most of these levels are literally the same lol

Very interesting video, got right to the point. Just got a new sub.

I think people sometimes forget that Dante's Inferno is just one part of The Divine Comedy, which is biblical fanfic, but it's not officially canon.

Question. How can Plato, Socrates, all others etc, be saved by Christian salvation before Christian salvation existed? Surely every single human being born before the sacrifice of Jesus Christ is in Limbo then???

With gods like RA? Really?

God isn't evil because a god doesn't exist. But when I speak about the evil of forced birth christians I am speaking about what the majority believes not what all christians believe. Just the very fact that not all christians are even close to being on the same page shows the obvious lie of christ. Which leads to the following truths of this post in which no christian can refute! If hell is real then abortion is the most humane thing that could ever happen to any potential human being ever! The risk of eternal torment if true will always outweigh bringing any finite life into this world. So how insane is a religion that makes human extinction the best option to human suffering? So the question for forced birth extremists is which is it? Do you honestly believe hell is real or is the bible lying? Are you ignorant to what eternal conscious torment is? Are you in denial that exponentially more people will suffer for eternity than claim a life in your heaven belief? Or do you just disregard and hate conscious life and don't care about those who will suffer for eternity? There will never be a hate as great as those that believe in hell yet want to force more births so that more will end up in eternal torment. Most forced birth christians agree that an aborted fetus would go to heaven...which would guarantee that they would be saved from eternal conscious suffering in hell! In fact, the majority of the world should have wished to have been aborted if Mark 9:42-48 is true. And this flawed thinking by the so called pro-life movement and Christians is what makes them so dangerous and showcases their evil hypocrisy. They think they are moral but are far from it! They place the worth of a non-conscious being over the well being of every human on the planet. You see this in their support of Trump's authoritarianism, supporting those that do nothing about climate change or gun violence, supporting those that do nothing about America's unsustainable health care costs, supporting those that give tax breaks to billionaires at the expense of the poor and middle class and forcing raped 10 year old little girls to give birth. The pure hatred for all conscious life is the foundation of christians as shown by their real world actions, words and beliefs.

Not bad. (These things have formed a part of my life long study.) For a superficial exposure to those practices which can bring about both the immanent and transcendent experiences of God. Kudos! New sub.

Subbed and liked

What a video

We really can't expect any X-men and mutant stuff until ~+'26 ?

How about actualy saying what the amendment is. I know them but I bet alot of people dont

Anarcho capitalism is the best

The third amendment only pertains to soldiers! Nothing is said about sailors, marines,airmen, or guardians.

now explain every US law

Thanks maester luwin

¡The Explainer is the best for rapid-fire factual fun!

Something to explain here: The very base of Anarchism as defined by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon already calls for the abolition of property which is why in his most prominent work: "What is Property?" He answers that question with: "Property is theft". Anarchism can, per definition of the term as a political and economical idea, NEVER be Capitalist, because the etymology of the term excludes the very thing that HAS to exist in order for Capitalism to exist: Property. Therefore the Means of Production being owned by nobody equates to them being mutually owned by everybody according to proudhon. Hence why his "branch" is also called "Mutualism". But since Proudhon was the first to use the term "Anarchism" in that way, it is therefore the etymology that follows up with EVERY kind of Anarchism. So "Anarchism" as a whole advocates for communally and mutually owned Means of Production, not just Anarcho-Communism. And, yes, that also means that "Anarcho-Capitalism" is an oxymoron. Not just because of the etymology of Proudhon, but also because Capitalism is inherently extremely hierarchical and based on pure coercion and authority. Even if those people go: "mimimi but the original greek definition", it still contradicts the very essence of Anarchism to "combine" it with Capitalism. Because even if you simply say: "Anarchy means no Rulers", well, Bosses, Managers etc. ARE Rulers. They hold power and authority over the rest through coercion. Freedom of Movement doesn't negate that, especially if you will find the same structures absolutely everywhere. And if that wasn't enough, Capitalism will simply and inevitably create a state again anyway since if everything becomes a commodity, that WILL include the powers that defined the state: Legislative, Executive and Judiciary. So according to the ideas of Rothbard & Co. on whom they base their ideas, those WILL be privatized. Yet capitalism dictates profit maximization as the ultimate goal. So its only a matter of time until one Company offers all of these branches of a state, therefore uniting them under one banner, therefore, de facto, creating a state. That's just Capitalist economy 101: "Tapping into new Markets". See: Amazon and their constant expansion. But then again... people who know the first thing about Economy or history as well as etymology of terms don't call themselves "Anarcho-Capitalists". Hell even Rothbard knew that was a dumb Idea^^ Hope that helps. Feel free to look up anything I said or use the information I shared in any way. Such is the Anarchist way ;)

Economic progressiveism 🙏

I love how unbiased this is. Keep up the good work ♥

Gnostics are heretics, but we can all agree Material world is evil

6:43 this is a picture of Saint Augustine, not Peter Abelard

What about Islam? Muslims affirm that Jesus is the Messiah (as stated in the Quran), but do not consider Jesus divine.

The core belief of Bahaism is oxymoronic vis-à-vis Judaism, Christianity, Islam.

POPE BENEDICT XVI: “THE JANSENIST MENTALITY PRESENTED A GRIM AND SEVERE FACE OF GOD, VERY REMOTE FROM THE FACE REVEALED TO US BY JESUS. IT LEAD TO A VERY STRICT AND WIDESPREAD INTERPRETATION OF MORAL LIFE.” In the 17th century the Jansenist heresy preached a religion of fear and anguish. Priests were obsessed with “sins of the flesh.” God was presented only as a harsh and condemning judge, not as a merciful Savior and Good Shepherd. The Jansenists taught that only a few people were saved, and only the purest of souls, free of all taint of sin, could receive Communion without the fear of committing a sacrilege. New Eucharistic devotions emphasized the separation and distance between God and ourselves. St. Vincent de Paul said: “We no longer see people receiving Communion, not even at Easter, the way they formerly did.” In the early 1900's Pope Pius 10th enraged those with a Jansenistic mind set by encouraging frequent & and even daily communion. And further, he began allowing children to receive holy communion as soon as they reached the age of reason. Before then, you had to be about 14 years old. Jansenists taught that the Eucharist is a reward for virtue, but the Council of Trent back in the 1500's had decreed that Communion is an “antidote by which we are freed from our daily faults and preserved from sin.”

''John" Hus 💀💀💀💀💀💀

A sect that wanted to live pure, poor lives and rejecting material wealth.. and marked heretical by the catholic church.. *looks at all the extremely opulent cathedrals all over Euruope and Americas* GEE I WONDER WHY.

This whole video is a paradox

Im so high that i didn't understand any paradox.

Where's the rick astley paradox?

Third

second

I comment so that no one can say that I’m first

Hussitism is not a heresy. Jesus said to DRINK. So we MUST DRINK!

So... Jan Hus is a heretic for wanting reforms (e.g. communion in both kinds) But we're cool with using Martin Luther to condemn Antinomianism? ... even though he wanted the exact same reforms (e.g. communion in both kinds) and more? Pardon me for being a bit confused

Moksh is highest but until someone achieves it they're trapped in the cycle of births, Not necessarily Human birth.

Gnosticism got condemn in 1 John too

I've never had a single person in my life who didn't do at least some of these and thats why I no longer socialize with anyone

❤❤

i wonder how many politicians have studied this video lol

👌👌👌👌

An interesting fact is many people use these tactics without even being aware of it. It's just their way of life that they consider fair and just. So usually there is no way to cure a toxic person, you try to have the "talks" to adjust their behaviors but it will never work. This is why recognizing red flags and trusting your gut are important. Many people end up in miserable relationships feeling stuck, manipulated, and abused because they glossed over the signs firsthand. Take care of you out there.

Pleas reply so i will comeback to write them to avoid them

Not pretend to offend but how Iconoclasy is heretic? Because bow down to images is clearly bad in the Bible: "You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments." Ex. 20:4-6. "Do not make any gods to be alongside me; do not make for yourselves gods of silver or gods of gold." Ex. 20: 23. "Do not make idols or set up an image or a sacred stone for yourselves, and do not place a carved stone in your land to bow down before it. I am the Lord your God." Lev. 26:1 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 9 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 10 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments. " Det. 5: 8-10 "He did what was right in the eyes of the Lord, just as his father David had done. 4 He removed the high places, smashed the sacred stones and cut down the Asherah poles. He broke into pieces the bronze snake Moses had made, for up to that time the Israelites had been burning incense to it. (It was called Nehushtan.)" 2 Kings 18 : 3 - 4. "The idols of the nations are silver and gold, made by human hands. They have mouths, but cannot speak, eyes, but cannot see. They have ears, but cannot hear, nor is there breath in their mouths. Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them." Psalm 135: 15 - 18. "With whom, then, will you compare God? To what image will you liken him?" Is. 40:18. "I will destroy your idols and your sacred stones from among you; you will no longer bow down to the work of your hands." Mic. 5:13.

Yet another one of these clone channels. 123 subscribers, 811 views, and I’m sure this channel will get views and subscribers super quickly.

Silent treatment is not bad depending on the reason, for instance taking a break after an argument after voicing this to the other party. But unfortunately the other person could take it as silent treatment and call it manipulation which is manipulative in its own right if the other person tends to be the problem.

Use me as the "I was here before this blew up" button

My ex used almost every trick mentioned here..💀

Thanks now I’m gonna make sure to use all these💪

this video boutta blow up

What would help would be to state your own viewpoint. Catholics are heretical to protestants and Orthodox, depending who you ask, Copts may be heretical to Orthodox, Protestants are heretical to Catholic. Some groups such as Henricians and Hussites were merely attempting reform. Heretical to the Pope, maybe, closer to the truth than the Catholic church was in their time.