"Special Guest Bastard" is amazing 😂

Awesome

Old One Punch Man talks to Professor Dumbledore.

I doubt we'll see Ke showing up at these anymore either after the Oscar.

even in Star Trek.

@@usamazahid3882 he was tough but fair on Star Trek. Super fair in Beverly Hills Cop.

He was a good person in Beverly Hills cop

Really good and gentle in Beverly Hills Cop. But at the same being authoritative. Great acting

Agree

thats like saying can deadpool be non-violent and serious, or he doesn't have to be that violent or goofy all the time. doing what you're saying would destroy what the amazing writers of the show have built when the show was still active

If Matt is happy and Daredevil at the same time would be a mistake. It's like making Spiderman with no problems, and super cool or something like that. Wouldn't make sense. Suffering and darkness is part of Daredevil.

@@eero3698 Thats true. Also keep in mind that Daredevil didn’t originally start as dark and suffering. Frank Miller made him like that. I’m under the impression that they’re going down the Mark Waid route.

@@jameshaggerty8348 true, but Frank Miller also put emphasis on Daredevil's religion. I'm not catholic, but I know suffering it's part of catholicism. Also, now Daredevil can be partner with spiderman, who also is a character that has live a lot of bad situations in comics. About Daredevil doesn't being bloody, I don't think it doesn't mean he's not the best symbol of light. He has his own code. For example, he doesn't kill, but that doesn't mean he can't beat the crap out of his enemies.

@@eero3698 does a Daredevil show have to be bloody to be good?

Why do you think that disabled actors *should* play disabled characters?? Isn’t the whole point of acting to play someone that you're not?! I get that you wouldn't cast a white guy to play Black Panther since the characters race is essential to who they are, but I don't understand why non-disabled actors aren't allowed to play disabled characters. I really don't see an issue with it whatsoever.

@@Blitz-dm3kv For example to give children with disabilities someone to look up to. Someone they can identify with.

​@@Blitz-dm3kv here's my perspective, I would not say that non-disabled actors arent allowed to play disabled characters, but rather it should be that more disabled actors should be cast to play disabled characters.(Also slight caveat but i think the whole point of acting is not to play someone that you're not but rather play a role, sometimes that role might be very similar to the person playing it) 1. Representation! It would be really cool for young children to have not only a fictional character on screen be disabled like them but also the actor! 2. Disabled people have different struggles or different experiences than non-disabled actors. Yes non-disabled actors can try and learn from disabled people what these experiences/behaviors/struggles are but they would never be able to say they know it 100% because they have not experienced it themself. For example, you wouldn't cast a white person to play a black person in a movie talking about racism towards black people not only because of skin color but also because the white person would not have personally experienced this racism towards black people since they are not black. Yea those are my thoughts if you need me to elaborate or clarify just lmk.

It's definitely not as feasible for the Daredevil role. People will say "use stunt doubles more", which will just increase work for VFX artists and editors during post because it can double/triple the scenes they have to edit the actor's face in the shot since with the Daredevil mask, half of the face is still shown and recognizable (in the show, Charlie did 80% of his own stunts which greatly lessened the amount of editing in post needed). Marvel Studios(and other big studios that produce major blockbusters) already have a reputation of overworking but underpaying non-unionized VFX editors and workers, how much more if their workload was tripled? Plus the logistics on set itself if they had a blind actor in the Daredevil role, it really isn't a stationary role, Matt Murdock is constantly on the move, and I think it would be really dangerous, as well as hard to manage the mise en place during scenes with a blind actor. I also agree that disabled actors should play disabled roles as much as possible, but I don't think the Daredevil role is the hill to die on for this fight. Stan Lee himself has recognized that the Daredevil character really isn't a good representation of people on the actual blindness spectrum, since if we look closely at the premise of the character, Matt Murdock can even perceive better than sighted people. Plus, for anyone trying to cancel Charlie for taking the role, he did his best to be respectful with his treatment of playing the character. He spent 3 months observing a blind man who served as a consultant for the show just so he can get the mannerisms right. Plus he has literally won an award (called the Hellen Keller Award) from the American Foundation for the Blind themselves, so clearly he did something right. I don't think people should be cancelling him over this.

@@cardboardcreationsart the Daredevil role is different though. No one on the blindness spectrum can relate to him and how he traverses through life, because even sighted people can't (since he can perceive better than sighted people). I think for other blind character roles the fight to get actual blind actors in them should definitely be furthered, but not with the Daredevil role. Also Charlie himself was awarded the Hellen Keller Award by the American Foundation for the Blind for his respectful portrayal. If they thought it was wrong on his end that he got the role, they wouldn't have gone out of their way to honor him in a ceremony.

It's a damn tragedy the Netflix shows got cancelled, they were all really good for the most part. It looks like they're slowly bringing them back but it'll be under Disney's terms so it probably won't feel the same. CW is just a cesspool, the shows used to be decent but they've all changed to be agenda machines.

I'd rather 3 strong seasons than watch it go to seed

duh, he has a career to maintain?

What the hell is that supposed to mean? :D

@@barracuda0405 foggy looks great in this panel

Yeah, his drip is amazing

@@barracuda0405 law is temporary, drip is forever

I hope somehow mcu disney's daredevil reboot season 4 still make a correlation with the first 3 seasons which are in netflix so people have to watch the first 3 seasons first bcz this show is freakin mental good

@@jyu6977 no we want daredevil in a movie now DD FOR THE BIG SCREENS let's gooooo ⚡⚡💫🤞🏻🙏🏻

@@priyac7054 not yet. Too many people are just now hoping on the bandwagon but don't understand the character yet, plus a majority of the fan base is wondering whether or not he gets a show and IF it will continue the Netflix story, Mature or not

@@SecondAftermath it's going to be a movie not a Disney +series, MCU is definitely going darker if moon knight is any indication

@@priyac7054 There's been no indication aside from a sort of brutal werewolf beat down in the trailer that Moon knight will be as dark and brutal as Daredevil and plus rumors and even Kevin Feige giving the green light for the show's fourth season on Disney plus before a movie

@Kalani phirle is it a bit obvious or smthng

@@becauseiambatman2019 nah not at all lmao

HE WAS SWEATING AND STUTTERING!! i love him so much

I heard that the sequel for this may have been a hit or miss, but he really wanted it to stay it as is so the viewers can entertain themselves with their thoughts 💭 about what happened in their minds. Yeah I agree somethings should just stay as is with no sequels.

Donner, Columbus and Spielberg all always seem to have said they never came up with a good enough story for it.

Yes exactly

I agree. As a Catholic myself I find parallels with Matt's character and how he handles faith with my own struggles with faith. I just absolutely loved the conversations Matt has with Father Lantom who is played amazingly well. He was one of the characters I missed in S2. Also, Drew Goddard who is the creator of the show is himself catholic so he was keen that the show try to avoid the stereotypes.

Sorry! We didn't record the whole panel. (Glad you appreciate the quality though.) If you're interested, there's a teensy bit more info in an article we published on the panel: cultspark.com/2016/11/07/wizard-world-pittsburgh-notes-daredevil-panel/