It is atmospheric pressure + thermal shock( rapid change in temperature caused can material to fail by spraying cold water into a hot surface)
@bor35492 ай бұрын
Not sure what the porting is like inside the cylinder cast, but if it's just mismatched inlet/outlets, couldn't you grind and weld to reshape them? And possibly sand cast just the slide valve with a different geometry?
@AbbasAbbadi-z5v2 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot. It was the best I saw up to now. It shows we did not get the sentence " we should not invent the wheel". We have to understand the wheel invention mechanism.
@Walter-w9v3 ай бұрын
Newcomen's machine was designed and built to supply Atmospheric Power. Watt's machine was designed and built to supply Steam Power. They are two different machines, so they shouldn't have the same name. What's wrong with Atmospheric engine and Steam engine, seems pretty logical to me. Or is it something to do with the Steam Engine being the Industrial Revolution, logic goes out the window? There's an Industrial Revolution's worth of difference between Newcomen's Atmospheric engine and Watt's Steam engine.
@cjezzerc3 ай бұрын
Great video. Was wondering where the cylinder drain was and this showed it really nicely. Also the way this showed how the slide valve linked the cylinder to the exhaust was much better than any diagram or animation. Thank you.
@georgeblair71293 ай бұрын
Beyond cool!
@dk1ey7794 ай бұрын
What radio is he using? It looks like a National Radio.
@agostinodibella99394 ай бұрын
I first saw one of these Almond right angle drives at Rough and Tumble at Kinzers PA, and was amazed how it worked. You almost get hypnotized watching it like a camp fire!
@black_eagle4 ай бұрын
Wow, it's like something out of science fiction (David Lynch's *Dune* comes to mind). Nothing like this is made today. We are clearly in an age of decline.
@domenicozagari24435 ай бұрын
Just put the pressure back again.
@G10Jon5 ай бұрын
I thought Corliss Safe was William Corliss - George’s brother. We have a Corliss safe which may be for sale.
@dougmacqueen16795 ай бұрын
I may know a buyer. Where abouts is the safe? And he can move it as well.
@G10Jon5 ай бұрын
@@dougmacqueen1679 in Newport Rhode Island
@mearalain30065 ай бұрын
Awsome explanation. We need more.
@1943L5 ай бұрын
Now I understand. Mind you in use they are clacking noisy valves compared to normal slide one.
@ronblack78704 ай бұрын
i actually love the sound of the clicking valves
@vikingsofvintageaudio74706 ай бұрын
This is the best video on the whole internet in regards to explaining the Corliss valve. Incredibly well done!
@gustavgnoettgen7 ай бұрын
"One more time, the camera got interrupted." BZZZZZZZ ... "One more time, the camera got interrupted." BZZZZZZZ
@paulnicholson19067 ай бұрын
when designing storage tanks you have to install a vacuum breaker so it won't collapse if the wall is thin. Also now we use nitrogen to inert vessels to exclude air to prevent flammables from igniting (like gasoline) but in the old days they purged with steam to get the air out. Amazing a Newcomen engine could have a piston force of 90,000 psi. I calculated the force on a steam locomotive piston once at 200 psi and I think that is in the same range although a much smaller piston area.
@gregwarner37538 ай бұрын
I have been to several "steam ups" at this fascinating museum. This mechanism is most fascinating. It took a very advanced level of three - D thinking to create the motion and even more to manufacture it. I think the ball ends were machined first and then inserted into the arms of the drive then the arms were cold forged around the balls. The other fascinating things are the Corliss steam valve drive on the reciprocating stem engines an well as the huge vacuum tube triodes in the Wireless section of the museum. I hope to make the next "steam up".
@RolandElliottFirstG8 ай бұрын
cool!
@jonathanvoshell79148 ай бұрын
3:11 For the fabrication of the pivot ball I can see the use of a Lathe tracer to cut a ball shape from half of a rod and than drilling out the material. Roughly the same thing could be done for fabricating the housing of the pivot ball. And thermally expand the housing to drop the ball into the housing.
@Pete-xe3il8 ай бұрын
To use the size change of steel as one example, it expands or shrinks about 6 1/2 millionths of an inch per degree, per inch of material. Those spherical ends look to be roughly 2"-2 1/2" Cutting a ball shape is easy on a lathe with the complexity of a tracer attachment. The internal cup less so, but not impossible. However there's no way your going to get nearly enough temperature changes between the two parts to get them to drop in place. Exactly how it was done I don't know, but thermally would only get you part of the way there.
@camojoe835 ай бұрын
Only idea i can tbink of is a radius cutter and offset the chuck like you're grinding a piston pin on a crankshaft, then use thermal fitting to get it set together. Only way I can think of to approach that with just a lathe.
@camojoe835 ай бұрын
Maybe theres just enough reduction in the OD of the ball when they cut the oil groove in it that would get you in there.. I'm only assuming there's an oil groove on the ball tho, can't be sure unless we see one broken or cut open
@-Todays-Tom-Sawyer-8 ай бұрын
Great rig, horrendous fist....
@sydwelglobal14398 ай бұрын
Just because you can do something doesn’t always mean you should! 😂
@TheBlaert8 ай бұрын
What's your point exactly? These were a hell of a lot cheaper and easier to produce than something with bevel gears all those years ago
@ramzeneger8 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video!
@organbuilder2729 ай бұрын
WIAT a minute. The walschaert and Baker vale gear used on locomotives allow for a variable opening and closing of the valve. The lead and lap is changes by changing the stroke of the steam vale. Engines starting under load receive full boiler pressure, As the speed increases the stroke is shortened and less team admitted to the cylinder allowing expansion of steam to keep the engine running more efficiently. No locomotive ever used corliss valve gear as far as I know. You refer to the action of a D type valve only used on low pressure engines - stationary and in locomotives. The big engines developed in 1930 - 1946 used spool valves or poppet valves.
@petermclaughlin1203 ай бұрын
and the Stephenson Valve Gear had the same function shame this was glossed over
@2meterPeter.9 ай бұрын
AMAZING
@sanjayfernando468610 ай бұрын
I really enjoyed this video. I build miniature steam engines, all of which have all been the slide valve type. I have my heart set on building a Corliss in the future and the beauty of the mechanism and your fabulous explanation has increased my desire to build one - thank you!!😃
@BillSteinhauser10 ай бұрын
At 20:20 you were wondering how much surface area there is for tubes in that wood fired vertical boiler made in 1966... If each tube is 2 inches diameter and 7ft long, that gives you 3.66 sq ft of heat transfer atea per tube. With 205 tubes in that boiler, you get about 750 sq ft, total surface area for all tubes in that boiler. Hopefully that gives decent heat exchange space, for efficiency. The automatic Columbia boiler 22:00 is undoubtedly easier/better to run unattended, and probably just as efficient, providing enough steam (15hp) to power most any steam engine on site (since they are not under much load) as long as you don't try to run too many engines at the same time. I wonder how much surface area there is for that automatic boiler?
@daleolson350611 ай бұрын
Cool
@janstolk48611 ай бұрын
It's fascinating to look at but an awkward mechanism . I doubt it could go at any speed faster than this without shaking itself apart , also any recipocating motion robs horse power . I wonder what the motivation was for that design .
@martin-vv9lf8 ай бұрын
the tech wasn't sufficiently advanced at the time to make bevel gears.
@RustyInventions-wz6ir11 ай бұрын
Just found your channel and Subscribed. The sort of things interesting to me. Wish I had a bigger workshop.
@tbyrn444 Жыл бұрын
Ever heard of lighting. It actually works quite well. It allows one to see what you're actually talking about so we can actually learn something instead of being frustrated and deciding to leave and never again watch one of your videos. Just a thought.
@wattage-uk9zt Жыл бұрын
Newcomen's machine was an Atmospheric Pump. It provided Atmospheric Power, ( natural air pressure) a whole 10psi.max. So, why call it a Steam Engine? A Steam Engine is different, It provides Steam Power. That's why it's called a Steam Engine. It could provide High Pressure Steam Power, as much power as your engine could take, which explains why there were so many explosions. James Watt dumped Newcomen's Atmospheric Power and Arkwright's Water-Power for High Pressure Steam Power. Like James Watt's High Pressure Steam Engine. It was the difference between an Industrial Revolution and no Industrial Revolution!
@jandoerlidoe3412 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for shoring this fascinating and educating video.... Never knew Corliss did make such....
@jeremysmith1339 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely fascinating
@themediaman100 Жыл бұрын
For those who are not mechanicaly minded this will just be another piece of machinery. But I think it's bloody marvellous! I'm amazed at the design and simplicity of it. Who the hell thought that one up? Mr Almond must had funny thought processes, but it is of course a work of genius.
@CRUZER1800 Жыл бұрын
A crying shame the audio is SO bad.... Could not understand most of it...
@DanChase84 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video! Please post more since I will probably not be able to get there Saturday 🙂
@TheMan1510 Жыл бұрын
That's one of the neatest things I've ever seen! Perhaps you can build a robot to open the other locks, like the one in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/lZe3q2V6a91lZrc
@s16100 Жыл бұрын
very cool. Wish you would have used oil and actually lite it for a moment to see the flame looking for tails, dark or light smoke etc. to see how she really works. but this water demonstration is cool.
@MrJoestudent Жыл бұрын
aint no stoppin paul!
@jackb4249 Жыл бұрын
Nice!
@jeremyriegel6257 Жыл бұрын
Id say the rod comes out and you place the right angle in the joints at a precise angle via moving the balls. Then set it back to its timed position and put the rod back through
@camojoe835 ай бұрын
He was talking about how they got the balls in the eyes of the cranks so smoothly.
@MacWhatley Жыл бұрын
Great to see new posts!
@randygyver Жыл бұрын
Rolf's work is something to behold!
@sheep1ewe Жыл бұрын
Awsome!!
@JenkoRun Жыл бұрын
Tesla's non-Hertzian waves are not electromagnetic, they are Dielectric impulse displacement currents, the magnetic field component of an EM wave is very lossy and Tesla wanted to avoid this problem for power and communication transmission, an impulse current isn't affected by the inverse square law and transmission delay because it has no magnetic field, and thus no losses, provided the transmitter and receiver and perfectly tuned to each other. His hairpin circuit is one manner of producing it, run that through a tesla coil setup, preferably 3 coil, and you'll be a step closer to his system, it's apparent he was using this method for Wardenclyffe from FIG 5 of his rare notes, the tower contains a hairpin circuit in its design. The lack of magnetism is the same reason why you can freely touch the cold side of the circuit or interact with it in water without being harmed by it, no magnetism = no harm.
@walterbennie816 Жыл бұрын
It's powered by atmospheric pressure, so why call it a steam engine? A steam engine's powered by steam, like James Watt's engine. It's a different engine.
@walterbennie816 Жыл бұрын
It's an atmospheric engine. James Watt's engine is a steam engine. Reverse the process and you could describe a Watt engine!
@thelockpickinglebowski633 Жыл бұрын
Amazing. Thanks for sharing.
@cliffwoodbury5319 Жыл бұрын
so besides crushing itself does it have any application in the real world!!!