Abdessamia Bencheikh

Пікірлер

@CrichtonChristian-l9j 4 күн бұрын

Moore Susan Young Sharon White Amy

@HousmanBrandon-r8p 9 күн бұрын

Thompson John Garcia Mark Taylor Ruth

@JoyceElroy-z9w 11 күн бұрын

Jackson Kimberly Hall Christopher Brown John

@AlaouiRochdi 11 күн бұрын

ايام زمان لاتعد

@JoyceElroy-z9w 12 күн бұрын

Brown Frank Martinez William White David

@JoyceElroy-z9w 12 күн бұрын

Robinson Jeffrey Perez Barbara Gonzalez Sarah

@jackymarcel4108 12 күн бұрын

Moore Edward Garcia Donald Jones David

@jackymarcel4108 13 күн бұрын

Perez Daniel Lopez Ronald Anderson Nancy

@FieldDebby-o5h 14 күн бұрын

Taylor Steven Clark Frank Smith Kenneth

@ChestertonSam-p5x 15 күн бұрын

Miller Jason Gonzalez Carol Clark Michelle

@ClareBoyd-f8c 17 күн бұрын

Hernandez Gary Perez Brian Jones Angela

@ClareBoyd-f8c 17 күн бұрын

Brown Betty Walker Betty Gonzalez Helen

@IMAHMS Ай бұрын

Clearly, to identify objects as distict things, is a motor function; it pertains to what can be done with that object. Moreover, the syntax structure of language is that of representing an action, and the area of language formation in the brain (Broca's area) is located in the frontal lobe pre-motor area which is involved in planning actions.

@abderrahimighous76 Ай бұрын

آتمنى لك كل الخير والتوفيق وإن شاء الله تكون في أحسن حال باذن الله.

@johnhelm6231 Ай бұрын

Linguistic studies 💯.

@e.c.3844 2 ай бұрын

PBSNewsHour

@e.c.3844 2 ай бұрын

But Yesterday I Spoke with Prime Minister Trudeau.

@e.c.3844 2 ай бұрын

NOAM CHOMSKY AMERICAN PROFESSOR

@e.c.3844 2 ай бұрын

Governor Chowdhury

@e.c.3844 2 ай бұрын

Mike Bloomberg Former Governor of New York City

@e.c.3844 2 ай бұрын

Governor Bloomberg

@e.c.3844 2 ай бұрын

Michael Bloomberg Blue Eyes.

@e.c.3844 2 ай бұрын

Prime Minister Bidon and President Bloomberg

@bilalmohammed0 2 ай бұрын

Noam Chomsky, Fundamental Issues in Linguistics (April 2019 at MIT) - Lecture 1 - what are the fundamental computational operations that enter into constructing syntactic objects and why are these and others? - what are we trying to achieve in the study of language? - Galileo was awed by the question "How do finite means produce infinite means?" -language and individuals' languages are unique to humans. -capturing the notion in the mind that enables us to construct in our minds infinite expressions is difficult which behaviorists ignored. Unlike behaviorism, which was concerned with external structures of language, innatism was concerned with the notion of internal structure in the mind which led the study of language to be in the natural science, ie., biolinguistics is one example. - the I-language, the basic property of language, the internal system/the finite system became the subject of study in the study of language in the 20th century. - how the speaker of a language selects a syntactic object out of an infinite array is a total mystery. - the acquisition of the I-language is encountered with a couple of conflicting conditions, learnability, and evolvability. - how can we take simple operations, like Merge, to achieve genuine explanations? -dislocation and compositionally put together yield genuine explanation.

@madelinemontalvo6151 3 ай бұрын

It would be great if we were all as intelligent ! He's a gem.

@ouedribabdellah3909 3 ай бұрын

فن اصيل يطرب القلب،و العقل،ثرات مغربي اصيل.

@leonsantamaria9845 4 ай бұрын

What and what.... professor Noam Chomsky....l will understand... you..class...l mad my self.....(Merge...p,q, ws....a,b....👍👋😄

@leonsantamaria9845 4 ай бұрын

Im domy ...l don't understand to much... and I don't like....l like to understand....lm so mad my self...l love to learning linguistics, is not easy.... get Noam Chomsky...👍😵‍💫

@scottcampbell7384 4 ай бұрын

Mental giant, moral fool. I can still see him singing with Hugo Chavez before the demise of Venezuela. After the demise was well underway, Noam tried to back pedal with the typical "nobody ever does socialism right" lame excuse. PS_ I adore the comments...I haven't seen this much fawning since Bambi was released by Walt Disney studious in 1942.

@simo56 4 ай бұрын

الملحون فن مغربي عريق بدايته كانت في العصر الموحدي في القرن 12

@czarquetzal8344 8 ай бұрын

I like the philosophical foundation of his linguistics - Essentialism. It retains something that cannot be fully grasped by empirical science

@markdavid1208 9 ай бұрын

Nice to hear the late Jim McCawley get a couple shoutouts.

@carlitosgl 10 ай бұрын

without exception, except for head movement 🤪25:03

@lagartogoldin Ай бұрын

Estoy con vos.

@AsEnIxX-wtf Жыл бұрын

Thanks for uploading the two lectures.

@ArunVBM23ID100 Жыл бұрын

That Wink....

@KUP-g3k Жыл бұрын

wow! a legend!

@Josephus_vanDenElzen Жыл бұрын

1:50 Galileo 2:08 How is it possible to express an inffinite number of ideas with a couple of dozens sounds, which in itself have nothing in common with the thoughts in our minds and allow us to understand what is not present in consicousness? That's indeed an interesting question. But, doesn't he goes too far with 3:06 "everything we can conceive and the most diverse movements of our soul" Some experiences are auditory and visual; consider colours, one can tell a blind man everything there is to know about colours and yet when he would miraculously starts seeing for the first time his experience will be expanded.

@halfcadence1417 9 ай бұрын

Conception and expression are not the same thing

@farahali5754 Жыл бұрын

Perfect , A few good men

@farahali5754 Жыл бұрын

بحترم جداااااااا كبار السن في التعليم لا مثيل لهم Youth , his body language is more than mental expressions and thoughts

@casteretpollux Жыл бұрын

Language is social and historic and evolves rapidly in a social context and changing world. It's for communication. I'm.not seeing any mystery. Would anyone like to explain?

@atheoma Жыл бұрын

the mistery has been repeatedly articulated by noam in numerous interviews and lectures including this one. namely, the spoken/written language seemingly operates as a linear representation of symbols. on the other hand, reading or listening to a speech, we effectively ignore the linear sequence of words and decode the message as a complex structure which is not explicitly given. that means, we posses implicit ability to process any message tho this ability is totally separated from conciousness and unreachable by introspection. human kids demonstrate an exclusive ability to acquire language instinctly, long before they obtain enough linguistic data to learn the sintactic rules by statistic generalization of experience. the language is used almost exclusively for generating thought. humans, just as other animals, didn’t need language to communicate. being unable to generate complex recursive sintactic structures, big apes have still a profound system of communication with which they can communicate efficiently and sufficiently. the organs of speech were there long before the emergence of language so as in animals. try to scientifically explain all this with trivial statements like ‘language is social and historic and evolves rapidly in a social context and changing world’.

@czarquetzal8344 9 ай бұрын

Read poetry. Is the language of poetry serves to communicate?

@ghofranemohamed6782 Жыл бұрын

He's genius,😍

@linguistics1224 Жыл бұрын

What is this about?

@emiliogonzalez1412 Жыл бұрын

That questioner is pretty confused by Noam’s use of the word neural nets but I think he doesn’t know the term refers to both biological and artificial systems. It’s just common to use it in an artificial context these days.