3 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@nathalie2369 8 күн бұрын
Il semble qu'il considère plutôt la séparation que le lien entre autrui et soi...si je suis complet et qu'auteur est complet pourquoi insister sur la séparation ?
@cherniismail7997 6 күн бұрын
@@nathalie2369 si je suis incomplet, alors ma relation avec autrui devient de l'exploitation. Je cherche en autrui ce qui me manque, ce qui va me compléter. Or, si la nature de ma relation avec autrui c'est une recherche de ce qui me manque, la relation n'est plus une relation éthique. L'éthique consiste en une relation avec ce dont on ne tire aucun profit, avec l'étranger absolu. Donc forcément, une relation éthique ne peut exister qu'entre des êtres séparés et indépendants les uns des autres, donc des êtres complets.
@nathalie2369 20 күн бұрын
Salut Ismaïl. Si on est soumis au jugement de l'''autre'', comment ce jugement se manifeste -t-il? Par le jugement de l'ensemble des ''mêmes''?
@cherniismail7997 8 күн бұрын
Qu'entends tu par l'ensemble des "mêmes"? Tu veux dire l'ensemble des ipséités qui font société? Tu me demandes si le Moi est jugé par la société?
@Walter_Benjamin 24 күн бұрын
Attention l'intentionnalité n'est pas une représentation, mais une "visée" dont la représentation est un mode au même titre que le percevoir, l'imaginer, le souvenir etc... Et l'intentionnalité ne se poursuit pas dans un mentalisme, de '"l'image mentale" de quelque chose mais est plutôt une jonction entre la res cogitans et extensa.
@cherniismail7997 24 күн бұрын
@@Walter_Benjamin Merci pour cette précision. J'ai déja expliqué l'intentionnalité comme visée ou rapport (ou jonction) avec un objet dans des vidéos précédentes, et qui donc ne se limite pas à la representation ou à former des images mentales. Merci de la faire remarquer et de le rappeller en tout cas. C'est bien pour ça que sert la section commentaire. 😊
@medso1237 27 күн бұрын
30:20 bro thinks he taxi driver
@nathalie2369 Ай бұрын
Merci Ismaïl. C'est très bien que tu reviennes sur des idées développées dans tes vidéos précédentes, car à force de revenir sur une même idée, en l'éclairant différemment...ben...on la comprend mieux! 😊
@nathalie2369 Ай бұрын
Coucou Ismaïl. Je ne comprends pas comment l'infini nous interpelle...ne serais-ce pas nous qui interpellons l'infini? Pourquoi faire une distinction entre l'expression orale et écrite...ne sont-elles pas des actualisations au moment où elles se produisent ?
@cherniismail7997 Ай бұрын
@@nathalie2369 l'interpellation ici implique deux choses: 1. Ça se fait sans qu'on s'y attend. Quand quelqu'un t'interpelle, c'est comme être appelé par surprise. 2. Quand on est interpellé c'est pour se justifier. Il y a donc un rapport d'autorité entre celui qui interpelle et l'interpelé. Dire que c'est nous qui interpellons l'infini, ça veut dire que l'infini peut ne pas se douter de notre existence et par notre interpellation, il est surpris par notre presence. Mais si l'infini est surpris par une presence qu'il ne soupçonnait pas, alors il n'est pas l'infini. Donc il n'y a que l'infini qui peut interpeller. Et de deux, si on interpelle l'infini, alors c'est l'infini qui doit se justifier. Et ça c'est juste une absurdité. L'infini ne peut pas se justifier envers une substance finie puisqu'il faut de l'infini comme reference à une justification. Si moi je vais être le juge de l'infini, mon jugement ne meut être valable que s'il est conforme à certain critère. Or dans la justification, le critere en question est la morale. Sauf que seul l'infini connait la morale. Toute justification a pour reference l'infini. Donc une substance finie ne peut pas demander à une substance infinie de se justifier. C'est uniquement l'inverse qui est valable.
@cherniismail7997 Ай бұрын
@@nathalie2369 pour la question concernant l'écriture, il dit que la parole implique toujours un face à face alors que l'écriture peut s'en passer. Quelqu'un peut mieux se défendre en parlant que par l'écriture parce qu'en parlant tu assistes à ton discours. Et à chaque fois que quelqu'un veut deformer tes propos, tu es là pour y répondre. Avec l'écriture, ton discours est un peu à la mercie de l'interprétation des autres. Il faut pas non plus lire ça au sens propre non plus. Parole et écriture ici ont un peu une dimension de sens figuré. Si on veut être tres technique, on dit juste qu'il y a un discours inséparable de la présence de son auteur (si l'auteur n'est pas là, le discours non plus. C'est la parole), et un discours qui peut se passer de la présence de l'auteur (discours écrit, ou enregistré. Donc oui, si on enregistre ta voix, ta parole devient de l'écriture aussi).
@TheBrendNew Ай бұрын
"“No privilege or morality, can shield you from any necessary violence and brutal efficiency.” Thank you so much for this sentence. It makes me understand everything better in just a few words. Job well done!
@nathalie2369 Ай бұрын
Si chaque intériorité a une volonté cela fait que nous pouvons nous donner naissance à chaque instant par nos actions ou nos pensées ?
@cherniismail7997 Ай бұрын
@@nathalie2369 l'intériorité c'est la volonté. Et oui. Comme j'ai une volonté, mes pensées et actions sont produites par moi, pas par des causes extérieures. Donc on peut dire que chaque action, c'est le Moi qui se redonne naissance. C'est ça la séparation: je suis séparé, donc autonome. Mais il ne faut pas oublier ce qui rend possible cette séparation et mon autonomie: c'est Autrui.
@erikfurudisatoko 2 ай бұрын
ça me fait penser au Je et Tu de Martin Buber pour l'importance relationnelle
@cherniismail7997 2 ай бұрын
@@erikfurudisatoko Effectivement, Levinas s'inspire de Buber. Il en parle d'ailleurs dans les parties traitées dans cette video. Cependant, la relation entre le Même et l'Autre est différente du Je-Tu. Levinas critique Buber dans le sens où la relation de Buber n'est métaphysique. Elle est légitime bien sûr, mais c'est pas celle dont parle Levinas.
@nathalie2369 2 ай бұрын
Cette fois j'ai l'impression d'avoir un peu mieux compris... mais il y a un paradoxe qui me chiffonne : comment être à la fois infinis dans le contact avec ''l'autre'' mais aussi finis? 😊
@cherniismail7997 2 ай бұрын
Alors, il ne me semble pas avoir dit que le Moi est infini dans sa relation avec l'autre tout en restant fini. Si tu fais allusion à l'idée de l'infini contenu dans le Moi, elle ne rend pas le Moi infini. Le Moi reste quand même fini. S'il est infini ou deviens infini, lui et l'autre deviennent égaux, ce qui est impossible. Le Moi qui s'extériorise dans la relation éthique ne devient pas un infini.
@ParanormalUKNetwork 2 ай бұрын
Excellent video! I first read DofE for my philosophy degree back in the late 1990s, however post Nov5th 2024 it suddenly feels very relevant. But more 'Post-Marxist' than Marxist in the classical sense.
@hali.m23 2 ай бұрын
Il me semble que c'est un très bon projet bonne continuation
@darillus1 2 ай бұрын
when it comes to death, the fact that life is finite and not infinite gives life meaning
@delbimore431 2 ай бұрын
Le même et l autre ne pouvant par nature pas être reliés, cela apporte une telle libération. Merci, cela me fait énormément de bien et aide tant à cesser la culpabilité de n être pas tout. ❤ Hâte de vous suivre aux prochaines vidéos sur ce thème ou d autres. Aussi, merci de ne pas faire la surenchère des vidéos léchées avec lumières et caméra 4k... Ca fait une bonne pause d artifices ❤
@delbimore431 2 ай бұрын
Faites vous partie de la théosophie? Merci
@cherniismail7997 2 ай бұрын
Non. Je suis très loin de ça. Je suis d'ailleurs athée, du coup ça va être compliqué de me trouver parmi des groupes religieux. Je ne fais qu'expliquer des livres de philosophies (sans forcément être d'accord avec les thèses avancées par l'auteur).
@delbimore431 2 ай бұрын
Abonné!
@delbimore431 2 ай бұрын
Super video et merci de nous apporter de l'essence ❤
@emilioazevedo2909 2 ай бұрын
Bravo et merci
@nathalie2369 2 ай бұрын
Merci Ismail de nous proposer de la lenteur d'analyse, mais bon, Vite des réponses !😂...ok, je sors.
@ferdawssaid2862 2 ай бұрын
Très intéressant! Merci
@sebastien9634 2 ай бұрын
Merci pour cette proposition, j'ai tjrs voulu lire ou du moins m'immerger dasn ce livre sans trouver le moment pour. Tres content de tomber par hasard sur ta vidéo ( sur KZbin j'ai tapé ni toi ni lévinas ni le livre). Aucun commentaire sur son contenu, j'ai à peine commencer à regarder, et je y aller par morceau.
@bananapancake666 3 ай бұрын
Recently started reading this book and found your videos. I'm no academic, but have read a few, mostly political, philosophy books. Found myself feeling like I might be missing some context and your videos have helped me make sure I understand the chapters I've read! Since its a review of the material for me, I love having on in the background while I do stuff. Love your presentation style. Definitely wish every philosophy book had something like this for us normies. Cheers! Edit: Also I think I was your 420th subscriber!? Lmao
@cherniismail7997 3 ай бұрын
@@bananapancake666 thank you for your support. You made my day with your encouraging comment 😍
@mark4asp 3 ай бұрын
"How and why did the Enlightenment and the values of progress produce the most destructive, regressive and barbaric events human kind has ever witnessed?" <- The Enlightenment did not do that. Stalin, Hitler and Mao did - none of them Enlightenment thinkers, none of them particularly influenced by Enlightenment thought - all of them obessed with their petty ressentiment. Please stop trashing The Enlightenment. Stop misrepresenting it. Adorno and Horkheimer's "Dialectic of Enlightenment" is a lazy, journalistic style book; written at a bleak time in history, when both authors must've been pretty badly demoralized. That book is NOT about The European Enlightenment and is NOT a critique of such.
@zayaricon 3 ай бұрын
great job.Hope to see more.
@vivianviridiana96 4 ай бұрын
Very interesting 💜
@natashatuskovichcoworking 4 ай бұрын
Something other than human, sure: something better. Bring it on!
@randomchannel-px6ho 4 ай бұрын
I know I'm lucky to have gotten a good education from a young age but I barely feel like I'm the same species of people who are larping up todays obvious fascist...
@orangeguy5463 4 ай бұрын
Palestinians are not a ghost enemy for Zionists. Terrorists simply publish their own actions on the internet, and Israel reacts accordingly, this happens completely independent of which mythologies of hatred are perpetuated. If someone kidnaps your sister what does it matter which stories you are told? There is no accusation towards Palestinians which projects the true intentions of Zionists. A Zionist is simply someone who believes that Jews don't need to ask permission to exist. Any critique of enlightenment, which inevitably demands that Jews assimilate to rational society, thereby removing their agency to defend themselves against ethnic persecution, is inherently Zionist. I don't think you operate off of a definition of Zionism which could possibly include the majority of Zionists who believe that a 2-state solution is possible and in the best interest of the Jewish state.
@orangeguy5463 4 ай бұрын
You should understand that Stalin and the Ayatollah alike have used the word "Zionist" as a placeholder for "Jew who won't fall in line". It's a tired old cliche and they do this because they know Marxists eat this lazy euphemism up. It is a terrible irony that you take all this time to appreciate the context of various schools of Marxist thought to understand the nature of antisemitism arising because of Jewish refusal to conform to the latest iteration of enlightened liberal democratic society as a defense mechanism. You have spent so much time, just to ultimately latch onto precisely the same illusion that critique of enlightenment is supposed to rid you of. You have been spoonfed a myth that you can somehow believe that Zionists are a regional iteration of fascism (in the Marxist sense) and that criticizing Zionism in this way is completely different from antisemitism. In doing so, you have contributed to an active campaign seeking to turn liberal democratic society against the 'bad jews'. Of course it's not antisemitic, you have no problem with Jews, you only criticize the ones who are against the mainstream discourse demonizing their heritage.
@cherniismail7997 2 ай бұрын
Well, sorry to respond to your comment after a month. Let's put things straight and say that Palestinians ARE a ghost enemy for Zionists which can easily be proven using even your analogy with a sister kidnapping. If someone kidnaps my sister and I retaliate by killing him, his entire family and his neighboors including children undiscriminately, then yes, the kidnapper is a ghost enemy. And no, those who died by my actions are not human shields that the kidnapper used. So, it does matter a lot which story is told. If you want to claim to the "right to defend yourself", you can't defend yourself however you want or please. When International Law and almost every international organisation that watches over human rights violation agree that Israel is committing war crimes and genocide, it is case closed. And likewise, the claim to "right to self-determination" cannot justify any act you commit or any way you want to "retaliate". So, even within the narratif that Israel is just "defending" itself, it still counts as war crimes and genocide (a genocide that started waaaaay before October 7th). And so, no, Israel is not responding "accordingly". As for the second point about Zionism being just "the right to self-determination", it is historically false. From its beginning, in the writings of the founders of Zionism, it was stated that zionism is a colonial entreprise, and that the land of Palestine is an empty land that belonged to no one which is just false. Zionism uses the same rhétoric as all colonial and imperialist mouvements regarding the regions they target (empty, barren land at the hands of savages). If you want to define Zionism as just "the right for Jews to autodetermine themselves and fight their oppression", then Israel cannot be representative of Zionism, since it was literally built for colonial purposes from the start (and doesn't even represent the interests of the Jewish people, btw but that's another debate). And lastly, about the two state solutions, it was already been debunked as a possible solution. Check Ilan Pappe's work on it in his 10 Myths on Israel.
@cherniismail7997 2 ай бұрын
About this, if I take your take on the issue, then I guess that every Jew who is anti-zionist, because there are, is what? A self-hating Jew? A brainwashed Jew? A helpful idiot who is in the mainstraim discourse demonizing their own heritage? This is precisely how zionism has contributed to antisemitism because it imposes only one way for a Jew to be a Jew. The number of zionists who accused Jews of being traitors for their anti-zionism should be alarming. Ben Gurion even went as far as say that any Jew who doesn't support zionism deserved to die in Nazi camps. No, it's not Stalin and Ayatolla who use Zionist as a placeholder for a "Jew who won't fall in line", it's the Zionists who want to control the Jews and make sure that they don't fall out of line.
@JB-du3qv 4 ай бұрын
The origin and cause of "anti-Semitism" is the supremacist cult called Judaism. It instills the feeling and attitude of moral, spiritual, and intellectual superiority over all those goyim not descending from their ancestors. It's in Judaism that their world mission of world conquest and control is explicitly stated. All nations are hostile enemies to be destroyed or subjugated. All nations will be their servants. It's in Isaiah and the Torah!
@JB-du3qv 4 ай бұрын
Jews project their fear onto Gentiles. Adorno projects his own projection.
@JB-du3qv 4 ай бұрын
Nothing but hysterical rambling from delusional paranoids. These people project their own fears onto the population, and then chastised them for failing to accept a foreign society that refused to assimilate.
@sb3424 4 ай бұрын
When they stop sexually mutilating children, then maybe I'll change my mind about them. I have no tolerance for child sexual abusers. Until then, Hadrian was right. Js are a scourge on society.
@Pilferedcoffers 4 ай бұрын
You ought to have MANY more views than you currently do good sir. Thank you for posting and sharing such insightful commentary with us.
@zayaricon 5 ай бұрын
Thanks
@ryanmurtha2392 5 ай бұрын
Don't forget the prophets - And the Lord said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem. Jeremiah 11:9 Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against him. And he hath confirmed his words, which he spake against us, and against our judges that judged us, by bringing upon us a great evil: for under the whole heaven hath not been done as hath been done upon Jerusalem. Daniel 9:11-12 Hear this word which I take up against you, a lamentation, O house of Israel. Amos 5:1 Because of the multitude of the whoredoms of the well-favored harlot, the mistress of witchcrafts, that selleth nations through her whoredoms, and families through her witchcrafts. Behold, I am against thee, saith the Lord of hosts: and I will discover thy skirts upon thy face, and I will show the nations thy nakedness, and the kingdoms thy shame. And I will cast abominable filth upon thee, and will set thee as a gazingstock. Nahum 3:4-6 Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I, even I, am against thee, and will execute judgments in the midst of thee in the sight of the nations. And I will do in thee that which I have not done, and whereunto I will not do any more the like, because of all thine abominations. Ezekiel 5:8 As it is written in the law of Moses, all this evil is come upon us: yet made we not our prayer before the Lord our God, that we might turn from our iniquities, and understand thy truth. Therefore hath the Lord watched upon the evil, and brought it upon us: for the Lord our God is righteous in all his works which he doeth: for we obeyed not his voice. Daniel 9:13-14 And Moses said unto Aaron, What did this people unto thee, that thou hast brought so great a sin upon them? Exodus 32:21 Yet many years didst thou forbear them, and testified against them by thy spirit in thy prophets: yet would they not give ear: therefore gavest thou them into the hand of the people of the lands. Nehemiah 9:30 For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins: they afflict the just, they take a bribe, they turn aside the poor in the gate. Amos 5:12 Be ye not as your fathers, unto whom the former prophets have cried, saying, Thus saith the Lord of hosts; Turn ye now from your evil ways, and your evil doings: but they did not hear, nor hearken unto me, saith the Lord. Zechariah 1:4 For the punishment of the iniquity of the daughter of my people is greater than the punishment of the sin of Sodom, that was overthrown as in a moment, and no hands stayed her. Lamentations 4:6 Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the Lord, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward. Why should ye be stricken any more? ye will revolt more and more: the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. Isaiah 1:4-5 But truly I am full of power by the spirit of the Lord, and of judgment, and of might, to declare unto Jacob his transgression, and to Israel his sin. Hear this, I pray you, ye heads of the house of Jacob, and princes of the house of Israel, that abhor judgment, and pervert all equity. They build up Zion with blood, and Jerusalem with iniquity. Micah 3:8-10 And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and their fathers have transgressed against me, unto this very day. For they are impudent children and stiffhearted. I do send thee unto them; and thou shat say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God. And they, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear, (for they are a rebellious house) yet shall know that there hath been a prophet among them. And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briars and thorns be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, not be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house. And thou shalt speak my words unto them, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear: for they are most rebellious. Ezekiel 2:3-7 We have sinned, and committed iniquity, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled, even by departing from thy precepts and from thy judgments: Neither have we hearkened unto thy servants the prophets, which spake in thy name to our kings, our princes, and our fathers, and to all the people of the land. Daniel 9:5 Hear this word that the Lord has spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. Amos 3:1-2 O Israel, return unto the Lord thy God; for thou hast fallen by thine iniquity. Hosea 14:1 The Lord hath been sore displeased with your fathers. Zechariah 1:2 But thou hast utterly rejected us; thou art very wroth against us. Lamentations 5:22 Howbeit thou art just in all that is brought upon us; for thou hast done right, but we have done wickedly. Nehemiah 9:33
@charlieintheclouds 6 ай бұрын
You're good at explaining things, at using common language to help me grasp these concepts. I'm surprised at being able to follow along despite the pace at which you're going. Subbed!
@cherniismail7997 6 ай бұрын
@@charlieintheclouds And just like that, you made my day. Thank you 😊🙏
@TheGhostofCarlSchmitt 6 ай бұрын
one of the most interesting works ever made.
@medso1237 7 ай бұрын
On the mana and enlightenment section, theres a little cut? did you recording mess up or is that intentional :D? Also much love for the content i've seen so far - my work and relationship has robbed me of the little free time i had for 'soul nourishment' (reading) and this has been a helpful and lazy way to introduce myself to texts and decide if it'll be worth investing more time into the ideas or not without committing too much! <3
@cherniismail7997 7 ай бұрын
I just realized that. In the last section the sound and image get out of sync. No, it's not on purpose. It's the editing that got messed up. I'm sorry for that. And thank you for your compliment ❤ It really means a lot 🙏
@clive-live 7 ай бұрын
Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer (1944) The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception Source: most of one chapter from Dialectic of Enlightenment; Transcribed: by Andy Blunden 1998; proofed and corrected Feb. 2005. www.marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htm
@clive-live 7 ай бұрын
"Marx and Engels worked before the. modern academic disciplines of history, social psychology and economics had been separated out and become formalised, professionalised and institutionalised. His work is normally rejected by modern historians, social psychologists and economists, as well as philosophers, ethnographers and politicians. It is also the case that sociology developed through the works of Max Weber, Georg Simmel, Alfred Schuz and Emile Durkheim, against the Marxist tradition, although just because of Marx was a major influence on those more partial tradition traditions. Perhaps the most useful way, then, of using the Marxist tradition is as a form of sociology and this line I will folllow" Colin Burgess
@clive-live 7 ай бұрын
"History doesn't do anything, people do" Colin and Clive Conversations in the Kitchen 5th December 2023
@clive-live 7 ай бұрын
Historical and Dialectical Materialism
@medso1237 8 ай бұрын
watching this on 2x speed while you talk about 'fast and easy' knowledge 🤭
@cherniismail7997 8 ай бұрын
Hopefully everything is still clear at 2x speed 😅
@medso1237 8 ай бұрын
@@cherniismail7997 it's an acquired skill from radiation poisoning (being born in the 21st century)
@Looonyism 8 ай бұрын
You are amazing, I love the way you are communicating these ideas
@cherniismail7997 8 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙏 you made my day ☺️
@psikeyhackr6914 8 ай бұрын
Postmodernism is the intellectual manifestation of the Post Traumetic Stress Disorder created by WWI & WWII. Most people are not technologically astute and sophisticated. It does not even occur to them to ask simple physics questions like; What was the distribution of steel down the Twin Towers and how would that affect collapse time due to the Conservation of Momentum. So we get silly psychological reactions and rationalizations.
@psikeyhackr6914 8 ай бұрын
Double entry accounting is 700 years old. Invented in Italy. Adam Smith used the word "education" Eighty Times in Wealth of Nations. He wrote *"read, write and account"* multiple times. Shouldn't accounting be mandatory in high schools as part of Western Culture since Sputnik?
@cherniismail7997 8 ай бұрын
Can you be more specific in relation to the culture industry? I'm not sure I understand what you're asking.
@psikeyhackr6914 8 ай бұрын
@@cherniismail7997 For perspective I went to college for Electrical Engineering. But back then the term e-waste did not even exist. The Laws of Physics *DO NOT CARE!!!* Culture is a form of Group Think but it is mostly emotional/rationalization not logical. The media is about the psychological manipulation of people for money/power/control. So on the level of economic power doesn't it make sense that everyone should know accounting? But that might give too many individuals among the masses too much power so it makes more sense for the Cultural Controllers to maintain controlled ignorance. Read *The Catcher in the Rye* , that is Culture. Isn't Planned Obsolescence integral to "The Culture" now? When do you hear economists talk about the depreciation of durable consumer goods and how it affects their Net Worth? There is the Dumb Culture and the Smart Culture. The people in the Smart Culture hide the important information. You just have to find and read the right books. *The Screwing of the Average Man* (1974) by David Hapgood
@cherniismail7997 8 ай бұрын
@@psikeyhackr6914 I'm sorry but I still don't see what this has to do with the culture industry. I'm going to need more info, please.
@psikeyhackr6914 8 ай бұрын
@@cherniismail7997 I responded 12 hours ago but the YT algorithm deleted it and l haven't written ahother yet.
@medso1237 8 ай бұрын
good work bro,
@selamw 9 ай бұрын
I just started listening to this and i already want to say thank you for this video!
@sandrasdiri 10 ай бұрын
It's really informative and helpful. I'm impressed by how well you explained everything! Keep on going! ❤❤❤
@caitlinsarah-hj3cd 11 ай бұрын
Will anarchism remain a revolutionary social movement or become a chic boutique lifestyle subculture?
@cherniismail7997 11 ай бұрын
The answer in the next episode 😉