Yes but keep in mind I don't have a production team!! I'm a high school science teacher (and as such obviously don't have access to ClF3) and father of three who makes videos in his relatively sparse free time...

Obsidian for me, and fluorite my fav mineral 😁

No fancy formula, just a simple mixture of water (absorbs the heat energy, stopping the paper from catching alight), ethanol (has a low flashpoint so will burn readily), and table salt (gives the bright orange colour to the burning of the ethanol - ethanol by itself burns with a clean, blue, hard-to-see flame) 😁

Thanks!! I appreciate your feedback 👍 I'm not skilled enough to make animations to include in my videos - maybe one day? Also, I have longer videos that go into greater detail, but my "Know your stuff" range are just short (2 mins) 😁

Haha!!! It wasn't, like... You... Was it?? 🤣🤣

@@SciencewithHeen I would never!!!

No problem!!! 😁

Thanks so much!! Glad you liked it 😁❤

😁

Thanks!!! Truth be told, me too 😁

Haha, um... Thanks? I think? 🤷‍♂🤣

day ruined.........

Haha!!! Sorry, just tellin' it like it is... 😁

Now you do 😁

You're welcome 😁 And well done!!!

😊

Haha!!! 🤣 Thanks Gingle, appreciate it 😁

All good questions!!! 👍 None of which we have the answer to - yet. I'm sure one day we'll be clever enough to answer questions like this. Just, not at the moment...

Yepp, the same question came up in my mind. No answer to that. It's a mystery for the rational mind. When considering Goedels incompleteness theroem, there are questions (mathematical statements), that can not be answered (proven) inside its frame of reference. Since language can, at least in principle, encoded in mathematical statements, this kind of questions might be no answerable. I wonder, if physicists ever think about this; or just ignoring it, because it feels a bit uneasy.

Anytime 😁

No prob 😁

Haha, possibly!!! But that's okay as I also mentioned to the right, and pointed 😁

Proton 👍

@@SciencewithHeen elaborate on quarks and label them please 🥺

Elaborate on quarks? See my earlier video titled, funnily enough, 'Quarks'...

@@SciencewithHeen ty... I'm new 🥹

Welcome aboard!!! Hehe. Have a look through my other videos, you may find some that appeal 😁

Haha!!! 🤣 I'm with you on that one... 👍

You're welcome 😁

It's the strong force that quarks interact with (via gluons as the force carriers), not the electromagnetic force. And whilst this video is about protons, the same holds for neutrons. Also, quarks have no energy levels to jump up or down as electrons do (electron shells) - that's a different scenario...

@@SciencewithHeen The strong nuclear force and gluons most probably do not actually exist. And 'em' interacts with quarks, quarks being a charged particle with it's own associated magnetic field with it. And 'if' quarks have no energy levels, (like electrons), then how exactly does gamma radiation get emitted from and absorbed by, a nucleus? Also, this item from my files: THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 3/25/2017b. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. (The 'stationary photon' does not really exist, it is mentioned basically only to help describe what a stationary photon would do.) 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.

Hi, my contact details are on the channel page. On the other hand, I'm not an engineer or manufacturer - all the details of the science involved are in the video. 😁

IKR??? Air pressure at sea level is 101.325 kilonewtons/square metre (14.7 pounds/square inch), so it doesn't mess about when the can is sealed...

😉

🤣

Yeah it's fun!! A lot of people don't realise just how much the weight force of the air is pushing on us. This is a quick and simple demonstration of that - I'll post a slightly longer video (over a minute so not a 'short') later this evening, explaining what's going on 😁

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iXauqZ-ni9Rlrbc

С ведром придется ходить вверх и вниз. Таким образом, вы просто останетесь наверху 😁

🤣🤣😉

A month? 🤔

I was in a hurry to film it before getting swamped by kids at the park!! 👍🤣

Because Science!!! 😁

It was pretty steep, like 60-70 degrees. But it was also in a busy park swamped with little kids, so I didn't have time to plan anything out!! 😁

@@SciencewithHeen 60-70 (like I am) - that is impressive! It seems just enough, that the water runs to it's momentary "lowest" point though. In the sommer I was sad, that my very big wooden drill (old style) did not work out to transöort cement powder ... it just turned WITH the archimedan screw. Had to build a pushing mechanism then ;-)

Yeah, as far as the water is concerned it's constantly falling to its lowest point (due to it having a low viscosity) as the screw pushes it higher. Wouldn't work so well with a powder which would just spin with the screw due to friction... 👍

@@SciencewithHeen you're right! That exactly happened. On the other hand: Extruders use the same principle, so you can build up high pressures, when the stuff is fed on the beginning end, but still not the zement. It did not move at all m, but it got compressed to a degree, where I had to hammer-carve it out with a stone chissel! Impressive! It took only seconds, to get it hard like stone although it was completely dry. I was reinventing a processor for aircrete like Gibran does.