GAR CFD

Пікірлер

@garcfd 3 күн бұрын

probably best to ask Baram support about that

@TheSorters 5 күн бұрын

I struggle with the boundary layer command not act doing anything. Almost like it ignores anything. How do i get, say 100 elements in the first couple of mm?

@ahmetkirhan5896 2 ай бұрын

is this simulation done by hpc

@garcfd 2 ай бұрын

yes the run was done on a GPU via the "dicehub" platform

@officialstevenma 4 ай бұрын

What are the units for pressure and velocity?

@PJ_design 5 ай бұрын

Hallo, amazing simulations! Is the UFO-CFD solver still available somewhere? The mesher seems very promising. Is there also a conversion script to openFoam? Is there any more information available? I tried to check out your hompage, but it seems broken. Regards from Austria

@garcfd 4 ай бұрын

thanks - please contact me on [email protected] if you have any specific CFD support requirements.

@imonghosh7286 5 ай бұрын

Thank you.

@garcfd 5 ай бұрын

Oops, I forgot to enable the popup windows again - sorry!

@HOW-TO-BECOME-A-CFD-ENGINEER 5 ай бұрын

Thanks, Giles. This was a great explanation.

@garcfd 5 ай бұрын

Thanks Kade 🙂

@channghiepnguyen1861 6 ай бұрын

Hi, can you tell me that which version of OpenFOAM do you use ?

@shivamgupta9967 6 ай бұрын

Can you make tutorial on how to do that, it will be great help

@shivamgupta9967 6 ай бұрын

Hello Can you share the case file it will be great help

@notownself 7 ай бұрын

No notes. Perfect. Don't change a thing.

@Zimrack 7 ай бұрын

What application is this?

@officialstevenma 4 ай бұрын

Paraview, but the CFD is done externally in a command line or elsewhere

@kamai346 7 ай бұрын

can you show how to get lift and drag coeficient

@oofiefoofieziz6394 7 ай бұрын

Sadam hussein

@opensourcemechanics 7 ай бұрын

Very good!

@maxyusha241 7 ай бұрын

Just to be sure, alpha = 2 is air?

@TerragonCFD 7 ай бұрын

Nice ! 🙂

@sfsorion2 7 ай бұрын

Mate, that’s the MiG-1.44

@theoluquet1784 8 ай бұрын

Hello, What macro are you using to create your surface?

@architsaxen 8 ай бұрын

Can you please share the complete tutorials of this simulation?

@architsaxen 8 ай бұрын

can you please share the tutorials of this simulation?

@corrdude 8 ай бұрын

self contact will keep that solver busy

@emmanuelvassilakis5630 8 ай бұрын

Thank you :)

@emmanuelvassilakis5630 8 ай бұрын

Very nice Giles! Can you upload it with a better quality?

@garcfd 8 ай бұрын

maybe I can try it again...

@gussaadeh 9 ай бұрын

will you ever provide these files on a github?

@enchantedbrick 9 ай бұрын

Neat walk through!

@TerragonCFD 9 ай бұрын

Speedy 🙂

@human12547 9 ай бұрын

Keep on putting in the effort Remember this boi when you get famous

@householdemail1305 10 ай бұрын

I remember a design that allowed the wings to fold up during re-entering. Falling stabilizer.

@vincentrivera743 10 ай бұрын

It looks like the planform where the Chinese got its design cues for the J20. It would appear that the Russians have good R&D in terms of investigation into technology concepts. But for some reason this x-plane did not proceed into production. Perhaps the development and production of the SU57 stealth fighter proved to be a better design, with better performance metrics. Which leads to the question is the Chinese J20 a better stealth fighter than the SU57?

@opensourcemechanics 10 ай бұрын

Amazing! Is the GPU code opensource? Is it by Finite Volume Method??

@Chleosl 10 ай бұрын

If carnard F-15 and Mig-23 had a baby:

@armyan_mafia 11 ай бұрын

It's not MiG-33 I'ts MiG 1.44

@Коопиротив 9 ай бұрын

Nah uh. its from Ace combat. MiG-33. mIg 1.44 way more like eurofighter

@MilkT_mco 8 ай бұрын

@@КоопиротивYou're wrong tho

@Коопиротив 8 ай бұрын

@@MilkT_mcomig 1.44 dont have gap between air intakes

@MilkT_mco 8 ай бұрын

@@Коопиротив MiG-33 is a modernization of the MiG-29, search it up. Mf really sayin "omg its from ace combat" ☠️

@MilkT_mco 8 ай бұрын

The MiG-1.44 would've been named the 33 if it became the next gen fighter for the soviets, but the Su-47 won and the 1.44 never got to see its light of day.

@TerragonCFD 11 ай бұрын

Thats nice 🙂

@TerragonCFD 11 ай бұрын

Thx for the overview ✌

@DavidPrObooMBer 11 ай бұрын

What the fuck this algo wants

@QUINTIX256 11 ай бұрын

fiiiiiiiiiiiiish

@EinhanderSn0m4n Жыл бұрын

That red spot between the canard and the leading edge extension is what interference drag looks like.

@rustyjona7384 Жыл бұрын

Pressure in what? Apples, potatoes?

@nikelinq2899 10 ай бұрын

In the description it says pascals

@thymenwaterman8672 Жыл бұрын

pressure as in what unit? Pascals? nice graphic tho

@millinag3817 Жыл бұрын

Potato.

@LongTran-em6hc 11 ай бұрын

Defenitely potato

@RAYY_WILD 11 ай бұрын

i think this is just a scale for visualisation

@fanBladeOne Жыл бұрын

Toasty boii 😅

@rodgeng3375 Жыл бұрын

What software?

@АлександрЕрмошин-ф5щ 11 ай бұрын

OpenFoam and ParaView

@Azakadune 10 ай бұрын

Roblox.

@russia983 8 ай бұрын

💀@@Azakadune

@sslavi Жыл бұрын

What is "nut"?

@garcfd Жыл бұрын

eddy viscosity

@sslavi Жыл бұрын

@@garcfd Thanks

@dmitrybard3183 Жыл бұрын

Very nice video ! Danke !

@gamelord9491 Жыл бұрын

My guy that just looks like the SU-57 no cap. Tha't not unknown xD

@CJBuggs Жыл бұрын

Some really small stabilizers...

@cyanidetaco759 Жыл бұрын

that's an SU-57 lol try again liberal. ppl like you are why florida needs to form the greater florida imperium...

@Jesko. Жыл бұрын

Kid: Mom? Mom: Yes? Kid: Can we get an SU 57? Mom: Oh no, no, no we have a SU 57 at home. SU 57 at home:

@asphaltspectre1364 Жыл бұрын

So true

@hidden_killz5102 Жыл бұрын

I think something your model is missing is the air going into the scoops would not afford so much drag, the air is going in and being consumed, then expelled by the engine.

@garcfd Жыл бұрын

yes agree - I have done it before but need to modify the solver to allow an internal boundary condition.

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер