have accepted as inevitable. A human view would be to ask, how does intolerance brew across time? How could intolerance be quenched at its source? In my view, one possible approach is to achive literacy of complexity across the world. Groups of people that heavily understand the complexities (way beyond what we call education) of our world will have a much lower propensity towards intolerance than those with mechanical and / or religious understanding of it, where an us vs them mentality can be pushed far more easily.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
This is a powerful submission. Can we make this into a full video? If so, what name do we address you as, so we can reference accurately. Thanks for this lovely submission.
@JavierGomez-lv5mq
@JavierGomez-lv5mq Ай бұрын
@ChroniclesofLegends i have a project named Ocmaya which has the goal of bringing a literacy of complexity to as many people worldwide as possible. I have a yt channel with that name which yoi can reference and or "cite"
@uwen1443
@uwen1443 Ай бұрын
a simple guideline or principle to resolve the paradox is the litmus test: do not do unto other or consequence that you would not want or accept what others do onto you. this may seem old school but holds true even in our modern scientific era as it affirm the nature of our common humanity above self vested interest.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
Absolutely, you said it right. Wisdom doesn't get old.
@DrJohnnyJ
@DrJohnnyJ Ай бұрын
That assumes that the other wants for himself what you want for yourself. This is a very weak assumpion.
@timothybell5698
@timothybell5698 2 ай бұрын
This perspective is exactly what I would expect from the guy who wrote "I have too much superego and not enough ego" (Les Mots).
@Helm-w1q
@Helm-w1q 2 ай бұрын
I can't tell you.
@EternalOutsider_1988
@EternalOutsider_1988 2 ай бұрын
Kant’s ideas on metaphysics are strikingly similar to Adishankaracharya’s.
@kparag01
@kparag01 2 ай бұрын
He had read all Vedic texts
@Luxington1
@Luxington1 2 ай бұрын
Deep dive? More like cursory summary.
@Seekthetruth3000
@Seekthetruth3000 2 ай бұрын
Good info, short, and to the point.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for joining on here. We appreciate you.
@marklandwehr7604
@marklandwehr7604 2 ай бұрын
Cincinnatus Next time you could tell the story about what really went on with tcivil servant
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 2 ай бұрын
Ok
@RajuG-d3b
@RajuG-d3b 2 ай бұрын
So many Rishis of India had delved deep into this TRUTH not discernible with the help of our externalised consciousness opening through the sensory organs. In recent times , for example, Sri Ramakrishna paramahamsar ( 1836 --1886, Sri Remana Maharshi( 1878..--1950) ..........so on and so many unknown seers 😅
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 2 ай бұрын
Great comment. Thank you for the insight.
@johnmanno2052
@johnmanno2052 2 ай бұрын
Insteed?! Methodologhie!!?? I smell a computer voice. Alas! Alack! Oh woe!
@superplayalistic
@superplayalistic 2 ай бұрын
what's with the music. so distracting
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
Hope you find other videos with no music.
@Rico-Suave_
@Rico-Suave_ 2 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched ……
@peterclark6290
@peterclark6290 2 ай бұрын
Humanity will continue to 'dance between the lines' until we accept absolutely our position as an incidental creature on an incidental planet,... Evolutionary recipients of intelligence, imagination, compassion. These attributes are awoken, reinforced, emboldened by an adequate childhood which no society to date has set about providing with each birth. We accept criminality, addiction, under-achievement, belief as natural: which they are not. Our genome contains a blueprint for a specific outcome, the full set of human attributes. To wit: adequate courage, resilience, inquisitiveness, self-improvement and sociability. The big question is: can _sapiens_ take this opportunity seriously? Overlay our base survival instinct with a quality precondition to maximise the potential of our replacements? The Cosmos is exceedingly curious because it is seeking a master. Who will it be, from what planet, what galaxy?
@Kurianganga
@Kurianganga 2 ай бұрын
Population pressure and the inherent evil nature of man eventually renders government inoperable. So, the order that Hobes emphasized that can be established by the government on behalf of the people also collapses. Then man goes back to his state of nature and the cycle repeats itself.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 2 ай бұрын
Wouldn't it be so fast in happening and re-happening if there wasn't any control? Don't you think so?
@Aditya-f8t5z
@Aditya-f8t5z 3 ай бұрын
I think Karl Popper was trying to say build theories on things we can gather data....☺
@GilesMcRiker
@GilesMcRiker 3 ай бұрын
Climate science definitely do not look for ways to disprove their theories!
@hottyoompaloompa1782
@hottyoompaloompa1782 3 ай бұрын
I agree that science is not supposed to be authoritative, but include other kinds of knowledge is not a good idea. In your video Feyerabend seems to propose the use of the knowledge of primitive peoples to tackle certain problems, such as the presumed climate change. However people who advocate for that tend to cherrypick what they think are good without testing them, which is done by the scientific method, and acknowledging the consequences in a wider picture.
@hottyoompaloompa1782
@hottyoompaloompa1782 3 ай бұрын
I think you, or Paul Feyerabend, conflate dogma and scientific method
@fraserhayes4
@fraserhayes4 3 ай бұрын
A pity the voice is a robot.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 3 ай бұрын
Learn what you can and move on.
@fraserhayes4
@fraserhayes4 3 ай бұрын
@@ChroniclesofLegends What I have learned is that despite going to the trouble of preparing and posting this video you couldn't be bothered to find a good, real, human voice to speak the text because you really do not care about your audience. And now I am moving on. Good bye.
@noahway13
@noahway13 3 ай бұрын
A believer will say that you can't prove that their god doesn't exist. l used to call myself an atheist but now I say I'm agnostic because that flips the script and puts the ball and the burden of proof 100% in their court.
@kenkaplan3654
@kenkaplan3654 3 ай бұрын
But see if they propose evidence and possibiilities of it not on your demand of ground of intellect, the ground of your choosing as a frame of reference, you have rigged the game. It's like the joke about the lost key and the lamp post. Your demand is "the key has to be here where I can see it." One who has diect experience of what we call "God" says "but the key is not there. It exists in a place that is accesible but it is beyond this framework." Therefore no amount of ecidence will suffice for you. It's not about belief. It is about experiencing something within self greater than the rational mind and senses, and does not conform to religious dogma. But for most who insist on "proof" in the material, the idea is incomprehensible. It's like saying I should give you the taste of chocolate with a diagram. Bruno Groening of Germany was a healer of such capability in the 1950's that thousands came to where he was staying for healing and many got up out of wheelchairs and walked. He healed the blind. There are dozens and dozens of eyewitness accounts. But reading or hearing about it cannot give you the experience. Most people who become spiritual were either born with heightened intuition or had an powerful intersection with higher order reality in their teens or later that was incontrovertible. I grew up in an Atheist household. I never thought about God once in my entire life. I never went looking for God, never searched for God, never looked for a religious path. (the word "God" is such a poor, loaded word) Yet it found me in ever expanding experiential ways so that over years a coherent construct of existential higher order reality emerged. And there are thousands like me who each took a unique independent road that was not a traditional one yet ended up with the same vision and understanding. It's like hearing about this thing called "lake" or "river" or "ocean" when one has never seen them but when finally seeing them and then diving in and finding immersion, no words or explanations are necessary or even helpful. They just are.
@noahway13
@noahway13 3 ай бұрын
@@kenkaplan3654 Some people are 'believers' and some are logical and require evidence. Whatever helps you sleep at night...
@SuperJg007
@SuperJg007 3 ай бұрын
​@@kenkaplan3654 you can have a subjective experience about anything and that is personal to you, yet when you claim that objective reality is basically what i am claiming from my subjective experience then it is false. your analogy should be something like this, a rational person comes to you and asks you to open the door if you are claiming you have the keys. it doesn't mean you have to find it here or there, but you did claim it so how can you back up your claim.
@kenkaplan3654
@kenkaplan3654 3 ай бұрын
@@SuperJg007 According to this video, all theories are testable in some form. But if your standard of evidence is to produce FM frequency on an AM radio, it is impossible. We are not talking about one personal direct experience in my life. We are talking about thousands and they dove tail with the thousands of other's like me. Here is one of the more powerful examples which changed the direction of my life. The really powerful peak experiences in my life are in the hundreds. "About 20 years ago, a friend called me. a young woman he knew 23, had been murdered in center city. He was beside himself. He asked me to be with him. We went to Rittenhouse Square Park in Philly.. He was inconsolable. This way above my pay grade. So we are walking and I have nothing for him. Suddenly a powerful cone of light envelops me. I hear myself saying "Her death was a contract of soul she entered into to sacrifice herself to deepen the needed appreciation of the preciousness of life of those around her". Immediately a powerful wave of peace spread from the light into me and jumped to and enveloped him. He then in an instant calmed down. He said "I don't know how you said that (or what he felt) but somehow it made sense." He was OK. I had no idea at the time what a "soul contract" was. There was no literature on it. I came across "Journey of Souls" by Michael Newton, a hypnotherapist who did "life between life" regression in 2000+ cases over 20 years, which is a classic in the field and it explained it in detail. His types of results have been confirmed by many independent sources. The experience altered the course of my life and I began deeper investigation into what I call "afterlife studies" and the "technology of consciousness" I began teaching on it, even at some libraries. Now when you search "Soul Contracts" on the internet you will get pages and pages of websites and articles on the, Robert Schwartz. came out with his seminal book "Your Soul's Plan" in 2009 in which he went into detail of 10 case studies as to why these people had chosen extremely difficult lives. The point here is not only **was I not looking for this** and had no idea it even existed, but it was thrust upon me. I now know it is part of my contract. I learned about it directly from an extraordinarily powerful mystical experience *before* it was well known and before there was really any literature on it. Throw in about 500 of these that over time build a composite picture, and that is the basis of my life view. I read in a book about how the brain works and the author said that one anecdotal experience is not evidence but a great mass of them are. For me, you, and others, are making a great mistake, falsely equating "evidence" with "proof". There is plenty of evidence that the material rational theory of existence is false or at least the evidence should lead one to say "this needs more exploration". Another example "One of the most famous of all near-death accounts was related by Kimberly Clark Sharp, who was working at the time the story unfolded as a social worker at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle.[1] She was assigned to Maria, a Hispanic migrant worker who had suffered a massive heart attack and was being cared for at Harborview when, suddenly, she “flatlined” or went into cardiac arrest. Fortunately, the medical staff were able to resuscitate her-Sharp being in the room, watching-and everything seemed routine. However, when Sharp was just about to leave the hospital for the evening, she received word that Maria was very agitated and wanted to see her. It took Sharp some time to calm Maria down. Then came the interesting part: Maria pointed to a corner of the ceiling and said she had been up there watching people work over her body. She told me precisely, and correctly, who had been in the room, where they stood, what they did, and what they said. She described the placement of machinery and all the paper that had been kicked around on the floor during the resuscitation, paper that the electrocardiogram machine had been continuous feeding out. Next, with a snap of her fingers to show me how fast she had moved, Maria told me she suddenly found herself outside the hospital room, looking down at the emergency room entrance. She described the curvature of the driveway, the vehicles all going in one direction and the doors opening automatically. Everything was absolutely accurate. Sharp didn’t believe her. It was simply too much. The rational, trained social worker began to think of far-fetched ways in which the migrant worker Maria might have gathered all of the detailed information that she clearly possessed. However, Maria wasn’t finished with her story. She said she had been distracted by something in a different part of the hospital, a and she next remembered staring closely at an object on a window ledge about three stories above the ground. It was a man’s dark blue tennis shoe, well-worn, scuffed on the left side where the little toe would go. The shoelace was caught under the heel. Maria was upset, she explained, because she desperately wanted someone to go get the shoe. Not to prove to herself that it was there; Maria knew she was an honest woman and she was telling the truth. No, she needed to prove it to others-that she really had been out of her body, floating free, outside the hospital walls. That she wasn’t crazy." They looked and found the shoe exactly were she said it was, exactly as she had described it. There are thousands of stories from many vectors , such as reincarnation studies, experiences of high Yogis, etc. that point to a higher order reality. When one runs into a truly omniscient advanced being, it changes how you look at things. To cling to dogmatic rationalism is in this arena is actually unscientific. If these were sparse and highly scattered accounts, one could say yes, there seems to be some mental anomaly here. But they aren't. They are part of a fabric of thousands of accounts from a 5000 year old mystical tradition on this planet. We are just starting to apply scientific research into the phenomena. Thanks for your time
@kenkaplan3654
@kenkaplan3654 3 ай бұрын
@@SuperJg007I answered this. I don't know why it is not showing. I'll wait a few days. The bottom line is you fail to distinguish between "evidence" and "proof". There is plenty of evidence, objective evidence, but it is not in your line of sight. When enough evidence is available, as it is now, to challenge the materialist-rationalist theory of existence, then that evidence should be explored. It is not because of both ignorance and willful blindness.
@guyyoav
@guyyoav 3 ай бұрын
God cannot be falsified hence is not scientifically proven.
@noahway13
@noahway13 3 ай бұрын
They will say that you can't prove that he doesn't exist. l used to call myself an atheist but now I say I'm agnostic because that puts the ball and the burden of proof 100% in their court.
@mrshankerbillletmein491
@mrshankerbillletmein491 3 ай бұрын
No need to worry then
@robertanderson3905
@robertanderson3905 3 ай бұрын
O aye the stinky pinky BULL COKE HeaDS
@historyforatheists9363
@historyforatheists9363 3 ай бұрын
Most of the information in this video is wrong. For actual historical information on Hypatia, based on scholarship and analysis of the sources, please search for "History for Atheists The Great Myths 9: Hypatia of Alexandria". It debunks the many myths about Hypatia.
@Rico-Suave_
@Rico-Suave_ 4 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched twice…… 12:40
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 3 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Thank you for being here with us.
@kisemboemmaateenyi
@kisemboemmaateenyi 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the good work
@eugenietron7301
@eugenietron7301 8 ай бұрын
this is a very interesting video, thank you for your work!
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 8 ай бұрын
Thank you so much
@RajlaxmiGhosh-u9g
@RajlaxmiGhosh-u9g 9 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 9 ай бұрын
Thanks for joining us
@tran_genetic
@tran_genetic 10 ай бұрын
garbage stolen from "AI" generators
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 9 ай бұрын
Learn the lesson and move on.
@Bazza1025b
@Bazza1025b 11 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 9 ай бұрын
You are welcome
@Bazza1025b
@Bazza1025b 11 ай бұрын
Thank you. You are a G.E.M. :)
@massimoesposito7014
@massimoesposito7014 11 ай бұрын
Bertrand Russel was not so sufficiently intelligent to ask himself ""Who gave me all this rational ability and intelligence?" Russel could deny the God eistence only if he could prove that he created himself.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 11 ай бұрын
Wisdom!
@olmetothai
@olmetothai 11 ай бұрын
We dont care
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
Nobody asked you to care.
@post-structuralist
@post-structuralist 11 ай бұрын
I think this video is mostly well done. I also especially enjoy how you chose someone not widely talked about to those even in STEM with no outside knowledge on deeper philosophy. From one philosopher and writer to another, thank you for this. P.S If you ever need extra help or insight for the channel, ask and I shall lend you my aid. --Rex E.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 11 ай бұрын
Thank you so much. We will appreciate all the help and collaboration from you. We are glad to see someone who understands our mission and is ready to contribute to bringing legends to life again. Feel free to email us. Thank you.
@haroldraley8197
@haroldraley8197 11 ай бұрын
I read Russell avidly as a young man and still appreciate his insights, but eventually discovered the Iberian philosopher Ortega y Gasset who was to impact me much more. Russell's ego gets in the way of his thought, and his Marxist predilections are unworthy of a mind as capable as his. Russell is often original. Ortega never fails to be and in language unmatched in modern philosophy.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends 11 ай бұрын
Great insights you shared. Thank you. "Russell ego gets in the way of his thought..." Wow!
@eoleol4750
@eoleol4750 11 ай бұрын
This is the reason this video does not work. Your comment was more appreciated than the video. Your human brain is able to make comparisons between different philosophers, form an opinion to appraise one over the other, and arrive at an conclusion based on real life experience and knowledge gathering.
@1crazypj
@1crazypj Жыл бұрын
So, he was almost 'royalty' and his grandmother had money ? I'm not sure how you can make an eight minute video feel like it's 45 minutes, some form of time travel? Sorry, he wasn't being shoved up a chimney to die young like many Victorian era children. It's sad he was orphaned when only 3 but pretty sure he was in pretty good shape otherwise. And, why wasn't he a christian? Terrible video, won't be wasting my time with another By the way, It's pronounced hazel-meer not hassel mer🤨
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Жыл бұрын
How many did you watch yet?
@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921
@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921 Жыл бұрын
Please watch and share with others my four brief videos in which I present examples of scientific facts contained in the Bible; facts that the writers thousands of years ago could not have been aware of without divine knowledge given to them by God. And today's scientists agree with those facts! Thank you!
@divinewon73
@divinewon73 Жыл бұрын
There are scientific facts mentioned in books about Superman and other marvel comics… Are we to believe they are reality as well? Scientific facts mentioned in a book does not make the entire book true and there is no evidence to prove any claims from the bible or other religious mythology past or present.
@cuttycolyar7991
@cuttycolyar7991 Жыл бұрын
PERHAPS YOU COULD ACCT. FOR HIS MULTIPLE MARRIAGES BY HIS SCREWING AROUND. NICE P.R. THOUGH.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Ай бұрын
Really?
@cuttycolyar7991
@cuttycolyar7991 Ай бұрын
@@ChroniclesofLegends REALLY !
@ounkwon6442
@ounkwon6442 Жыл бұрын
Just look at those who claim to be Christian, e.g., Jo Bidden of United Suckers of America - a Catholic. Well, in the human history, more people were killed by 'Christians' on crusades and holocaust. They are proud of what they are, doing in the name of God, which most don't know or don't care, or his name is not found in most Bible translations. e.g. 'I am the LORD, that is My name' - NIV translation.
@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921
@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921 Жыл бұрын
Please watch and share with others my four brief videos in which I present examples of scientific facts contained in the Bible; facts that the writers thousands of years ago could not have been aware of without divine knowledge given to them by God. And today's scientists agree with those facts! Thank you!
@robertpolnicky7702
@robertpolnicky7702 Жыл бұрын
Ill admit to me the philosophers are god. But it leaves a vacuum. Where einstein or jesus christ or some entity or frank sinatra has got to fill that void. Or aristotle.
@robertpolnicky7702
@robertpolnicky7702 Жыл бұрын
I havectrouble with it. But. But. Its a good road map. Jesus was a good aristotle. Philosopher. And better than alkegory of the cave. Plato. Mt ooinion.
@duaneburris7ate9
@duaneburris7ate9 Жыл бұрын
Because you simply do not have the capacity to properly examine the facts.😊 if you try to deny this... You have successfully made yourself a god. no one can properly know all the facts... None but God. Go ahead... You can be as god. To do so, however, has you proclaiming the existence of the one who created you to be in his image. Quite the paradox you've got going there.
@unclefielding2325
@unclefielding2325 Жыл бұрын
The title is only incidentally related to the content.
@Jonathan-y1v3o
@Jonathan-y1v3o Жыл бұрын
Russell's most juvenile work 'Why I am.Not a Christian ' ..Those who read this book also should read his daughter Catherine Tate Russell 's book about her dad. 'My Father Bertrand Russell ' . The favourite daughter exposes his hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Жыл бұрын
You dropped a good insight.
@Jonathan-y1v3o
@Jonathan-y1v3o Жыл бұрын
@@ChroniclesofLegends when trying to understand the so-called geniuses and celebrities, we need to look at the whole picture with all its complexities and stand away to have a correct perspective. Or else we will miss the woods for the trees.
@wberckmann
@wberckmann Жыл бұрын
Real Christianity, not the slick, dogmatic, quackery kind that attracts the proles, but the genuine wisdom and understanding that characterizes the life and works of the master Christian himself is so far in advance of Russell, it's like watching an automotive engineer alongside a 4 year-old playing with toy trucks in the sandbox. Russell, a supposed "metaphysician," wouldn't recognize real metaphysics if he tripped over it. Brilliant mathematician, perhaps, but unfortunately it didn't extend to other fields, including metaphysics. There's so much hyperbole in this tale that it's enough to make one become nauseous.
@ChroniclesofLegends
@ChroniclesofLegends Жыл бұрын
I feel Russell would later admit most of the areas where his ideologies were misunderstood. Do you think so?
@divinewon73
@divinewon73 Жыл бұрын
Christianity is just one of the longest lasting flavors of religion and its various forms… Protestant, Catholic, and all the various make-believe sets as well. It’s a pathetic waste of energy when people could be making decisions based on facts instead of theory and make-believe without 1 ounce of evidence.