Her art in contrast to here beliefs is ironic ashell

Excelente artista plastíco.

idek how this is considered "art" not even that difficult to make lmao

This is the stupidest thing I’ve ever seen

💀🌈🚮 ✌️🚬🗿

Omg (deadpan)

Art has been lost. I don't care what word salad you make up for this stuff it's not skillful art. If it is I got a 9 year old that will blow you away. Bidding starts at 100K for their "crayon period" works. LOL

MY DAD

Noice plz reply

Leo Frontini: Of Awe & Humility June 20 - July 27, 2024 1969 Gallery Leo Frontini’s practice begins with quick sketches that capture figures and scenes, which are then transformed into detailed paintings. He sees his painting as metaphors that incorporate surreal and romantic narratives. Frontini uses music and a structured studio practice to facilitate his creative expression.

Much better art.

😍

Cest vraiment beau!

Tuttle cannot hold a candle to Frank Stella!

I would love a piece really awesome

This makes me feel nothing. It's too lacking. Maybe the artist explanation piece could help, but overall, it kinda leaves you wanting a real piece of art..

Oh I love it so much😢😢😊😊😊

I don't get it.

Very cool sculptures. Love it.

Not sure what it is , it is BEAUTIFUL.❤❤❤❤

thankyou for the time and effort to do this. Many artists and I know think this is great. I have recommended it to classes an in lecture I presented. Great!

Me: nice splatter of paint

Much of contemporary painting has reverted back to foreground, middle ground, and background tropes. Representation, figuration, and subject matter reign. Issues matter. Yes, Clement Greenberg was fiction but is what we have now any better? The problem is our eyes see fast. We instantly assimilate images and quickly become bored. Rehashing visual conventions are often unsuccessful and, to be fair, most abstraction is a regurgitation of the past too. Art is no longer the zeitgeist it once was. Besides Jackson Pollock, the closest the art world had to putting an artist on the cover of Time Magazine was either Jeff Koons or Matthew Barney. That time has past. Beeple stirred a bit of controversy but, for most people, it's more engaging to swipe left and swipe right. In this sea of the new normal, painting doesn't care. Painting is still, quiet, and anachronistic. Even so, the paintings of Thomas Nozkowski's make quite a noise, the antithesis of Rothko's vibrating hum. Spirituality is replaced by transgression, uncertainty, and the chattering of teeth. If art mirrors our times, Nozkowski's pulse was prescient, aligned more with the existential angst of Jordan Wolfson and Neo Rauch than with his own generation. Thomas Nozkowski's paintings are not "a celebration of form and color." He plows through abstract expressionism and minimalism with a sneer. He's inspired by the slippage between thoughts, images, things, and patterns. Nozkowski's paintings do something. They function. Some paintings exhibit a perverse humor. Their enigmatic presence is remarkable considering they're directly and simply painted on a small scale. In an age of oversized art in oversized galleries, Nozkowski's honest work shuns grandiosity, like Vemeer's, "The Lacemaker" mocking David's histrionic, "Coronation of Napoleon". One of Nozkowski's predecessors is Myron Stout, whose black & white paintings cohabit a space between abstraction and non-representaion. Google search Stout's "Untitled", 1957 - 1968, at the Yale University Art Gallery. Like Nozkowski's work, it's a small oil painting, consisting of a white "V" shaped figure on a black ground. Myron Stout's "Untitled", is simple in form but, "What is it?" "What's it doing?" The white shape is simultaneously flat and deep, receding and advancing, every rounded corner different from the next. Stretching. Pulling. Doing no-thing. Its graphic simplicity resists assimilation. Nozkowski's, "Untitled", takes Stout's "V" and turns it into a right angle swimming pool in the middle of a Van Gogh wheatfield. Disagree and you'd be correct. The painting just sits there, neither affirming nor denying your thoughts because, of course, painting does none of these things. It's neither a representational take on Myron Stout's "V" nor an abstraction. Like the shutter of a camera lens, it closes, resisting interpretation. Not to be outdone is a simple lime green shape on a grey background. Empty of detail and minimal in construct, it is perhaps the most vexing painting in the show. Is it a pixelated artichoke? Nothing coalesces. Questions beget more questions. Like many of Nozkowski's paintings, the image is unpinnable and is frankly, odd. In another "Untitled" painting, the painting is both a cartoonish take on Hokusai's, "The Great Wave of Kanagawa" and a character from Dr. Seuss... 'Clark' in the park. There are other painters whose work shares an affinity with Nozkowski. Albert Pinkham Ryder, Forest Bess, and Gertrude Abercrombie were artists who also worked on a small scale outside the mainstream. Their internal dialog with the world couldn’t care less about the official canon of art history. Thomas Nozkowski's vision was no less singular. We were lucky to have him.

So tired of watching Mexican men and women producing art on this childish level. Mr. Montes please get an attorney and sue the institutions you graduated from for not teaching you how to draw and paint on a mature level. Joy Levelle was a great artist but she shouldn't be your hero, IMO.

Can I show my art to an art director please?

No men in NYC. That's new.🤦‍♂️

I like that you show close-ups but please somehow tell us who the artists are & if there is a label show that too.

I don’t understand art.

Just usual crap, this "art" would be forgotten in 2-3- years/

Epic

Wow , love to see this in person.

So it’s basically fabric curtains hanging in the windows? 😂

Wowness! He’s definitely in a league all his own. Thanks for the video. Got anything longer for Stella? Would love some slow pans to really soak up the textures and forms. Cheers!

Thank you for highlighting the life of this man; I will not forget his name.

Thank you so much for sharing the experience of this exhibit. Eric White surely has a deep thought provoking narrative with this collection. Great job capturing it. Your commentary was very informative, but if you do not mind me asking, what were your feelings and thoughts after taken in the show? Appreciate you.🙏🏽

Epic 🎉

I’m getting pretty bored of majority black women shit. I wanna go to an art gallery and be impressed not made to suddenly turn sorrowful and guilty.

Excellent!

He looks like Jeff goldblum

Which artists are these? Love the glass pieces and the wall pieces around 17 mins. What gallery? What show?

WOW!

Большой фотоальбом. Только это не искусство. Фотограф ничего не теряет и не приобретает.

Im sorry i love art and have dedicated my life to its creation, but this is garbage at least its visually interesting but that's it. I understand why these pieces are important to the history of art, but i just don't get why people have to come up with these bs essays for describing a painting of DIFFERENT COLORED SQUARES.

🔥🔥🔥

A glimpse into how things change but still remain the same

For certain her style of art is unique as well as pretty

Those are nice works!❤

This is so cool

Lovely précis of what the exhibition is about, nice to hear someone who understands Ryman’s thinking in these works. 👏