The fact that you have chelsea over arsenal is an atriocious decision and proves either bias or lack of knowledge. Arsenal has twice as many FA cup wins than Chelsea has trophies in their cabinet. Absolutely absurd and invalidates your football opinions
@10thingsyoudidntknowabout2 күн бұрын
@@jonocossey1 As I have already explained before I am talking about the Premier League which was introduced in 1992. And I am sorry for you but there Chelsea has more wins then Arsenal. You are right that the situation changes if you take the whole englisch football into consideration. But as the title and the script says, I am talking about the Premier League.
@artapples84173 күн бұрын
Save yourself 10 minutes and skip this joke video .. he has Liverpool as fifth lol 😂
@10thingsyoudidntknowabout3 күн бұрын
@@artapples8417 yes because I am talking about the Premier League which was introduced in 1992 and Liverpool have only won it once so far. But you are right that if you also consider the Football League First Division then Liverpool has 18 more titles. But you have to read the title of the video next time before you are talking about a joke video😉
@jamesdolph4375 күн бұрын
I personally think there military hat's look stupid
@butterfingers54046 күн бұрын
That all a bit rubbish
@StephanTrube6 күн бұрын
Very enjoyable and interesting content, thanks! But the outro sound logo is _way_ too loud. Not sure wether my neighbours approved.
@yakirfrankoveig80946 күн бұрын
Thats the point of the vid
@10thingsyoudidntknowabout6 күн бұрын
Sorry about that! I try to fix that in future.
@theenclave49816 күн бұрын
It's not exactly a North Korean smart phone, it's made mostly in China.
@N15NotNam6 күн бұрын
Everything from china
@ezradja7 күн бұрын
12:15 the original name of that French pastry knockoff
@hartoz7 күн бұрын
12:56 the fourth test was considered a success, the missile managed to travel 1/2 a mile in various directions (at the same time) and did unalive some people.
@wess47117 күн бұрын
The only thing NK invented is their history - and perhaps the concept of what it is to be pathetic.
@Cav-z1y9 күн бұрын
Ukraine didn't even really get challenger 2s, they go a downgrade version and they're still doing very well
@stanogden457413 күн бұрын
Man United will be next possibly in 2025
@rodintoulouse305414 күн бұрын
Great video. I lived in London for 17 years and I must say you nailed it. Really good research and suggestions.
@graemesimpson13514 күн бұрын
Wow where is this magical land of Lodon? Please tell me you AI-generated legend?
@Cody38Super17 күн бұрын
10 fighter jets used in Ukraine..... #1. They've used more than that, almost 400 have been shot down. #2. Russia doesn't have 10 different fighter jets to their name.(inventory) #3. Mig 21(not used anymore), Mig 29(current), Mig 25/31(current, useless, carries 1 missile), Mig 23/24(worthless), Su 25(not a fighter), Su-27-35 Wanker(all the same damn plane, not "new/ different" models, they're just the same airframe!), Su-57(doesn't actually exist, isn't in "production", has not been seen on a battlefield) although...through the "remote view" on one of our Patriot systems in Ukraine, we did see two Wankers escorting one Su-57 from a looooong way off, and were able to get an R.C.S. measure off of it....and let's just say, the Russians claims are about 500 times too generous to what we recorded, which is also in line with what India said it would be seeing how that was the reason they dropped out of the program. Russia was lying about its Stealth and radar/Weapons systems. But, that's just par for the course....lie. #4. Russia, has never actually produced a fighter airplane, period. The Felon isn't in production, has not been sold to anyone, legitimately. The Soviets produced some, but since we defeated them in the Cold War and collapsed their country, "Russia" hasn't produced jack-sh!t! They modified the Wanker...not a new plane, Soviet plane. And they never really developed the Fulcrum further, I mean they did the Mig35 project, but same plane again and they only built one or two, so that crap doesn't count. Russia seems to think if you change a plane a tiny bit, you can call it something new....NO!..it's just an A-model, B-model, etc. Otherwise America would have the F-35, F-36 and F-37!....no..F-35A,B,C ! One is for the Air Force, one is V.T.O.L.(B) and the last is the Carrier version with larger wings and stronger gear....not new planes, same plane, three variations...all F-35! The F-15 has had 9 different variations over the years, if we called it something new every time, we'd be out of F's! Hahahahaaaaa. They never go for real accomplishments, just for Propaganda value, put all the effort into looking like and no effort into being like, great idea, how'd that work out for you in Ukraine?
@10thingsyoudidntknowabout17 күн бұрын
I’m sorry that this video made you so angry. It should only be a list of 10 Russian fighter jets and nothing more. Of course a same airplane has got different versions, but they still have different names. And I really don’t know how you get to the number of 500 fighter jets shot down by the Ukraine.
@ИванХохлов-ц6ь17 күн бұрын
Обычный госдеповский тролль. Сбито 400🤦♂️ На этом можно заканчивать читать далее
@infrasleep18 күн бұрын
Not sure why Hereford get a mention when Newport and Aldershot went before them and Chester Darlington,Halifax to name a few have gone since. Can't see that one 3rd tier title and a single season in the second morphs them into "big". Bury have a bigger history (top flight football/2 FA Cups) as do Bradford Park Avenue (played in all 4 Divisions) who went bust in the early 70's
@latinourbano20 күн бұрын
The OK sign in Brazil means "take it up the A**" If you extend your hand foward with all your fingers open wide (kind of like greeting someone or about to shake someones hand) in Guatemala it means " screw you" If you fold your fingers of your hands ..(king of like when you do a manicure facing you) ita Mexicoa way of "flipping the bird"
@giod626621 күн бұрын
All deliverd in VERY smal numbers.. :(
@Jasonth13119 күн бұрын
That is the Problem
@giod626619 күн бұрын
@@Jasonth131 And very late..
@SheffieldTheHomeofFootball22 күн бұрын
Blackburn Olympic? Winners of the most important match in football history according to many historians. The 1883 FA Cup Final. Also, Wanderers were not formed in 1859 as a formal club. They formed in couple of years later from / in co-existence with Forest but their formality really began when the FA began in 1863.
@Ανδρέας-ΓεώργιοςΣκίννερ22 күн бұрын
AEK are Greece's third most successful club, actually, following Olympiacos and Panathinaikos. Many other historic clubs of Greece have gone through bankruptcy, although none have had their almost €400 million debts magically disappear. You have Iraklis, who have bought out other companies time after time in an attempt to make their way back to the top fight, as well as Greece's oldest club, Panionios.
@norbertholstein260423 күн бұрын
Rangers died, no iteration, a new club. 3 trophies total
@andyoneill150323 күн бұрын
The rangers will go bust again soon. Wonder what they will call mk 3 or even pay the facepainter 🤔
@humanprehistory23 күн бұрын
Having stated that The Wanderers were unrelated to later clubs that included 'Wanderers' in their name, the vid features a picture of Nat Lofthouse with the FA Cup after Bolton Wanderers win in 1958.
@SimonHeartfield23 күн бұрын
That's because these awful AI created videos can't tell the difference.
@MrBob1989x23 күн бұрын
Bury FC from England
@loyalroyal24 күн бұрын
I support Reading and we may well be the next club to go bust. The most inspiring story is Parma as its circumstances look similar to ours.
@david_g_barron24 күн бұрын
Newport County. Not far from Hereford United in terms of what leagues they played in the 1970s and 1980s s well as Geographically, but went bankrupt in 1989. Phoenix Club started again in 1989 at the then Level 8 of the English Pyramid system. Many years up to 2013 in Non League until getting back in the English Football League, and have been in League Two ever since.
@leighreganarblaster985224 күн бұрын
That’s wrong not $1 one pound because Scotland part of England
@bobsteele958124 күн бұрын
Scotland and England are both part of the UK, but are distinct countries
@paulwilson265120 күн бұрын
No Scotland isn't. Fool.
@ronwilson981524 күн бұрын
Technically the current iteration of Rangers are not the same as they've always been. Glasgow Rangers no longer exist, The Rangers is a separate entity.
@bobsteele958124 күн бұрын
Utter nonesense
@danieljames932224 күн бұрын
Sounds like a Celtic supporter
@bobsteele958124 күн бұрын
@@danieljames9322 - Not only a Celtic supporter, but a moon-howling Celtic supporter 😉
@ronwilson981524 күн бұрын
I don't like Celtic, but the truth is the truth, something you delusional Rangers fans don't seem to be able to handle.
@ronwilson981524 күн бұрын
@@bobsteele9581 I don't like either Celtic or Rangers. In Football Manager there are four teams in Great Britain I will never manage, two of those are Celtic and Rangers.
@ericbrammer224525 күн бұрын
Two stand out; Challenger, and the Bradley IFV. I just wish Sweden had Surplus "S"-tanks to hand-over, as it's small profile, ability to Entrench itself (oh, that front 'digger-Plow' is Extra Armor!), and small crew, make it Ideal as a Defender that may 'snipe' at times. Too bad the M-1 is tough to integrate into their supply-lines (and, it wallows in Mud; too heavy upon the tracks), but it's Not a 'Defensive' tank, it's an assault-tank. Glad to see the German Leopards doing alright, as they're equally good at Offense or Defense, but thin Atop in plating. Once the Ukrainians gain the Offense, I hope they look-back, at the Hellcat, and make a Modern type with a bigger Punch, more speed, more floatation [at the tracks], and anti-drone defense? The Booker ISN'T That, btw.
@jacksonteller133727 күн бұрын
The AMX-10RC isn't a tank. It is a reconnaissance vehicle and an FSV. Even the M-55S would be a better option as a tank than the AMX-10RC. But in the role it is meant for the AMX is magnificent, we fought along side it and our French allies in Mali.
@ffcghjttv27 күн бұрын
I can see you have no Idea what you talking about!Few months ago I so on youtube Ukrainians recorded PT 91 hit few times by russian drones and survived, Leopard hit once and finish. You see Poland have developed reactiv armour proved on Ukraine to be one of the best existing and Polish made electronic on board is aswell working very good.
@briansmith-l1q27 күн бұрын
try an update
@DH.201627 күн бұрын
I wouldn't categorise a wheeled vehicle as a tank.
@dirgsuite554628 күн бұрын
Except, they did not make much of difference, did they? Crews not trained properly, not enough of them, lack of ammunition, Abrams very disappointing.
@filippozoncada366028 күн бұрын
My opinion t 90 abrams and leopard 2 have shown to be very vulnerable
@patrikbinder646721 күн бұрын
Every Tank is vulnarable, But Leopard and you can See it in Videos is very Hard to destroy. On Every destroyed Leopard, 3-4 T-90 are destroyed. And after nearly 2 years, Leopards are still there, thats speaks for himself
@19piet8128 күн бұрын
FACT 1: the canon of the M1 is a licenced copy from Leopard 2; FACT 2: the canon of Challanger 3 will be a licenced copy from Leopard 2
@ДанилаДзевялтовский29 күн бұрын
У нас в России, эти ваши танки как цирк шапито по городам возят😂 людям показывают. Challenger правда не возят, тяжёлый оказался 72 тонны всё-таки😅. Их даже из грязи наши вытащить не смогли так и бросили. Абрамс и леопарды не проблема.😊
@matsforsberg628729 күн бұрын
Everything made in USA has a dark history and most often tens of thousands murdered people - The American way
@bobwitkowski641029 күн бұрын
In answer to your question history will answer your question.
@Outlaw-of2lt29 күн бұрын
I stopped drinking coca cola in 2015 I was sick as a dog for 3 months after I left it from withdrawal be warned never drink this rubbish
@10thingsyoudidntknowabout29 күн бұрын
I hope you are doing better now!
@johanfogelstrom4137Ай бұрын
The Swedish (Leopard +) has the least losses in %, so does the Swedish CV90 =)
@petesy0324 күн бұрын
Well there is cv90s on display in Moscow, where did they come from?
@johanfogelstrom413722 күн бұрын
@@petesy03 Still, has the least losses if you compare with any other. How many B radleys and Abrams are in Moscow?
@petesy0322 күн бұрын
@@johanfogelstrom4137 well they have on display the ones were still in one piece, the number of destroyed Bradley’s and Abram’s is a guess but dozens and dozens, they actually have a relatively in tact cv90 on display in Moscow
@tallshort1849Ай бұрын
Bit rubbish that
@BadwolfGamerАй бұрын
The Challenger 2 won this video.
@tankeriv28 күн бұрын
In real life the Challenger 2 won absolutely nothing.
@grahammoore896726 күн бұрын
@@tankeriv Do you mean prizes in a competition? Its kill ratio is the best in the world, I am sure you know that.
@darrenstanton633225 күн бұрын
Challenger 2 is better than any tank on here
@darrenstanton633225 күн бұрын
@tankeriv you know nothing
@tankeriv24 күн бұрын
@@darrenstanton6332 Yeah sure... The Challenger 2 has great terrain handling... (*kuch...*)... The Challenger survives all Russian anti tank missiles. Defeats all APFSD rounds... Really bro.... The Challenger 2 is outdated unfortunately. It is a very good looking tank. But not even on par with a modern T-72B3M. Maybe the Challenger 3 upgrade would do much better. But the terrain handling I fear won't see much improvement. Simply because it is too heavy.
@josephherman5790Ай бұрын
I was raised on R/C and Pepsi,I simply hate Coke,it's only good for cleaning rust off tools and cleaning the toilet bowl of sh*t.
@davebirkbeck9348Ай бұрын
Try upping your volume.
@tankerivАй бұрын
Fun fact : You showed a Leopard 2A6 whilst talking about the Leopard 2A4., another fun fact. The Leopard 2A4 proved to be too heavy and too lightly armored for the conflict. It cannot survive a first hit from the Russian 125mm 2A46M model 5 used by the T-72B3(M) / T-90M / T-80BVM. Basically it cannot survive a first hit even from the frontal armor by any of the Russia's currently fielded mainstay tanks. In comparison the gun used on the German Leopard 2A6 the 120mm L55 smoothbore is NOT capable of defeating the Russian T-72B3 frontal armor from mid or long range. The Same is for the Abrams L44 gun. It cannot defeat the T-72B3's frontal armor from medium to long ranges. I am not quite sure where you got your Challenger 2 record that it made an impact in the war. Since it isn't liked because of its poor mobility and its gun is insufficient to do direct tank vs tank engagements on longer ranges. And since the environments it is being used it are mainly mostly flat terrains the engagements are mostly medium to long distances. And that's where the Western tanks are hopelessly failing at this moment.
@bullsfan6965Ай бұрын
Leopard 2A4 isnt heavy at all compared to abrams or challenger 2. It has performed much better than those two other tanks. Also Leopard 2A4 can survive a hit from 2A46M5. Russia doesnt use the best apfsds projectile theyve made because they cant manufacture them in large numbers. And Leo2A6 can penetrate t72b3m and t80bvm almost anywhere. T90m can withstand a hit on the upper front armor.
@JAmediaUK29 күн бұрын
The Challengers did very well against Russian tanks in Iran. So far, none have been taken out by a Russian tank. In Ukraine, one had a mobility kill and was later taken out by artillery whilst stationary. The crew had got out. AFAIK no Challenger crew has ever been killed.
@tankeriv28 күн бұрын
@bullsfan6965 There are quite a few images available of the opposite. Where a T-72B3 is hit multiple times from the front. Also Russian testing has proved the T-72B3 to be able to withstand the L55 at medium and long distances.
@leszekk.73Ай бұрын
The best tank is one that can be used quickly and effectively by the army. Armor thickness, electronics, engine - have secondary roles if the tank is not on the battlefield or if the crew cannot use it effectively. Abrans, Leopards and Challengers are good tanks, but in this conflict they are in short supply and delivered late. Half of the tanks donated to Ukraine by the allies are Polish PT-91 Twardy tanks (30 in 2022 and 60 in 2023) and T-72M(R) and T-72M1(R) (about 300 tanks). These tanks were donated from the first days of the war. They could be immediately used on the battlefield, because their designs are very similar to those previously known by Ukrainian tankers.
@sabo-firbeata3883Ай бұрын
Challenger 2 is worse than the T54, a failed project! Leopard 2A6 is the best tank in Ukraine
@thetrooper9236Ай бұрын
Based on ?
@noke25Ай бұрын
U sure you not in a parallel world? 😂
@thetrooper9236Ай бұрын
@@sabo-firbeata3883 Leopard over 43?destroyed and many more damaged
@BadwolfGamerАй бұрын
Oh look it's another Leopard 2 fanboy, The Leopard 2 is a low-mid tank at best.
@Maddog-xc2zvАй бұрын
@@BadwolfGamer lol, my turn to say "based on"? more were destroyed because much more were provided, simple statistic fact. How many challengers do they have? 5? so they don't even use it, reason why a an equipment that is in fact used in large numbers is more prone to have more casualties - see the Abrams, even the Americans are stating that not just the engine, but rather gun, lack of protection (depleted Uranium plates removed from the tank armor by the USA before delivery) in place being reinforced by ukrainians (mainly reactive bricks of armor), the Abrams is not a tank fitted to be used in a Ukraine alike battlefield. The A2 was used as work horse before IFVs till Ukraine realized that tanks can never be used as a main weapon in this "drone" warfare war fight style.
@TheRobGuardАй бұрын
I'm not a military person (never held a gun in my hand, etc). But seem to me tanks are pretty vulnerable in Ukraine. They are supposed to be mean machines noone can hurt but a simple 100 dollar drone can take it out from far away, so can other anti-tank missiles held by a single guy, etc. Tanks were king in WW2 but I doubt they are that great anymore, but it all depend on the context, in specific situations they might shine again I guess. Today drones and missiles are kings of war. Not tanks, artillary or jets.
@neilmason139427 күн бұрын
I am afraid that your thoughts show your lack of broader knowledge and understanding. Tanks still have a major tole to play on the battlefield.
@grahammoore896726 күн бұрын
Everything in the battlespace (sea, land, air) is vulnerable to one or more counters. In the land arena, tanks remain the best protected weapon system. You do not scrap your best mobile, protected direct-fire weapons. You defeat the counter-systems or minimise their effectiveness.
@tasman006Ай бұрын
Fun fact it was the Challenger 1 not Challenger 2 that made the world record shot. Also you forgot the Leopard 2A6 which you showed but was talking about the Leopard 2A4. I think the T80BVM and T90M should have got a mention being better than the standard T72.
@nebojsacokic4811Ай бұрын
T90 proriv shuold be on this list
@bikechainmic28 күн бұрын
T90? The turret tossing cosmoanut launchung tank?
@nebojsacokic481128 күн бұрын
@bikechainmic it was t72
@Maddog-xc2zv28 күн бұрын
@@nebojsacokic4811 Also T90. You need to watch more videos of those destroyed.