GE113 Hydrographic Surveying Topic-5
58:03
GE 108 Property Surveying Topic-2
2:27:20
GE 108 Property Surveying Topic-1 Part-1
1:16:41
GE 108 Property Surveying Topic-1 Part-2
1:06:54
GE 108 Property Surveying Topic-0
1:47:32
Пікірлер
@whophd
@whophd Күн бұрын
So Mr Mercator didn’t solve how to travel on Great Circle lines? How do we describe the navigation today? Do Great Circle lines even have a definition, e.g. from point to point?
@ammaren9459
@ammaren9459 Ай бұрын
I think you forgot to mention that the central meridian in each zone is always set to 500 000 east. That means that as you get closer to the zones, the actual width of each zone decreases, so you can include a quite large area of the neighbouring zone to the west without encountering negative easting coordinates.
@ShanneeClaireFernandez
@ShanneeClaireFernandez 2 ай бұрын
Sir, unsaon pag input sa calculator kanang sa cosine law? Salamat!
@MICOLEANNDAHILAN
@MICOLEANNDAHILAN 2 ай бұрын
hi shannee
@lemileta2681
@lemileta2681 2 ай бұрын
Good teachers❤❤❤❤
@matejvarga1989
@matejvarga1989 2 ай бұрын
Don Boyes
@samiullahqayyumzoy-nx1sv
@samiullahqayyumzoy-nx1sv 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for making a perfect video about it
@kentabatayo-o8j
@kentabatayo-o8j 4 ай бұрын
Attendance
@josebravo834
@josebravo834 7 ай бұрын
So if I dig a straight hole through the spherical earth and throw a metallic ball into it, can you describe what will happen to that ball? Would it stop and be floating at the center because gravity is pulling it downward at opposite sides of the earth OR would the ball be going up and down up and down non stop?
@coldsnap999
@coldsnap999 3 ай бұрын
It would travel so fast because of gravity (~23,000 or so MPH, something like this iirc) it would shoot through the molten core before it could melt and it would start to slow as it reached the other side of the earth's surface, before stopping and falling back through the same way to the other side it came from. It would continue shooting back and forth through the hole like this forever, left undisturbed.
@lancy340
@lancy340 8 ай бұрын
Remove the background music. What a stupid work
@lynnbalinas7010
@lynnbalinas7010 8 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing Sir
@timd9430
@timd9430 8 ай бұрын
Very good explanation!
@anoopv4082
@anoopv4082 11 ай бұрын
You are a legend 🥹
@iamhim911
@iamhim911 Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir but music is so annoying
@daviddoyle8098
@daviddoyle8098 Жыл бұрын
Comments for consideration. The easy part first. To @solomononuchefaruna5022, who asked about the Rx, Ry, Rz values when transformation between NAD 27 (North American Datum of 1927) and NAD 83 (North American Datum of 1983). As author Gagula noted very well old horizontal datums are purely two dimension so a three dimension transformation is really not reliable. In addition as the author showed older local datums are comprised of networks that are not exactly consistent (e.g. different orders of accuracy 1st, 2nd, 3rd). meaning there are different levels of spatial accuracy in each coordinate. This must be considered for any transformation. Both NAD 27 and the original definition of NAD 83 were both 2D. Consequently, the national transformation between is a gridded solution across the country rather than a 3D or 7D approach. The official transformation can be found in the National Geodetic Survey’s (NGS) NCAT (National Conversion and Transformation tool) -- geodesy.noaa.gov/NCAT/. There are four publications that describe how this tool has evolved by NGS -- geodesy.noaa.gov/library/, in the search box type NADCON and all are shown. In general, the uncertainty between NAD 27 and the original solution of NAD 83 completed in 1986 is 0.15 m (1 sigma). Very important to note that NAD 83 has evolved with the introduction of GPS beginning in 1989 and the user must now be aware of which area of the country they are working in and what are the requirements for the uncertainty of any transformation the most current is NAD 83 (2011). It is vitally important in our current world of high accuracy expectations that we fully understand the foundations for national and international coordinate frames. Now that we are multi-constellational (not just GPS) WGS 84 should not be considered as a reference since the other three constellations are all defined in their own system such as the Russian GLONASS which uses PZ90.11. All the constellations are closed aligned to some realization of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) Now on to WGS 84. A small error, the reference system was originally defined by the Defense Mapping Agency (DMA) in 1987 and published in DMA Technical Report 8350.2 “World Geodetic System 1984 Its Definition and Relationships to Local Geodetic Systems”. DMA became NIMA in 1996 and is the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). The most current link to the WGS publication is --file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/WGS%2084%20-%20NGA.pdf. Regrettably the author does not indicate how the government of the Philippines defined high accuracy (>3 cm) in the WGS 84 datum. The U.S. Defense Department NGA does not provide access to any ground control framework such as Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) with accurate WGS 84 coordinates for anyone outside of the U.S. Defense Department community. Additionally, the datum for WGS 84 changed seven times as outlined in the linked NGA report to be closely aligned with the ITRF. The most current realization is called WGS 84 (G2139) released in January ’21 aligned to ITRF14. I suspect that the Philippines Active Network (PageNet) was most likely constrained to regional CORS that are published as part of the International GNSS Service (IGS) -- igs.org/ for which all coordinates are provided in ITRF
@ZarathustraX
@ZarathustraX Жыл бұрын
This is absolutely fantastic.
@GuteTesfaye
@GuteTesfaye Жыл бұрын
On this give me example
@oblonghas
@oblonghas Жыл бұрын
Who is this guy? This explanation made it click for me
@gameBB6
@gameBB6 Жыл бұрын
verry helpfull thanks
@salimalshekaili6707
@salimalshekaili6707 Жыл бұрын
one of the best UTM explanations on YT so far
@carlovalera9721
@carlovalera9721 Жыл бұрын
Salamat sir more vids pa po
@markanthonycastillo2651
@markanthonycastillo2651 Жыл бұрын
@solomononuchefaruna5022
@solomononuchefaruna5022 Жыл бұрын
Thank u for your comprehensive tutorial. Could u please provide steps on how we can solve the Bursa Wolf 7 parameter transformation model for the transformation parameters by Least squares
@markanthonycastillo2651
@markanthonycastillo2651 Жыл бұрын
Good day sir. Can i ask question sir. If CE graduate then gustong mag enroll ng GE ilanh years na lng po sir?
@bkgupta5073
@bkgupta5073 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate your knowledge. You are the real teacher whose students get true light about subject . Thank once again
@jeckramos352
@jeckramos352 Жыл бұрын
Good day Engr. Meron kaba discussion about geodesy surveying sana mapansin thank you
@ahmida81
@ahmida81 Жыл бұрын
Merci beaucoup pour votre excellente explication
@DEDEGANTEEENGG
@DEDEGANTEEENGG Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir.. i got it
@educateandentertainment1592
@educateandentertainment1592 Жыл бұрын
May I ask you some questions?
@educateandentertainment1592
@educateandentertainment1592 Жыл бұрын
Hello sir can I contact you? I have some questions about the zone.
@Ottiz_Killgor
@Ottiz_Killgor Жыл бұрын
this is very concise and understandable.
@thanamalvilamonaragala1943
@thanamalvilamonaragala1943 Жыл бұрын
good explanation
@DanielSantos-zm7vi
@DanielSantos-zm7vi 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much :)
@sekharbondi1503
@sekharbondi1503 2 жыл бұрын
Very much Appreciated Mate 👍 thanks for your Videos
@woohpagent6181
@woohpagent6181 2 жыл бұрын
Taking a GIS course and really needed a video like this! Thanks!!
@jumaomulubi8887
@jumaomulubi8887 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, I have inquiry, Kindly do a video on how to get the scale factor, translation and rotation parameters given both local and global coordinates in Bursa wolf model.
@loismuyuka9642
@loismuyuka9642 2 жыл бұрын
Good
@walaaz4082
@walaaz4082 2 жыл бұрын
thank you I was really confused before watching I understood everything , great way of explaining
@itaydvash
@itaydvash 2 жыл бұрын
How can I get this presentation? 🙏
@Baoshing
@Baoshing 2 жыл бұрын
Upload para sir mag major subject GE. amping!!
@annlablab
@annlablab 2 жыл бұрын
Sir. Can I have a copy of your presentation? I am a graduating GE student from Bicol University. Thank you so much if will be given chance
@Minesplorer
@Minesplorer 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation!
@percymak72
@percymak72 2 жыл бұрын
Credit for this video should go to Professor Don Boyes an online teacher on Coursera, the man behind that presentation.
@HydrographicSurveyor
@HydrographicSurveyor 2 жыл бұрын
good job brother
@edwardanthonypardillo985
@edwardanthonypardillo985 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir, Very Informative
@gleannaliston7485
@gleannaliston7485 2 жыл бұрын
Sir pwedi pa tutor? 🥺 5pm - 9pm everyday, I'll wait for your response sir ☺️
@mccl9641
@mccl9641 2 жыл бұрын
Hello sir meron kayung video about mine surveying? Ty
@abderrahmaneaviation6515
@abderrahmaneaviation6515 2 жыл бұрын
Some thing is complicated a little bit, because you said in 04:29 that curved line it's not a straight line, but for me it is the straight line in reality, because it doesn't matter if my track was a straight line and i made some zigzag following the way points right and lift, but my track from London to New York departure bearing 288° remains straight in reality, and the curved line doesn't exist
@grimbeast4374
@grimbeast4374 2 жыл бұрын
You really explained a complicated thing very simply. 👍
@anmolratnaars
@anmolratnaars 2 жыл бұрын
sir what will be the vcalue of Rx, RY, Rz when axes of two datum are parallel while doing datum transformation form NAD27 to NAD83
@thangta8604
@thangta8604 2 жыл бұрын
how did you do it can you share with me , thank you