7th constitutional amendment Act ke according state reorganisation Commission form hui thi ,

Wrong , first check your information ,

पीछे बज रही धुन तो और भी सुंदर 🎉

The film focuses extensively on falsehoods about Karsandas Mulji, presenting him as a devout follower of Lord Krishna and a believer in Puranic deities, which contradicts historical records and his own statements in Maharaj Libel case. In reality, Karsandas Mulji was a critic of Puranic deities and did not believe in the stories of Lord Krishna's Ras Leela, which he described as false and amorous. His statements during the Maharaj Libel case, documented in his Gujarati newspaper "Satya Prakash" on October 21, 1860, reflect his disbelief in the Puranic texts and his systematic attack on Hinduism as part of a broader British colonial conspiracy. 1. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that all the Hindū Sanātana sects arisen in KaliYug are false “…the sect of the Maharajas has arisen in the KaliYug, therefore, according to the doctrines of the Shastras, it must be false ...” - “Satyaprakash” Gujarati Newspaper of 21st Oct, 1860 by Karsandas Mooljee 2. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that the stories of Lord Krishna, Gopees, Raas lila are false and amorous. “…The story of the "gopees" and the incarnations of Vishnoo are believed in by several sects, but are opposed to the ancient religion. The Shaivites believe in the incarnations of Vishnoo equally with the Vaishnayas. As far as I have reacl, all the sacred books do not contain amorous passages. I am not aware whether Sir William Jones has said that "Krishna is to this day the darling god of Hindū women." I have heard the story of Brahma coming out of an egg after remaining three millions and millions of years. I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Veds, which 1 have not read. The stories are considered by most Vaishnavas are literally true…” - Karsandas Mooljee, cross-examination by Mr. Bayley as part of Maharaj libel case proceedings (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249) 3. Karsandas Mooljee accepting that he has not read the Hindū Sanātana texts and does not believe in any texts apart from Veds. Hindū Sanātana believes in multiple texts as its foundational and core texts including Ved, Puranas, Smriti, Tantra agama, Itihaas, and Vedant. “…I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Vedas, which 1 have not read…” - (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249) Inaccuracies in the movie (as compared to Maharaj Libel case proceedings) The movie contains several inaccuracies regarding the beliefs and practices of the Pushtimarg sect. During the trial, the movie shows Karsandas explaining the correct meaning of Brahma Sambandh to the court, which was that all things are to be offered only to Lord Krishna and not to the Maharaja. However, this stand was actually taken by Jadunathji Maharaj in the real-life proceedings of the Maharaj Libel case. In fact, Karsandas Mulji maliciously and scandalously tried to prove to the court, by mistranslating the commentary verses of the Brahma Sambandh mantra by Gokulnathji (one of the Acharyas of Pushtimarg), and twisting the translation to mean that everything should be offered to the Maharaja and not to Krishna. This portrayal presents views that are far from the reality about Karsandas. The dialogues delivered on Brahma Sambandh by Karsandas in the movie were actually said by Jadunathji Maharaj as per the Maharaj Libel case proceedings. In the film "Maharaj," the facts of the historical Maharaj Libel case have been significantly distorted, especially in the pivotal trial scene. The movie inaccurately portrays the dialogue exchange between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj concerning the Brahmasambandha mantra, thereby misleading the audience about the actual events and character representations. Misrepresentation of Dialogues In the movie, the dialogues between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj during the trial are swapped, leading to a skewed portrayal of their respective positions. The film shows Jadunathji Maharaj accepting the Brahmasambandha mantra to mean that followers must offer their wives to the Maharajas. This is a gross mis-presentation of the historical records. In reality, it was Karsandas Mulji who presented this erroneous and defamatory interpretation in the court, not Jadunathji Maharaj. Historical Facts According to the actual case proceedings, it was Karsandas Mulji who twisted the meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra to suggest that the entire sect, including its original Acharyas, endorsed heretical practices. This misrepresentation aimed to malign the Pushtimarg sect and its spiritual leaders. Karsandas's allegations were part of a broader attempt to depict the sect as morally corrupt and its practices as deviant. Jadunathji Maharaj's Defense Contrary to the film's portrayal, Jadunathji Maharaj defended the true meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra in court. He clarified that the mantra meant all offerings should be made to Lord Krishna, not to the Maharajas. Furthermore, Jadunathji Maharaj acknowledged in the court that he was not a deity but a guru, emphasizing his role as a spiritual guide rather than a divine figure. This critical defense by Jadunathji Maharaj was aimed at correcting the false narratives presented by Karsandas Mulji and maintaining the integrity of the Pushtimarg sect's teachings. Character Assassination The film's portrayal of Jadunathji Maharaj as a manipulative and heretical figure is a severe mischaracterization that strays far from the documented reality. By depicting him as someone who endorses immoral practices, the film unjustly vilifies him and misrepresents the true nature of his statements during the trial. This distortion not only damages his reputation but also misleads the audience about the fundamental principles of the Pushtimarg sect.

Thanks..

Bakwas

Very nice thank you so much ❤

उम्मीद तो जग गई लेकिन किसी ने इन्हीं बादलों से बारिश की उम्मीद भी की होगी 😢

Mdm ji apne political s5ke nota dedijeye plz

Pata nahi tha😮😮😮

❤❤

Hello ma'am UP ke district court ke final order ki certified copy nikalwane me kitna kharcha lagta hai plz bataiyega

करसंदास christian convert tha tbhi aisa hua

❤

Thank you mam ❤ aur bhi video banayega please

it wasn't the last case of jury system correct your knowledge please , it was the first case when demand arose to end jury system, jury system ended in 1973

Thoughts of a mad DOG 😂😂

Thank uu mem❤ kal mera exam hai uss video se mujhe marx ke taughts ke bare me overall knowledge to hua ❤

Sb Dharma Pavitra hi he sirf sanatan nahi he ekela Pavitra … fark sirf itna he koi Sache bhaav se manta nahi Hindu hoke Dusre Dharm ka apmaan nahi kar Sakta koi

BJP rule crony capitalism congress rule socialism

Thank you ma'am....!❤

10th board Exams yaad aa gye.

Sundar

Shut up.. And get your facts check before barking any nonsense

Nice

❤❤❤❤❤

Mahabharat se hi pata chalta hai ki ek parivar me dharmi log b rehte hai aur adharmi bhi. Aur iiss case ne punah sabit kia hai ki jeet sada sarvada dharma ki hi hoti hai. Karsan Das hi Krishna dwara chune gaye Parth the jinke dwara unhone apne naam par hone wale adharm ko logo ke samne uska sach laya. Hare Krishna.

No doubt Sanatan Dharm sabse Pavitra Dharm hai aur sabse khubsurat bhi aur iski ijjat ham sab sanatani Karte bhi hain per kuchh log aise hote Hain Jo Apne swarth ki purti hetu Dharm ke Naam per adharm karte hain aur usko Na jaane Naam per adharm karte hain aur Na jaane hamare shlok Granth aadi likhe Gaye ko galat Matlab Nikal kar Apne andar ki hawas Apne andar ke matlab ko pura Karte Hain Asaram bapu Ram Rahim Radha man Sarathi Baba aur Na jaane kitne kitne Dharm ke thekedar hamare Vishwas ka andha fayda uthate hain aur ham bevkuf log Hain Jo Bhagwan per Vishwas karne ki jagah ine pakhdiyon ke andhvishwas per Vishwas kar lete hain jaise ki movie mein bataen kya na hi ham Dharm ke khilaf hai aur naahi Bhagwan ke ham to puchte Hain unhen jo humse bhi Bade Hain vah hamen bachayenge ham kya unhen bachane nikale hain hamari ladai in Dharm ke thekedaron se hai Jo andhvishwas ko badhava dete Hain Jo hamare Aastha ke sath khilvad Karte Hain aur inko poochho to vah dusri culture mein yah ho raha hai vah ho raha hai yah batane Lage pahle khud to sahi ho jao

जैसे ही रोक लगाई तुरंत मैंने देखने के लिए डाउनलोड कर ली बैन होने से पहले ही डाउनलोड करके जो लोग नहीं देख सकते वो देख लेने का मजा ही अलग है 😂

🎉

Gst had brought in that day also july 2016 midnight please make video on 101 caa and art related it

Vallabh bhai Patel ki beti ne bhi Charan Sewa to ki hogi.

If you have problem with the truth then you are the problem

महाराज मूवी तो ब्राह्मण वर्ग के कृतियों और शुद्ध(obc) पर किया गया अत्याचार है पर हिंदू पर कैसे प्रोपेगेंडा हो गया??

नैतिक रूप से देखा जाए जो गलत है वह गलत कहना चाहिए लेकिन कुछ लोग आज भी जब खुद पर उंगली उठती है उसको प्रोपेगेंडा बोल देते हैं

जो विरोध कर रहे हैं वास्तव में वह ब्राह्मण है

Please do make video on leader of opposition, does it belong to any legal post or constitution or rules book of parliament, convention in parliament

Mount kilimanjaro and alps🎉

🎉

🎉

Aaj bhi is sampradaye me angikar कुप्रथा मौजूद हे

Serious nonsense … pls get correct info .

Adhuri jankari ke sath apni bakwas mat karo pehle puru jankari lo fir bat karo

This still happens in havelis of Gujarat. And devotees are blind We have direct relationship with our beloved God we don't need any pervert guru and brothel like havelis

Yeh galat hai. Pehale case padho, fir KZbin pe bakvas karo

🎉

Nice information 👌

I have searched m c Mehta I found your video again 🎉

❤