En principe, c'est vrai

@@erwinresearch9224 sauf que ton principe ne fonctionne pas !

sometimes that's exactly how I feel

Thanks for your comment. You are right, conventionally the current flow is always indicated from "+" to "-". I have gotten into the habit of always looking at the direction of flow of the electrons. I should point this out to avoid confusion.

Thank you for your comment, which is the opposite of my opinion (I mean your definition is correct, but in this setup the direction of the current does not change/pulses during rotation)

Thank you very much for your kind comment. Indeed a fascinating topic, electromagnetism needs to be investigated more.

there is no free energy. the pyramids were not generators of free energy but they were collecting current from the atmosphere and friction of weather in it inside walls. To get energy either generate it or collect it there is no magic-free device with infinite energy the bigger the collection station the more atmospheric current you get the more energy you burn the more you generate

Dein Kommendar ist genauso, wie vor fast 50 Jahren, als du vor mir in der Schulbank gesessen bist

Thanks! If I encourage someone to rebuild or improve, then I have achieved the purpose of my channel

@@erwinresearch9224 actually got it running!

More than 50 years ago, when I was 14 years old, there was a program on TV called 'Blick in die Welt', every Saturday, a must because it showed great technical developments and I was fascinated by it. It influenced a lot of things in my life. KZbin has more than replaced that, so if I can add something in that respected sense, I'm very happy. Thank you!

@@erwinresearch9224 no. You made this so thank YOU.

Also I am making a wimshurst right now. Edit: I can put a video of it on my second channel when it’s done.

감사합니다

There are two problems in making this type of construction usable, the current-contact problem and increasing the effect by repeated use of the serial current in the magnetic field (like the windings in conventional electric motors, but this always requires a commutator)

@@erwinresearch9224 Ya, a brushless direct current design is the motivation(pardon the pun).

Interesting! Both the mercury and the 30,000 revolutions are difficult to implement. Would it make a difference to replace the mercury with rotating connecting disks (copper)? Please let's openly exchange thoughts, what would be your expected behavior?

@@erwinresearch9224 An anti gravity effect can be achieved.

I don't think I can technically implement the mentioned requirements, maybe it can be reduced to a simpler construction. I am sure that the description of the magnetic field and its formation is not correct or complete. There are too many effects that are not fully explained and much more than we currently know. I share your openness to think further.

Thanks! There are four spindles with two magnets each, no additional auxiliary magnets. A single spindle consists of a ring magnet at the upper end, then an aluminum disc (to guide the conductor tape), several copper discs (for the thickness of the conductor tape), then an aluminum disc and another ring magnet, the two ring magnets attract each other and hold the whole thing together.

I love your motto: "... and anything that man knows, which is not merely rumbling and roaring of mankind, can be said in three words." - I'm certainly leaving physics behind, but why not add fantasy and poetry? It's allways part of it!

​@@erwinresearch9224⚠️ God has said in the Quran: 🔵 { O mankind, worship your Lord, who created you and those before you, that you may become righteous - ( 2:21 ) 🔴 [He] who made for you the earth a bed [spread out] and the sky a ceiling and sent down from the sky, rain and brought forth thereby fruits as provision for you. So do not attribute to Allah equals while you know [that there is nothing similar to Him]. ( 2:22 ) 🔵 And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. ( 2:23 ) 🔴 But if you do not - and you will never be able to - then fear the Fire, whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the disbelievers.( 2:24 ) 🔵 And give good tidings to those who believe and do righteous deeds that they will have gardens [in Paradise] beneath which rivers flow. Whenever they are provided with a provision of fruit therefrom, they will say, "This is what we were provided with before." And it is given to them in likeness. And they will have therein purified spouses, and they will abide therein eternally. ( 2:25 ) ⚠️ Quran

It's like a little puzzle piece that I wanted to add, by now I think I should have covered all the variations

This is where I leave the exploratory claim, I was expecting something like this. The next video will be different.

You are presumptuous and/or uneducated. Your country's wire color conventions, are not the only ones that exist. Also, conductors don't care what color of plastic they're wrapped in, they will still function the same. Furthermore, what kind of life do you live that you even care about such petty things...

:) originally I had a red/pink cable, but I burnt it out

My comment still stands. I was not wrong. It just didn't apply here.

Thank you very much, that's exactly how I see it too - I openly think it was meant ironically

it is a motor and corresponds to our physical knowledge. But it deals with a forgotten, strange and not fully explained part of the basics.

Thanks for your comment! You are right with your idea, it is an absolutely logical thought. The question arises if the disks are firmly connected to a cylinder and the current is only supplied via the axis (counter-torque must be made possible, actio=reactio). I will point this out in one of my next videos.

@@erwinresearch9224 My thought was of course to have the two magnets pointing in opposite directions. I realize now that the opposing fields on the inside will squeeze out through the connecting cylinder and provide counter torque. No rotation will occur as a consequence. Or will it?

You are right this setup wouldn't work. If it would work that would bring physicists into big troubles - not that is not really an argument ;-)

Thank you for your comment. I have to correct my opening text, my intention was/is to point out the deflection of the lower disc to the right side (to be seen @0:55) as an effect of the counter torque. In further videos there will be a construction that makes the counter-torque more visible.