@@nomore6167 stay tuned, we have some ideas around this 🙂

@@faxinadu One suggestion I have when you make an update is to draw a black background behind the progress percentage when saving the wavetables. In this video, the progress percentage was displayed as white characters overlaid onto the green waveform section. To me, this made the progress percentage difficult to see. It would be more helpful if a black rectangle were drawn behind the progress percentage, as that would increase the contrast between the progress percentage and the background, thus making it easier to read.

@@nomore6167 Yes good tip, was noticing the same.

@@dirkkeersmaekers4343 yes, totally compatible, we have users who have that beast and all works.

What do you mean by as a DAW?

Kontakt sample library tool

@@nexatil9490 please buy a legal copy of Kontakt, thanks

Thanks a ton for the kind words! <3

no idea, haven't used K5 in years...

@ On the same day I discovered, kontakt 5.6.6 has a small difference in the programming language, I managed to solve it! Thanks for the excellent content!

Ah yes! Makes sense, a lot has changed.

Ha thanks!

Version 1.4.4 with Intel Mac support has just been released, go for it!

Thank you!

- Animation has nothing to do with CPU, its meaningless in that regard - The synth is not Vital and not meant to be, its a sampler/wavetable hybrid - This is exactly what an engine like Kontakt brings to the table - the ability to do this hybrid approach - This synth packs very high quality effects like Replika, Raum and others What can it do for you? It is a creative, inspiring, fun instrument with a rock solid user experience, comes with tons of high quality presets and all the sampled content and wavetable is not locked and can be used in other synths.

@@faxinadu Thank you for elaborating;)

Not at this time, perhaps coming later but no promises.

Compiled and successfully tested on Intel and ARM Ubuntu Linux distributions. Will come in the next day or two with 1.4.5 release!

@@faxinadu awesome!!!

Linux support for ARM and Intel is live now with 1.4.5 , go for it :) kzbin.info/www/bejne/larGo3aqoKZofJY

At the moment no plans, but there are requests such as yours, no promises.

@@faxinadu I second the request, I wonder why there's no Intel CPU support, is it a compiler issue?

@@LahceneBelbachir First M1 came out 5 years ago, with the first OS being Big Sur. Providing Intel builds would mean: - Supporting a platform that Apple do not. - Supporting a platform we don't test on. - Supporting operating systems Apple or we don't support or test on.

@@faxinadu Makes sense, still a fantastic app regardless.

@@LahceneBelbachir Thank you! I have been toying with the idea since people requested, but if we can't guarantee quality operation then I donno if we want to put that vibe out there.

@@UchtdorfBLN yes presets are already possible! The second request i also want to do, will include hopefilly in the next update (shift cllick for example(

Implemented, will be there with the next update: IMPROVED Holding shift while selecting a wave shape sets that shape for all the steps of the respective wave. IMPROVED Holding shift while toggling the random checkbox for a wave shape step toggles the random checkbox for all the steps of the respective wave. IMPROVED Holding shift while clicking the random button toggles all the random checkboxes

@ Good Morning from Berlin! Are you sleeping too or are you just coding 24/7? Man, don’t forget to live too. Thanks for being that passionate and for listening to your clients. Fun to be part of this app-journey to see it growing. Thank you!

@@UchtdorfBLN <3 ! I am no longer in Berlin but lived there for 5 years, just recently moved away.... kungerkiez !

@ No way Kungerkiez, no way! it is just 5-7 minutes by feet from my place, other side of the Kanal. Kreuzberg.

@@juno6 the cycle count is not changed, only the feame size

@@faxinadu That would be nice... you tell the app how many cycles the wavetable has, and how many you want. With that info, if you want less frames, the app can delete cycles, and if you want more, it can create new frames by interpolation.

E.T. go home :D :D

Haha a friend of mine just gave me one of these es1. Thanks for the video 🙏

Thank you! Let us know what other features would make it even more creative and fun for you!

@@faxinadu I am already active in the KVR thread. :) But if I have a suggestion I will let you know.

@@watchthemkraut6842 One thing we will add for sure is option to also export every single cycle within the wavetable as a file of its own :)

I do use it for my own uses, but you have to understand that NI abandoned it and it is no longer developed or maintained, going on 2+ years already. So it is a use-at-your-own-risk and as long as it works situation.

@ oh wow I didn’t know this! It was still “new” to me haha. Did they switch to a different alternative or just abandon the idea all together?

@@NickScottProducer There is a new UI language being rolled out called KUI, its still very early days with it though.

It is about the modules, being open source one could offer such a module there (similar to VCV etc)

so literally 2000? give me the exact details and we can add it in.

@ well the polyend tracker can use wavetables that have a frame size as low as 16 samples (lol probably rarely used) all the way up to 2048, and it doesn’t impose limits on the amount of cycles it can have, it just runs through whatever you have. I’m guessing your program would like it if it was powers of 2, so I’m guessing a setting a few options that follow that like 1024, 2048, 5096. All those would be awesome, especially if I can do small window sizes like 64 samples, because polyend tracker only has so much sample memory, I’m guessing what settings are right is going to highly depend on the table and how complex it’s trying to be, I’d be using the lowest settings I can get away with to save space. I got some help recently on tuning bespoke modules to the exact frequency needed to just record wavetables of FM and whatever else I can think of in bespoke. I’ll have to play around a bit and get back to you on what is actually usable in the tracker. I’ve really been wanting to try to do a set of low resolution wavetables with a lot of frames to just see what can be done and still be a small enough file to be used in a project. There’s a lot of room to get creative with the tracker since it’s really just playing a sample in a wavetable way it seems to me that some cool stuff could be done in the time domain that others might not be able to do, like having fx baked in and stuff

I just found your website, I’ll contact you through email, we can talk more there, I’ll have to get you examples, I just started a new job and am short on energy for now but I should be back to normal in a few days. I mean before I talked to the peeps over at the bespoke discord I had been experimenting with getting a waveform to the correct frequency with CDP then editing it to oblivion but that introduces all kinds of phase madness, but might be useful in the right context. Anyway I’ve been driving myself semi-crazy trying to get a good consistent way to make wavetables for polyend tracker. If you can help that would be so badass

I don’t want to just sample analog stuff, sure for some of it yah but I want digital waves ;)

@@theorize999 then i don't understand the request, the app does this already.....

thank you very much! <3

With what settings did you get this behaviour you describe? We have not encountered this. I am assuming you only set the first and the last shape, remember that there is crossfading all throughout. Regarding FFT and resynthesis - that is another topic, we might do something like this with an update, but our experience is that resynthesis wavetables are not inherently that interesting, depending on material of course.

@@faxinadu I looked at your video, haven't yet tested myself. E.g. sharp corners cause aliasing. Maybe most host synthesizers will re-synthesis it there, then it's not needed in your app. Thanks for the reply.

@@xgmode With version 1.1 we added a few band limited shape options, more will come in the next versions. Version 1.1 also introduced nyquist filtering options in the shapers section. As you said, some synths clean up also on their side.

@@faxinaduIdk about that one, resynthesis is pretty great, I’ve heard some great wavetables of acoustic instruments that must have been resynthesized. I don’t know if this is something you’re selling, but I’ll buy if you make it able to do a lot more cycles, that’s really what I need

@@theorize999 what do you mean by "a lot more cycles"?

You would have to use the method provided by the synth, in this case Blofeld. I know there are a few software editors for it that can probably help in that as well.

Built in player is for sure something we were aiming for, in fact we had it in there and removed it because it was not morphing well across the tables without producing clicks. If we can solve it we will bring it back in the next version for sure, along with some other cool additions.

Agree - preview is essential for creative workflow. Great concept though.

@@bobrv8 100% , we will attempt to bring it back in with the upcoming versions.

@@faxinadu Maybe something like this: instead of a preview of the end wavetable result do a preview of the waveform types: select a waveform from the list and have a small listen button at the Start/Early/Middle/Late/End/Shaper selectors. That just loops the selected waveform to listen what you're adding.

@@xgmode That is possible yes, but I think the whole point is to experience the morph. We will give it another shot with a coming update.

You first create them in the app and export, then you put them on the USB (see the Erica manual for details)

Do you have a Graphic VCO? As far as I know, there’s no way to load external samples/wavs like that…

@@aeko Oh nuts, I think you might be right, and this one from Erica doesn't allow loading custom wavetables. We got this info somewhere and it seems like a mistake. We will look into the list today and re-examine each, one by one and remove what is wrong. We also found a few that are compatible but not on the current list. Apologies for the confusion and thanks for the spot!