I can see you feel strongly about this, and I appreciate you sharing your perspective. It's understandable that, from your point of view, religion may seem unnecessary or even fabricated, especially when viewed through the lens of history or personal experience. However, many people find deep meaning, hope, and purpose in their faith, which makes it significant to them. While it’s true that history is filled with different beliefs and religions, the search for answers to life’s big questions-why we’re here, what happens after death, and what gives life meaning-has been universal. Religion often attempts to provide these answers, and for many, faith isn’t about ignorance or blind belief but about seeking deeper understanding, connection, and morality. Dismissing all people of faith as 'ignorant' may overlook the diversity of thought and experience among believers. There are scientists, philosophers, and leaders throughout history who were deeply religious and also made incredible contributions to human progress-figures like Isaac Newton, Blaise Pascal, and Martin Luther King Jr. I’d love to hear more about what’s brought you to your perspective, and I’m happy to share why faith is meaningful to me if you’re open to a respectful exchange. Conversations like this can help us better understand one another, even if we don’t see eye to eye.

Alleluia, indeed! You’ve touched on a profound truth

You're absolutely right that the specific phrase 'Holy Trinity' is not found in the Bible. However, the concept of the Trinity-God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit-is woven throughout Scripture. Early Christians developed the term 'Trinity' to describe this reality revealed in the Bible. you can read Matthew 28:19, John 1:1-14, Acts 5:3-4, Luke 3:21-22

@@bibleinatale the concept is not found in scripture. This is a misidentification of how the 1 divine person operates. There isn’t 3 persons just one

@@joerivera8720 the trinity is all about one God in three persons The concept of the Trinity is a topic that has sparked much discussion and interpretation throughout Christian history. While the word "Trinity" itself isn’t explicitly found in Scripture, many Christians believe it is derived from passages that highlight the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit working together as distinct yet unified (e.g., Matthew 28:19, John 1:1-14, 2 Corinthians 13:14). That said, I understand there are different interpretations of how God operates as one divine being.

@@bibleinatale trinitarian have misidentified the operations of a single divine person and what he’s capable of. This 1 divine person is capable of transmitting his person into another nature, and genuinely operate in that nature. Trinitarian misidentified this transmitting as another unique person. It’s not, it’s the same person in a different operation called transmitting or begetting, meaning to bring forth. I was a trinitarian myself, I actually know multiple interpretations of the trinity. Like Catholics Tolmen, orthodox monarchy or some protestants version of social Trinitarian. I’m well versed in the doctrine. It’s in error of mis-identifying.

@@joerivera8720 Thank you for sharing your perspective. It's clear that you've put significant thought and study into the doctrine of the Trinity and related interpretations. I respect your journey and your commitment to understanding such profound theological concepts. If I may, I'd like to offer some insights on the Trinitarian view to clarify where the differences might lie. In the Trinitarian doctrine, as historically affirmed by creeds like the Nicene Creed, the understanding is not that one divine person "transmits" or "begets" Himself into another nature in a modalistic or singular-person sense. Instead, the doctrine holds that there is one divine essence shared fully and equally by three distinct persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These are not "modes" or "operations" of a single person but are distinct persons who exist eternally in perfect unity within the Godhead. Begetting and Begotten: The concept of "begetting" in Trinitarian theology refers to the eternal relationship between the Father and the Son, not a process of "transmission" or a temporal act. The Son is eternally begotten, meaning His sonship is an eternal reality within the Godhead, not a creation or transformation. Unity and Distinction: The doctrine emphasizes both the unity of the divine essence and the real distinctions between the persons. These distinctions are relational (Father begets, the Son is begotten, the Spirit proceeds) but do not imply separation or division within God's essence. Historical Misunderstandings: The early church addressed views like modalism (the belief in a single person manifesting in different modes) and Arianism (the denial of Christ's full divinity). The Trinity was defined carefully to avoid these extremes, affirming that while God is one in essence, He exists eternally as three co-equal, co-eternal persons. Scriptural Basis: Passages such as John 1:1-14 (the Word was with God and was God), Matthew 28:19 (baptizing in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), and John 14:16-17 (the Father sends the Spirit through the Son) support the coexistence and distinct roles of the three persons in the Godhead. I understand your perspective that this could be seen as "misidentification," but from the Trinitarian framework, these distinctions are not misidentifications but are rooted in a careful reading of Scripture and the early church's theological reflection. That said, I deeply respect your thoughtful approach to these doctrines and your willingness to engage with different interpretations.

I appreciate your perspective, and it's true that the development of theological doctrines often intersects with historical and cultural contexts. However, the concept of the Holy Trinity is a deeply theological one that evolved over centuries and is rooted in early Christian efforts to understand the nature of God as revealed in the Scriptures. The doctrine wasn't 'invented' as a political ploy, but rather emerged from debates among early Christians grappling with the relationship between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. For instance, the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD sought to clarify Jesus' divinity in response to theological disputes, not to compete with Judaism or other religions. It’s worth noting that while theological doctrines often reflect their historical context, many believers see the Trinity not as a competition but as a revelation of God’s nature. Whether one agrees or not, understanding the historical and spiritual motivations behind it helps provide a fuller picture.

I'm so glad you found the video helpful! 😊 It means a lot to know it resonated with you. If you enjoyed it, don't forget to hit that like button and subscribe for more content! Your support is greatly appreciated! 🙌

God is good

John 8 42 kjv Jesus said unto them if God were your Father ye would love me for I proceeded forth and came from God neither came I of myself but he sent me.... so wich part of God is lying when Jesus said .... neither came I of myself? If there is One God he came of himself . It's that simple. And your teaching Jesus wasn't the perfect sacrifice

@@unholywarrior9007 Thank you for raising this point; it’s important to understand what Jesus meant in John 8:42. Jesus wasn’t saying that He is separate from God in essence or being. Instead, He was highlighting His relationship with the Father as part of the Trinity-One God in three persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). The phrase 'neither came I of myself' emphasises the Son’s submission to the Father's will in His mission to redeem humanity (Philippians 2:6-8). It’s not a lie but a reflection of their distinct roles within the Godhead. Jesus being sent doesn’t mean He’s not God; it means He willingly came to fulfil the Father’s purpose for our salvation.

@baribordaniel2770 so God didn't send himself God to be the sacrifice? I HAVE MORE .... John 7 16 kjv Jesus answered them and said my doctrine is not mine but his that sent me.... if there is only one God this is a lie but if there is 3 Gods separate persons/persona/essence then it is true . Don't tell me if God says my doctrine is not mine then is he teaching the devils doctrine? John 7 17 kjv if any man will do his will he shall know the doctrine weather it be of God or weather I speak of MYSELF. ... so if he speaks of himself then it is his doctrine and he lied in vs 16 . Now keep in mind he says God not the farther this isn't john 5 . Not read it slowly . Weather it be of God OR ... not and if I speak of myself it says or . JESUS TELLS US HE ISNT GOD HERE..... JOHN 7 18 KJV He that speaketh of himself seaketh his own glory but he that seaketh his glory that sent him the same is true and no unrighteous is in him. ... in Jesus own words all in context if Jesus was speaking/speaketh of himself God he would be unrighteous. .... your teaching God is unrighteous and lying. And don't worry I got more .

@@unholywarrior9007 Thank you for sharing these verses and your thoughts. I understand how these passages could seem complex, but they align with the Christian understanding of the Trinity. The Trinity teaches that there is one God in three distinct persons-Father, Son (Jesus), and Holy Spirit. They share the same divine essence but have different roles. When Jesus says, 'my doctrine is not mine,' He isn’t denying His divinity but pointing to His role within the Trinity, which is to reveal and carry out the Father’s will (John 6:38). This doesn’t imply separation or contradiction but shows their unity in purpose. Jesus’ words in John 7:16-18 reflect His humility and obedience as the Son of God. He came to do the will of the Father, not to glorify Himself. This doesn’t mean Jesus isn’t God-it shows that within the Trinity, the Son submits to the Father’s will for the sake of salvation. In Philippians 2:6-8, Paul explains that Jesus, being in the form of God, humbled Himself and became obedient unto death. This humility and submission highlight Jesus’ righteousness, not unrighteousness. When Jesus says, 'my doctrine is not mine,' He is not suggesting separation from God but showing that His teaching originates from the Father. This doesn’t mean Jesus is unrighteous or lying. Instead, it reveals the perfect unity within the Godhead. Jesus and the Father share the same divine essence (John 10:30: 'I and my Father are one'). His mission was to point people to the Father and glorify Him, fulfilling the role of the obedient Son. His words in John 7:18 affirm this: ‘He that seeketh His glory that sent Him, the same is true, and no unrighteousness is in Him. Far from saying He isn’t God, Jesus’ words affirm His unique role in God’s plan for salvation. As the perfect sacrifice, Jesus voluntarily came in human form (John 1:14) to fulfil the Father’s will. This doesn’t make God unrighteous or a liar. Instead, it demonstrates God’s love and justice. Jesus spoke of His mission in terms of submission to show us what perfect obedience to the Father looks like. This doesn’t diminish His divinity; rather, it magnifies the depth of His sacrifice for humanity. I appreciate your thoughtful reading of these passages, and I’d love to continue discussing them with you. I believe the Bible is consistent in teaching that Jesus is fully God and fully man, working in perfect unity with the Father and the Holy Spirit. If you have more questions or verses to share, I’m happy to explore them together. My goal is to understand God’s Word more deeply, just as you are striving to do.

Yes, the Holy Trinity-Father, Son, and Holy Spirit

3 different Gods . Your teaching God lies. John 8 42 kjv Jesus said unto them if God were your Father ye would love me for I proceeded forth and came from God neither came I of myself but he sent me. ...so if thete is One God then God is lying when he says Neither Came I Of Myself. Its that simple. God sent himself God and then lied to us?

@@unholywarrior9007 The trinity is one God in 3 persons just like i explained in the video water can exist in vapour, liquid or ice The verse you quoted, John 8:42, aligns with the doctrine of the Trinity, where Jesus, the Son, proceeds from the Father but is of the same essence as God. Jesus isn't saying He is separate from God but that His mission and incarnation came by the will of the Father. The 'sending' reflects their relationship within the Trinity, not a contradiction or a lie. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one God in three persons, and this relational language helps us understand their unity and distinct roles.

@Bible-in-a-bit so you agree that your doctrine teaches God lies . There is not 2 Gods so when the one God Jesus said neither came I of myself. He would have to be lying. . I can turn this around on your logic let me show you . Genesis 9 11 i will establish my covenant with you neither shall all flesh be cut off by the waters of a flood neither shall there be a flood to destroy the earth . ... now we have big telescopes and a s we point them at halies comet we see its mostly ice . Now God could push it into the earth wich would flood the earth . Now if Jesus pushed it or the spirit or the father or the burning bush pushed it or the cloud it's a lie . You can't say we'll God said he would not do it so if the spirit did it some how it's not a lie . With your logic promises covenants mean nothing because God can just devide out another part of himself and say it wasn't me I didn't lie . One God sent himself and lied to us . Your teaching doubt the opposite of faith . And why would we have faith in God to save us if he lies? He might be lying about saving us or not flooding us . We should just fear him then . No love . Your logic makes no sense

God is good

and we shall hold our peace

God is good

i pray God uses us well to carry out his work here on Earth

God is good

indeed

God is great indeed

the king is born

Amen

Indeed it’s a nice Video❤️

Indeed ❤

And lords of Lords