What urban designers usually ignore is the importance of ornament. 'Variety' comes close but it is not the same. Urban designers think in terms of structures and volumes, but ornament is really the bridge between the structures and our feelings. Take any beautiful city like Prague, Rome or Paris, remove the ornament and the city is destroyed. All the other things that seemed to be important, height and width, proportions, traffic, actually are secondary.
@spikedpsycho23836 ай бұрын
pisss off.
@sizor3ds Жыл бұрын
Toronto could keep the publicly owned railway, and just turn the parking lots into rented out land. Then use the revenue from rents to fund transit
@matthewconstantine5015 Жыл бұрын
I'm in Rome right now and the city has amazing bones, but this is by far the most car-brained, car choked city I've ever visited. Worse than Manhattan. Worse than Paris. It's like it has all the right ingredients to be an amazing urbanist paradise, but they decided to treat it like a North American, car-centric city. Roads, sidewalks, crosswalks, all jammed with cars. And the streets are so loud. Great infrastructure ruined by cars.
@danielcarroll3358 Жыл бұрын
I'm surprised that none have commented. Thumbs up to the mayor from a neighbor (Berkeley)! I've never owned a car, have worked in four countries and am now retired at 77. He is on the right track.
@skittlesnspace Жыл бұрын
Great video!
@qjtvaddict Жыл бұрын
Maybe the commies were right
@marciosoares1052 Жыл бұрын
Hello, my husband and I need a place to live in Toronto in December 2023. It will be great share a house.
@MateusChristopher Жыл бұрын
Yeh its not hard to believe most economic output is the cities because suburbs don't output anything 😂
@bardmoseby745 Жыл бұрын
'Promosm' 😡
@winstonsolipsist1741 Жыл бұрын
Listening to communities and making sure different voices are heard and, apparently, ignored if you and your neighbors don't like what the city wants to do because you and your neighbors are too ignorant to understand how cities should be built.
@rauschma Жыл бұрын
I keep thinking that a family apartment should be two apartments that can be connected or separate: Then the (one or more) children can have their own space with its own entrance when they are, say, 16+. And when they move out, their apartment can be rented to someone else and the parents won’t live in an apartment that’s too large for them (which I have seen happen many times). Affordability could be an issue, though.
@korcommander Жыл бұрын
I specifically want to move to the suburbs to get away from all the "urbanization". Its nothing but ugly roads and crime.
@MrAronymous Жыл бұрын
Going to the suburbs to escape ugly roads? U sure?
@korcommander Жыл бұрын
@@MrAronymous yes actually. I can at least drive on the roads in the suburbs without having to worry about my car's or bike's suspension.
@Knightmessenger Жыл бұрын
@korcommander enjoy the suburban roads now before they break and suburbs cant afford to fix all of them.
@korcommander Жыл бұрын
@@Knightmessenger The big city couldn't fix its roads way before, despite all the money.
@Knightmessenger Жыл бұрын
@@korcommander makes you wonder why we keep building new infrastructure instead of fixing the existing one first.
@galactic904 Жыл бұрын
I'm a renter and not an owner nor developer.
@galactic904 Жыл бұрын
Hi, very good show. Could someone please elaborate about the section at 2:50 (many members of the development industry are worried and concerned about this new policy and say that it basically will block any new development to reach the 100 Units and will make 98% to 95% of the other Units "just as affordable". ) Thank you.
@eddie9559 Жыл бұрын
I'm I the only one not seeing any backyard or kids as she talks about them?
@blabla-rg7ky Жыл бұрын
the "if you love nature don't live in it!" statement is wrong. As someone who loves nature and lives surrounded by nature I can tell you with certainty that people ARE meant to live in nature. You can not live without it... I mean, technically you can live without nature, but it will be detrimental to both your mental and physiological health, so you should remove that motto from your life if you don't want to be guided by it continuously and suffer.
@benjamindumez Жыл бұрын
I dont think thats whats being said. People often live in suburbs to have the idea of "living in nature" but really the sprawl is just ruining the environment. Cities are often planned so poorly that they do not incorporate the parts of nature that you are talking about that are good for mental and physiological health. We should be adding those aspects to cities rather than making cities just endless freeways, parking lots, and department style stores. Some examples are much of chicagos shoreline being given to the public as different types of parks. Also when you look at cities like portland oregon they include lost of trees along streets. large parks like central park are also one thing. anyways, cities need to add lots of that along with density to create the green space and visual interest needed. The visual interest with architecture is another thing too. I think we can agree that you are right that people are meant to live in nature. but I think that we need to achieve that with density to also protect it from the negative externalties of sprawl. Also, when most people think of a "city" they are just thinking of a poorly planned city. It seems like you are thinking a city is the polar opposite of nature.
@red_skies80 Жыл бұрын
@@benjamindumezI think the best way to go about this is to build nature into the city rather that building the city into the nature. Though urban expansion is inevitable, I believe that there is a lot of value in terms of preserving some of that nature within the urban realm
@NoirMorter Жыл бұрын
At least you are honest in your disdain for suburbs which is a lot more than I can say for most other new age urban planners. I'll take living in nature before I live in a city any day.
@dominicgunderson Жыл бұрын
False dichotomy
@MrAronymous Жыл бұрын
If everyone lives in nature nobody lives in nature.
@dijikstra8 Жыл бұрын
You think living in a suburb is "living in nature"? I live in a densely populated area of Stockholm, Sweden with subway access, but still have a ten minute bike ride to two different large nature reserves, I think that is much preferable to the endless sprawl that is American suburbs. Suburbs are just a different kind of urban form, they're not nature simply because people have private lawns.
@NoirMorter Жыл бұрын
@@dijikstra8 that’s nice. Have you been to America?
@dijikstra8 Жыл бұрын
@@NoirMorter Yes I have, lived in NYC 15 years ago.
@MyDumbQuestion Жыл бұрын
Make the station the destination. I don't understand why that's such a hard concept to grasp for city governments. Great vid!
@MBT06 Жыл бұрын
I would never raise my kids in a suburb. No freedom. No connection. It was awful for me, and will be awful for the next generation.
@karld1791 Жыл бұрын
What homeowners are looking for is constantly rising house prices from a lack of supply by not allowing anything getting built. Not simply a new building reducing their home value they want constant increases.
@glenmurray3180 Жыл бұрын
It has always been about design and density... What we have is density without the principles of design that Jane succeeded in proving true. Downtown Toronto has seen highrise towers that blow away street-level life destroying local one-of-a-kind businesses and replacing them with a monotonous repetition block after block of a McDonald's, Shoppers Drug Mart, TD Bank, Cannabis shop, 7/11, Starbucks or similar chain store. When every place looks the same there is no such thing as place anymore.
@robertsun8922 Жыл бұрын
I think you hit on all very valid points to shift to a more sustainable and walkable city. However, I think you miss one key component is the difference between the street infrastructure we have here in US and Canada serving mainly cars to the many narrow, slow and shared streets in residential neighborhoods throughout Japan. That alone if you can solve that issue will help drive and accelerate all your other points you discussed. Transitioning away from cars to a walkable and transit-oriented city is the secret sauce for a host of issues and lead to more virtuous cycle of long term benefits within a community from housing affordability, stronger local economy, green infrastructure, grass roots planning/development, etc.
@delanotravis Жыл бұрын
Great video!
@seventhcompactor1505 Жыл бұрын
This is so stupid. They want to move felons into your elementary school neighborhoods.
@bobbyclair386 Жыл бұрын
Has this been built anywhere in Toronto? Is it allowed according to the current bylaws on any piece of residential zoned land ?
@hghayesh Жыл бұрын
Hi Naama, Thank you for the video is very informative and makes really good arguments. Can you please elaborate on Myth #2? I have always thought it good for the government to invest in social housing? Specially in a city like Toronto where prices are way above the average buyer. Is there no European model of social housing that would work for us ?
@TRWnan Жыл бұрын
My response to this segment, in meme format: 'Stares in Vienna"... In this section she's not debunking a NIMBY myth, she's making a political statement of opinion. Bad opinion. Harmful and either ignorant or callous opinion. ... She's just parroting ideology and provides zero justification for the opinions she is expressing as if they are facts. She claims "we" don't want the government to build housing (an opinion many do not share). She claims building public housing would raise taxes, which is flat out wrong - public housing pays for itself as the tenants pay rent and the costs are significantly lower (discussion to come on my next point). She claims the private sector can build housing more efficiently - a claim that depends on what definition of efficiency is - If measured only by financial return for investors, private for profit housing is more efficient. - If measured by cost to the public per housing unit delivered (but to who?), it's a wash or very close - If measured by cost to the residents, public or public supported co-operative housing is vastly more efficient. How does that work? There are a bunch of different categories of factors, incentives, and costs that are very different between the types of housing: | Rental | Condo | Co-op | Public Land Ownership | Investor | Collective | Public or | Public | | | Community or | | | | Collective | Unit ownership | Investor | Individual | Collective | Public Maintenence cost | Investor | Collective | Collective | Public | | or Individual| | Rent Paid to | Investor | Unit owner | Collective | Public Build Incentive | Max Rent | Max Profit | Housing | Housing Owner Incentive | Max Rent | Max Gain+Rent| Housing | Housing Cost Land |Seller wants the max mkt rate | Low Lease | Zero Build Finance |High rate short term bank loans| Credit Union | Access to low government rate Infrastrucure | Same in all categories Planning Dept | Close to same | Potentially Higher Materials | Close to same | Potential volume discount Developer Profit | Zero Or high | MAXIMIZED | Zero | Zero GC Labour | Same in all categories GC Profit | MAXIMIZED | MAXIMIZED | MAX or 0 | MAX or 0 if public employee Subtrades Labour | Same in all categories Subtrades Profit | MAXIMIZED | MAXIMIZED | MAX or 0 | MAX or 0 if public employee Mortgaged cost | MAXIMIZED | MAXIMIZED | Moderate | Construction & Maint cost only Mortgage Struct | Equity fund | Individual | Bond or Access to low government rate Resulting Rent | MAXIMIZED | MAXIMIZED | Moderate-Low | Minimum required Second Resident | MAXIMIZED | MAXIMIZED | Stable | Stable
Жыл бұрын
It would be good to show the entire floor plan, so we can see the aggregation of the apartments and the overall shape of the building.
@cliffwoodbury5319 Жыл бұрын
There should be covered walkways connected them and some may even have walk/bikeways even if they are 4-20 stories up so you can get from building to building. If you have them in large groups as they are in many of these pictures, you could have floor escalators or even people movers in the largest developments. And to make this work the best you may have deser clusters with gaps between them for larger green areas. Underground parking and corridors should be a must.
@globalfoodaction6748 Жыл бұрын
Maybe the context is not fit for the location. Brilliant.
@Thoughmuchistaken Жыл бұрын
That was great.
@santaclosed5062 Жыл бұрын
Toronto is a city with plenty of good welcoming people. That’s genuinely true. But Toronto as a city, it’s slightly better than average US cities. And if we are focusing only on growth, it shows quite remarkable dynamic. But that’s just it. Toronto now is just a typical example of Americanized gentrified city with losing cultural and historical singularities to the ever growing real estate speculation. It’s because we are only focusing on the growth and blindfolding our-selves about all the losing qualities. Yes, Toronto has a good urban planning policies such as mid rise planning guideline which reminds me of good European urban planning guidelines. But that has completely lost it’s dynamic due to frenetic and quasi-chaotic real estate development which starts kicking people out of the city and killing urban diversity. Toronto has some beautiful green patches here and there like Trinity bell woods, Riverdale. And areas like Don valley,High park are effectively amazing. But the city’s urban blocks are rather very grey in Toronto with raised proportion of heat islands everywhere. One time, the city which Jane Jacobs was so fond of, now it’s been becoming exactly like the cities which Jane Jacobs has criticized of. Due to uncontrolled or rather politicized real-estate speculations and development, Toronto has lost many good and unique values and it becomes more like a typical American big city with also typical problems inherent in those American big cities. Personally, I think Toronto still has chance to become a happy city with a very unique cultural trait and kind people. But if the city continues as it’s been lately and if city keeps its long, wishful and unhealthy obsession on wanna-be-NewYork, that chance will simply be slimmed out.
@OldScientist Жыл бұрын
Getting to Net Zero by 2050 would cost $9.2 trillion a year (McKinsey). That's not going to be good value for money. That's nearly one-tenth of global GDP. That money would be better spent on a myriad of things including educating the fifth of humanity who are illiterate and represent a 7% annual loss to the world's economy. Maddeningly, there is no climate crisis. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past.
@temo_takeson2 жыл бұрын
Great webinar and insight into all forms of housing solutions!
@tonys29572 жыл бұрын
Very interesting context from legacy to greenfield ...
@juliusvinh1092 жыл бұрын
Where are the footage?
@04296329812342 жыл бұрын
This is so true! Really interesting content
@clarkseadon93202 жыл бұрын
Very useful & interesting, as Toronto moves to increase density.
@michaelgenin5632 жыл бұрын
I guess all those European cities have everything completely wrong then.
@BenjaminEagan2 жыл бұрын
Wild... I just put on my headphones and they started autoplaying a background tab. The background tab was a recommended video from another waterfront Toronto vid I was watching. So out of the blue high school pal Aaron Barter is introducing himself from a mystery tab! This waterfront project is looking incredible though, can't wait to see the new Don River and explore the new trails and wetlands.
@mattsmith58562 жыл бұрын
The canopy really looks amazing.
@RaffaelloLorenzusSayde2 жыл бұрын
I wonder why Canadian municipalities are strict about constructing very tall buildings. Look at other countries, where they build taller buildings in their cities. We need to test our limits and build beyond what is considered nearly impossible.
@winstonsolipsist17412 жыл бұрын
Wow. That density look like a living hell. I would feel claustrophobic. The noise levels must be deafening. I'll stay on my 100 hectare ranch.
@amac2612 Жыл бұрын
as it should be.
@Nognamogo Жыл бұрын
Many people like living in dense cities. And if cities are more dense instead of sprawling suburbs, your ranch will have more room in nature.
@neilirvine71299 ай бұрын
In the US and Canada, we would rather be homeless than make these changes.
@movia12342 жыл бұрын
I think it's an interesting fact that the same percentage live in 20+ story buildings as in RV/vehicle/boat in the US, but talking about 20 story buildings gives the impression that it is the one true way to density. I used to live in Hoboken, NJ and there are some high rises, but most people live in 3-5 story apartment / condo buildings. With this type of construction, they achieve a density of about 50,000 / square mile. In the DC area where I live now there are plenty of rowhouse neighborhoods with high density, walkability, and transit.
@tomtrask_YT2 жыл бұрын
The way I interpreted that claim she made was that if you counted people living in 10 or more story buildings, it would overwhelm mobile homes (&c). If you counted 5 story and above it would overwhelm it even more and so on. Twenty stories is where it balances out and residential buildings of that height are not common at all.
@lws7394 Жыл бұрын
@@tomtrask_YT20 story buildings are complex to build . Skip zoning and mixed used iin residential neighbourhoods . When you transform 7 of the 61% detached homes into semi detach any housing shortsge could be solved. Just 1 in 10 single family zone plots into a duplex ..No new road structure needed ... Ahould be not so difficult imo. (And .., build ( mix used) midrise around every transit station ...)
@cliffwoodbury53192 жыл бұрын
THIS SHOW IS AMAZING!!!! Canada is doing a lot of rail projects now but it wasn't always like that and it may slow down so i hope this expands as i would love to see this channel go internationally so transit enthusiast can watch/see projects happening in urban/regional/national/international railway projects worldwide. One thing i wish was done is more maps showing the locations in regards to the whole city to get a better sense of the locations being spoken of for those who don't know the city.
@dalehalliday35782 жыл бұрын
to build a livable city, people should have access to sunlight as a right. There are many other ways to allow for more density without affecting sunlight.
@algonquin912 жыл бұрын
Great idea and great speech!!
@harmless19472 жыл бұрын
Really nice effort. Thanks and best wishes ahead.
@AEuropeanCitizen2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@anthonykim9492 жыл бұрын
Great informative video! Could you expand on point 3 on how the lack of government funding in Tokyo promotes mixed use development? Is this possible with a public transit system?