Germany | Can you solve this? | Math Olympiad
14:51
Algebra Exponential Equation
4:10
14 сағат бұрын
Algebra Exponential Equation
4:51
14 сағат бұрын
Algebra Exponential Equation
4:52
14 сағат бұрын
Algebra Exponential Equation
5:18
16 сағат бұрын
Algebra Problem
6:58
16 сағат бұрын
Algebra Exponential Equation
4:57
19 сағат бұрын
Пікірлер
@rajendransubramanium5650
@rajendransubramanium5650 4 күн бұрын
x=3
@ugursarac9033
@ugursarac9033 4 күн бұрын
3
@KhubaebPlusAmmar
@KhubaebPlusAmmar 4 күн бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@venkatesank3841
@venkatesank3841 18 күн бұрын
Why do you split log10. Log10 is 1.
@danieldolebski2689
@danieldolebski2689 18 күн бұрын
beautiful work!
@wes9627
@wes9627 18 күн бұрын
I've solved Golden Ratio problems like this so many times I can do it in my sleep. a=ln[(√5+1)/2]/ln2=0.694241913630617...
@malvoliosf
@malvoliosf 21 күн бұрын
“One” is pronounced “wun” /wan/. Rhymes with “fun”, “run”, “sun”, and “done”.
@MohamedMathani
@MohamedMathani 22 күн бұрын
thanks
@Fedida12
@Fedida12 23 күн бұрын
Why not simply let 2^a=k from the start ?just put 1^a = 1 (for all a) and 4^a = (2^a)^2 and you get the same equation in k^2=1+k but in the second row
@sarantis40kalaitzis48
@sarantis40kalaitzis48 25 күн бұрын
No need to divide because 324=18^2 so original equation is 1+18^x=(18^2)^x so 1+18^x=(18^x)^2 . Let 18^x=k so 1+k=k^2 so k^2-k-1=0 so D=(-1)^2-4•1•(-1)= 1+4=5, So k=(+1+√5)/2 or k=(+1-√5)/2 so 18^x=(1+√5)/2>0 Accepted or 18^x=(1-√5)/2<0 Rejected. Etc .. taking Log Both Sides.
@Kwalliteht
@Kwalliteht 26 күн бұрын
x^3-x=24 Very simple. 3^3-3=24.
@bakrantz
@bakrantz 26 күн бұрын
Factor out x to x(X^2 - 1) = 24 where X^2 - 1 factors to (X-1)(X+1) then you have (X-1)*x*(X+1) = 24. This means the product three consecutive numbers is 24. Brute force it to x = 3 where x-1 = 2 and x+1=4 and 2*3*4 = 24
@dougnettleton5326
@dougnettleton5326 26 күн бұрын
I really don't understand these methods that require remembering so many formulae. In this case, the factors of a "difference of cubes." By the time you've observed the relationship between 3, 24, and 27, you've already found a real root, specifically 3, since 3^3 - 3 = 24. Then, just long division of x - 3 into x^3 - x - 24 and use the quadratic formula, to find the complex roots.
@vijayakkumarsanjeevi2148
@vijayakkumarsanjeevi2148 26 күн бұрын
3
@prollysine
@prollysine 26 күн бұрын
let u=2^x , 738=2*3*3*41 , u^3+/-u^2+u-738=0 , (u-9)(u^2+9u+82)=0 , 2^x=9 , x=log9/log2 , test , 8^x+2^x=729+9 , --> 738 , OK , 1 -9 9 -81 82 -738
@ronaldnoll3247
@ronaldnoll3247 28 күн бұрын
very nice ... thank you
@lalasofy
@lalasofy 29 күн бұрын
Easy,1a+7a=49 so 49/8=6.125 ,a=6.125
@wa007123456
@wa007123456 29 күн бұрын
Wrong ,'a' is an irrational number. Additionally, [1+sqrt(5) ] /2 = Golden Ratio. And the approximate value of 'a' might be 0.2472 = log([1+sqrt(5)]/2]) which Base number of log is 7
@AlexanderSemashkevich
@AlexanderSemashkevich Ай бұрын
k=(log(sqrt5+1)-log2)/2log2=log(sqrt5+1)/2log2-½ k≈0.3471 4^0.3471+16^0.3471≈4.236 64^0.3471≈4.236
@wes9627
@wes9627 Ай бұрын
The internet has hundreds of Golden Ratio problems like this one, and I can now solve them in my sleep. For example, a=ln[(1+√5)/2]/ln2 without writing anything down. OK, I recognized that this problem may be converted into the Golden Ratio form Φ^2-Φ-1=0, which has positive root Φ=(1+√5)/2. To obtain this form divide the given equation by 7^a and rearrange to (2^a)^2-2^a-1=0. Then substitute Φ=2^a to obtain the Golden Ratio equation and finish up, a=lnΦ/ln2.
@DanToomey-j8n
@DanToomey-j8n Ай бұрын
Planear division is pragm😂atic we all know sauce remedy. Rnx as ought agter agitar hex g n= on 4a volume 6.3-√coomon p2 ⁹ 19 nnn -2√commonoower approx 14-19
@andresrebolledobanquet1924
@andresrebolledobanquet1924 Ай бұрын
10x = 130 x = Log 130 / log10 x = 2.11394 10^2.11394 = 130
@andresrebolledobanquet1924
@andresrebolledobanquet1924 Ай бұрын
10k + 100k = 1000k 110k = 1000 k = log 1000 / log 110 K = 1.46958 110^1.46958 = 1000
@samdaman2510
@samdaman2510 Ай бұрын
It is just log6(50)
@kimdokjasdream9158
@kimdokjasdream9158 Ай бұрын
X=log6(50)=log6(5²*2)=log6(5²)+log6(2)=2log6(5)+log6(2)
@calinmik429
@calinmik429 Ай бұрын
You really don't need this hard of a solution. log² (2^3x) + log ² (2^x) = log² 30 3x + x = log² 30 4x = log² 30 x = (log² 30) / 4
@Emailminecraft
@Emailminecraft Ай бұрын
Log(24)/log(8) ?
@techerateofil-alexandru2018
@techerateofil-alexandru2018 Ай бұрын
Idk how I've found your channel but i'm an engineer and I just love clasic math equations from my highschool days done step by step as a tutorial, gave me a bit of nostalgia, subscribed
@anatolykhmelnitsky2841
@anatolykhmelnitsky2841 Ай бұрын
8ˣ + 2ˣ = 68; 2³ˣ + 2ˣ = 64 + 4 = 2³*² + 2²; 2³ˣ = 2³*²; 2ˣ = 2²; x = 2;
@dragonplay2069
@dragonplay2069 Ай бұрын
It's actually 1, uh...
@mathpro926
@mathpro926 Ай бұрын
nice solution
@alvaroromansqui4318
@alvaroromansqui4318 Ай бұрын
You could just make everything same base and remove them. Solving the exponents as a simple ecuation
@EvaFels
@EvaFels Ай бұрын
Curious. Applying the Log with base 2, e.g. Log2(2) = 1, immediately gives 3m.Log2(2) = Log2(20) and m = Log2(20)/3 = 1.4406. It’s not worth watching all these disgusting promotion videos, which even take more time than your lengthy solution.
@AndrewFatherOfEdward
@AndrewFatherOfEdward Ай бұрын
I was equally appalled
@mirkozinauer319
@mirkozinauer319 Ай бұрын
1^x+7^x=49^x 1+7^x=(7^x)^2 K=7^x 1+K=K^2 K^2-K-1=0 . . .
@sinalbertckwong6406
@sinalbertckwong6406 Ай бұрын
why not use exponential method. That is, a^x ==> x log a......
@nickcellino1503
@nickcellino1503 Ай бұрын
Why was it necessary to make 2^x=K? 2^x . 2^x . 2^x= 2^3x. if 2^3x = 2^4 which is 16, then 3x=4 and x=4/3.
@KhubaebPlusAmmar
@KhubaebPlusAmmar Ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@torstenbroeer1797
@torstenbroeer1797 Ай бұрын
The question at the beginning was k=? Now, what is the value of k? It took me about two minutes and five lines of writing (including the original line and the final result) to get k=0.694… So what is all this idiotic calculation for?
@ZacharineFlormata-c2f
@ZacharineFlormata-c2f Ай бұрын
100
@PayuY-b6u
@PayuY-b6u Ай бұрын
5 just calculate a few small nos
@drmatt1984
@drmatt1984 Ай бұрын
You can't just reject the negative solution to the 4th power unless the question states "find the real solutions" or similar. There are at least k complex solutions to the equation.
@HardeepSidhu1
@HardeepSidhu1 Ай бұрын
Veryyyy good explanation...keep it Up!!! Love It!!!<3
@KhubaebPlusAmmar
@KhubaebPlusAmmar Ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@AshYourFellowComrade
@AshYourFellowComrade Ай бұрын
Won't it be -2+4i for the second value of x?
@KhubaebPlusAmmar
@KhubaebPlusAmmar Ай бұрын
Yes but also two another values
@leviniscrazy
@leviniscrazy Ай бұрын
X^3 -X^2 = 100 X^3-2=100 X =100
@KhubaebPlusAmmar
@KhubaebPlusAmmar Ай бұрын
Your answer not correct
@HardeepSidhu1
@HardeepSidhu1 Ай бұрын
broooo...if they are in division like x^3/x^2, then only it will be x^3-2....but in this case, it is in substraction and not in division and x^3-x^2 is not equal to x^3-2..got the point...<3
@commanderlemonlionplayzz1347
@commanderlemonlionplayzz1347 Ай бұрын
Very good explanation
@KhubaebPlusAmmar
@KhubaebPlusAmmar Ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@3r4kl3s
@3r4kl3s Ай бұрын
why dont you use log in base 2 right away when you switch to logarithms? In other words convert 2^3x=18 directly into 3x=log[in base2]18 because the log in base 2 of 2^3x is obviously the exponent, i.e: 3x. You would reach the same solution faster.and more intuitively. Is there any rule that forces you to use log in base 10 at first?
@victorlundin5075
@victorlundin5075 Ай бұрын
If you want an estimated value of x, you need to put it in the calculator. A lot of calculators only have log base 10 or e So that's probably why they use log base 10
@DaneBrooke
@DaneBrooke Ай бұрын
Nice job. I only mean to help your channel succeed when I tell you (a) watching you re-over-draw what you already wrote perfectly is why I will actually avoid your videos. (b). "x = l2(3)" where I write l2() to indicate "log base 2" gets points for compactness, but falls short of *elegance*. Remember, our calculators do not usually have a button for that. IMHO answers must be presented in "calculator friendly fashion", which is "3 ln / 2 ln" in this case, or in typeset x = (ln3)/(ln2). All the other equivalent suggestions, no matter that yours are very clever, hinder practicality.
@KhubaebPlusAmmar
@KhubaebPlusAmmar Ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for your comment
@sahu2923
@sahu2923 Ай бұрын
Nice ❤ Keep it up Support from india ❤
@KhubaebPlusAmmar
@KhubaebPlusAmmar Ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@sceletus_deus9401
@sceletus_deus9401 Ай бұрын
Unnecessarily long...log100 is simply 2 so it simplifies as 1+ 2/0.9 =3.2222