Haha, well I'm not a salesman, but..... we have three of the new CX350 variants. We use them all the time. We have also started to buy PTZ cameras for live-streaming. The Canon was a nice camera, but quite a bit more expensive. See if you can get a deal and compare (or rent one first).

@@EventVideo 😂😂 at the end of your video say So should you buy the cx350? You gave details about auto focus

🤯

Not really @rsmolkin. That's partly the sensor size though. In reality I get the best bokeh (dof) from my A7S3 with a lovely lens like the Sigma 50mm or 85mm. Most professional camcorders have that "Video" look

The world is a changing Stuart. Give it another few years and most event setups will be PTZ with AI based Autofocus tracking speakers. You can already buy early versions of this.

@@EventVideo Thanks for the reply and your thoughts; us BBoomers are frequently laughing at your generation cuz so many of you are not in #reality or consistently don't perform at the high #standards that Western Civ has modeled for a few hundred years or so. AI is not here; In today's world (that's me), setting the ISO and focal length is first, focus is a subset of those 2 parameters imo and I operate accordingly. When I was on the NFL sidelines, nobody used auto focus and people and things were zipping along at a high rate of speed. People can do what they want. Old Skool laws still work at all times [sic] and I typically ignore the #hype and hot air of the past 25 years or so. Most of all 'dat gonna be going off the rails shortly, LOL. Regards! :) Enjoy your choices of photo/cine platforms, that too is likely to be disappearing (the choices and inexpensive costs) in large part shortly also!

@@stuartkidney3257 Thank you for your service!

Close call. XF605 is more expensive, has better AF but shorter zoom range and less additional features like NDI and I'm not sure if it has HLG. Depends on your specific needs

We do all the time. Panasonic have done a good job with their updates. The AF Face tracking is pretty good. It can be fooled by people wearing hats or someone with their face side on to you but it's worth using at events in my opinion.

@@EventVideo Thanks for the prompt reply. I also need to know if this has the face detection/tracking in manual mode. The HC-X2 just arrived and it only has face detection/tracking in auto mode 😒 hopefully they change this in a firmware update. Also how do you find the lcd screen?

@@CL-Filmz It's only in auto mode and it's been on there for a while so I can't see them changing it. LCD is fine for our use which is mostly inside. From what I've seen the HC-X2 has a better LCD screen

@@EventVideo ​ @Event Video Yep, the LCD screen is better on the HC-X2. But how is it on the CX350? Has a few less codecs (P2 and All-i) on the HC-X2. Also there's no auto-sw option, it's completely missing. So in Auto mode the only thing you can choose to change into manual are the audio levels. I'm quite disappointed, I'm wondering what the auto-sw is like on the CX350. With face detection/tracking only available in auto mode I'm guessing the auto-sw is greyed out when tracking is enabled?

Hi Kevin, it's a 1" sensor but you do have the gain setting and I find up to 12db is acceptable for events. My test is more when you have "half light" events and not stage lighting. Can you get nice and tight on a person speaking and it's viewable. The answer is yes for the CX350. I prefer the GH5S or GH6 to the GH5 for lower light. In general a GH5 with an F2.8 lens like the 12-35mm on say ISO 800 (cleanest really) doesn't quite cut it for the same scenarios, but the GH5S (no stabilisation so this is on a tripod) is an absolute beast. S5 is full frame so much better. I did a quick review of the S5 and really liked it but my investment in lenses is for MFT and the Sony system which is why I haven't bought one. Hope that helps. Oh and AF.... well... Face tracking AF is actually very useful for these kind of cameras at events. Just keeps things pin sharp at the far end of the zoom. Otherwise yes, I agree, I'd be on manual.

Don't forget there are a couple of new Panasonic cameras out now in this range the X2 and X20 which are worth a look as they are cheaper by sacrificing a few of the broadcast features.

Thanks so much @ben . We try to cut through the fluff! I might have to make another one now as well. It’s been a while 😊

It's a good shout Peter, but it's some time ago that I was loaned the JVC. What I can tell you is that I still use 3 x CX350 regularly. If I was buying new now I'd have another look at Canon and Sony but when you need multiple cameras it gets expensive pretty quickly. Also the fancy extras, like NDI (for an extra fee) can often be taken care of by another piece of kit e.g. Birddog NDI boxes. That's a bit more futureproof if you switched out your cameras. I also love the firmware updates from Panasonic. We now have basic face tracking AF for free for example.

Sorry Gary, it was a while back. Maybe check their specs online

It's better but really what it added was Face Autodetect. We've just been using 2 x CX350s a lot for corporate events with mixed lighting and they are still excellent but one area that the Canon is better is AF

The Sony Z190 is a good camera. I liked the AF but wasn't too bothered about it's auto ND filter personally. It was larger and heavier than the CX350 (Panasonic) although the JVC is similar. If you can afford it I would probably stick with the Z190. Personally I own 3 x CX350 and have used them a lot

They added Face detect AF into a firmware update Tim since this video was made. It's not perfect but it's better than no AF.

@@EventVideo I bought a GH5 and it's now sitting a drawer. I spent hours and hours trying to get around focus hunting and finally just gave up. I'm just trying to do single operator stuff with the camera on a tripod. I ended up with a Sony a9. No vlog, but great low light, minimal rolling shutter and absolutely no focus hunting. I really love Panasonic but I can only trust canon or sony auto focus.

@@timsmusic7349 I'm afraid this isn't anything new. Panasonic's insistence on using DFD leaves many people unimpressed, but.... and it's a big BUT some of us prefer Panasonics colours and menu system if you can work within the AF limitations. On the CX350 we have face detect now which is a bit basic compared to Sony but still worthwhile in well lit scenes. The S5 is also a bit better. However Canon and Sony are by far the best for AF at the moment. Pretty much bulletproof

I haven't had time to test the XF605 yet but Canon are known for good AF. Also if they've fixed the streaming details being entered via an app then it's worth a look. The price is maybe 10% more than a CX350. We have 3 x CX350s now and we're very happy, especially since the last firmware update

Good question Dave. How are you finding the camera? From my perspective.... I don't stream out from it directly but I might as we return from COVID. I bought 3 x CX350s and we use them with our Black Magic switching gear. The recent firmware update was outstanding in my opinion. Can I rely on face tracking? Not really, unless it's fairly well lit, the subject isn't wearing a hat and I'm at a middle distance on the zoom but it's a fantastic addition for free. I don't think there's another camera at this price point I would buy over the CX350. NDI HX..... well I ended up buying Bird dog converters and using uncompressed but we find that for smaller jobs we don't take them with us as it's more gear to carry. One big thing they REALLY need to fix is the config for streaming on your phone via their app. Such a simple thing, but it renders the camera useless really if you have to type in an RTMP Stream Key using their on screen keyboard!

@@EventVideo I haven't actually received my cameras yet. I have purchased 3 of them... but they are backlogged. What I *LIKE* about them is, after even 3 years, they are still contenders because of software and functionality updates. Otherwise, I would never consider a 3 year old camera to buy in 2021. We will be using them primarily for multi-camera live-streaming (We use a mobile VMix rig for streaming), so auto-focus isn't much of an issue for me. I will only use Autofocus in the most extreme conditions, and never if the subject is moving in and out of DOF. The app integration (or lack thereof) is extremely disappointing, and does give me pause. Streaming directly out of a camera is a fringe use-case for us, but not out of the question. I am interested in wireless connectivity with these cameras, and know that while they are wireless 'ready', this does not come out of the box. I've heard that the AJ-WM50 is their preferred dongle (But for $199US, makes it rediculously(!!!) overpriced). I've heard that the D-Link DWA-171 works fine as well, but I haven't tested or heard much about this. All I want is the perfect camera for me that works and does EVERYTHING I want it to do for cheap. Is that too much to ask!? :)

It was a while ago unfortunately but was given to me by JVC

Thanks Heathcliff and yes there is a 30min limit for 4K 10 bit 422 colour basically, so 25fps PAL would also be covered by that.

@@EventVideo Thanks. That's REALLY surprising. I think the S1 might be a better option for that mode. Cheers.

Good feedback, thanks. I still see the UX180 mentioned a lot although I moved to CX350 so all my cameras colour match.

that is news camcorder and not a cinema camera....

Having used the DVX200, that's a pretty low bar. I am sure event video would have noticed that horrendous of a product even in 1 day of testing. I decided to return my DVX200 less than 3 hours after the delivery driver dropped it off. I wanted to love it because of the physical size, but that 4K crop was horrible. I am by no means a pro, I do a little bit of hobby type work, none of it is scripted or storyboarded. Let alone lit properly. I've used numerous Panasonic cameras alongside my Sony CX900, and they all stunk. I haven't tried the CX350 yet, but if EV says the autofocus stinks I won't even bother. The little bit of footage I have seen of this camera claiming not to have been corrected has been acceptable for my uses. Sure there are better options for controlled sets, but not much out there anymore for real life that's very good. My ancient CX900 still fetches nearly 50% of the price I paid new, in the rapidly obsolescent electronics space I think that's pretty good. HD Lens..... you're funny. Lenses that don't work well for 4K on a 1 inch sensor also don't work well for HD on a 1 inch sensor......the difference is that 4K is compressed more heavily so you notice it more. Don't blame artifacts caused by poor compression algorithms on the glass. No doubt if after I receive mine and it stinks as bad as you claim, I will update this comment.

The movement cadence is horrible with this unit.

I went with panasonic but that’s interesting feedback Kelja. How long ago was that?

that is news camcorder and not a cinema camera....

This app as the original ATEM mini so OBS but now you can use the ATEM Mini Pro to stream direct.

I’ve read mixed reviews. It would save me £1000 probably so that’s a positive but it may be a better move to get a second cx350. LANC compatibility is a real issue with the cx350. Have you tested the vz-stealth?

@@EventVideo No I haven't.

Did you find a better way Gerald? I'm all ears. I think I'll be adding more of the same camera. Probably another CX350 although maybe a PTZ. Need to do some research. The GH5S in particular often gets me out of trouble with a beautiful image in low light

@@EventVideo I was streaming concerts so things were set up a little different.

It does Michael. My footage was shot in 1080i

@@EventVideo is this the JVC GY-HC500U or JVC GY-HC500E ? because i sse in B&H website they have JVC GY-HC500U and it don't include 1080i in the specs. i asked them. they said it doesn't have 1080i.

I haven’t tried on this camera. Only on my GH5S and for that I’m using Sandisk. Did you reformat the card in the camera? Might be worth checking the Gh5 group on Facebook

Personally yes I preferred the cx350 and gh5s but I’m invested in MFT lenses. If I had my time again I don’t think I would go for the z190 but the a7iii and A7siii are good cameras. Have you also considered black magic? How run and gun are your shoots?

@@EventVideo I work in aviation - so often I'm running around manufacturing facilities getting shots (get here - then get there - then get here at 2:00, etc.) and shooting an airshow (need a nice zoom) - but I want my interviews to have nice bokeh to them. Also thinking FS5 since travel is easier. I just like that camcorder form-factor for run and gun - and then having a nice mirrorless for interviews or when I want to use a gimbal.

@@EventVideo What model would you recommend for Filming fast moving Aircraft?

@@Military872 I'd look at something with AF tracking. Unless you want wider shots I think you'll struggle to keep the focus on the aircraft. Having said that there is a firmware update coming at the end of May which will at AF Tracking to this camera which is a HUGE feature update at this price point. Other cameras you should look at? Camcorder form factor - Canon XF705 and the Sony Z190. If you don't mind a DSLR format the A7Siii is amazing. You could start with an A7iii for a lot less money and see if you like the Sony ecosystem.

Good question. I don't own a HCX1 but I've heard that the IQ (the overall feel of the images, particularly related to the lens) is a bit better. For live-streaming you don't need all the 4K wizardry. Pan & Tilt - well the CX350 does have stabilisation for that which is a bit like using a GH5 with stabilisation. Fast moving objects.... hmm focus pulling might be an issue. If you need AF (not everyone does) then the Sony or Canon are much better. The JVC (which I've also reviewed) just has face detect.

thankyou for your comments its important that the use of heavy faster panning & tilting i want to control image smooth looking is on a Sachtler FSB 8 video head with flowtech 75 tripod which i use. I fill the HCX1 has roller shutter issues the cx350 can be used for sports & wildlife filming i read about which aircraft filming would be ok as well im not into live streaming being honest did you mean the HCX1 has a good IQ which images look better than the cx350 or the other way round.

Glad you enjoyed it

It's a fairly common complaint in the Facebook forum (which I recommend you join if you're an owner). I haven't had too many issues with this but I don't really use the camera outdoors. It's for indoor events and green screen work.

Thanks Carlos. I have a CX350 and love using it. Panasonic and AF.... yeah, it's really starting to just be a bit ridiculous now. Sony z90 will beat it for AF I think BUT the Z90 is a smaller sensor camera. This camera is bigger and heavier but if you can try to rent one and try it out.

@@EventVideo Good advice. Thank you. I will do it. One more question. What did you think of the focus and image quality of the JVC GY HC500? Thanks again.

@@CarlosTorres-hi6si Typical of a 1" sensor to be honest so average. Inside I was focusing manually and I had a couple of shots that I wanted which it worked well for. One was a speaker at a microphone (podium) and the other was a speaker sat in a char. Outside I tried the face detect mode. It doesn't work if you're wearing a hat (which is kind of forgivable) but it seemed a bit hit and miss

Hi Tony, I didn't feel that to be honest. I had the camera for one day and I wasn't shooting in 4K because for streaming that's not my primary concern (feels odd in this post COVID era to not be obsessed with 4K, 8K etc!). I didn't get enough time to look at the low light characteristics but it's a 1" sensor so it can only do so much. We lit the stage a bit too well (I had a headache from the lights by the end). Not saying this person is wrong but I'm always wary of more extreme "I hate camera brand X" reviews.

Tony B it did surprisingly well but I’d put it on par with the cx350 which I would have at 12db gain. Is a 1” good enough? No not in my opinion. You need lighting . Certainly compared to a Gh5s or a7iii /a7s3... not comparable and I think that’s more the route I’d go if I was working on weddings

5m or may have been 10m. If you want to go longer look at "Optical HDMI" which can run up to 100m

I'm on the hunt for something smaller but that can work at events. Still can't really beat a mirrorless camera like the GH5S. The larger CX350 is pretty good but you'll be at 12GB gain for most events. 1" sensors just aren't really up to the job if the lighting isn't on point and.... it's often not but the hunt continues!

@@EventVideo If you want good ergonomics and good quality, you have to give a lot of money. Which is horrible not only for your pocket but for the planet as well. But the youtube prostitutes are telling different stories this is the problem here....

St Margaret Mary's - I think I did a quick colour correction in post on this to be honest. I should adjust it but probably the gh5 is worse as it has a well know magenta hue.

Hi Carlos! With a 1" sensor camera like the CX350 you will not match the low light capabilities of say the Sony A7S2 but the reason you buy this type of camera is the ease of use for events and things like the zoom. In practice I find it's pretty good for "noise" for example when there are lots of dark areas on the edge of the stage. Especially in 4K. I tend to use it on wide and then use my GH5S for close ups so I'm always running two cameras.

@@EventVideo In Focus thanks for the advice. Greetings from Lima, Peru.