Ok, in the future, I will try to make some videos without music and with the original sound....

Thanks for watching....🙏

Yes, you might be right, but if a pot stays under the oven for 2 hours, it could cause a slight disruption in the production process. What are your thoughts on this?

We do it at work when there isn’t enough free board in our pots. A short delay in production isn’t worth someone’s life or the longevity of the equipment either

Thanks for Watching....👍

Thanks for watching.

Yeah, it's such a missed opportunity. you are right...Imagine if they could harness all that wasted energy for something useful. It could make a real difference. but sometimes you can't do it.

They do, slag is recycled for many other purposes, I can't remember what they are, haven't looked at it since my indoc, but it is not just dumped to be forgotten Source- I work in a steel plant

It sounds like you had a long and fulfilling career operating a KRESS pot carrier at USS in Gary, Indiana. Thirty years is quite an impressive tenure! Now that you're retired, I hope you're enjoying the well-deserved relaxation and perhaps pursuing some hobbies or interests you didn't have as much time for before.

@@SteelChannel1 THANK YOU

Thank you for watching and coming here. I'll try to do it. Can you please tell me what kind of molten steel is interesting for you? I will make it when I go to the steel plant.

Thanks for watching my friend. 👍🙏

The number of hours a slag pot carrier works in a day or during a shift can vary depending on several factors such as the specific operations of the facility, production requirements, maintenance schedules, and safety regulations. Typically, in industrial settings, slag pot carriers may operate for several hours continuously during a shift, which can range from 8 to 12 hours per day. However, it's essential to consult the specific policies and practices of the company or facility where the slag pot carrier is being used to determine the exact operating hours. Additionally, adherence to safety guidelines and regulations is crucial in determining operational schedules.

more than 700K€

@@SteelChannel1 Thanks! I'll have to look at the conversion value of that.

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Thanks for Watching.

Thank you very much for watching.🙏

Thanks for Watching.

This project in fact, this project remained silent for a long time and old project for a while until it was finally launched after a long period. I also ask about why this dust appears in this manner and color. Now, I am sharing with you the response I received from the factory manager, hoping to shed some light on this matter. this is the answer and i would be happy if you tell me whats your idea about it: "That was just electrical and hydraulic equipment testing and During full commissioning, all of this dust will be completely absorbed by the dust collection system."

thanks for Watching. 👍

Green steel?

😉👍

Thanks for watching... Please send me an email and give me your suggestions.

Did you see, already emailed you

Thanks for watching... Please send me an email and give me your suggestions.

Thanks fo watching.....Zes...Fortunately, the driver is alive.

@@SteelChannel1 is he hot

@@WeebRemover4500 ???

Thanks for Watching.

@@SteelChannel1 Hi, Dear.I saw your KZbin channel and understand you are a very hardworking youtuber. Very nice video on your channel, I really enjoyed it. According to your channel, I noticed that you have good quality videos but the videos are not getting views and subscribers are not increasing. You need to optimize your channel and do video SEO to reach your target audience. Otherwise, if you upload videos to your channel throughout the year, none of your videos will get viral views. If your channel is optimized a little and if the videos are SEO then your channel will rank very fast and your channel will grow.

@@SEO-EXPERT--ARYAN Thank you so much for your kind words and constructive feedback on my KZbin channel! I'm delighted that you enjoyed my videos. I really appreciate your insights regarding the optimization of my channel and the importance of video SEO. I'm well aware that these are crucial factors for the success of a KZbin channel. Your recommendations are extremely helpful, and I will definitely focus on improving my channel management and delving deeper into optimizing my videos for search engines. Once again, thank you for your support and for taking the time to review my content.

if u need any hlp,i can@@SteelChannel1

Maybe....I think that you are right....

Thanks for watching... 🙏

You're welcome !@@SteelChannel1

🙏

Thanks for watching. 🙏

Thanks for Watching....and thanks for your Question....

Bei der Vacuum Degassing wird Dampf verwendet, um den Druck im Vakuum zu regulieren. Der genaue Druck in Torr, den erreichen, hängt von den spezifischen Anforderungen des Prozesses ab. In der Regel streben jedoch an, einen Druck von [spezifischer Druck in Torr] oder niedriger zu erreichen, um eine effiziente Entgasung zu gewährleisten und die gewünschten Ergebnisse zu erzielen. Du musst jedoch den spezifischen Druck angeben, der für deine Anwendung relevant ist. Der Druck hängt oft von den Materialien und den spezifischen Bedingungen ab, die für den Entgasungsprozess erforderlich sind.

Thanks so much for the explanation, and thanks for watching.

It's not a bad design. These pots will become warped over time, from prolonged use. It's an inevitable consequence of dealing with materials of high temperatures. What was the actual reason for this accident was the operator overconfident, and thus not following procedure. This pot is clearly overfilled. He should let the pot sit for around 2 hours to form a upper hardened crust, so the molten slag does not pour out when he decides to move the pot.

Thanks for your idea. While I understand the importance of slag as a byproduct in steel production, it's worth exploring alternative methods to mitigate any potential drawbacks. Perhaps we can explore more advanced technologies or processes that reduce the need for dumping slag in undesirable areas or find ways to accelerate its cooling process. Innovation in the industry could lead to more environmentally friendly practices without compromising the crucial production of steel. It's essential to continuously evaluate and improve our methods to ensure a balance between meeting the world's steel demand and minimizing any adverse effects on the environment. another better solution is to use a Slag Pot Carrier, depending on the Railway system. It has significantly lower costs. It's a byproduct that, when handled responsibly, doesn't pose major environmental concerns.

@@SteelChannel1 A Slag Pot Carrier is nothing more than a wheeled loader that carries the same slag to the same pit and dumps it down the same slope into the same hole. It's just a rubber-tired truck instead of a steel-wheeled train. It uses the same diesel as the train. Whatever the difference between them may be is negligible. I could even argue that the Slag pot truck uses more evil diesel fuel because it's basically a one-load-at-a-time type deal, while the train can pull many cars from the base of the blast furnace to the dump, each of those cars having 4-10x the capacity of the truck loader. And I would add, the Slag Pot carrier is a single use device; its only function is to load and carry the hot slag to the dump site, load-by-load. Assuming a steel mill has train rails running through it, a little train running around a steel mill could conceivably carry finished steel billets (huge slabs) product to a external rail terminal and/or from a slab mill to a rolling mill, within the footprint of a mill. Most steel mills have rails running through them. If they don't and such a mini rail network would have to be constructed from scratch, then maybe the wheeled loader would make more sense. But I think you could look at any steel mill in the world and you'd find that rail network within the footprint of the mill. Even if you look at Steel Dynamics or Nucor, the most recently constructed mills in the US, they have rail lines running across their plant.

@@alanpecherer5705 Firstly, thank you very much for the interesting insights and discussion. While the comparison between a Slag Pot Carrier and a steel-wheeled train raises valid points about load capacity and fuel efficiency, it's essential to consider the broader operational context. The assertion that the Slag Pot Carrier is essentially a one-load-at-a-time device and may use comparatively more fuel is noteworthy. However, the efficiency of these vehicles depends on the scale and layout of the steel mill. if a steel mill lacks existing rail infrastructure, the construction of a mini rail network may be a substantial investment. In such cases, a wheel loader can provide a more practical solution, especially for smaller scale steel mills where the cost and logistics of installing rails is much, much higher. Additionally, the observation that a Slag Pot Carrier is a single-use device focused solely on slag transport highlights its specificity in function. In conclusion, the choice between a Slag Pot Carrier and a steel-wheeled train should be contingent on factors like existing infrastructure, the scale of production, and long-term operational goals.

@@SteelChannel1Look, the whole process of making steel in a blast furnace absolutely commands rail connectivity to the site. Kilotons of coal, limestone, and iron ore must be brought in. That is rail, nothing but. Those materials also have to be stockpiled in enormous piles because the furnace cannot be allowed to run out of its various feedstocks. Most blast furnaces run continuously for YEARS and shutting them down is not flicking a switch, it is more like a religious experience. So they always need a month's worth of coal and ore & limestone. So they have to have enormous piles of this stuff and it is not going to happen in a suburban subdivision. The whole operation has to be sited in a remote area with lots of land around. Then, those mat'ls have to be moved around the site. There is simply no way a blast furnace does not have rail lines running up to it and through it. Also, rail is not especially expensive to put in. It's gonna last 60+ years without much maintenance, while the roads your slag cars run on require maintenance far more frequently. But it's not even a consideration, the furnace has to have rail, there is no other way. Nobody has to think about this, is what I am saying. If you are running a sandwich shop, you cannot have just enough bread and cold cuts to operate to 11:30 on any day, you have to build up & manage materials in excess of your immediate needs. You can't think about it. But more specifically, if you think blast furnaces are egregious, horrible polluters (and they are and that is why I love them) then focusing on the slag pot cars vs slag trains is worrying about the last 1% of the issue. The pollution comes from the coking process which generates astronomical amounts of ammonia, sulfur dioxide and trioxide, benzene and toluene and all manner of hydrocarbons. But all of those chemicals have been recognized as valuable byproducts and have been scavenged from the coke ovens for 60 years, at least. To worry about the diesel pollution from the slag pot car vs the little train is silly. To worry about the limestone slag being dumped back onto the ground where it came from in the first place is...worry-wart stuff. It ain't worth it.

@@alanpecherer5705 I completely understand your perspective and reasoning. Moreover, I do not have any slag pot carrier and do not intend to sell any product in this regard. Given my background in this industry over several years, I have a genuine interest in these topics. Your viewpoint is entirely rational. However, it's possible that your context assumes a country with a well-established infrastructure without any problems. In nations facing challenges in procuring spare parts for locomotive engines or other electrical components due to sanctions or other reasons, the inability to obtain these parts can lead to locomotives being parked for extended periods. In some cases, even if a locomotive is repairable, its components are removed and repurposed for other locomotives as spare parts, making tractors a practical solution in such scenarios. Regarding pollution, the discussion can span several hours. On the whole, I would like to say I concur with your perspective.

maybe in future....

As you can see, unfortunately, without coordination, after the slag fills in the pot, the vehicle moves away, and the output under the furnace opens again, and the slag is released again without attention to whether there is a pot underneath or not. It seems likely that the explosion was caused by the presence of water, which is normally used for cooling the tires and the surrounding environment, and was there.

I don't understand what you means. can you explain me more.

@@SteelChannel1 Two things: 1st there really must have been something combustible (entrapped, compressed, gases? Carbonates?) where there should be only liquid inert slag. Something was wrong in the furnace. It doesn't look like the ladle was wrong. The second is this modern "Green" topic/fashionable discussions of making Steel with hydrogen, instead of good old coke! That could cause unexpected explosions; hydrogen is very "leaky", too. Then the iron made with hydrogen could be of very brittle quality! Once the hydrogen is in the steel, You don't get it out, completely. I wouldn't trust to build bridges with that kind of steel!

@@konradcomrade4845 Thank you for your explanations; I think they are very reasonable.

@@konradcomrade4845 you are right....It's possible that unexpected combustible materials or conditions in the furnace could lead to issues. Proper control and monitoring of the steelmaking process are crucial to avoid such problems. However, without specific details about the incident you're referring to, it's challenging to provide a precise analysis. Hydrogen in Steel Production: The use of hydrogen in steel production is indeed a topic of interest and is part of efforts to reduce carbon emissions in the industry. The traditional method of using coke in blast furnaces releases carbon dioxide. Using hydrogen as a reducing agent instead of coke is seen as a more environmentally friendly alternative. However, the transition to hydrogen in steelmaking must be carefully managed to address potential challenges. Hydrogen is known for its flammability and, as you mentioned, its ability to permeate metals, potentially affecting the properties of the steel. Engineers and researchers are working on developing methods to control these issues and ensure the quality and safety of hydrogen-based steel. Brittleness of Hydrogen-Infused Steel: The brittleness concern you raised is valid. Hydrogen can cause embrittlement in certain materials, and this is a significant challenge to be addressed in the development of hydrogen-based steelmaking processes. Researchers are exploring methods to mitigate hydrogen-induced brittleness to ensure that the resulting steel meets the necessary structural and safety standards. Trust in Hydrogen-Infused Steel for Critical Structures: The trustworthiness of hydrogen-infused steel for critical structures like bridges is a matter of ongoing research and development. Engineers and scientists are working to understand the behavior of such steel under different conditions and to develop techniques to ensure its reliability.

Thanks for watching. 🙏

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching. 🙏

Thanks for watching the videos... 🙏

Yes, that's really interesting process.

Thanks for watching. 😊🙏

Thanks so much.

Thanks for watching. 🙏

Thanks for watching.

Thanks for watching.

Yes, definitely... This is very dangerous job.