Amusing and strange to refer to such a dominant movement as unimportantly weak compared to Christianity.

Prof Gore, what edition of the bible is that, which you read from on Nicodemus? 😇

This is atrociously basic and filled with mischaracterisation of Marx and his work. Not surprised, as it comes from the US American university environment. At least the definition of psycho-genesis was all right

This series was so insightful. I am pursuing a classical education of my kids at home, so this was initially prompted by my desire to understand the Greek philosophers, and then I found the videos so interesting and easy to listen to, I couldn't stop there. Thank you, Mr. Gore!

fuel swallel

Thank you for sharing your lessons. I'm working my way through all of them.

At 9:28, my bible (KJV) says, "...from the tribe of Benjamin," not Ephraim.

I believe one of the most important if not the most important father of the Church, Saint Athanasius, said God became man that man might become God

As Christians, we must delineate that, unlike Plato, we do NOT think of the material world as being necessarily bad. That would be the gnostic heresy,.

24:45 Isn't this Apolinarism? To say the logos replaced the rational soul while the body was human.

This lecture is brainwashing not education!

He totally misrepresented Pelagius. Pelagius did not deny the necessity of grace. Pelagius Written Anathema: Synopsis: By Rev. Daniel R. Jennings, MA Around 418 Pelagius was asked by Albina, Pinianus, and Melania, wealthy Roman converts to Christianity, to provide a written condemnation of all that had been alleged against him. In response he provided the following anathema in their presence. It is unclear whether this is the complete written statement or just a fragment. It is found quoted in Augustine of Hippo’s two-part work "On The Grace Of Christ, And On Original Sin". "I anathematize the man who either thinks or says that the grace of God, whereby 'Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, is not necessary not only for every hour and for every moment, but also for every act of our lives: and those who endeavour to disannul it deserve everlasting punishment." Signed by Pelagius

"Atheists are fragile... they live in a universe that is intolerable to the human psyche. And they don't like being there, even when they say they do." Wow. That was quite the statement.

Excellent presentation of Livingstone's ministry

32:40 That's Justin Martyr right there, isn't it?

The 4 cardinal virtues are explicited in the Republic. Is this a platonic concept or a platonic concept that has become general, in some sense?

Thank you for uploading these!! I just discovered them, and they are so helpful and informative

Thank you very much Mr Gore, this series has been incredibly helpful! God bless.

Thank you Bruce! Mike in the UK😊

25:51 very interesting

Lewis John Clark Frank Gonzalez Michelle

Williams Thomas Lopez Nancy Garcia Mark

Davis Steven Allen Kimberly Thompson George

Thomas Laura Taylor John Jones Gary

Me screaming "efficient cause"

When I first read the passage concerning "Let us do evil so that good may come" I took it as an indictment of a "The ends justify the means" mentality. If I rob a store to feed the hungry, I hve still sinned, and deserve the punishmemt I will receive. My good works in feeding the hungry do not justify my breaking from faith, to act is a faithful manner. I do appreciate another view Mr. Gore. Thank you for your public ministry.

Excellent work! Helping me a lot in reading Bible. Have a question , missing something in understanding how Phythagoras who believes in Body/Soul dualism be monist?

Excellent, Lessons from you and David Pawson helped me in better understanding the scriptures. Do we have a physical copy of your book?

This was brilliant and essential. Thanks

It’s such an exciting feeling to give an answer that the professor doesn’t know what to do with the way Nichole did. It doesn’t mean you’re correct but it means you’re thinking and making the professor think too

credit goes to this woman for giving Jesus ''food'' for thought.

Barth seems to have been a man full of contradictions. He build his theology on Hegelian dialectics and Keirkegaardian Existentialism, then claimed to be entirely against human reason. And as for his claim that God is "wholly other", how can we know such an unknowable God, never mind love a God who we have nothing in common with?

25:30 sounds to me like Plotinus was the original Kant

poor Christa :(

This teacher I’m not sure if he’s a professor. I think he teaches like a someone would teach a dog how to do tricks. This teacher has. Arrogance. When the student had an idea he replies oh I’ve never heard that before get your PhD write a paper and come back to me to me and maybe we can talk about it. Instead of addressing it maybe later with the student, he just wants people to remember what he said not to actually interact with him With dialogue. He’s just there to preach. He’s a soffit. He’s there to collect his paycheck a test and go home at night not really a philosophy, teacher or professor more like a dog trainer training at students oh, you don’t have to memorize this name because I’m not gonna test you on that just memorize what I’m gonna test you on don’t even think about what it actually means and how pertains to you just listen, so you can pass the test that way I’ll keep my job

Just love you man! Been learning and affirming so much. There is no doubt the Lord led me to you. None. I've been watching now for a steady couple years, and found your deeper site with what seems like all your lessons. SUPER GROOVY on that! Thank you Mr. Gore. Thank you brother. The Lord's blessing on you and yours. Peace

I am currently into platonic dialogues and this is really great. The Fedon references were caught! You're amazing, professor.

Two things are almost criminal about this content. 1. That we on KZbin get this level of education for free 2. That more people don’t know about this channel and content. Thank you Mr. Gore, thank you

It should be added (something else I was unaware of as a Mormon youth) that Lucifer is considered the brother of Jesus. The temptation of Eve in the garden was likely an invitation to become like other Elohim, such as that of the angels, which likely was very appealing to her. Elohim is a very general term used of ALL divine beings. Jehovah is a divine being, but so are angels, cherubim, seraphim, and all of God’s divine council and all the rest of our Heavenly Father’s host. Eve was tempted by the Serpent (likely a winged Seraphim who was cursed to crawl on his belly and no longer granted accessibility to ascend to heaven). She likely saw this as a way to improve herself to a deification status and become immortal. Only problem is, how God made humanity was very good, and needed no improvements from them. I see this as the same teaching Mormonism promotes…to become gods (Elohim). It’s a slippery slope they are embarking upon to follow this line of temptation. It’s basically saying, what God made is inferior and not good enough the way He made mankind.

I was raised Mormon, but even as a twelve year old, I started seeing contradictions with the church dogma as it compares to the teachings of Jesus Christ. I’d even been deemed “holy enough” to go to the temple and be “baptized for the dead”. My grandmother was heavily involved in genealogical research. I eventually left when I was almost an adult and let the church know to remove me from their records. Mormonism doctrine has so many elements of Gnosticism in it which is why it aligns with Freemasonry. The more I learn about distinctions between New Age/Gnosticism/Occult versus Christianity, the clearer these lines of demarcation become. The Mormon teaching of who Jesus is as the resulting offspring of Elohim/Mary uniting is nothing short of the Genesis 6 account of “Elohim” (a plural term pertaining to ALL celestial, divine, spiritual beings, angels [aka Sons of God] included) taking the daughters of men (human women) and producing offspring of Giants (Hebrew: Nephelim). This would make Jesus a Nephelim according to their tradition, and God Almighty a common lesser deity…precisely what Gnosticism teaches about the demiurge, the pleroma and relegates Jesus Christ to nothing more than one of the aeons.

"Sacramental Brownies" lol Thank you for such a informative and healthy teaching. Grace to you Bruce.

Based 😇

Thank you Bruce

Could one say that, as greek accents were pitch accents, all the logic behind accentuantion is to produce something like a RE-DO-DO, and never a RE-DO-DO-DO? For example, if the ultima is long, it has already two beats for the DO-DO. So, the penult must be the RE, and have an acute accent to raise the pitch. If the ultima is short, it is one DO. If, then, the penult is long, it must be the RE-DO-DO, so, it must have a circumflex, in order to rise the pitch to RE and than fall back to DO.

Ty very much for the lesson

God had a dilemma? I dont believe that at all. His Plan, His Rules

How can people call themselves Christians and yet celebrate pagan and satanic festivities such as Halloween? That's beyond me 😒

Hello Bruce, I’m curious why you throw in the word “Friday?”Should we be well aware that the Gregorian calendar wasn’t even in effect on the 14th day of the first month of Abib the year our Savior was slaughtered to cover our sins? During the reformation, one of the big deals that solidified the Catholic Church not taking the Protestants seriously, and considering them simply being naughty children to their mother church, was that they didn’t seek to follow the actual calendar, and ALL 10 of the 10 commandments that the Catholic Church modified by removing #2, changing the Sabbath to a Sun Day worship and splitting #10 into two to make up for #2 being removed. I think after reading about the slaughter of the Goths and Vandals in the 3rd and 4th centuries, I wonder if the Catholic Church slaughtered most of the communities who did operate by a different calendar and set of observance days. It’s also pretty well understood that the Jews who rejected our Messiah seemed to have twisted their calendars by the 3rd century to fit their new religious observances, so I think we also seem to know it isn’t Saturn’sday either. Furthermore, the months were probably not based off of a crescent moon (which the Book of Judges goes into some detail how that got popularized). The reformers were being told that if they truly were to break off and be separated from the Catholic Church, that they should give up the Sun’sday worship that the Pope declared as the worship on the venerable day of the sun, and all who didn’t would be considered heretics. The New Covenant makes it fairly clear we have freedom to worship every day, but as far as following the Popes calendar and man made worship days that aren’t aligned with Leviticus 23, it seems like it is a bit disingenuous for me to adhere to them as my belief grows closer to Him and not a religious structure. Could you share how you understand and reconcile the church observing days that aren’t actually in line with the Leviticus 23 moedim, even though all of the ways our Savior fulfilled Scripture were done on the actual days on the timeline of Leviticus 23? And if there are still a few days to fulfill before the end, is it worth at least entertaining the idea that we should know when those 7th month days actually are? Not what religiosity has decided on a calendar made popular by a pope?

Job 19:25-27, it's said they look to the cross ✝️ while we look back to the cross ✝️

A textbook of this entire playlist would be awesome tho