Пікірлер
@BintonB 7 күн бұрын
this is what happens when you dont caution it the first time in this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/d6TMkHl_eKyAoas
@nbranski43 7 күн бұрын
The review comes down to whether or not there is clear and indistinguishable evidence that an error occurred. A lot of people in these comments are really popping off in confidence that the player who received the ball first was onside, but if you freeze frame it at the appropriate ... I don't know how anybody can be so confident in saying onside. The angle, as good as it is, is not enough ... there are touch tight moments with heels off the ground between both players that could have lead to either one of them being behind the other at any given moment. That to me is what this is about. It *looks* like it was probably onside, but that isn't enough to overturn the call on the field. By the same token, had the official decided the call on the field was onside and it was a good goal, there would be equally not enough evidence to overturn it. This is what happened on PSU's first goal, which was reviewed for offside as well but stood, even though on the replay it appeared to be offside with the angle. In every controversial moment of review in this game, the tyranny of the on the call field was absolute. Both Penn State goals, several incidents that could have given UNC a PK, the red card review, the final goal in OT (had it been reviewable)... all of the calls on the field stood because there was no where near enough evidence to overturn it.
@SamuelPearlman 3 сағат бұрын
0:43 The call on the field was GOAL (at least that's what the announcers said twice). And the video is pretty clear the attacker was onside. If the call on the field WAS offside, then I could see this maybe being too close to overturn.
@dextermcgrubbin 13 күн бұрын
Low impulse control
@ChrisJones-us5dl 15 күн бұрын
ONSIDE both times.
@tomolson5913 18 күн бұрын
Not a goal.
@briankaskie7014 18 күн бұрын
Fairly easy decision as they got it right. Defender was not in playable position as ball was well-hit to her opposite site thus reactionary deflection to Penn in offside position....ergo, gaining an advantage. Great job crew.
@johnandrews5141 17 күн бұрын
If it was a "reactionary deflection" as you describe. You need to go back to the last time BLUE played the ball. You can only be offside when it is played by a teammate. So, when blue played it, #25 was onside. Therefore it doesn't matter where blue is when it deflects off of the white defender. The determination of offside is not at this moment. Yes, if, when the ball was kicked by blue, #25 was in an offside position, and it was a deflection, she would be offside. But, she wasn't. Goal stands.
@ShaunFleming 13 күн бұрын
You can't say that the defender wasn't in a playable position simply because the ball was played to her non-dominant foot. It was very easily playable if she chose to use her right, instead of reaching across her body with her left. And besides being a deliberate play, the attacker who received the ball was onside when the ball was played by her teammate. I'm really wracking my brain trying to understand why the referees let the offside call stand after review.
@Camden0800 13 күн бұрын
Neither of the attackers were in an offside position at any point……
@briankaskie7014 13 күн бұрын
@Camden0800 yes they were at time of initial blue kick to UNC #2. That is clear and obvious. Yet, second phase of play she would be onside. However, the initial call negates following opportunities.
@briankaskie7014 13 күн бұрын
@@ShaunFlemingno need to rack as the officials, including self watching phase of play, UNC #2 was running to left appearing to anticipate yet ball delivery was to inside. We are taught to confirm if defender was in playable position and with her right foot she would have also had to reach... rather....if she missed ball entirely, would penn have been in offside position? Start there and work backwards. Cheers...🎉
@johnandrews5141 19 күн бұрын
So, what the referee showed is the foul by blue was only a YC. RC only because of 2 YCs. Should have given a straight RC for the challenge. Blue will get a longer suspension for a RC rather than 2 YC.
@RSQ-z4m 19 күн бұрын
Two players were offside as of when the pass *was made*. It does not matter what what happens to the pass.
@johnandrews5141 17 күн бұрын
One was onside #25 . Who eventually played the ball.
@SamuelPearlman 12 күн бұрын
The attacker who ran onto the ball was onside, freeze the video when it is kicked by the offense.
@RSQ-z4m 4 сағат бұрын
@@SamuelPearlman At :46, when the all is struck, a PSU player is offside. An offside is called when the ball is kicked. There is no waiting to see who plays the ball after that.
@SamuelPearlman 3 сағат бұрын
@@RSQ-z4m That is 100% incorrect. Offside is a violation. Just because "some other player" was in an offside position does not result in an offside call, and offside is DEFINTELY not called when the ball is kick. Whether or not a player was in an _offside position_ is judged when it is kicked, but the violation is judged after that player interferes. As this is a US college match I'll quote from the appropriate Rulebook: "Rule 11: Offside. t is not an offense to be in an offside position. [...] A player shall be declared offside and penalized only if, at the time the ball touches or is played by a teammate, the player is in an offside position and then: 11.2.1 interferes with an opponent ... 11.2.2 interferes with play by touching or playing a ball that was passed or touched by a teammate; or 11.2.3 gains an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent ..."
@tomolson5913 19 күн бұрын
Correct call. 1st PS touch was offsides when she touched the ball. Ref got it right
@Ancty678 18 күн бұрын
completely wrong, first player who touched the ball is clearly onside bc the girl in white is behind her. goal should have stood
@SamuelPearlman 12 күн бұрын
Just freeze-frame it when it was kicked by her teammate, she was actually kept onside by the defender next to her who was running forward.
@kennygismo6315 22 күн бұрын
penn st sucks.
@johnandrews5141 22 күн бұрын
Good call by the official. White initiated contact with red. He knew what he was doing. 2-2 tie and 7 min left. He was looking for a PK.
@johnandrews5141 23 күн бұрын
100 % a goal. The defender in white at the top of the arc puts blue #25 onside. Attacker who scored was behind the ball when #25 passed it to her left. This is a good goal, no offside in both cases.
@diegobarboza-z4u 18 күн бұрын
You're wrong, there is a new where a if an oppenent touches the ball and your in an offside position will be called
@johnandrews5141 17 күн бұрын
@@diegobarboza-z4u you need to go back to when the original kick was by the blue player near centre stripe. At that point' blue 25 was onside. The determination of offside is not when it is played by white defender. It is when it is played by BLUE. If it is a deliberate play by white, blue positioning is a moot point. If it is not deliberate and is a deflection, then we must determine the status of the blue player. Which goes back to the kick from near centre. Therefore, onside and this goal should stand. So, you need to educate yourself on the Law. So, it is more than just "touching" the ball by the defender in determining offside. I hope this helps you as an official. If you are not an official, please do not embarrass yourself by commenting that people are wrong when you clearly do not know the LOTG. So....I am not wrong.
@Washboard-l2j 15 күн бұрын
@@johnandrews5141 So the officials on the field looking at a replay were wrong? I've got my money on them, not you.
@ShaunFleming 14 күн бұрын
@@diegobarboza-z4u can you quote the rule? I'm reading the NCAA rules and don't see anything that would make this offside.
@FavreianVengeance 27 күн бұрын
Probably the wrong call. No way of knowing based on this footage though.
@thedahkterizzin8831 28 күн бұрын
Easy call. Pen. Two handed push. No attempt to Play the ball.
@rizzivideocollection1902 28 күн бұрын
Correct call by referee - IFK at spot of infraction. Not sure that ND goalie in green jersey is maintaining mandatory 1 yd separation from the wall but error is Standford's wall which jumps and moves/twists, allowing the deflection for a goal. STUNNER - Stanford scores seconds later on a long shot to win the game!
@maumor2 Ай бұрын
How about college gets rid of the stupid countdown clock? CRAZY IDEA
@johnandrews5141 Ай бұрын
NOT offside. JMU player on the far right was just standing there. She did not become involved in active play, did not interfere with opponent or play. You cannot say the white player was impacted by JMU player position. It is not part of the considerations.
@johnandrews5141 Ай бұрын
RC for white #10. YC for blue #20. Restart blue FK for original foul. It HAS to be red because of kick AND gesture to blue player.
@keithwetherhold1255 Ай бұрын
That was a weak yellow! I've seen a LOT worse not given a card
@johnandrews5141 Ай бұрын
She got stepped on by her teammate #34. No foul. Good management of situation. Have AR and/or 4th help with the benches for water by teams. Good job
@johnandrews5141 Ай бұрын
This is not an intentional handball. It is clearly outlined in the IFAB. Ball was kicked by a teammate. As is when you kick the ball and it hits your own hand. No infringement.
@maumor2 Ай бұрын
I refuse to watch college soccer until they get rid of the dumb time clock
@grumpyref Ай бұрын
No caution (at least) for the tackle??
@TheMrBbab 2 ай бұрын
I can't find what 27 did
@micklewis9691 5 ай бұрын
SPA-2 defenders on their recovery runs and there was a legitimate attempt to play the ball from the keeper.
@saleemabufares4292 5 ай бұрын
The commentator 😂
@AhmedHassan-ed5ue Жыл бұрын
Short game
@saleemabufares4292 2 жыл бұрын
There was no stop clock signal 😂
@saleemabufares4292 2 жыл бұрын
Well done 'flagsman'
@daviddonayre2654 2 жыл бұрын
wow, that ref didn't have the balls to show a red card!
@guntherrankenburg2628 3 жыл бұрын
never a pen
@izzymoody7781 3 жыл бұрын
#3 is crazy
@izzymoody7781 3 жыл бұрын
should’ve been a red card smh
@saleemabufares4292 3 жыл бұрын
Great run and coverage near the end...!
@laylorene1720 3 жыл бұрын
jl3q7 vur.fyi
@saleemabufares4292 3 жыл бұрын
Ouch!!! I hope you weren't laughing...