An Ancient Sage said, “ Every phenomenon is the original reality.” Fine. Yunmen held up his cane and said, “This is not the original reality.” After a pause, he said, “ If so, then the three poisons, four perversions, five clusters, six senses, twelve media, eighteen elements, and twenty-five realms of being are not the original reality.” Why not understand in this way- you’d save quite a bit of effort. Buddhism is a most economical affair, conserving the most energy- it has always been present, but you do not understand. I tell you, moreover, that there is nothing that is true and nothing that is not true. How can there be truth and untruth in one thing? Just because of seeking unceasingly, everywhere is seeking; pondering principles is seeking, contemplating the model cases of the ancients is also seeking, reading Zen books is also seeking; even if you sit quietly, continuously from moment to moment, this too is seeking. Do you want to understand? Then that seeking of yours is actually not seeking. This is extremely difficult to believe and to penetrate, hard to work on. Those of you who are not comfortable are that way, generally speaking, because you are either oblivious or excited. That is why you say you do not understand. Right now, how can you avoid being oblivious or excited? When that very thought of yours arises, it is the flowing whirl of birth and death: do you consider it habit-activated consciousness, or do you consider it immutable? Contemplate in this way over and over again, and you will have a bit of guiding principle. Elder Foyan -12th century Chinese Chan master
@ennio559616 күн бұрын
🙏
@davieb4824Ай бұрын
Hoko, thank you. I have been sitting with Baizhang's fox for a few years now. This sitting with it has been fruitful. I remember your incisiveness from years ago at MZMC. So when I discovered this video, I was excited to hear your discussion about the wild fox. Davie
@whitepath6295Ай бұрын
Beautiful!
@arujunamalmeroАй бұрын
at 11:29, She Said "Wisdom, Ethics, and compassion." but it is "Wisdom, Ethics, and concentration." Probably it is obious, since she said "Wisdom, Ethics, and concentration." right after that at 11:55..
@arujunamalmeroАй бұрын
Hoko said "Suzuki Roshi's "Zazen is good for nothing" at 10:11 but it was Sawaki Roshi's words not Suzuki Roshi's.
@ThoseWhoDare2 ай бұрын
Thank you, Roshi. If I had the possibility, I would travel from Europe to your Zendo, just to pay my respect to you and the community, and to sit with you all in Zazen 🙏🙏🙏
@JenS-oz2mo2 ай бұрын
🙏🙏🙏
@JenS-oz2mo2 ай бұрын
🙏🙏🙏
@hakuinzenji41232 ай бұрын
Can you guys augment the audio? Bless you
@meherenow7292 ай бұрын
Another wonderful teaching, thank you.
@DevInvest2 ай бұрын
☸
@milainkstincto2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this! 🙏😊
@jorgecarson91332 ай бұрын
A lot of meaning is different before the 19th century. The idea of someone being “blind” as akin to unenlightened goes back at least to New Testament. It’s kind of a gnostic idea
@jorgecarson91332 ай бұрын
“Not being blind” to something meant something radically different back then. I have the feeling Dogen meant something like not being conscious of the affectation of cause n “affect” not effect.
@meherenow7292 ай бұрын
This is your best teaching yet. Well done.
@meherenow7292 ай бұрын
Thank you for the teaching.
@meherenow7292 ай бұрын
Thank you for the teaching.
@meherenow7292 ай бұрын
Thank you for the teaching.
@JimTempleman3 ай бұрын
The amazing thing is that we all see it as a glass of water! "The mystical power and wondrous function, Carrying water and lugging firewood." - Layman Hōun
@mariann25133 ай бұрын
„“But I say to you who hear, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you. To one who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also, and from one who takes away your cloak do not withhold your tunic either. Give to everyone who begs from you, and from one who takes away your goods do not demand them back. And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them. “If you love those who love you, what benefit is that to you? For even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who do good to you, what benefit is that to you? For even sinners do the same.“ Luke 6:27-33 ESV
@anthonybillings40773 ай бұрын
Okamura Roshi gives clear lectures on profound texts. He has a series on Dogen's view of Buddha Nature, for example, on the Dogen Institute website. Highly enlightening!
@from-Texas3 ай бұрын
Has anyone ever mentioned to you that you look like Dogen? Just saying..
@shokuchideirdrecarrigan74024 ай бұрын
Congratulations, Esho! Thank you for your talk!
@arujunamalmero4 ай бұрын
Thank you, Shokuchi for your kind support!
@paintpaper94 ай бұрын
Thank you♾💗💫♾🪷🦋
@Gino-ds2ce4 ай бұрын
@Gino-ds2ce Speaking of Katagiri, besides having sex with a number of his female students he also attempted to rape a woman closely connected to Mpls. Zen Center, though not a member. She managed to fight him off. I believe attempted rape is a felony. But you don't want to know about things like this. You know. The truth about him. It happened in 1979.
@jonassteinberg37794 ай бұрын
Damn when he starts talking about western industrialization...ugh. Heartbreaking.
@jonassteinberg37794 ай бұрын
Just say, "no." LOL!
@jonassteinberg37794 ай бұрын
subject versus object or anything isn't a contradiction -- we only conceive it as a contradiction because when we grasp one-sidedly "self" or "atman" or "niagra falls" we imbalance Totality so as soon as we objectify anything Totality immediately reminds us that everything is dependently arisen therefore if we say self then immediately no-self arises, if we say no-self then immediately self arises and if we say niagra falls then immediately no niagra falls arises 😂 It's only confusing if we make something substantive and persistent!
@its_eis4 ай бұрын
Lucky to be able to learn from you, greetings from Poland!
@jonassteinberg37794 ай бұрын
Absolutely epic story about entrance into the way. Wow.
@jonassteinberg37795 ай бұрын
Very touching story about adolescence and the questioning of everything.
@aurora36555 ай бұрын
I’m not trying to be argumentative, and at the risk of sounding like a total dolt when it comes to Buddhist dogma…🤷♀️ how can there not be a self? The only way I can rationalize there not being a self, is in that there is no such thing as consciousnesses. A lot of ppl will argue that there very much is consciousness, I tend to think not. I tend to think that we, and everything else, are just products of conditions, and what we call consciousness, is just different conditions than the insentient…Or, there very much is a self, with autonomy over decision making power. I can focus on the bodhisattva path, or do “what thou wilt.” Who is observing 🤷♀️ The Buddha wouldn’t be known, if there wasn’t a self 🤷♀️. Isn’t it our total screw ups in life that destroys our sense of self, and brings the Buddha into existence? But someone has to practice in order for that to happen….unless we are just products of conditions 🤷♀️ I think something got lost in translation from “mind” to “self”, to “no self.” I get discriminating mind vs no mind. I’m talking about things that cannot be properly described with words, but “mind” to me , as opposed to one’s body, that’s a valuable discrimination.
@aurora36555 ай бұрын
But if there is no you, why feed yourself? Or tend to the needs of the body? Why protect the body and leave it intact🤷♀️ Why “feed the hungry ghosts.”
@joshsmith291917 күн бұрын
The way I understand it (and I'm not an expert) is that there is no self, as in, no core piece of yourself that is uniquely you. If we were to look at a truck, take it completely apart and examining each piece, no part alone would make the truck a truck. The engine doesn't make a truck. A truck bed doesn't make a truck. A steering wheel doesn't make a truck. But when we see these elements all put together, our mind fills the void to say "truck". I think the buddhist perspective is that you can do the same with a person. The 5 Skandhas (or 5 heaps, or aggregates) are the five elements that make a person. There is 1. form, 2. sensations, 3. perceptions, 4. mental formations, 5. Discernment (conscious attention). In this list, there is no soul. The implication is that this means we are simply an experience of these 5 elements working in harmony. The same way the pieces of a truck cruise down a road, our pieces enable us to experience life. And like a truck, our pieces come undone with time. There may be more to this, but this is the most I understand. Personally I don't think this disproves the potential of a "self" or soul, but it's a solid theory. I think there are things on other planes of existence that we are literally unequipped to comprehend. I hope you are well, and I enjoyed your question and typing this response.
@aurora365517 күн бұрын
@@joshsmith2919 and yet, when u assemble the truck; there it is. A truck. Maybe the same is true of “Buddha.”
Haha the guy sat himself to death lolllll. Inspiring!
@steveurick30445 ай бұрын
As an English speaker in Japan I feel so blessed to have these talks because I have not found a living teacher of Zen here to follow, even though my Japanese is pretty good. (I am sure there are some, and if someone wants to tell me who they are, I would very grateful for that, too.)
@micasa9045 ай бұрын
I wonder what karmic causes led me to listen to this lesson on the Pragnya Paramita today....)) A deep sense of illusion ? Greetings from the land of Po.
@its_eis5 ай бұрын
thanks and greetings from Poland!
@mahmutyasar96126 ай бұрын
Love from Turkey, thank you sir you have been completely helpful to a kid whom 21 years old student and had some serious questions towards to world therefore the himself. I have been practicing zazen for 1 years and it is good for nothing. I would like to write paragraphs and so on however just i can say is just thank you seriously from my heart.
@krisztinabeda6 ай бұрын
Could you share the website you mentioned, please? I am interested about the book too, please help me to find it!
@jonassteinberg37796 ай бұрын
Regarding Uchiyama's idea that "Westerners" would require an intellectual explanation of Zazen before they could practice -- that requirement is rooted in the white European academic tradition and has to do with the privileges of hegemony, as well as the white European narrative tradition -- there are many groups of people in the United States that would not have required such an exaggerated approach.
@its_eis6 ай бұрын
I am grateful for having a chance to listen from across the ocean!
@hillardtoddy13206 ай бұрын
P R O M O S M 😪
@NigelRBlack6 ай бұрын
Deep bow from Australia ❤
@interdimensionalsailboat6 ай бұрын
What in sangha friends and family gets us to get to the cushion in form of support? Isnt it likely their opinion of us? I recognize my personal problems in regard to growing up the way i have are the cause of my misunderstanding and i presume it has to do with the acceptance of another person's love and care. I just can't see it. I used to be endlessly mocked for practicing. ^ think i found it.
@MichaelJ.Linden6 ай бұрын
thanks !
@interdimensionalsailboat6 ай бұрын
I am struggling with a decision and i went to sit. I was opening the hand while things arise again and again. I am now done sitting, I gained nothing and i burst out laughing. Thinking that sitting was somehow going to give me the missing piece of the puzzle while logically always saying it is good for nothing 😂.
@interdimensionalsailboat6 ай бұрын
But i guess by doing so i saw i had no more information to go off and made up my mind.