I did it and has worked a few times, then head up an nothing more hapend , servo to the bin 😢
@rayphilpot19468 күн бұрын
Excellent run through I think we need more of these detailed type pix .. far too many endless flying showing off .. of no help to others on a “how to” basis. Well done Cheers Ray NZ
@carlosandresflorezbueno484922 күн бұрын
Hello about the rudder servo, it’s posible to put in the rear part ?
@eddrakes22 күн бұрын
That is a bit difficult to tell whether there is a recess available for a rear-mounted rudder servo. The problem with doing that is the extra weight then applied at the rear. That would have to be counterweighted at the front - normally by locating the 10S/12S batteries a bit further forward. Even with the mid-mounted rudder servo(pull-pull) the batteries are already nearly disappearing under the cowl at the front! It is all up to you, of course. Just perform COG checks before fixing or cutting anything! Good luck. I am very happy with the mid-mounted rudder servo.
@gtjumperАй бұрын
Watch those servo wires on the composite laminate, vibs will cut through them
@bleak02182 ай бұрын
Hi, do You have a flight video with this nice machine?...
@eddrakes2 ай бұрын
Sorry, no. It takes considerable skill and experience to film aerobatics. Most people expect to get away with using a mobile phone!! Sorry, it really requires a tripod and dedicated video capture. The cameraman's zoom management has to be good and he should have a good working knowledge of the aerobatic sequences to be filmed. Quite demanding really.
@bleak02182 ай бұрын
Hi, can someone plese tell me what "EXP" stands for in the model name?...
@eddrakes2 ай бұрын
"Experimental Progressive" The design includes some aeronautical test design components/structures not current on full sized Extra's.
@bleak02182 ай бұрын
@@eddrakes I see, thank You!
@rcfan854 ай бұрын
I loved it, quick question regarding the servos, does the plane hae the spcae for standard servos or it has to be mino servos? i have Savox SV-1270TG i would like to use, any feedback please. thanks
@eddrakes4 ай бұрын
Wings have lasered markings as a guide to cut out for standard servos. Rear of fuselage has no such cut out guides. Of course, you can apply your skills and open up those servo openings with a measure of patience!!
@derekgurney58216 ай бұрын
What’s the extra wire not plugged into the receiver? Nice setup!
@eddrakes6 ай бұрын
There are two leads from the ESC. One has signal and power - that's the one plugged in - and the other is just power and is not required to be plugged in.
@alwaysflying65407 ай бұрын
I wasn't crazy about these colors, but yours looks so good
@eddrakes7 ай бұрын
Don't let some views on the plane fool you, there is no yellow in the finish! It is all white, black and apple-green. Looks pretty good too.
@eddrakes7 ай бұрын
This plane comes ready to fly 3D and is not appropriately setup for precision aerobatics (PA). For PA, I have changed out the servo arms for 25mm aluminiums. Also, I calculated that the COG should be about 30mm forward, of that nominated, to prevent unwanted pitching in a straight line.
@alwaysflying65407 ай бұрын
@@eddrakes . The colors do look great. I have the experience to modify the flight envelope. Thank you for the great tips and reply. The quality looks amazing
@RobertBulko9 ай бұрын
Hi Ed, where did you find the best CG, please? Is it in the middle of the wing tube? Thanks
@eddrakes9 ай бұрын
Innitial flights were based on the nominated, centre-of-tube marking for COG. The plane was very pitchy. A quick geometric check showed that the "normal?" COG should be more like 30mm in front of the nominated COG. I added 120g of lead onto the motor box, just behind the motor, to achieve this new COG. This was WAY BETTER for my flying style - precision aerobatics.
@RobertBulko9 ай бұрын
Thank you. 🙂 Could you tell me what is the weight of the battery you used? I want to use 6S 5000 830g. 🙂
@eddrakes9 ай бұрын
I use 6S 5000 at about that weight....
@aeromodeller111 ай бұрын
Prop pitch is conventionally measured at a specified radius, usually 2/3 or 3/4 of radius. This is entirely arbitrary, since the measured pitch will usually be different at each radiius. Pitch measured in this way will allow a rough sorting of props, but it is useless for performance analysis.
@aeromodeller111 ай бұрын
There is geometric pitch and aerodynamic pitch. They are not the same. Geometric pitch is how far the blade element chord would move forward as if it was a screw, moving with the blade element chord tangent to the line of advance. Propellers can not work like that. They do not screw through a solid medium. The blade element must have an attack angle relative to the path through the air to develop lift. The distance travedled through the air is less than the geometric pitch. I prefer to call that the advance; the distance traveled through the air in one revolution. My comment was on the geometric pitch. The geometric pitch can be calculated from the blade element angle at each radius. Almost all props I have measured have a different geometric pitch at each radius.
@aeromodeller111 ай бұрын
That will give you the pitch at the 30 degree blade angle. But the pitch usually varies along the blade, different at each radius.
@eddrakes11 ай бұрын
Prop Pitch definition is "the distance a propeller moves through a fluid in one complete revolution", not the angle of the prop which varies through its length. Ask if you need a more complete explanation. Sorry if you are having trouble understanding this... Watch again, listen to the instructions carefully. It works very well!!
@radukapu11 ай бұрын
Very nice build. Just finished mine. Can i ask you a question? Where is your CG ? By their mark if i put my 5000 mah 6s Gens ace 730 mg i’m tail heavy. Thank you
@eddrakes11 ай бұрын
This is a beautiful flying plane when you arrange your balance point at the COG nominated, center of the tube. In your case, I assume the battery is as far forward as it can go. A few of my planes were a bit tail heavy. In these cases I bolted lead weights onto the motor box behind the motor (as much as 120g but varies case by case) until the COG nominated is the static balance point with the wings level - not pitched up or down. The COG nominated results in a plane that needs a little down on the elevator when flying inverted. I am a precision aerobatics flier, not 3D.
@radukapu11 ай бұрын
@@eddrakes Hello Ed. Kindly thank you for your reply. I’m sport flyer i would say ton crazy 3D. I just got really confused by CG. Also my plane is approx. 700 longer than length mentioned in manual. ( they say 1661 mm mine approximately 1730mm) Also some guys say the factory put CG more forward so i could be on the rear edge or about there of the wing pipe. But i like to follow the manufacturer as i trust they spent some time designing the plane. But really doesn’t sound right adding 200 g of dead weight. My only answer would be the gas engine and tank are heavier than small electric motor and one battery. This is the first time i’m having this issue. Thank you Radek
@waynerc1841 Жыл бұрын
Looking forward to the maiden
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
Hey Wayne, sometime next week - maybe the public holiday, Monday. How is yours going??
@waynerc1841 Жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes I have had the Extra NG 60” for a while now - already worn out I fly it so much - Extra NG PNP 67” due for delivery to me on 17/6. I love these planes. Will check Mondays schedule…
@aussiedigger1441 Жыл бұрын
Great build. I epoxy 0.5mm carbon plates on the sides of the outer motorbox as it's a weak spot in the 67in pilot. Absolutely awesome plane & my fav atm.
@delta545 Жыл бұрын
How did the powerbox sensor v3 work for you? I thought it was for smaller planes, but it's a good option. I just bought the same plane and I'm thinking about which regulator to use. Thanks and regards
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
Sensor V3 is terrific - provides 2 independant, regulated power sources into the Rx. Under advice, I am regulating the 2 x 2S lipos down to 7.9 volts which then remains at constant "voltage in" for an entire flight. The colour coding - indicating remaining (%age) battery charge - is very helpful, letting one know approximately how much is left in the batteries - you do not need an external checker.
@Lawzy Жыл бұрын
Great build. What is your average flight time?
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
Around 5mins on 10S 60C 5000mah batteries flying F3A pattern sequences. I will be converting to 12S shortly - same as my Pilot-RC Slick 74" which is now running way better on 12S. The duration will not change but the authority will be crazy!
@zilog-z80 Жыл бұрын
Nice build, approximate flight time with that configuration?
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
I have edited the video description. Please check the information below the video again.
@billyhoward4680 Жыл бұрын
'Promosm'
@waynerc1841 Жыл бұрын
Nice build and great accessory fitting..
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
Thanks Wayne. I think I just like painting stuff RED!!
@luann_Silv4 Жыл бұрын
if i buy where can i go and pay someone to assemble
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
I do not know where you live... In Australia contract assemblers are pretty hard to find. I know of just one and he is pretty well retired from building. He used to charge about 25% of the total (ARF plus equipment) cost to do the job. If you are already a flier surely the way to becoming a complete hobbyist is to build this plane yourself? Good luck with your endeavours....
@lamagill1 Жыл бұрын
Very impressed with everything except the motor mounting bolts. It would appear to create some significant point loads on the box and has no bracing. I assume by now you have plenty of hours on the plane. Has this been an issue?
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
Are you engineering orientated? Structurally, the portalised nature of the motor support renders it VERY STIFF. I have employed this method of support on many planes and for many years - these threaded bar portal frames work extremely well!!
@lamagill1 Жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes Thanks for the reply. I will give it a try.
@FelipeCerdaBarra Жыл бұрын
What do you prefer between this Extreme Flight 78" and the Pilot RC Extra NG 78"?
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
Extreme Flight has the edge for two main reasons. 1) All carbon laminated plywood is slightly larger/more substantial than in the Pilot-RC. 2) EF wing latches and retainers are now all metal while Pilot-RC is still using largely plastic fittings.
@FelipeCerdaBarra Жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes thank you for this feedback! Really useful for my purchase decision 👍
@davidfalgout7304 Жыл бұрын
nice build, but can you fly?
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
IMAC aerobatics for 10 years now. Can't find a decent cameraman....
@davidfalgout7304 Жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes SWEET!
@ATCDave1 Жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes Didn't know you were allowed to fly IMAC with a gyro...
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
@@ATCDave1 I fly IMAC routines but don't partake in competition. Mostly instruction for older fliers wanting to try their hand at aerobatics.
@sheldonsaintstudio Жыл бұрын
That is so cool 😎
@kevingoldbey7401 Жыл бұрын
Can u tell me we're u bought this plane please thanks
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
These planes are built by Pilot-RC in China.
@eddrakes Жыл бұрын
These planes are built by Pilot-RC in China. Desert Aircraft in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia is where I purchased this one.
@Krash_fpv Жыл бұрын
One day I will have one......one day
@nicolasricosanchez2 жыл бұрын
Hi guys! Do you know where I can purchase one of those ?
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
Search for a Pilot-RC dealer in your country. I deal with Desert Aircraft in Queensland, Australia.
@darrenbeck16022 жыл бұрын
Great plane Ed
@Ra_dio_Iberico_ea4ggc2 жыл бұрын
como te quedó de nivelado el centro de gravedad? veo que el regulador de 120A tendrías que haberlo montado bajo los tornillos bancada del motor, ya nos contarás los 6 elementos de Lipo que le pones, el avión parece muy Ligero, ponle Giroscopos al automático o botón de Pánico, te sacará de muchos apuros. buen avión, ni demasiado Grande, ni tan pequeño.
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
Centre of gravity as marked, over the joiner tube, is good. Since the rudder servo is located mid fuselage length, I had to move some weight further back from the front of the plane. So I put the ESC near the batteries. I am correcting the plane RTF weight to a measured 5.96kg. The battery is 2 x 5S 5000mah 50C --> 10S. I never use the safe mode for the gyro - too controlling. As an experienced, aerobatic pilot I find the gyro in its simplest, "stabilisation" mode is enough for me. Yes, and you are correct, this size is perfect for flying at our field. Thank you for the comment.
@dustinl68382 жыл бұрын
I feel like I just watched one of those videos they make for a person for their funeral lol. But for a plane. Great flying plane though. Love mine.
@rcas350pilot82 жыл бұрын
I think I finally found what I am looking for. A plane made with top quality construction and not all Styrofoam. Not going to be cheap but don't mind paying for the quality. And thanks for this excellent vid showing off all the parts and pieces, great job!
@kordji17972 жыл бұрын
Hello, just wondering how you managed to wrap the tail so well, I had a mare of a time trying to do mine and still haven't found a decent tutorial for it
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by "Wrap the Tail??" What does this mean, "I had a MARE of a time??"
@kordji17972 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes Never mind :')
@ezequiel80052 жыл бұрын
🙌 Promo`SM!!
@marianolte82332 жыл бұрын
Nice plane. Did you balance at the indicated CG location? It seems a bit too far back
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
Hi Maria. Starting balance point (CG) was as per the inner fuselage markings - approximately 20mm behind the back side of the joiner tube. Upright followed by up side down flight tests then indicated how the CG should be adjusted to suit my flying style. My style is F3A or IMAC --> large aerobatic manouvres. I move the battery to achieve my required balance point.
@marianolte82332 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes Thanks Ed..
@marianolte82332 жыл бұрын
Ed, still thinking about this. My CG mark is 27mm behind the wing tube. Do you recall how much closer you moved to the wing tube for final balance after flight testing?
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
@@marianolte8233 Since I fly and adjust weight to get the result required in the air, I have no CG marker in the plane. This is all subject to your flying style of course. I prefer precision aerobatics - large manouvres - resulting in a more forward CG location. Additionally, I employ a stabiliser which not only stops the annoying wobbles caused by wind, but also compensates for problems with CG. In other words you can quite off the correct CG position but lean on the stabiliser to keep your plane level! Similarly, a stabiliser obviates problems with all the trims caused by badly centering servos. Go to this URL to calculate your CG - fwcg.3dzone.dk/
@acousticambientguitar24052 жыл бұрын
Hi , I am trying this motor on my 67 " slick , since the Dualsky ga2000 is unavailable. Would my Avian 100amp esc be sufficient spinning a 16 x 10 prop ?
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
I am assuming you are refering to the Dualsky ECO4130C 470kv? An eCalc calculation yields the expected maximum current draw to be 95.5amps! So, a 100amp ESC is rated too close to the 95.5 expected. Hence you see me using the 120amp ESC.
@acousticambientguitar24052 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes Yes I have the Dualsky eco4130c 470kv . What made you choose this motor ?
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
@@acousticambientguitar2405 I have a large number of sport and F3A/Pattern planes. Virtually all of them are powered by a Dualsky motor. My experience tells me they are top quality motors at very good prices. Always remember to employ "eCalc" to ensure you are selecting well matched equipment for your application!!!
@acousticambientguitar24052 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes Many thanks for the advice !!!
@davidhall43982 жыл бұрын
Hi Ed thank you for the unboxing video... I'm just in the process of building mine at the moment after owning 2 67in Slicks I've added lots of reinforcement to the small motorbox essentially making it strong enough if the prop hits the ground the PROP breaks! Instead of it ripping these extremely weak motor boxes out!!!...I added carbon fiber 4mm X 4mm rods along all 4 sides/corners and drilled holes through main motorbox firewall and glued these in place plus I also added the Balsa fillets that come with the kit down the inside corners and then glued/screwed into the ends of these to the main firewall to hold it in..plus I also made another piece of plywood and glued this onto the front face...these are weak too!! Great planes but this little motor box lets them down IMHO. What made you choose that particular Dualsky motor? I run the Dualsky GA2000R with an hobbywing 120A and it pulls 135A on a 18 x 10 prop...I love the motor 25cc petrol equivalent. I have KZbin videos if your interested under David Hall 67in Slick Love to see your progress building it.. There a lot longer than the Slick 5 inch I've also added some carbon rods to some of the vertical uprights after realising there's NO UPRIGHT VERTICAL Carbon fiber in these planes...and I've had a few tumbles with mine and the internal vertical plywood can break up... I like your idea for 3 inch Dubro wheels especially off grass strips!!! I tried one of those YEP ESC on a 60 in plane I have with a Sunnysky motor and I couldn't get a SETTING Even with the program card I tried allsorts of combinations of timing etc but gave up in the end it just kept stuttering... I'll try and upload some Video of the Motorbox modifications to KZbin.😉
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for all the helpful comments. I may yet add some of the reinforcing you suggest. To go a little more easily on the airframe, and by preference, I fly IMAC and F3A sequences only. So, by comparison with 3D motor box loading, my flying is more gentle. I have had and still have around 20 sport planes in the 20cc to 30cc size range. Check out my Pilot-RC Slick 74" Under The Hood video showing all the equipment installed. Note the motor box is replaced with fully portalised threaded rod supports - very strong. With this motor attachment system the plane sounds solid and authoritative. I have now watched your 67in Slick video - very nice.
@davidhall43982 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes Thank you Ed for replying, I really like your setup on your 74in especially the threaded bar idea brilliant 😃 I need to learn more smooth type flying it's like another skill on its own especially IMAC its truly very difficult to do I've only been back in the hobby 3 years and it's been a steep learning curve not just with the actual flying but with all the new technology/lipos but so rewarding when it comes together. It's winter here in the UK tried flying today but was a bit too windy and cold. Can't wait to receive my new ESC and external BEC and prop tomorrow in the post, still trying to source another Dualsky motor in the UK...I wish I could go bigger than the 67in but my car is too small plus they take up so my room. Good luck with your new NG look forward to some flight footage hopefully ? 😉
@chrisvernon76082 жыл бұрын
Dave did you take any photos of the mods you did ?? I just yesterday crashed my 67 inch extra, I did put extra bracing in but would like to compare, I had a dle 20 in mine, also did you use the supplied engine mount ??
@davidhall43982 жыл бұрын
@@chrisvernon7608 Hi Chris I didn't use the supplied engine mount ... I'm running the electric setup using the supplied motorbox which is very very weak ...see my other videos on my channel....I used carbon rods and extra plywood on the front... I've mended the NG many times ....and come to the conclusion the landing gear is way way too rigid it breaks the fuselage on any heavy contact ...IT SHOULD BREAK but it doesn't it rips the fusalage to bits. I have had three of the 67 NG's and only two now and one of them is two planes ...be very careful with the wing bolts and quick release mechanism....I would recommend using aluminium wing bolts or making the sliders stiffer....one of my wings came out mid flight....good luck with the repairs....I use plenty of thin CA and bi carbonate...not easy to get everything in line if it's heavily damaged...I had to move the wing tube to align with the tail....but it flies perfectly. I have one tatty plane but with expensive gear in it...so it should be reliable for a while.
@chrisvernon76082 жыл бұрын
@@davidhall4398 Oh I cannot repair it !!! its match wood, I will replace it but am looking at the 67" slick and the extra as opposed to the NG, have you any opinion on the others
@tonyg64342 жыл бұрын
Always good to watch your unboxing video's
@dn41322 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the response. Is the triangle stock used to beef up the landing gear and firewall?
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
All airframe structures are as they were out of the box. All I have added is my equipment and red-painted support platforms for that equipment.
@dn41322 жыл бұрын
How did you manage the build without the build manual? Any problems?
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
I have built plenty of these before. So, some experience helps. Try using this manual (online) which matches the 78" version quite well. pilot-rc.com/manual-extra-ng-103/
@TafariLauro2 жыл бұрын
Max size propeller? 25"?
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
Just to clarify your question, do you mean 25" prop at 12" pitch, same motor and same battery? If you did that you would blow up the motor and ESC and battery pretty quickly!! According to eCalc, all things remaining as shown and just changing the prop diameter to 21" would put the motor near to its power limit. I like to run my equipment quite cool while still getting the performance required for the aerobatics I do. I get 560watts/kg (on the equipment shown) which is plenty for easy verticals.
@TafariLauro2 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes Distance from motor center to wheels center in order to know max size prop, I´ll use different motor....
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
Plane level - distance from motor centreline to ground is approximately 330mm.
@TafariLauro2 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes ok thanks
@asommer5182 жыл бұрын
Great straight forward explanation
@darrenbeck16022 жыл бұрын
Good one Ed
@darrenbeck16022 жыл бұрын
How do the ailerons work? Are there four servos.
@eddrakes2 жыл бұрын
Yes, four servos. Two "Y" leaded for each side then carefully tuned to give virtually the same throws each for top and bottom.
@darrenbeck16022 жыл бұрын
Looks like a really nice plane
@r.cooper97902 жыл бұрын
I remember climbing up there as a young boy, I wonder if there is any fish in the rivers up there?
@juanfeliperinconcolmenares67303 жыл бұрын
Hi! Where did you get those motor support rods? How did you secure them to the motor box? Are they working well? Thanks for your answers.
@eddrakes3 жыл бұрын
3/16th or 4mm Threaded Steel Rod -------------------------------------------------------- This rod should be available from your local hardware store together with the plain nuts, nyloc nuts and washers. The result is a very strong motor mount due to multiple portal framing rigidity. Method: - Drill 4mm(+) holes accurately centred over the cross-hairs lasered into the motor box face. The hole centres should match those of the motor spider. - Dowse the holes in thin CA so as to harden up the area and resist the clamping pressure of the nuts. - Accurately calculate and cut four threaded rods long enough to position the motor with allowance for all fasteners and final adjustment. Make sure the cut ends are chamfer cut/sanded so as not to ruin the nyloc nuts as they are wound on. - The order of parts on one rod starting from inside the motor box is: Nyloc nut, washer, motor box wall, washer, plain nut (including blue thread lock), [outer end] plain nut (including blue thread lock), washer, spider arm, washer and nyloc nut. The final result is a very rigid motor support that makes for a quiet-running power system.
@juanfeliperinconcolmenares67302 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakesThank You very much, really good information. I really appreciate the detailed explanation.
@clickybread3 жыл бұрын
Hi, what is the flight time your using in this model?
@eddrakes3 жыл бұрын
4 To 5 minutes depending on how aggressive the aerobatics are.
@BossTweed693 жыл бұрын
Did you flip the polarity on the board of one of the servos? I'm new to this and I need to figure out how to do it.
@eddrakes3 жыл бұрын
Watch my other reversing video kzbin.info/www/bejne/npe3g6l8raeDnM0
@BossTweed693 жыл бұрын
@@eddrakes brilliant thanks for replying 👍legend
@BossTweed693 жыл бұрын
I have another question if you don't mind answering or pointing me in the right direction. If I wanted to add multiple servos and have them all moving and doing the exact same thing is it possible for me to hotwire all the servos and join them to the one I have connected to the board or do I have to have them all individually connected to the board and tell the board I have done so? The reason I ask is I'm a beginner and after a few hours of tinkering I have managed to get one motor working with a potentiometer connected to the board but I don't really want to learn the coding side so I figure it would be easier to connect all the other motors to the one I have set up, or would there be a power/safety issue if I did that?
@eddrakes3 жыл бұрын
@@BossTweed69 If you daisy chain them the power drain on the receiver may well shut down the receiver! You need to use a power box like this....www.ebay.com.au/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l1313&_nkw=servo+section+board&_sacat=0
@eddrakes3 жыл бұрын
The Servo Section Board feeds independent power to the servos so the receiver is protected.
@RBAERO5 жыл бұрын
Nice plane. Do you have flight videos?
@eddrakes5 жыл бұрын
Sorry no! Cannot find anyone at my club prepared to give the video job a go!