It’s five words, you fucking dumbass

It is and jesus aka Michael

- (Isaiah 3:16-17). 16 Moreover the Lord saith, Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes, walking and mincing as they go, and making a tinkling with their feet: 17 Therefore the Lord will smite with a scab the crown of the head of the daughters of Zion, and the Lord will discover their secret parts. That’s why *4 schools*(which isn’t a lot) banned the Bible. -Brutal Honesty-

Praise God. How wonderfully refreshing to see that in this era

I love this

Thank you Jesus

So much truth

What do you think?

I would like to add my two cents here after reading this discussion. First of all I believe we should follow the teaching in 1st Corinthians 11. The main problem here is the misunderstanding of 1st Corinthians 11 altogether. I also have made an intense study of this passage, and the obvious conclusion is that Paul was referring to long hair being the covering. The first thing one should take notice is the lack of wording required to conclude that a veil is being referred to here. The word veil or cloth is not in the text if we read from the King James version. If you read from the “modern” versions then you might get that view but not from the Textus Receptus. I would like for you to reread the verses that allegedly refer to a veil which is 4-7 and 13. In those verses we read the words, cover, uncovered and not covered. According to scholars these are used as adverbs. Like if you were to say I am going to cover my feet. No one should be thinking of a veil just the action of being covered. What is missing in these verses are nouns that would prove the idea of veils. Since we should not be assuming anything we should be asking the question what is the thing that a woman should be covered WITH based on the passage ALONE? So if you do the math you would find that Paul refers to hair directly 3 times and then indirectly 4 times with the words shorn and shaven. So if there is no noun for the word veil or cloth yet there are 7 instances of idea of hair, then what are we to conclude? That Paul is referring to hair whether it be short or long. But the counterargument would be that Paul is allegedly telling women to put something on. But that is not exactly true it says a woman should be covered, but he is referring to long hair based on the surrounding verses. But what about that a woman ought to be covered when praying or prophesying? The assumption is a that Paul was referring to only two instances which is not true he was merely giving us two examples. This also applies to men about being uncovered. Evidence of this is written in the forgoing verses. Paul writes that men ought not to cover because he is the image and glory of God. And then Paul goes into how woman was made for man and is the glory of the man. So it would seem that man shouldn’t be covered at any time if he is the glory and image of God. Paul also mentions that the mere observation of a praying woman should make us note how uncomely (unappealing in appearance) for a woman to be uncovered. Paul states this in a way that it should be obvious to anyone that she looks off in verse 13. He does this again in verse 14 about how shameful it looks if a man has long hair. He says it this way… Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? KJV So this judgement that we should make is exclusively based on observation of an “uncovered” woman as well as a long haired man. Two consecutive questions both appealing to something innate or within us. Paul is in essence saying that it should be obvious to see that something is wrong or off. So how is it that for the women we are somehow to know within us that a woman would be unappealing in appearance without a manufactured veil? That does not seem logical especially since the word veil is never mentioned. Unless that is not what Paul is meaning but rather that if the woman was not covered in long hair (meaning her hair is short) doing something holy or godly LIKE praying or prophesying. I think most people can relate that looking at a woman with short hair does have an unappealing appearance. It naturally provokes head turns. And if there was any question Paul flat out states what he was talking about in verse 15. So the facts are that there no nouns to use as evidence of a veil. There is evidence that Paul was using praying and prophesying as examples. Paul appeals to nature and something innate within us to judge that being uncovered or covered (meaning having short hair or long hair) should be obvious to all. So this cannot make sense with a manufactured veil.

Is the salvation forever? Our can it be removed

I am impressed! Ptolemy, a Greek in Egypt, ordered the Septuagint written. The Greeks and more specifically the Macedonian Greeks claim to be descendants of the gods(fallen angels). You might also search out Edward Strong, who was a member of the Masonic lodge and a devout Catholic.

Jesus is my king and Lord

Is Jesus your king

AI got it right in 3 seconds plain and simple. Why can't human beings??

What will you do?

Whaaaaa??😅😅😅

Wow! Spot on. How 'bout we emulate the one who made the ultimate sacrifice...Rock on Dennis. God bless

What are you sacrificing?

This video has made sense to me. However, I yearn to know more comparisons besides Psalm 40:6 & Heb 10:5. This is what my heart has always been longing for.

I'm so ready for Jesus to come

Awesome!

Come Lord come

For us humans the book of Revelation occurred during the time Jesus was separated from God. And if you read thoroughly and carefully, the Bible indicates that there are those who are "anti-Christ." It's not some specific dude. It is everyone who isn't pro-Christ. The mark in head and hand are also thoughts and deeds. For we will know them by their fruits. It's not some barcode. It is the thoughts and actions of those who are not His. Something else crazy? The name "Lucifer" means "Day/Morning Star." The only other time that term was used is at the end of Revelation describing Christ as the morning/day star. And the only person kicked out of heaven was Christ when He was separated from God for our sake. Why do we all think a one-time mention of "Lucifer" is the Father of Lies? I wonder why that is when the Bible repeats everything else over and over.

“Anti” means “in place of.”

Lol 😂😂😂

😂😂😂

Jonathan Edwards was correct to point out that there are 4 Main Texts that define the Antichrist: Dan. 7, the "little horn"; 2 Thes. 2, the "man of sin, son of perdition"; Ref. 13:1-10, the "sea beast": and, Rev. 17, the "Scarlet Harlot". That's how Christians ought to determine the identity of the Antichrist.

Greek meaning of Anti - “against”, “opposite of”, or “in place of”. Read what John said in 1John 2:18 - 29.

"ἀντί" in Koiné Greek can mean several things. It can mean "against" as you said, but it can also mean "substitute". Besides, if you were Satan, wouldn't you "pretend" to play along with Messiah's message to gain trust? Personally, I think people are underestimating the principalities and powers we're dealing with, and the worst tactical mistake an army can make is underestimating the enemy.

Would the perfect infiltration not be supported by the perfect imitation? This is fodder friend, sorry to say. I'm not trying to argue the opposite, but instead, focus on God exclusively. Ultimately even the demons will be used to fulfill God's ultimate will. That should not frighten or concern you. When all is said and done, we aren't meant to focus on these things in this way to try and "catch" the anti christ. But rather to turn our focus towards God so that he may absolve us of such things and embrace us with all that He is.

You're cherry picking verses, lmao

Technically, Allah would fit those restrictions.

😂😂😅

Exactly! An Anti-Christ will deny Christ as God made flesh. So, if someone accepts Christ as God, then they cannot be the Anti-Christ.

What do you think?

That's the truth right there

What do you think

I'm ready for the Lord to come

Lying false prophet

Come Lord come

Rev 12 is an example of that point - (imho) I Thess 5 is interesting in light of this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oquYlpx4jqypaassi=sZ3_u2F5Rrpw1Ju5 -" When they say peace and safety"

What do you think?

You're not a hater are you

I'm a Dualist

What is your view?

I can't wait for Jesus to come

I believe it was a sign

Do you believe that the woman in the sky fulfilled the Revelation 12 sign?

You know, for those who never knew these beings in particular, but thought of "a good joke" or mockery to put on about them, should not play with something they'll greatly regret sooner or later. Seriously, don't foul around with what you don't know unless you want to destroy all the good in your life rapidly for senseless reasons. Hope Archangel Michael will forgive you for this shit you did, thing which maybe even yourself don't know why you did.

What do you think?