Very interesting. Thank you for posting.

What a great video, and i love you hair 😁

Eagleton: you are a marxist puppet

The "standing room" is about Nick and the Marthas having to stand: Offred kneels ("I don't sit, but take my place, kneeling..."). The comments made on the oppression should be directed towards the orderly fashion everyone is subjected to not just Offred

this talk and vivek are just something else man. wow

❤❤❤FREE PALESTINE❤❤❤

Stumbled on another Vivek lecture which surprised me by its cultural explanation of the defeat of the socialist momentum of the anti-colonial struggle… it’s apparently the Black and Brown academics seeking career prospects responsible for the weakness of Marxist politics!!! Whatever happened to the materialist analysis!!!

Wonderful lecture, the speaker begins and ends with affirmative quotations of Franz Fanon in making an appeal to a return to Solidarity, as apposed to the contemporary currents of identitarian reduction.

What an absolutely observant comment the sitting room.

These arguments were old and completely discredited 50-60 years ago. He's deliberately ignoring the very real issues that are unique to the many groups he says should assimilate. Assimilation has been proven to be a form of identity death. The answer to this was multiculturalism. These identities he complains of were chosen by the groups involved. They were not forced onto people. His argument is weak as he flounders during his talk and during his answers during question time. Allowing people to be themselves does not weaken a society, it makes it more cohesive. I think he's actually advocating a monocultural England and perhaps advocating a very strict immigration policy that excludes migrants who are not the same as white Britons. He wants to go backward to some mythical golden age. If this past golden age was brought back, there would be no place for him in it. Question: in his world do brown people fit into England and English society?

Interesting

thank you, mr. chibber.

There is no ‘return’ that is tlamduicz Marxism doesn’t mean ‘politics k agree with’ or ‘true liberation’

54:14 that is what ‘Marxism’ for the sake of being Marxism. So-called ‘National liberation’ is blamehvil esque and Talmudic, it’s not a tradition worth building on itself. It is often dilettantishly particular it’s and also pseudo-liberators, seeking a single organ of total rule making it not better. Sacrifice’one’s won’t is skemthinf as Apple I’m fmaialir wkth Jan repvitolary cknetx. It paces a GREAT debt on what you are fighting for being right and jsut The ideals of humanity were recognised there and outside and elsewhere and Tenure debates are fine

53:13 ‘returning’ to ‘Marxism’ 53:130 that is a ridiculously dubious revisionist stance. The issue was conflict on the Hanoi Moscow axis and differential policies, cost cutting and wishing not to be too obdurate. You can tell a Mirror sorry of this isn a pro US way

51:59 I don’t lk the terminology

50:51 dpeends whcih ones, this is really trying to railroad one ‘true communsit’ and also ‘mark st’ ideolgy and lionise it and to call everything else not to. Thsi SK false. Yes there was professionally responsibly nameable Marxism. Marxism isn’t sth let alone it intrinsically good or true sighted, truly analytical

49:34 ‘the’- dubious An important moment in thsi area dk history for understanding later history. It was presaged

31:06 there were different structures within them There were tons of different ideologies and movements, the issue was not consciously trying not to be alone, but trying to didn’t hints that fit their image, while at the same time some levels made sens I would say this is very partial A lot do the movements esp agains they Vietnam war was extremely diverse ideologically an internet terms of specific positions ‘Marxism’ can be many things it shouldn’t be vlaiursed The structure of academia has a lot for lack

14:44 or of thsi variant of orientalist There is gradation, orie talos m can just mean study of one area by another, it can be critical, contra sadi

So interesting! thank you.

Said takes a lot of flak for Orientalism (some of it justified) but he was and is so much more than just one book. You get the sense that the essence of Said is some form of democratic humanism. Given what is going on in the world today any form of humanism would be welcome.

Thanks this was really well done

In 1978, the Palestinian-American professor Edward Wadie Saïd published Orientalism, in which he studied the West’s conception of the Orient World and criticized modern imperialism. Orientalism is a masterpiece that contributed to the development of postcolonial studies. Just made this animated video about this book. Enjoy it! kzbin.info/www/bejne/i4OVgoJrnrqCb6M

All your ideas lead to the proposal that fools rule and intelligent people be removed. This leads to bankruptcy. State ownership and other nonsense that lead to poverty. I lived this in Eastern Europe and I am disgusted by such ideas.

127 / 5.000 Rezultatele traducerii Could I say that the communists from Romania (where I live) and from other eastern countries made fun of their countries and people?

I agree.

Going out with a BANG!

Very impressively articulated realities

How can I reach Professor Gurnah. I am working on a book on him. Besides, I am doing my PhD on Mr. Gurnah's fictional oeuvre. Is it possible to meet him in person in Kent or anywhere else in Britain? If yes, how? Does he respond to e-mails? Univesity of Kent, please let me know. I am from India and I teach in a college here in the department of English and cultural studies.

Proud of Mr. Gurnah and remember his play called Jambazi at Lumumba College.1967?

Blacks gained our freedom

This was really informative and interesting, thank you so much.

"You can't have racial oppression without class oppression." Seems obvious, but really cuts through a lot.

was the sitting room quote that exact page because I couldn't find i tin the Handmaid book

What scares me about the economic segment is that I can fully imagine the private sector simply dominating these new industries, controlling the house,health and transport of newly trained workers and having huge workforces indebted to them.

What the Globalist orgainized Crime Hates the Most We the people want to know where every DIME is going and to whom. They will create a war or whatever it takes to get you to stop asking.that question please start asking that question before they hide their crimes against HUMANITY.

Vivvek not white labels but INDEGENOUS ism, hindutva, got all served starting peasantry to upwards. Adthianath #yogi

We are imperilised in UK, kept in dark imperilised kzbin.info/www/bejne/iGrFZoaDaclmpM0

Does one feel oppressed if it is not defined for them? 🤔 Insightful for sure. Enlightening even.

where can we find the text of this lecture?

HOW CAN YOU SAY PAN ARAB IS PROGRESSIVE???????!!!!!!!!! IT WAS PRO NAZI. IT WAS RACIST TOWARDS NONE ARABS!!!!!!!! TURKS BLACKS IN AFRICA KURDS PERSIANS ETC........ PAN ARAB=RACIST ARAB FASCISM!!!!!!!!!!! EAND OF DISCUSSION!!!!!!!!!!!.......

Such a treasure to the world. What a beautiful human being.

CONGRATULATION MR. GURNAH

Insighful

Fantastic presentation. Worth watching two or three times.

I am currently reading Paradise by Gurnah. He writes beautifully, his narration captures one's entire attention, and the pace of the story develops moderately. It was surprising to see the reference to kyrgyz (p.105). I am originally from Kyrgyzstan.

that first question i was like.. what? what is she trying to say/ask? and then chibber was like "i don't understand" so yeah, wtf

Wasn't Freddy Mercury of Zanzibari descent too?

Zanzibar Ix my mother lnd