Is your platform suitable also for designing a high performance competition rc glider?
@SIMNET_aero3 сағат бұрын
Yes, and you can register for a free trial here: www.simnet.aero/signup
@b.w.oostdam887514 күн бұрын
Thank you for a very very insightfull video! I design and build rc aircraft and was already loaded with a little knowledge but your methodical comparison of airfoils is very welcomed by me and is a very good approach.
@shaiksohel416015 күн бұрын
Most valuable video for airfoils selection on KZbin Thanks allot ❤❤
@TheDickeroo16 күн бұрын
Have you ever heard of the Kline Fogleman Airfoil? We introduced a step that traps a vortex which then becomes part of the airfoil and reduces some of the friction because it is air against air. It has been tested on Darrieus Wind Turbines successfully. It has only taken fifty years to gain some acceptance. A B S T R A C T This study provides a detailed analysis of the aerodynamic performance of various airfoil configurations, focusing on lift coefficient, stall characteristics, and maximum lift-to-drag ratio. The investigation includes the NACA23012C profile and configurations with different step geometries, ranging from one-step to five-step designs. Experimental measurements were conducted using awell-equipped aerodynamic laboratory, Institute of Aviation Engineering and Technology (IAET), Giza, Egypt. The lab features a wind tunnel, propeller test rig, and data acquisition system. The experiments were conducted meticulously to ensure accuracy and reproducibility, with a standardized method employed for uncertainty analysis. The results reveal distinct aerodynamic behaviors among the different configurations, highlighting the significant impact of design variations on aerodynamic performance. Notably, the three-step configuration consistently exhibited high performance, with a competitive or superior lift coefficient across a range of Reynolds numbers, showing an improvement of up to 35.1 %. Similarly, the four-step configuration demonstrated substantial increases in lift-to-drag ratios, reaching up to 53.2 %, while the five-step configuration exhibited varying trends with a minimum drag coefficient. The study also investigated stall characteristics and sensitivity to Reynolds numbers, revealing the complex trade-offs inherent in airfoil design. The findings provide valuable insights into optimizing airfoil performance under different operational conditions. Additionally, the adoption of two and three stepped airfoils resulted in significant reductions in blade material and associated costs for turbine blades.
@hamzalag2006Ай бұрын
Great explanation
@shumtecАй бұрын
Very cool platform, but unfortunately not available for my country.(
@princem5908Ай бұрын
This company is amazing and i would love to reach out for help in my projects
@ОлегКо-э9кАй бұрын
фуфло
@ОлегКо-э9кАй бұрын
ты не умеешь это делать , абсолютно бестолковое видео . Кнопкодав мамкин без теории и практики работы
@shahabkhodadoust7152Ай бұрын
Real good.🎉🎉🎉
@ChaseNoStraighterАй бұрын
Bernoulli has nothing to do with lift.
@alexandrpetrov11102 ай бұрын
mastering airfoil selection for fixed-wing drones. In our previous video, we covered the basics of how airfoils work
@ilovetrees232 ай бұрын
Thank you
@eprohoda2 ай бұрын
yo- beautiful shots-
@literalprimate2 ай бұрын
Great video, unfortunately a very incorrect definition for lift :(
@FB01022 ай бұрын
Can you elaborate?
@3SPR1T2 ай бұрын
Awesome video for engineers thanks!!
@evrik783 ай бұрын
05:39 You are missing something. When calculating the CL and CD it is not by the chord c, but by a surface of reference. Otherwise, the dimensional analysis and results don't check.
3 ай бұрын
Thank's for sharing.
@muhammadkazim89003 ай бұрын
amazing, is this simulation environment available now?
@David-tz8xf4 ай бұрын
What payload is that, an EO9XX or MWIR payload?
@amaldeep11825 ай бұрын
Can you please explain the types of air foils used in aircrafts with their properties
@pulsarspacetime5 ай бұрын
Absolutely interesting video and very broken down!! 👏👏
@ginonguegang92326 ай бұрын
The correct lift equation has the aircraft wing area and not the wing chord
@CarlosChavez-gs1ld6 ай бұрын
Buen Hecho Juan. Gracias.
@JetLagRecords6 ай бұрын
SIMNET, I love your channel so much, I just had to subscribe!
@jamcof6 ай бұрын
Great video!
@Boogie3D6 ай бұрын
2:25 You should specify it better. From your description you can have a relatively thin (5-6%) undercambered airfoil and the max difference betwwen upper and lower surface would make it something like 7-8%.
@FrontSideBus7 ай бұрын
Don't you mean an aerofoil?
@mubasshir6 ай бұрын
American English
@hetavparikh94887 ай бұрын
Very useful and knowlwdgable video I must say. I was researching the resources to fairly design the airfoil and came across your video series. It cleared quite few questions for me. Thanks a lot for making this video series and will be waiting for new videos. 🙌
@FPVREVIEWS7 ай бұрын
The video touched on the subject but didn’t actually talk about it. That’s the forward shift in CP with increase of AOA. Dealing with the effects of camber on the pitch of the aircraft, maintaining stability without losing efficiency is a major design challenge and something for consideration when choosing the overall aircraft configuration. It’s actually possible to achieve aerodynamic instability with dynamic stability at the same time with no moving parts.
@ОлегКо-э9кАй бұрын
ты тоже в этом ничего не понимаешь .
@FPVREVIEWSАй бұрын
@@ОлегКо-э9к Please enlighten us on the subject, Troll.
@ОлегКо-э9кАй бұрын
@@FPVREVIEWS я не ваш папа, чтобы давать вам авиационное образование и покупать заводы боинга в частное владение . Спроектируйте несколько десятков удачных проектов и истина посетит вас .
@davidg39447 ай бұрын
Thanks, this is a well-presented video. Looking forward to whatever else you produce on the subject of low-speed aerodynamics.
@bartekprzybylski11697 ай бұрын
Very good video! I like it a lot. Can i make a suggestion to change colour of airfoil and graphs for brighter for better visibility of diffrences :-) Good luck with Your project!
@SIMNET_aero7 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment and suggestion, we'll improve the image contrast for part 2 of the series.
@MTFTVlive7 ай бұрын
Easily the most comprehensive video on the intenet. I've been searching for something like this for weeks, imagine my surprise seeing this video was only a day old. Subscribed!
@SIMNET_aero7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! Stay tuned for part 2 which will offer many practical tips and tricks for airfoil selection. If you have any other topics you would like us to cover, feel free to let us know.
@MTFTVlive7 ай бұрын
@@SIMNET_aero yeah I’d love to see differences between pusher and puller prop configurations aerodynamically, I’m currently trying to build a 3d printed fixed wing drone using the inrunners from an junked $20 quad