Thank you so much for this, it was really helpful!
@EmilyIlett Жыл бұрын
If the government decreased spending by 10bn would the effect still be 25bn but less instead of more?
@МаксимКарасёв-р9э Жыл бұрын
This theory is garbage. When you save money it doesn't vanish. You just put it aside for a while and then spend, so you have an infinite consumer spending in the long run according to this nonsense model. In fact, when the money supply increases by, for example, 1 000 $ it takes time for all goods to be expressed in new prices as a result of higher demand. So, the multiplier effect is basically the rise in prices of all goods and services rather than an increase in price of a good on which the initial higher supply of money was spent.
@thisisnotmyrealname6046 Жыл бұрын
Most helpful video I found on this topic
@EsterNghishoongele Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this I would like to follow your presentation
@chantel.masoeu Жыл бұрын
simple and straight forward! ❤️🥹 thank you sm
@gazielhayek4808 Жыл бұрын
Clutch
@hyojinlee Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video! Love it :)
@PANGULURUSIDDARTHA2 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture madam
@vidya.v2 жыл бұрын
🙏
@dastin16642 жыл бұрын
Damn! Useful.
@mamkay81452 жыл бұрын
Thank you've teach me cash flow in 1 minutes
@ДауренАскаров-р3е2 жыл бұрын
Great video, easy for understanding
@RaquelSantos-hj1mq2 жыл бұрын
How do you predict MPC and MPS? How do you get into the heads of millions of individual consumers and their unique circumstances and psychology?
@mahak21932 жыл бұрын
hi where did you get those advantages from what textbook i need citations
@surajtp19512 жыл бұрын
what is KAFA?
@Kushagra_kanwal2 жыл бұрын
Short form of Capital Account Financial Account
@surajtp19512 жыл бұрын
@@Kushagra_kanwal Thank you but what does 'K' stands for? if Capital account then it should be 'C'? correct me if iam wrong
@Kushagra_kanwal2 жыл бұрын
@@surajtp1951 Yes it should be so, but conventionally CA means Current Account. So, to avoid confusion we use KAFA. 'K' is used in place of 'C' because of similar pronunciation.
@middlepath30132 жыл бұрын
Really helpful to me .. thanqq...🤗 N God bless you
@Luke-tq8de2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video with really clear explanation. Thanks
@Mortum_Rex2 жыл бұрын
These days it's important to mention the big black elephant in the room too, i.e, offshore accounts. The "errors and omissions" are running in the trillions now.
@fahimmaf36392 жыл бұрын
tomorrow my final today im study, :)
@saraj71613 жыл бұрын
The importance of investments for a countries GDP
@yovan80909 ай бұрын
If firms invest more, this potentially create more gobs and then peaple who had been employed earn a salary which the should spend....when individuals are getting salaries...this increase their purchasing power compared to when they were unemployed which increase aggregate demand in the economy....in addition this will cause firms to produce more outputs in order to meet all the demand which directly cause the GDP to increase. This is also mainly one of the main reason why government spend in an economy, that is, to expect economy growth throught an increase in GDP
@ochukuemmanuel64213 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this video it was very helpful
@Nzwaki903 жыл бұрын
Well explained!
@basiceconomicsfinancial98823 жыл бұрын
Too much clearity👍 thank you
@LakshmiDevi-yl1lk3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this video
@deepeshpratapsingh72493 жыл бұрын
keep it up !
@xXMoneyLensXx3 жыл бұрын
I am sorry, but I am still confused about this issue. The specific issue for me is that I don't get why the export surplus has to be due to financial investments (or, as investopedia says, "borrowing money from foreign lenders or permitting foreign investment in U.S. assets")? Is it not possible that a country pays for the trade deficit with its own money? A) If the answer is yes, but that this money counts as an export because of double book accounting (any exchange goes both ways, so import of goods = export of money), how come investopedia and every other site writes that a country needs "borrowing money from foreign lenders or permitting foreign investment in U.S. assets" to pay for a trade imbalance? I mean, couldn't they just pay with their own money?
@Kushagra_kanwal2 жыл бұрын
A country can print only it's own currency. That's why they need to have Capital Account Surplus to offset Current Account Deficit because Global trade happens in US Dollars. Only USA can pay for it's trade deficit in it's own money i.e. US Dollars. But they don't do that because if they do so, it will increase money supply and cause inflation. When the entire world is investing in US and financing their current account deficit, there is no need to print more money.
@Kushagra_kanwal2 жыл бұрын
I hope I was able to explain properly.
@MrNimbus4203 жыл бұрын
Look at Venezuela and Argentina, that’s keynes right there
@MyteeBumbleBee3 жыл бұрын
So much clearer than the Khan Academy presentation! Thank you!
@basiceconomicsfinancial98823 жыл бұрын
Khan Academy method is confusing though
@khadeejahfalih90473 жыл бұрын
your video has helped me a lot!! tysm!!
@diegocolomes4 жыл бұрын
Savings are either a "leakage" or go to the financial institutions (which they usually do). If they go to financial institutions (as you assume first) you can not call that a leakage (as you do immediately after)...
@optimusopz35134 жыл бұрын
your videos help so much
@N1xnm4 жыл бұрын
This video was extremely insightful and deeply developed my comprehensive understanding of the balance of payments as it relates to economics.
@arashi97194 жыл бұрын
thankyou
4 жыл бұрын
You might need to learn this for an exam but be aware that it's broken. Keynesian economics is broken. Here's what's wrong... 1/ at 1:00 we are informed that any money saved: the savings, is put back to work in the real economy 2/ at 1:27 we are told the opposite, that savings are removed from the economy and is labelled "leakage" The base assumption used for the rest of the argument is 2/ but this is false. In reality 1/ is correct - banks put savings back to work within seconds of it being received. Any confusion is quickly covered up with clever math. The only justification for 2/ would be if people kept all of their money under their mattresses - they don't.
@homesweetcooking9394 жыл бұрын
Why economy so complicated geez, and its also useless for me...really regret to choose this course
@Thot-StompaSigma Жыл бұрын
Same In AP Macroecon and Im not even going to college, Im doing welding 💀
@OGtrushalpatel4 жыл бұрын
only MPS i care about is the car
@vanessabarbeezy4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!! I love you
@shammaalali3524 жыл бұрын
can someone tell me what dose it mean If the initial government value was 25b? like what do we do with the number, what does it show?
@dgfcl56ify4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! i fell asleep throught this part in the chapter because it was so confusing to read. thanks again!
@r.sai.adithya10754 жыл бұрын
Thanks it is a super short video
@zaddydynamite4 жыл бұрын
someone explain how monetray policy of lower intrest rates leads to infaltion
4 жыл бұрын
Easy. Money has.a cost. If I borrow $100 from you, you should expect something in return for the risk you are shouldering - I might not pay you back; and something for the inconvenience - you don't have the $100 to spend if you should need it. So I agree to pay you back after one year the $100 _plus_ $5 for your trouble. Summary: money has a cost. Now... The lower your interest rates, the less it's going to cost me. Summary: lower interest rates = cheaper money. I would probably buy a house if your interest rate is 1% but if you charge me 50% - no way. The house would end up costing me 50% more which is too expensive and I couldn't afford it any way. Summary: cheaper money leads to more purchasing. Now if there's 10 house's available but only one person buying then the buyer gets his choice. But if there are 1,000 people trying to buy then prices are going to go up - it's a sellers market! Summary: more purchasing leads to inflation. Review: Money has a cost (interest rate) -> lower interest rate is cheaper money -> cheaper money leads to more purchasing -> more purchasing leads to inflation Summary: Lower interest rates implies inflation