Maz Econ

Пікірлер

@jackpacedebono1915 6 күн бұрын

tysm

@zuhaltokur8641 12 күн бұрын

brilliant, thank you

@mRGaMeRRGamer Ай бұрын

Simplified and highly helpful

@mubinhasan2632 Ай бұрын

thank you king

@josefinaramos6534 3 ай бұрын

how about GARP?

@kevonjr411 3 ай бұрын

Very clear explanation!

@aeri_lofi 3 ай бұрын

THANK YOU SO MUCH! ToT

@chocomilk9228 6 ай бұрын

Great help!

@annemarieahononga44 7 ай бұрын

Parfait mercii beaucoup

@lexirish4618 8 ай бұрын

Very informative video for my University course. I really appreciate the help!

@jonathansimukoko466 8 ай бұрын

Well presented. Thank you. Everyone else on Tube didn't explain it as such

@Tyler-wj4us 8 ай бұрын

Excellent explanation, and straight to the point saving me for my final!

@Regi.Obimae 10 ай бұрын

Thank you very much Maz Econ, the explanation was short, simple and clear.

@AnoraWu 10 ай бұрын

Thanks a lot!

@eretna2480 Жыл бұрын

thank you a lot brother you saved my skin

@eldaralizade1707 Жыл бұрын

Brief, concise, straight to the point. Thank you.

@tajribintayhaque3353 Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for your clear explanation ✨

@amnashahzadi7275 Жыл бұрын

Very well...

@peterkasongomwelwa9325 Жыл бұрын

Impressive

@xyz-pg3zd Жыл бұрын

Basically someone is getting ducked over

@hritikawadhawan6707 Жыл бұрын

thank youu

@alexanderthedude5474 Жыл бұрын

Youre a real one

@johnathanhunter1351 2 жыл бұрын

0 2 2 2 4 is not Pareto Efficient. Miko is worse off because she wanted 'fewer' (a small number of) bars not no bars. 1 2 2 2 3 would be efficient.

@Darvin-Breen Жыл бұрын

0 is still fewer than one

@johnathanhunter1351 Жыл бұрын

@itzflyboyofficial5533 fewer means a smaller number. 0 is supposed to represent the absence of negative and positive numbers. It represents nothing, not fewer things.

@Darvin-Breen Жыл бұрын

@@johnathanhunter1351 no fewer simply means lower than what you already have. Lets change the example so you understand better. Lets use hours of work. If Mike prefers fewer hours of work and he currently has to work 2 hours , this doesn’t mean once he gets to 1hour he will be okay. The concept of needing fewer implies that you prefer as few as possible so Mike prefers having fewer books(fewer than whatever he is currently having) . This can only stop at 0 when there is nothing left to give up. Sorry for the long text

@johnathanhunter1351 Жыл бұрын

@itzflyboyofficial5533 Fewer implies she still wants at least 1. Otherwise, she would say she didn't want any. Fewer is less of, not none. I'm being finicky, but words to me are Important. I guess she needs to be more specific!

@asataala9477 9 ай бұрын

@@johnathanhunter1351 to me saying fewer makes perfect sense. zero is fewer than 1 and so she prefers zero over one. to say she doesn't want any means that having zero is of highest benefit to her, but doesn't necessarily mean that having one is better than having two. I know it's an old thread but I comment anyways haha

@shytee6477 2 жыл бұрын

You're a lifesaver

@eminecanankoca7390 2 жыл бұрын

thank you so much, finally I found someone made me understand

@69thAndYorkAve 2 жыл бұрын

This is one of THE BEST explanations and derivations of a constant & growing perpetuity on the internet. Thank you!!

@073-sakthivels2 2 жыл бұрын

Super bro it's much more clear

@aashirimran466 2 жыл бұрын

Blue marker is barely visible 🙁

@emilycestari 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you :) fantastic video

@mhshohag2558 2 жыл бұрын

Nice explanation, i think no one except you explained the edgeworth box like this. First you took two individual graph then rotate it and proved how the combined graph actually comes in. Thank you

@tanvigoel7411 2 жыл бұрын

thank you so much for such great explanations.

@ajhaastha6283 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for this.

@lornahonchoke4397 2 жыл бұрын

Quite helpful. thank you

@randombobpie 2 жыл бұрын

magnifique

@anshu9125 2 жыл бұрын

Such fabulous content. You make look everything so easy!

@mawiark6516 2 жыл бұрын

Keep going in english it helps a lot

@definitelynotme3482 2 жыл бұрын

Hello! I found your video really helpful, however, in my case the total prices of bundels are all the same. Does that mean that warp and sarp are both violated?

@楊惠閔-y5k 2 жыл бұрын

I think it’s true if the case is completely identical to the video (total costs are all the same but he still chooses X1 at p1, X2 at P2, X3 at P3)