Veritas Paradoxum

Пікірлер

@fiddletown2002 5 күн бұрын

The use of all capital letters has no legal significance. [A] State v. Gunnell, 2013 Ohio 3928 (Ohio App., 2013), slip op. at 3: "...{¶ 6} We note that similar "sovereign citizen" arguments have been raised in various federal court actions by pro se litigants, albeit unsuccessfully. See, e.g., United States v. Benabe, 654 F.3d 753, 767 (7th Cir.2011) ("Regardless of an individual's claimed status of descent, be it as a 'sovereign citizen,' a 'secured-party creditor,' or a 'flesh-and-blood human being,' that person is not beyond the jurisdiction of the courts"); Black v. Florida, N.D.Fla. No. 4:09cv30-SPM/WCS (June 4, 2009) (Petitioner's act of "writing his name in all capital letters does not change him from a human, natural person to a legal entity thus depriving the state court of jurisdiction to prosecute him for criminal offenses"); United States v. Curry, D.Md. No. WDQ-12-0163 (Mar. 19, 2013) (rejecting defendant's claim that "the use of capital letters means that the defendant 'is an artificial or fictitious person.' [Defendant's] capital-letter argument is * * * unavailing and frivolous"); United States v. Delatorre, N.D.Ill. No. 03 CR 90 (Jan. 30, 2008) ("This court's jurisdiction over Mr. Delatorre remains valid whether his name is written in all capital letters or a mix of capital and lower case letters, or whether he identifies himself as: a 'real flesh and blood man, in his private capacity,' [or] a 'sovereign secured party creditor' "). [B] Williams v. Warren (CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:16-CV-4657-TWT-JKL , N.D. Ga., 2017), slip op, at 3: “…According to the Complaint,1 Defendants have violated Plaintiff's First and Eleventh Amendment rights by using the name VICTOR WILLIAMS in all capital letters. He also claims they have violated his UCC filing, which is attached to the complaint as an exhibit. He seeks $150,000.00 in damages. Plaintiff fails to state a plausible claim for the violation of a constitutional right. Plaintiff's allegations are consistent with "sovereign citizen" ideology, which is not recognized by the federal courts. See e.g., Monroe v. Beard, 536 F.3d 198, 203 n.4 (3d Cir. 2008) (indicating that adherents of the "sovereign citizen theory" advocate that inmates copyright their names to justify filing liens against Page 4 officials using their names in court papers)..." [C] U.S. v. Mitchell, 405 F.Supp.2d 602 (D. Md., 2005), at 604 (footnotes omitted): “… The defendants also persistently claim that they are not properly identified in the caption of the indictments because their names are printed in all capital letters, thereby failing to properly represent them as "flesh and blood" men. These arguments are patently without merit...." [D] Payne v. Klida (15-cv-14127, E.D. Mich., 2016) slip op., at 8: "...Plaintiff's claim that he is not subject to the laws of the state of Michigan because of some distinction between corporate personhood and actual personhood is totally spurious, unfounded, and frivolous. As discussed below, it would be sufficient to conclude that Plaintiff's allegations are utterly frivolous and end the inquiry here. However, the Court makes a few fairly obvious observations for the sake of clarity and finality. First, there is no legal distinction between a capitalized and uncapitalized name in criminal matters. See, e.g., United States v. McAtee, No. 5:13-CR-17, 2013 WL 3364452, at *4 (N.D. W. Va. July 3, 2013) ("This filing alleges that Defendant is not the person named in the criminal charges because the name on the charging documents is in all capital letters . . . . This argument lacks any basis in the law, and in the Court's eyes is utter nonsense."); U.S. Hoodenpyle, No. 09-CR-00013- MSK, 2009 WL 1883919, at *1 (D. Colo. June 30, 2009) ("The Defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court regardless of how his name is capitalized in any document.")...." [E] Anderson v. O'Sullivan, 224 Md.App. 501, 121 A.3d 181 (Md. App., 2015), at 512: "...These contentions [strawman, redemption, "all capital letters"] have not, will not, and cannot be accepted as valid. Beyond the over whelming legal precedent rejecting them, government agencies have also condemned these theories. The IRS has opined that “[t]here is no authority under the Internal Revenue Code or any other applicable law that supports the claim that taxpayers may avoid their federal tax obligations based on ‘straw man’ arguments ... or similar arguments. The formatting of a taxpayer's name in all upper-case letters on government documents or elsewhere has no significance whatsoever for federal tax purposes. Internal Revenue Bulletin April 4, 2005, Rev. Rul. 2005-21, Internal Revenue Service…"

@samgomolka6260 Ай бұрын

Also that coin has 1 ounce of pure gold in it. This is why it weigs more. Even the Krugarand has 1 ounce of pure gold. They all have an Exact ounce of pure even if its has added metals. US coins are always worth more than almost any. Maybe Spanish or Mexican can have a higher value...

@veritasparadoxum6525 Ай бұрын

Exactly. That's what I had mentioned in the video that you still get 1 troy oz. of 24K gold for American Eagle gold coins (similar with a Krugerrand gold coin) and 0.0909 troy oz. excess is a combo of copper and silver.

@samgomolka6260 Ай бұрын

If your guy wants to melt it you have the wrong guy. This coin is a store of value so to say that they are going to melt it its to rip you off. No dealer will ever melt this coin.