Se entiende generalmente emic como el punto de vista del nativo y etic como el punto de vista del analista, mediante una serie de herramientas metodológicas y de categorías.
@clarkvanderbyl17335 ай бұрын
I don't know how I feel about calling the sister in this situation " immature". One of the first things that was noted was that it was made very clear to the family and especially their sister that they don't want Grand gestures or interruptions. To go against that request doesn't sound like immaturity, it sounds like maliciousness.
@steopsych5 ай бұрын
So I tend to agree, but with caveats: The age of the sister matters to me here, if she's a child I don't expect very much from her. Also, 'being very clear with the family re grand gestures/interruptions' strikes me as odd - I'd want some clarity around exactly what was said as this is someone planning a public engagement moment while asking others to tone it down. With a bit more information about those two, I believe I agree.
@RandomName-my2uo5 ай бұрын
How are you selling yourself as a psychologist when you dont know basic shit like "how to meet people without tinder". No wonder this channel is so small 🤦🏼♀️
@IbrahimMalik-sv6zp5 ай бұрын
The microphone is a lot better here! And you’re not a dinosaur in your early 30s lmao
@steopsych5 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@clarkvanderbyl17335 ай бұрын
My suggestion for dating is meeting people naturally. That usually means going to a bar (or somewhere where lot of people commonly are) and getting lucky (not THAT way...). You can kind of narrow down the people you meet based on where you go. Sports bar vs club, Comic shop vs jewellery making classes, etc etc
@showcase05255 ай бұрын
They may both be assholes, but there is a difference. Shes was wholesale wrong, while he was rude. If theres some weight to be applied, being wrong follows all the negative and non recoverable aspects. You can recover from rudeness *if* being wronged doesnt checks you out of it. Her wrong checked him out of it. This is not equal. At all.
@steopsych5 ай бұрын
Thanks for your thoughts! I can see where you're coming from here - given that we know the consequences - but I tend to try and only evaluate actions without respect to consequences as a psychologist. Usually I'm in the middle of it in the 'choosing action' stage and we don't know what the consequences will be until they happen, so my thinking is drawn that direction.
@aawillma5 ай бұрын
They're both assholes but I disagree that he's the bigger asshole. It sounds like they both used each other and neither of them communicated. Ultimatums get a bad rap. Often they are just a very clearly defined and strict boundary. But if you don't mean it then it isn't a boundary or an ultimatum, it's just manipulation. Sidenote I know plenty of healthy open relationships and they all have three things in common: they were open from very early on when the relationship was healthy and happy, they close the relationship to outsiders or new partnerships when things get tough in the core partnership, and they communicate about literally everything. I've been with my wife since 2009 and we've been off and on open since 2010 after watching True Life I'm in a Throuple or something. Since our very first conversation we agreed it's a "2 yes, 1 no" situation and either of us can close it at any time for any reason. There has been some jealousy, some confusing boundaries, etc, but nothing that I feel has made our marriage any more difficult. We were briefly separated in 2020 but that was caused by covid trauma. We both decided to be "not poly" during that time to make sure we were giving the marriage the best chance. We both ended up celibate for over a year but through therapy and hard work our marriage survived. Maybe only possible because we're both women? Not sure. People seem quite "short term" thinking nowadays which is a bummer to see. If I'm with someone 50 years and only have a few years of hard times that seems worth it but maybe that's just me.
@steopsych5 ай бұрын
Thanks, some useful thinking points here for me in working with people, actually. Will chew on it. I agree - the communication is critical. Unfortunately, many people are already communicating poorly - then add very challenging aspects like extra parties to the relationship that further compound issues.
@confuflesjr21395 ай бұрын
Damn I was going to say "yes you are the asshole" at the start of the video but hearing your analysis I started to see there are layers to their situation.
@confuflesjr21395 ай бұрын
First
@theproudONE928 ай бұрын
Jews are very skilled at this
@KymSevigne Жыл бұрын
Thank you SO much!! You are the first person to help me understand the difference between Emic and Etic through your wonderful description!!!!
@tomasguzman3926 Жыл бұрын
Thx for the help
@austinpierce60532 жыл бұрын
Another theory to think about when thinking about all this is that of 'linguistic determinism'
@raghavsinghrajawat89142 жыл бұрын
Hii ...pls text me.....I want to know something about this more
@WorldwideTopTier2 жыл бұрын
You are a brilliant psychologist ,thankyou keep uploading
@ringgap3 жыл бұрын
No, you just described "bait and switch". Lowballing is when i have a car for sale for $3000 and a dude offers me $900 cash, thats a lowball offer. "No lowballers, I know what I have."
@jessrichardson8813 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! I am waiting for my textbook (Culture and Psychology 6th Ed) to arrive and now I won't be behind in my course!
@Lreserved3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@sadiatasnuva42273 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@dorisberlin49723 жыл бұрын
Thank you.💖
@Nick-wn3de3 жыл бұрын
What exactly is the difference to social identity theory?
@shonavanmeurs7003 жыл бұрын
Social identity is about intergroup relations (group A in reference to group B) and self-categorization is about intragroup (when do I belong to a group/how does my group identity work)
@COZYTW3 жыл бұрын
Are etic and emic perspectives mutually exclusive? Or are they two guidelines which we may lean towards, to have a study that's more emic-based with some etic aspects in examination etc.
@eimearoreilly36243 жыл бұрын
Should I summarise studies at all? I am writing my undergrad thesis which will need a lit review in the introduction.
@eimearoreilly36243 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@belovelove46643 жыл бұрын
I have a roomate who is from ukraine. As I have noticed there is alot of confusion.This is really helpful for learning cultures. Thank you..
@DisconnectedRoamer3 жыл бұрын
im about to do the conclusion before i do the introduction
@gammaknifeee35004 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@JyotiRani-om6dk4 жыл бұрын
Thank you. You have explained it in a best way. I have scrolled through many videos but your is best.
@teleny31274 жыл бұрын
Top explanation thanks
@angiegirl41744 жыл бұрын
Thank you.. I have really enjoyed and appreciated these videos.
@matt51374 жыл бұрын
Dudeu should consider making videos again if u've got time I'm sure u'll blow off
@marcela61584 жыл бұрын
Good explanation.
@richasharma41674 жыл бұрын
Very well explained. Thank you.
@Viv8ldi4 жыл бұрын
Is Ingroup favoritism and minimal group paradigm the same or is ingroup favoritism just an effect of minimal group paradigm?
@mirpurya98484 жыл бұрын
Amazing Job Pithy and concise
@bhaveshpatel77565 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@marshacreary24425 жыл бұрын
Interesting
@2martino35 жыл бұрын
Clear! Thanks mate
@yevgeni91485 жыл бұрын
You are great - well done. And, thank your helpful videos.
@catherineangel75 жыл бұрын
Brilliant
@jdr915 жыл бұрын
The mixture of your English accent to american accent is very distracting
@thorkrynu45515 жыл бұрын
Good balance - the victim blaming aspect can be so sickening.