Boom! Whooomp! And that is how the brain works kids.

Does it drop bombs

for 25 years now there are being robots for inspection, disaster relief etc. developed and none have seen any use in production except boston dynamics dog. which is not to say this will surely be a neat childrens toy

This is clear proof to me that birds are fake.

So drone-inspired drones?

Confirmed. Birds arent real

I would be curious to know how easy it is to fly. Wouldn't a quad copter with skinny landing gear work better since it can hover more effectively?

Thats just a regular pigeon you see every day in New York! Spying on us!

621 I’ve got a job for you (ac6 reference btw)

اجاني الفضول لحالي التوجيهي هون ولا 😍💔

I liked your style in argumentasjon in (NTM).

Very exciting news! Bravo!

Incredible!

What an amazing university. Man I wish I get into it for the next fall.

Super vidéo !

En un mot, juste "mémorable" ^^

Le bon gros subventionné par les rechauffistes

How

Fantastic....what name of the Music?

Très intéressant

Bravo ! Super projet, faut aller lever des fonds et industrialiser votre POC 🚀

thx for everything🥹

I really wanted to see the mice play Mario 😭

Thanks.

Where can we get this treatment?

It looks as water does not want to stop confuse and surprise us. 🤷🏼‍♀️

wow

Sublime!

Bravo mon cousin.

3:00 but why was the tent still standing and not crushed? And the chance that every single one of them gets crushed by a block of solid snow (or probabaly ice) is extremely small. Especially if somehow the tent doesnt get a scratch. and even with broken bones, u can still think smart enough to try to get ur clothing before going into the cold.

Goals.

Everyone in the comments, read this: If you have the will to make this happen and walk again, then you have the ability to learn the science and do this in your own bedroom or any extra room you have. Get the necessary glassware, study the science, and just do it. You can do it. All the methods and means are either publicly published (like academic works, journals, etc.) or patented, which will show you how to make things yourself. Remember, the law says you can’t sell things made from patented methods, but you can create whatever you want for personal use. And if you need help, a paid subscription to ChatGPT can read those journals and academic works for you, explaining the findings quickly and clearly so you can get started fast!

No surprise this guy won the nobel prize

Surely it would be permanent to M.E/CFS Fibromyalgia and Long COVID.

Is there any trial happened in India - patient is suffering from spinal cord injury

Très bonne conférence 🙏🏽 De très bonnes orientations et dense!

Ground-Breaking Research Finds 11 Multidimensional Universe Inside the Human Brain Scientists have discovered that the human brain is capable of building structures in up to 11 dimensions. The human brain can think and create in up to 11 dimensions, according to a study that was recently published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. The Blue Brain Project claims that the dimensions are not understood in the way that most of us would typically think of a dimension. As part of the Blue Brain Project, researchers learned fascinating new information on the complexity of the human brain. We discovered a world that we had never envisioned, according to neuroscientist Henry Markram, director of the Blue Brain Project and professor at the EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland. Even in a tiny portion of the brain, there are tens of millions of these things spread across seven dimensions. We even discovered structures in certain networks with up to eleven dimensions. Once scientists researched the human brain, they discovered that conventional mathematical viewpoints were useless and inefficient. The image attempts to capture a multi-dimensional universe of buildings and locations-something that cannot be seen. On the left, you can see a computerized reproduction of a segment of the neocortex, the most developed part of the brain. Constructions with dimensions ranging from one to seven and beyond are illustrated on the right using a number of forms of varied sizes and geometries. A group of multi-dimensional holes or cavities are represented by the central "black-hole". Researchers from the Blue Brain Project contend that clusters of neurons connected into such holes constitute the crucial link between brain structure and function in a recent work published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. This image is from the Blue Brain Project. The high-dimensional structures and spaces that we can now plainly perceive cannot be detected by the mathematics that is often used to research networks, according to Markram. Instead, researchers chose to study algebraic topology. In the field of mathematics known as algebraic topology, topological spaces are investigated using methods from abstract algebra. Scientists from the Blue Brain Project collaborated with mathematicians Kathryn Hess from EPFL and Ran Levi from Aberdeen University to use this methodology in their most recent research. Algebraic topology, according to Professor Hess, "is like a telescope and microscope at the same time. It has the ability to zoom in on networks to spot hidden features like trees in a forest and simultaneously observe open areas like clearings. The scientists discovered that cliques of neurons, which are brain cells that transmit impulses, build the structures of the brain. A new entity is created as a result of the specific connections that every neuron in the group has with each other. The 'dimension' of an object grows as the clique's number of neurons does. The architecture of a virtual brain that the researchers created with the aid of computers was modeled using algebraic topography. They then conducted trials on actual brain tissue to corroborate their findings. The scientists found that when more inputs were added to the virtual brain, cliques with progressively HIGHER dimensions began to develop. Investigators also found gaps between the cliques. According to Ran Levi of Aberdeen University, the brain processes information when high-dimensional holes are visible. This indicates that the network's neurons respond to inputs in a highly ordered way. It appears as though the brain builds and then destroys a tower out of various three-dimensional building pieces, starting with rods (1D), then moving on to planks (2D), then cubes (3D), and then moving on to more sophisticated geometries with 4D, 5D, etc. The way that activity moves through the brain is like watching a multi-dimensional sandcastle emerge from the sand and then fall apart. The most recent knowledge on the human brain offers never-before-seen insights into how the brain functions. However, according to scientists, it is still unknown how the cliques and cavities form in such a peculiar way. Where does the brain store memories? is one of neuroscience's greatest mysteries, and the new research may one day shed light on it.

Oooh he so handsome what's his name 😅

Thank you... I'm a proud paraplegic one day the next I'm itching to walk. Your tackling all these variables means less volatility for all disabled people

Comment faire pour avoir une consultation ?

❤❤❤❤😂❤❤

Put an ice pack in one pocket and pump the cooled fluid around.

Ghosts are real

Slightly confused by the demo. It appeared (if I understand it correctly) to work like a vehicle satnav when going through a (satellite signal blocking) tunnel - interpolating from the most recent frame identified by the neural net from the mouse's brain. I instead expected the "video moments getting mouse's attention" (however determined - hopefully not just "mouse pointing in direction of screen") to drop in/out of black (say) - assuming the mouse was not giving the screen its full attention all the time. _If_ artificial neural net did indicate such full attention, that seems unlikely to have happened in practice in which case, if the neural net was indicating correctly, then maybe the mouse's perception of the overall light level dynamics (as specific sequences) as they affected its environment (the box) as a whole? Hopefully the training data included situations where mouse attention was not on the screen.

I would not assume that mice would "see" the film's content in the same way that we do. From what I've read, the eye's retina, never mind brain areas, likely highlights certain hard-wired shapes/curves and dynamic changes, in both motion and brightness. In an instinctive creature with no real understanding of human artefacts in a 2D scene (also having no smells), I imagine those would be the primary drivers of its attention, as measured via the described methods.

I see from (YT doesn't permit links anymore?) that mouse eye flicker rate is 14 Hz. Important to know when hoping mouse will react to movie frame content. Presumably in the experiments the frame rate was greater than this (e.g. human-conventional 25 fps or 30 fps).

Pour moi la science du climat actuelle, si c’est une science, c’est une science au doigt mouillé et certainement pas une science fondamentale stricte qui puisse permettre de faire des simulations fiables et faire des prévisions à long terme justifiant des mesures à prendre qui peuvent mener à des conséquences absolument néfastes sur les populations. En science physique la température est définie d’une façon précise par la loi de Boyle-Mariotte à un niveau purement local et en un temps défini. Depuis le début des années 80 nous disposons d’équations d’état fiables pour simuler des fluides statiquement et dynamiquement. Les simulations utilisant ces équations d’état sont fiables et utilisées avec succès dans l’industrie pour spécifier les équipements. Dans la science du climat la température n’est pas un paramètre scientifique satisfaisant la loi de Boyle-Mariotte. C’est plutôt un paramètre qui pourrait être lié à une sensation de chaleur et qui n’est pas sensé être locale en un temps bien précis car ce paramètre est toujours le résultat d’une moyenne sur une large surface et même parfois sur une durée allant à une centaine d’année. Le carottage des glaces en Arctique en est un exemple. Ce carottage ne peut en aucun cas représenter des mesures de température autour du globe terrestre mais peut seulement indiquer des variations de quantité de chaleur. Avec de tels paramètres, températures ou autres, calculés en tant que moyennes autours du globe il est scientifiquement impossible de faire des prévisions sérieuses d’autant que l’on passe outre sur l’apport de chaleur provenant du mouvement des couches tectoniques et des échanges de chaleurs provenant des failles ramenant des quantités de chaleur importantes par convection des failles jusqu’à la surface des océans. Ces apports de chaleurs sont d’ailleurs à ce jour mal connus si l’on en croit certaines conférence sur le sujet au Collège de France. Vous pouvez dénigrer ceux que vous appelez des climato-sceptiques avec une grande suffisance mais il n’en demeure pas moins que il y a un million d’années et au-delà il y avait 10 à vingt fois plus de CO2 dans l’atmosphère et la faune et la végétation étaient luxuriantes.

broo the circle brooo.. smooth 💀

Hermoso ❤

bad joke