7 сағат бұрын
7 сағат бұрын
Күн бұрын
Күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
21 күн бұрын
21 күн бұрын
21 күн бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@clippedx. 17 күн бұрын
Isn't that js the butterfly method? 💀
@harshagamingff2534 22 күн бұрын
Thanks
@akultechz2342 22 күн бұрын
L hôpital rule isnt used here as it is used when the function is maximum simplified and is 0/0 or inf/inf
@gaurishsridhar-eb7lp 22 күн бұрын
The original function had an indeterminate form of 0/0, so it is theoretically possible
@xTRTSCx 22 күн бұрын
It is theoretically possible and practically it works too, after using L hôpital rule you get 2√(x+16) if you plug in 0 you get 8
@akultechz2342 18 күн бұрын
There are forms where lhopital fails unless simplified
@TJBEATSAMV 22 күн бұрын
Thanks a lot ! The exam is in three hours（’ω’）
@Kasperlangejans 24 күн бұрын
Just use l'hospital rule?
@GrantMitchell-rb7gx 23 күн бұрын
Yes, L’Hopitals works here by taking the derivatives of the top and the bottom, and you would arrive at the solution faster and more simply than the 1-equivalent multiplication. However, for people that haven’t learned L’Hopitals, this video is a good demonstration of how to find the limit.
@butterflytr3077 23 күн бұрын
@@GrantMitchell-rb7gxtheres also a dumb thing in my country where the government removed lhospitals rule from the curriculum and are actively trying to discourage the students from using it, so they literally make questions that cannot be solved with the lhospitals rule for the university exam
@akultechz2342 22 күн бұрын
This is a good thing @@butterflytr3077
@casperlekkerkerker198 24 күн бұрын
but the start was 0/0??
@renr4502 24 күн бұрын
That's the whole point of finding this undefined limit..
@varunnadgir4513 23 күн бұрын
A limit is what the function approaches, so for the point x=0 of this function, it is not defined, but the function approaches the point 8.
@max3eey 25 күн бұрын
I love you 🫠😶🌫️😜🫡💞🫦🤳🦆🦧🙄🫨🥵😵😵💫🤕😪😪🤓🥸💩💀💀🤠🤠🤑🤑😼😼😼😼😼😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻🕳️🕳️🕳️🕳️🕳️🖤❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥🦠👄👁️👄👀👄👁️👄🦷🫀🦷🦠🦵👎👃🤏🤏🙅🙅🤷⚗️🧫🧫🧪🧪🧪🌡️🌡️💉💉💊💊💊💊💊💊💉💉💉
@beforebuy 29 күн бұрын
why dont directly divided it by 4.18 ......
@Follett2121 Ай бұрын
Great explanation!
@user-vw2tw4wp7k Ай бұрын
Thank you, it helped a lot💓
@Josh-ge4rw Ай бұрын
This is more easy to understand that my maths class WTH 😭
@nayelvalentinacastellanos Ай бұрын
Thank you
@abdulsubhan2019 Ай бұрын
wow so amazing sugoi desu I understood it amazing
@JimmyBoBrown18 Ай бұрын
legend
@txsmjk Ай бұрын
Why is my teacher making it so complicated when it was this easy 😭
@marcel_tremblay Ай бұрын
You are the man my man!!!
@front331 Ай бұрын
This is great. 👍
@JagadeviNatikar-qc6pk Ай бұрын
😮 Samarth H Natikar
@JagadeviNatikar-qc6pk Ай бұрын
😊 samarth h Natikar
@25.4.07 Ай бұрын
how do i fix "Error: Variable is not defined"?, I want to use letters a,b instead of numbers, and when following your tutorial a-r just shows error
@cupidsh34rt Ай бұрын
YOU ARE SO SLAY LMFAO TYSMMMM
@EarlJohn61 Ай бұрын
Quite useful, if you know your perfect squares.
@AlessandroNonno Ай бұрын
Thank you, that was exactly what I was searching for. One question, if instead we had the limit of (x e^(sin(x))) as x approaches infinity, would that limit exist?
@resulax9274 Ай бұрын
thank u
@sunithasuni1048 Ай бұрын
Sir how to pronounce 110 element clearly say sir
@sunithasuni1048 Ай бұрын
Thankyou sir
@joshuagarza789987 Ай бұрын
When I do this, I get error: variable is protected
@ScreenedInstructor Ай бұрын
@joshuagarza789987 First-- are you using TI nSpire CX CAS or TI nSpire CX? Second-- Try going to a page and hit-- [Doc], [4: Insert], [1: Problem]. Then try again.
@ScreenedInstructor 2 ай бұрын
I should mention situations like 372*99 (number has more digits than the number of nines in the multiplier) You see the number 372 is 3 digits and 99 is 2 digits. In this situation the method in the video still works. But it would look something like: 371(100-372) 371(-272)…. So 37100 - 272 = 36,828. Or you could instead do: 372*(100-1) 37200 - 372 = 36,828 This might provide a hint for the challenge question at the end
@stvdedal 2 ай бұрын
3:23 But it is allowed only if "2x+2y" is not zero. Whereas our implicit function is y=-x, so 2x+2y is always zero ?
@dianajoseph8549 2 ай бұрын
thank you for showing thes😊
@ashiee111 2 ай бұрын
can you help how to get the x y value
@arishsaifipro 2 ай бұрын
Thank you very much these videos help me a lot in learning all the elements
@우리흥 2 ай бұрын
Is there integral at x= something?
@우리흥 2 ай бұрын
I mean mode
@Ryan-fz9bk 2 ай бұрын
i love you
@PrakashKumar-nl7gy 2 ай бұрын
Thanks 🙏
@9LimaAlpha7 2 ай бұрын
nicely explained
@Ben-eh6tm 2 ай бұрын
THANK YOU
@coderorig2763 2 ай бұрын
Well explained. Thanks a lot mate!
@DeeKayLee 2 ай бұрын
thx bro
@siehhut9401 3 ай бұрын
Its Doable in the head within 30 sec
@kristofferkejser7594 3 ай бұрын
Great explanation!
@manaskulkarni9138 3 ай бұрын
tan[f(x)]/f(x) when f(x) tends to zero is always 1… it’s a standard limit.. a faster way of solving would be to multiply and divide the original question by 2/x… hence your answer would be 2
@Homme9 3 ай бұрын
Dude, you're just awesome! Your videos have helped me out big time. Keep up the good work, and maybe consider releasing a new series on Analytical Chemistry? Thank you!
@front331 3 ай бұрын
Is there a way to write common logs without writing the base? For example, when you wrote log x, could you do log x as you could in TI-84 or do you have to have the base 10? It's a little inconvenience even though you stated and we know the base is 10 lol. In TI-84 or other TI's, common logs are accounted for. Thanks for the video.
@Certified_hoodclassic⁶⁹ 3 ай бұрын
Thank you so much I didn't understand our lesson today
@aminsharify1555 3 ай бұрын
How can we find these data such as temperature and component?
@nokhinsiu7210 3 ай бұрын
needed this
@Rybezius 3 ай бұрын
God bless your soul you've saved my eyes
@hipmugger5952 3 ай бұрын
Best
@payson_rizzo4561 3 ай бұрын
you saved my life, thank you. none of my teachers use this calculator so it has been a pain in my butt. thank you ttytytytyt