No.

i just read that comment too whats up

I mean, a woman can express herself however she wants. It’s not always stooping to project sexuality. That just isnt Kate Bush’s style. It’s her own thing. What is fascinating is how people use the term ‘Female’, ‘feminine’. If she were a man, no one would speak of masculine energy or masculine power. They would just be an artist. If Kate achieves something, it is transcending her sex. I can appreciate her as an amazing, wildly creative artist without having to be confronted with her sex. Female artists should enjoy that thing male artists take for granted. Being considered an artists above all else

@@maishadigital8410 Sounds like a contradiction to me. First you defend an artist's projection of sexuality. Then, in the next breath, "Female artists should enjoy that thing male artists take for granted". Kate always said 'SENSUALITY' is where art is at. As for "Masculine Energy", I was alive when young girls would rush the stage and tear every shred of clothing from a male artist's body... without provocation. How many female artists, (discounting exotic dancers) have come close to being raped on stage. Then you have the gall to call a guy out for simply mentioning "feminine power". Like it or not, there's something in a woman's voice that does things to a man's soul.

Kate had too much creative energy flowing to have to resort to the arrogant path of making sales through soft porn, as Madonna and her clones did. Madonna was a mercenary seeking money, power, and fame, as a means of distracting herself from her massive and unrelenting self-hatred. Kate had too much depth and self-love, too many fantastic stories flowing through her noggin, and like Tesla and Edison, had too many experiments to conduct along the high road, to resort to the low road. Kate produced enduring art, her mirror-opposites, not so much.