Welcome

welcome

Thank you for the clarification. You're right, the Exeter manuscript does not contain Beowulf. The four main Old English poetic manuscripts are distinct in their contents, and it's great to see them correctly identified. It's important to highlight that these manuscripts provide a diverse view of Anglo-Saxon poetry.

Beowulf is contained in another manuscript known as the Nowell Codex (Cotton Vitellius A.xv). Both the Exeter Book and the Nowell Codex are key sources of Anglo-Saxon literature, but they are separate works. The Exeter Book primarily contains a variety of Old English poems and riddles, while the Nowell Codex includes Beowulf alongside other texts like The Wonders of the East and Judith.

The Jacobean Age traditionally spans from 1603 to 1625, corresponding to the reign of King James I. Events within this timeline are typically considered part of the Jacobean era, focusing on its cultural, literary, and historical developments. The closure of theatres in 1642 occurred much later, during the English Civil War, under the rule of Charles I. It is not a Jacobean event but rather part of the broader history of English drama and Puritan influence. If this event was included in a discussion of the Jacobean Age, it might have been an oversight or an attempt to draw connections between the theatrical traditions established in earlier periods and their eventual suppression.

welcome

welcome

welcome

Thank you sir

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fnm1h2Bshcxsqdk

​@@QaiserSajjad Thank you so much! 🙏

Welcome

You're welcome!

Welcome

Thanks for your appreciation! Glad you find it helpful.

Welcome

Glad you found it interesting. I'll see what I can do about adding quotes.

Thank you for sharing this! It’s amazing to know my video is being used in classrooms, even internationally. Best wishes for your studies at the University of Klagenfurt!

You're welcome!

Différance: Spelling and Meaning Derrida introduces the term “différance” (spelled with an ‘a’ instead of the usual ‘e’ in “difference”) to highlight two intertwined processes in language: to differ and to defer. In French, différance and différence are pronounced the same, so you only “see” the difference in writing. This pun underscores how meaning continually slips between presence and absence. To Differ: A sign (a word, concept, image) derives its meaning not from an inherent essence but from how it contrasts with other signs. For instance, we understand “cat” in part because it is not “dog,” not “mouse,” not “car,” and so on. This interplay of differences-this network of contrasts-structures our understanding of language. To Defer: Meaning is never fully “present” or complete, because each sign points to more signs and further contexts. If you try to define “cat,” you may think of “feline,” “mammal,” “domestic,” each of which again requires further definitions. Meaning thus emerges through an endless chain of references-constantly deferred and never fully closed or complete. Together, these two aspects of différance show that language is inherently unstable: we can never pin down a final, fixed meaning because it is always formed through contrast and continually postponed by its references to other terms and contexts. Trace: Presence and Absence Every sign or concept carries within it traces of the other words and concepts it differs from. For example, the meaning of “light” implicitly carries the trace of “dark,” since it is recognized partly by what it is not. This “residue” or “leftover” within a sign is what Derrida calls the trace. No Pure Origin Because each sign depends on other signs to define it, no word or meaning can ever stand on its own as an original or pure concept. Each sign is haunted by traces of its supposed opposites or alternatives, blurring any clear boundary between what it is and what it is not. Eternal Movement Since every concept is woven with traces of other concepts, meaning is an ongoing movement rather than a stable entity. The trace reminds us that there is always something absent shaping the present meaning-something that has left its imprint, even if we do not see it directly. In Deconstructive Criticism Putting différance and trace into practice, deconstructive critics look for how a text’s meaning is produced by differences and by the traces of those differences. They interrogate supposed oppositions-such as presence/absence, speech/writing, literal/metaphorical-to reveal how neither term can exist in isolation from the other. This analysis shows that what appears to be a stable center or essence is actually built on a complex interplay of signs, forever differing and deferring, always woven through by traces that prevent any final, absolute interpretation.

@QaiserSajjad wow ,amazing , thanks alot

Thank you

Thanks for subscribing!

Hope you find the content helpful!

As soon as possible

welcome

welcome

@@gunterxvoices4101 Exactly It’s actually about Jesus in revelation. Revelation 7

Welcome! Glad you found it helpful.

welcome

amen

Thanks

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. From a postcolonial perspective, the idea of the 'White Man's Burden' has been criticized for justifying colonialism under the guise of a civilizing mission. Many scholars argue that this notion masked the exploitation and subjugation of colonized people, portraying imperialist actions as benevolent. The idea that Britain conquered territories for 'palatable food' might sound humorous, but it oversimplifies and overlooks the deeper economic and cultural impacts of colonialism. The phrase ‘Brown Man’s Burden’ could be seen as a satirical twist on Kipling's words, yet it risks reinforcing the same problematic ideas by suggesting gratitude for colonial actions. Food and culture exchange can be appreciated, but it’s essential to acknowledge the historical context of power dynamics, exploitation, and resistance that came with colonialism.

@@QaiserSajjad Given your name I’m not entirely sure whether I’m not getting your sense of humour? If you are serious I do apologise.

@@QaiserSajjad oh- boy? Lol

Sure

💕💕💕

Glad you found it intriguing! Shakespeare's brilliance lies in how he brings historical figures to life with such realism. Mark Antony’s speech truly feels timeless, even though it’s set centuries ago. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

💕💕💕

Thank you

Good questions raised

Definitely brilliant poet, but it was truth of Empire, colonised people consider it otherwise.

I appreciate your feedback.

Thank you 😊

I'm glad you found it helpful!