Thank you! Appreciate it. 😊

😂

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! What approach do you prefer for implementing the same feature without adding an extra abstraction layer?

@@PatrickGod Well, for some context, we have dozens of projects with API interfaces in them that hit various services across our own internal network as well as external endpoints. That in and of itself is a lot to manage so we try to keep things as generic as possible w/o having to rely on too many third party NuGet packages that don't bring much to the table for us. Because of that, we rolled our own base service implementations and interfaces to fit our security and network requirements. They don't follow a specific design or organizational patterns other than separating concerns and decoupling key areas where we know potentially breaking changes have taken place in the past or are likely to take place. We do regularly re-evaluate our architecture and implementations to see if there are any new ideas/tech that may help us manage things more efficiently, but so far we have yet to find anything significant enough to warrant a complete redesign and rebuild. Typically what we'll do is change something like a series of classes over to records and make the corresponding downstream changes to properly utilize them.