Fr please I need the name of this theme

It's Wuthering waves ost 44 1:36:36

Yeah same frfr

it's a bug

Wew I guess I am not the only one, I thought it was only me for a second 🤣

I think everyone is having this problem

@@MissxLariz yes, I was wondering if other people have such a problem and it turned out that many people have a problem with the music in the game. There is no such problem now, it has been fixed.

@@giotto7303 Ah they fixed it today? I havent checked yet

@@MissxLariz I just played for 2 hours and everything was fine with the music. At least for me. xD If everything works well for you, then enjoy the game.

fr, there's no way the complaints that can absolutely be boiled down to "they just don't personally like it" can be called objective, apparently "objective" means "subjective" now but subjective still means subjective to those people, it's really wack

I love the style, but fuck the style, THE ADRENALINE it induces during combat is worrying, this is a good thing.

frfr, no music is 'objectively' bad, wtf are people on lol you either like it or don't, and if you don't, that's cool, go listen to something you love. like why even comment on it, it's so weird

​@@cloud_lost_in_thought This is not quite correct actually, if you work in the art field, whether its visual, audible or otherwise, you'll understand that subjectivity only goes so far, its easy to say music is all subjective, but then you can apply that logic to everything in life by simply saying "perspective", which is a poor approach to analysis and critique. There ARE in fact objective values to music and art in general. Someone can sing horribly and there'll always be 1 or 2 people out there who think "hey that sounds alright", but based on standards that exist for a reason, it doesnt mean it isnt bad. its just like video games, another medium of art, a game can be objectively bad, and you're still allowed to like it, but when player count, sales, and public feedback are all accessible and all signs point to "This will never succeed in the market' then that game is in fact bad. And outside of standards you also have a science to Appeal, in the same way that the brain processes things like beauty in facial symmetry. The same rings true for a singer, anyone who plays a guitar can tell you an out of tune one sounds bad even if you like it. Another point of reason here is Tone and context, Objectively, wuthering wave's music IS good, because it meets all the necessities of what is required for the game's style, Adrenaline, pacing, Aggression, and theme and how the brain recognizes sounds based on aesthetic. There is a saying for food that the japanese have, "you eat with your eyes". This same mentality can be applied to things like music. If i say "think about the Wild west", most people would immediately, even for a moment think about the stereotype of a desert outback, small town, high noon and bars, and for sound they'd immediately associate it with the expected instruments, harmonicas, guitars etc. How well you combine and match/contrast the chemistry of these things can make or break "atmosphere". Being able to do all of these things skillfully and make the masses of your audience enjoy it is part of how we measure something "objectively", using tangible credibility based on standards and patterns. In the same light, something can be objectively good, but people still dislike it, because simple objectivity does not always appear as appeal, this is how we end up with Niche categories that are intended for certain audiences but not others, and thus, Context defines such things, subjective yes, but at its core there are still objective values. Its like telling someone "yes you're technically right but..." There is a reason people pay money for art, it is because it is a skill, for something to be a skill there must be STRUCTURE, patterns and expectations that are met on some level, the rest of it is what you call creative liberty. ALSO, About the "If you dont like it why comment" sort of mentality, This is the sort of thing people say to deflect criticism, You are allowed to express you dont like something or that you think its bad, you are even allowed to be rude about it. Some will tell you "you couldve said this nicer". But a musician that knows what he's doing, or any artist in any field for this matter knows how to separate emotion from feedback and weigh it accordingly. If everyone went by the logic you've presented there, Wuthering waves' issues would never be addressed because its all "subjective". This is a poor approach to music, and unfortunately it is the same individuals who treat music in such a manner that are prone to be "tone deaf", they only hear what they think sounds good, they dont know the framework. Anyone who says wuthering waves music is objectively bad is not by default wrong in doing so, its simply a matter of whether or not they're able to solidify why they say this and have it reflect in both the reception vs the standard it can be expected to meet. This is why one would be incorrect in saying Wuwa's music is objectively bad, because it most definately, as stated earlier, checks all the NECESSARY boxes you could think of, and it reflects in its reception. REMEMBER, at the end of the day the job of the artist is not to please everybody, but to entertain as much of the audience as realistically possible, enough for it to be a success, you'll be diving into several miles deep rabbit holes if you try to talk about just how many angles music can be "objectively" viewed from based on the enjoyment of its audience as even the masses can simply be wrong about something, for example someone thinking a popular rapper or genre of rap is garbage, despite them being massively reknown, and you can judge even this by standards, comparing said individual to others in the genre (thus why competition is a good thing) Music CAN be objectively bad, and you are allowed to like music that is such. At the end of the day an audience always has a tendency to behave on some level, like a hive mind, this can be both for good measure or bad. Sometimes an audience is just full of idiots, and sometimes there are a few that just dont see the appeal or understand the language, as that is what art is at the end of the day, A language, and you either speak it, or you dont. To quote cyberpunk 2077 dialogue: each commenting on the music being bad in johnny's opinion~ V: "To each their own johnny" Johnny Silverhand: "Thats what folks with bad taste always say"

@@Verystoic wow, a thesis. Here’s the thing about all that: critical eye/ear, etc. aside (I’m a witer and proofreader, trust me, I know about the objectivity with witch someone in the field sees things others may not), you cannot deem a piece of art “objectively” bad in this context (youtube, yeah, we’re not in art school) unless you speak strictly for you. What you personally deem “objectively” bad, someone may love 🤷🏻‍♀️ that’s the beauty of art. An example: I think the Twilight books are so poorly written it’s laughable (most book critics would agree), but many people love them and that’s also ok. As for “why comment”: I was obv not talking about actually criticism, but people crapping on other people’s tastes or preferences. This is not a forum of experts giving their expert opinion on a piece of music of the purpose of examination. It’s KZbin. People come here to enjoy some music they like. It’s really not that deep. We are all allowed to enjoy what we enjoy.