Extremely informative and interesting, of course, but let's not forget his superb delivery in a lecture theatre. He makes it seem so easy, and so easy for his audience. Exemplary.
@HousmanBrandon-r8p2 ай бұрын
Thompson John Garcia Mark Taylor Ruth
@AlaouiRochdi2 ай бұрын
ايام زمان لاتعد
@JoyceElroy-z9w2 ай бұрын
Brown Frank Martinez William White David
@jackymarcel41082 ай бұрын
Moore Edward Garcia Donald Jones David
@jackymarcel41082 ай бұрын
Perez Daniel Lopez Ronald Anderson Nancy
@IMAHMS3 ай бұрын
Clearly, to identify objects as distict things, is a motor function; it pertains to what can be done with that object. Moreover, the syntax structure of language is that of representing an action, and the area of language formation in the brain (Broca's area) is located in the frontal lobe pre-motor area which is involved in planning actions.
@abderrahimighous763 ай бұрын
آتمنى لك كل الخير والتوفيق وإن شاء الله تكون في أحسن حال باذن الله.
@johnhelm62313 ай бұрын
Linguistic studies 💯.
@e.c.38444 ай бұрын
PBSNewsHour
@e.c.38444 ай бұрын
But Yesterday I Spoke with Prime Minister Trudeau.
@e.c.38444 ай бұрын
NOAM CHOMSKY AMERICAN PROFESSOR
@e.c.38444 ай бұрын
Governor Chowdhury
@e.c.38444 ай бұрын
Mike Bloomberg Former Governor of New York City
@e.c.38444 ай бұрын
Governor Bloomberg
@e.c.38444 ай бұрын
Michael Bloomberg Blue Eyes.
@e.c.38444 ай бұрын
Prime Minister Bidon and President Bloomberg
@bilalmohammed04 ай бұрын
Noam Chomsky, Fundamental Issues in Linguistics (April 2019 at MIT) - Lecture 1 - what are the fundamental computational operations that enter into constructing syntactic objects and why are these and others? - what are we trying to achieve in the study of language? - Galileo was awed by the question "How do finite means produce infinite means?" -language and individuals' languages are unique to humans. -capturing the notion in the mind that enables us to construct in our minds infinite expressions is difficult which behaviorists ignored. Unlike behaviorism, which was concerned with external structures of language, innatism was concerned with the notion of internal structure in the mind which led the study of language to be in the natural science, ie., biolinguistics is one example. - the I-language, the basic property of language, the internal system/the finite system became the subject of study in the study of language in the 20th century. - how the speaker of a language selects a syntactic object out of an infinite array is a total mystery. - the acquisition of the I-language is encountered with a couple of conflicting conditions, learnability, and evolvability. - how can we take simple operations, like Merge, to achieve genuine explanations? -dislocation and compositionally put together yield genuine explanation.
@madelinemontalvo61515 ай бұрын
It would be great if we were all as intelligent ! He's a gem.
@ouedribabdellah39095 ай бұрын
فن اصيل يطرب القلب،و العقل،ثرات مغربي اصيل.
@leonsantamaria98456 ай бұрын
What and what.... professor Noam Chomsky....l will understand... you..class...l mad my self.....(Merge...p,q, ws....a,b....👍👋😄
@leonsantamaria98456 ай бұрын
Im domy ...l don't understand to much... and I don't like....l like to understand....lm so mad my self...l love to learning linguistics, is not easy.... get Noam Chomsky...👍😵💫
@scottcampbell73846 ай бұрын
Mental giant, moral fool. I can still see him singing with Hugo Chavez before the demise of Venezuela. After the demise was well underway, Noam tried to back pedal with the typical "nobody ever does socialism right" lame excuse. PS_ I adore the comments...I haven't seen this much fawning since Bambi was released by Walt Disney studious in 1942.
@simo566 ай бұрын
الملحون فن مغربي عريق بدايته كانت في العصر الموحدي في القرن 12
@czarquetzal834410 ай бұрын
I like the philosophical foundation of his linguistics - Essentialism. It retains something that cannot be fully grasped by empirical science
@markdavid120811 ай бұрын
Nice to hear the late Jim McCawley get a couple shoutouts.
@carlitosgl Жыл бұрын
without exception, except for head movement 🤪25:03
@lagartogoldin3 ай бұрын
Estoy con vos.
@AsEnIxX-wtf Жыл бұрын
Thanks for uploading the two lectures.
@ArunVBM23ID100 Жыл бұрын
That Wink....
@KUP-g3k Жыл бұрын
wow! a legend!
@Josephus_vanDenElzen Жыл бұрын
1:50 Galileo 2:08 How is it possible to express an inffinite number of ideas with a couple of dozens sounds, which in itself have nothing in common with the thoughts in our minds and allow us to understand what is not present in consicousness? That's indeed an interesting question. But, doesn't he goes too far with 3:06 "everything we can conceive and the most diverse movements of our soul" Some experiences are auditory and visual; consider colours, one can tell a blind man everything there is to know about colours and yet when he would miraculously starts seeing for the first time his experience will be expanded.
@halfcadence141711 ай бұрын
Conception and expression are not the same thing
@farahali5754 Жыл бұрын
Perfect , A few good men
@farahali5754 Жыл бұрын
بحترم جداااااااا كبار السن في التعليم لا مثيل لهم Youth , his body language is more than mental expressions and thoughts
@casteretpollux Жыл бұрын
Language is social and historic and evolves rapidly in a social context and changing world. It's for communication. I'm.not seeing any mystery. Would anyone like to explain?
@atheoma Жыл бұрын
the mistery has been repeatedly articulated by noam in numerous interviews and lectures including this one. namely, the spoken/written language seemingly operates as a linear representation of symbols. on the other hand, reading or listening to a speech, we effectively ignore the linear sequence of words and decode the message as a complex structure which is not explicitly given. that means, we posses implicit ability to process any message tho this ability is totally separated from conciousness and unreachable by introspection. human kids demonstrate an exclusive ability to acquire language instinctly, long before they obtain enough linguistic data to learn the sintactic rules by statistic generalization of experience. the language is used almost exclusively for generating thought. humans, just as other animals, didn’t need language to communicate. being unable to generate complex recursive sintactic structures, big apes have still a profound system of communication with which they can communicate efficiently and sufficiently. the organs of speech were there long before the emergence of language so as in animals. try to scientifically explain all this with trivial statements like ‘language is social and historic and evolves rapidly in a social context and changing world’.
@czarquetzal834411 ай бұрын
Read poetry. Is the language of poetry serves to communicate?
@ghofranemohamed6782 Жыл бұрын
He's genius,😍
@linguistics1224 Жыл бұрын
What is this about?
@emiliogonzalez1412 Жыл бұрын
That questioner is pretty confused by Noam’s use of the word neural nets but I think he doesn’t know the term refers to both biological and artificial systems. It’s just common to use it in an artificial context these days.
@two_kopecks2 жыл бұрын
16
@dyssakis2 жыл бұрын
It's sad that the recording sucks so much
@LS-cc1zs2 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/aero/PLQGhw3BO_rdsQBzdiboBGaOYu-wbWBzVl Could you please share it for the others and me? I hope you like it ^^
@navenchang2 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@user-cx5ni7me6l2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the upload.
@abdulatifhamid10112 жыл бұрын
wow indeed he is a greatest linguist
@noresponse10682 жыл бұрын
He still alive?
@inef852 жыл бұрын
12:18 "Voluntary action is not a question which is currently fit for productive inquiry. " 👍 Brilliant response to the next time someone asks me why i broke something
@beahumane2 жыл бұрын
Great👌👌 #beahumane
@سارهمحمد-ث4ش4ض2 жыл бұрын
Good morning I have reserch how can I be in contact with you thanks
@Lokitofrances2 жыл бұрын
Hello everyone! Could someone translate these lectures into Spanish? I'm very interested, but I don't understand any English. Thanks
@megakeenbeen2 жыл бұрын
What's the spelling of the person he referenced? Rene Huybrechts?