I feel like there's a hidden branch of mathematics which will connect primes with addition, and therefore solve the reimann hypothesis, the collatz conjecture, many other unsolved problems with primes, and this problem. Who knows if it exists though?

Useless.

👍👍👍👍

I wonder if there's a limit to aleph sets relating to the monster group

I am sorry to have to tell you that this is rather a lot of arm-waving in which you failed to convey the definition of the property that the subsequent networks must not have in relation to the previous networks in order to qualify as a valid series. I think I get it that Tree(3) is the number of valid series for 3 colours of nodes. Each series must have 1 node, 2 nodes etc, and later networks must not contain previous networks which is very clear in meaning that you must not be able to snip a previous network out of a subsequent network with a pair of scissors, as it were. However there is another way that the subsequent network may be said to contain a previous network even though you cannot snip it out of the subsequent network with a pair of scissors. It involved something called a common ancestor, as though the nodes in the tree had somehow begotten one another and were members of a family, but how we were to determine which nodes had begotten which other nodes was not made clear, and so I have not yet reached the point of being curious as to how to prove that the number is actually finite, because I have not yet received an explanation of what the definition of the number actually is. Please help me if you can. Thanks.

it's not really a regulating function at that point. realistically youre just reverse engineering a series which converges to -1/12 and saying "oh of course! this means that the sum of the natural numbers is -1/12"

Congratulations Bhai 301 ❤

4:31 this part is kinda interesting, because if you made the mandelbrot set with this, you would get slightly different image, since the mandelbrot set changes when you move the starting point. it's like moving through the julia set dimension while staying on the mandelbrot orientation

Is there a direct relation between a certain prime number and its ordinal number? In other words, - is it possible to derive such a formula, when substituting the ordinal number of a prime number into it, the output would be the prime number itself, or, if not, at least the minimum range in which this number is located. How minimal can such a range be in such a case?...? Существует ли прямая связь между определённым простым числом и его порядковым номером? Другими словами, - можно ли вывести такую формулу, при подстановке в которую порядкового номера простого числа, на выходе можно было бы получить само это простое число, или, если нет, то хотя бы получить минимальный диапазон, в котором это число находится. На сколько минимальным в таком случае может быть такой диапазон?...

Trigger the flashbacks of undergrad quantum. Yuck.

Hi❤❤

TREE(3) is gonna be shaking in their boots when FOREST(3) enters

that's a rotational matrix, is used to rotate images in Computer vision and augment datas... weird. cool. secsy <3

I mean how did he do it then? No guesses?

I immediately tried it and it feels like witchcraft omg this is so awesome

Ah yes, the Auntie Parker square

You should check out how the French do numbers.

So, a 400 year old man is determining how we live our lives? Shouldn't we move beyond this 4oo year old mindset?

1000!

This is why I like mathematics, you can use different ways to get to an answer and it still connects to previous concepts. Even when applied to something wild and new like this

Yeah…. I think I’ll just stick with 3↑↑↑↑0

In Bangladesh, we sometimes use a sort of base 20 system for counting, where we count each of the grooves on our fingers + the tip of the finger, so that will be 4 points per finger times 5, making 20 points

Hi welcome to McDonald’s Yeah uh I guess I’ll have a Graham’s number Big Macs and uh supersize my Coke please

mom can we buy a new generator? honey we have a generator at home. the generator at home:

I'm expecting his shirt to have a stereogram hidden in it

I guess, you don't have to use numbers, you can simply write names on each half of each paper and do without the list :) And there is still a problem of a full cycle: If you are buying a gift for smb, then you are 100% this very person is not the one buying a gift for you (l have no idea how to solve it yet)

Fantastic explanation. Thanks.

thinking about derivative of a matrix i came across this idea whether can we define the properties of Riemann integration rigorously for functions , where 'X' is the metric space of n×n matrices, with both domain and codomain being 'X' This involves integrating a function whose inputs and outputs are both matrices.

interestingly, the resulting matrix / the limit of the series is also a rotation matrix

There are two timesI knew when the count glitched, and got higher than 301: November 2, and August 21, both 2024

Well what about the arcimedean

this is why you never go best out of 3

SCG(3) is already bigger than TREE(TREE(TREE(.....TREE(3)))) nested repeated a googol times... even if repeated TREE(3) times. Imagine SCG(13)

Dont lie, you came here because of danno, didn't you?

I would have bought my own cake by now 😂

...it seems like a massive cognitive dissonance to start talking about comparing sizes of sets, and then saying "this one is the first one, but these are all equal to eachother'. Like, no, no they're not. C'mon.

I find it funny how mathematicians are 'excited' by a patently wrong answer instead of (correctly) assuming something is wrong with the methods used in evaluating divergent series.

If you have the most basic laws of mathematics which tell you A is the answer and then you use very complex maths on the same problem which tells you the answer is B, Shouldn't you go with the A and assume that since B involves concepts we know nothing about like infinity A is more reliable? Yes i think so, so i go with the result that all positive numbers added gives you a positive number.

the fact that there are 324 398 comments, 4,2M likes and 301 views is insane

Appreciation of using a simple to understand proof!

Serial numbers now have letters

😁👋🏻👍🥇

*☠️*

I have a proof that the magic square of squares is mathematically identical to the perfect Euler brick, but there is not enough space in this comment to write it out.

This video felt like being forced to listen to the entirety of the sea cucumber joke in Finding Nemo

There’s still 301 views after 12 years

Sidhu. Moosa. Wala

I will have to rewatch this because I don't recall seeing an explanation for how the dual card system avoids someone getting their own number.

2024 update : it seems someone (Jenon Baek) proved Gervor's sofa is optimal (not peer reviewed yet tho)

I now know of this problem but do you know the name of a puzzle involving 4 numbers that only using addition and subtraction you can get any number from 1 to 40. You can use any combination. However you can only use each number once. I solved it and I would like to see how you solved it. Thanks.