Great Vid Eren, also My fave 50 from Fuji. Not a Summicron but close.
@stereolensКүн бұрын
Love the video and your photography style is just amazing!
@geedee3817Күн бұрын
all your photos taken with this lens could be scenes from a movie. So much character
@theGiantAngryRobotКүн бұрын
Absolutely engrossing, I couldn't stop watching.
@robertl.46752 күн бұрын
Thank you for this very informative video.(P.S. I also think you should display only one photo at a time and show them a bit longer… Your photos are beautiful!) Thanks for sharing!
@zezima4642 күн бұрын
Would you rather choose this one or the 23mm f2 for Streetphotography?
@gauthamjk22572 күн бұрын
I feel like I can click good photos but whenever im in a city and I see a good frame I just cant take it cause I fear people will come at me for taking pictures of them. Is there any way i can avoid this feeling and just take the picture
@okb22343 күн бұрын
great video
@Mohika8814 күн бұрын
Totally agree with what you’re saying here. The ergonomics are not that great. The lack of a D-pad and having to dive into the menu is irritating and I the moment passes. The weather sealing is super irritating and should have been addressed. The aperture ring is a total pain to reach.
@astrocyte94 күн бұрын
Muhteşemsin ! Renklerin,Sahnelerin,Müziğin hissettirdiği duygular çok hoş.Bir fotoğrafçı olarak gece yürüyüşlerimde benzer şeylere rastlıyorum ve deneyeceğim.İlham vericisin,Eline emeğine sağlık abi ♥
@ChrisThe15 күн бұрын
Really well-done video. If money was absolutely no object, which one would you rather have?
@rakoksy5 күн бұрын
Hi Eren, in another video in comparison with the old one I saw you suggest 50f2 for street. Do you think still so and you would consider 56 1.2 just for night shot or you changed your mind because you prefer the rendering of 56? I own both but I feel that maybe 50 f2 is enough because at 1.2-1.4 56 1.2 r shows a bit halo and from f2 they seem quite the same after the same postproduction workflow. What’s your advice respect to the old one? Thanks
@Mr.A_LDN5 күн бұрын
Since I bought this lens 5 months ago, It literally hasn't left my camera. I absolutely love it
@Simon-Simon-Simon5 күн бұрын
I have a original 56mm Love it mint condition original owner
@lionheart44245 күн бұрын
Yo, where did you buy used lenses? I struggled to even find a used X-T2 in Tokyo and if it were not for Map Camera I might have spent like 4 days without a camera in Japan and many amazing shots I got. I was looking for a cheap bright prime but could not even find manual lenses. Thanfully the OIS of the 16-80mm F4 saved me for some nights.
@ozpain15 күн бұрын
Had the original 56mm and used it on my Xt5. Excellent photos, but AF was rough
@titlecade5 күн бұрын
Definitely a camera for serious photographers. I own the XH2 and I love the handling and dials, but it is a terrible travel camera. X100VI would have been better if it offered a flippy screen, which Fuji shooters don't like.
@Chrizzowski5 күн бұрын
Great pictures and a great points. It's a tricky one for me though ... I have the new WR version and I absolutely love it, but I just find myself not reaching for the focal length as often as I'd like. If 56mm is going to be an occasional use length for me, then I'm tempted to maybe part with it to finance the new 16-55 mk2 instead if it proves to be any good.
@Ramon_Oaktree5 күн бұрын
I love your Videos!
@tomislavmiletic_5 күн бұрын
The old version was always more than sharp enough for me. I've made a ton of portraits with it, no problem. And making some type of rain cover for it isn't so hard. However, the main problem that I have with it is that you can't use it in the winter, course if in sub zero cold long enough, that auto focussing motor will freeze, and the lens will be dead, until it's warm enough agin. Ask me how I know...
@marooned26146 күн бұрын
How is the autofocus in the new one compared to the Sigma 56?
@gordonbunker32726 күн бұрын
Thanks Eren, agree with all your points. I have the WR version, was shooting with it yesterday - @1.2, love the falloff from focus to out of focus, also handles chromatic aberration pretty well. It's all matters of degree, but I'd stay with the WR - improved optics and AF are there when you need them, but mostly for the weather resistance.
@vladimir_filipas6 күн бұрын
Great photos and legendary lenses! I love the output of both versions but curently own new mk2 WR version which is in my case superior in every scenario :) I like that more “muscular” look and better build quality, weather resistance and shorter minimum focus! It feels really great on my X-T’s… The image quality is perfect, the sharpness, details, clarity, bokeh, colors and contrast and highlight rolloff are nailed perfectly…and the AF is sufficient but could be little bit faster in continous mode, but it is more accurate than the old version…
@albrechtn6 күн бұрын
..another great review...and the photos are real masterpieces..
@TonyNomadic6 күн бұрын
Vibes!
@okyeabuddyguy6 күн бұрын
Fuji had winners already with the character of the 35 and 56 lenses. All the modern WR lenses are just a hair too clean, and slightly too big, and slightly too heavy. I think in terms of design ethics, they took a step back. Everyone would have preferred if they kept the size small, optics the same, and simply added quieter focus motors and weather sealing and not such a massive price increase.
@df0rce6 күн бұрын
AF fail is unacceptable - imho. What does it actually bring to the table other than WR. Bummer Thanks for the review though.
@coomb6 күн бұрын
Tricked me into thinking I was about to watch a GxAce video based on the thumbnail.
@phil488pista96 күн бұрын
I am going to look for the old version while I am in Japan.
@malfunkt6 күн бұрын
Excellent application of the lens Eren! I've been shooting with a manual KamLan 50mm F1.1 mkII for years, and have come to rely on that lens for events and low-light photography. I find it's manual focus very quick and reliable to track subjects for low-light work. It compared well against the 56mm 1.2 in AlikGriffin's review, with the KamLan being a bit creamier in bokeh and softer at its widest aperture. I just today picked up a XF 56mm 1.2 R for 1/5th of a new WR version with the small defect of a declicked aperture ring. This is a lens I've wanted for years and I'm interested to see how well it performs in low-light in terms of AF. How responsive is the manual focus ring on the 1.2R?
@UP209D6 күн бұрын
When he doesn't juggling the lens, you know that lens is precious :)))
@TopshelfJunior6 күн бұрын
First off, great images man.. Really loved the photo at 1:49 !!! Second, I'm gonna have to get on the hunt for a 56mm OG version.. Seems like it has sumthin' for sure.
@Irenefloridia6 күн бұрын
How much editing do you do on your photos? Great video! I have the old 56mm and it's my favorite lens. I do wish it was lighter but the picture quality is great.
@Vartan2976 күн бұрын
Man… love your reviews. Only problem is… you can make great images with probably any lens, so mine would look nothing like your samples 😂😂💪🏻💪🏻 I’d buy one and the pics would be rubbish 🥹🥹🥹😂😂
@Shiromania6 күн бұрын
I wonder how the WR compares to the APD version of the old 56
@SummersSnaps6 күн бұрын
I think the most frustrating thing about Fuji is that we rely on them to provide glass with Linear Motors, so its a bit of a kick in the teeth for them to release a second version of the lens and omit this. What is doubly annoying is the coverage of this lens is huge, you can put a lot of step down rings on this lens without ill effect, so its over engineered for APS-C. They basically made a portrait astro lens, kinda odd. If they relaxed a little on the edges and corners wide open, we'd have a smaller, lighter 56 with LM. They chose pin sharp edges and corners wide open and because of that we got hit on cost, size, weight and AF performance. Wrong choice here imo. And so now we have nowhere to go for a decent AF 56 (85mm equivalent) for X Mount in terms of AF, the rest of the third party are stepping motors, which can be ok but still not the same as LM. The SIRUI 56/1.2 for example is stepping, noticeably better AF than the 56RWR but still not ideal. And when you consider a APS-C 56/1.2 is rendering like a 85/1.8 in full frame, you can pick up plenty of full frame 85/1.8's with lighting fast AF performance on other systems. I feel Fuji really let down their user base on core lenses, a bit of a shame.
@ThisMayContainNuts7 күн бұрын
You always blow me away with your photos, man. You're really talented, both in taking the shots, but editing them too! Also really like how opinion bases your videos are, instead of just being about specs. Also, I own the 56mm 1.2 WR and enjoy it a lot. It definitely is big, but with an extended grip on the X-T5, I don't mind it too much. But yes, AF could really benefit from having linear motors.
@tiborvargaart7 күн бұрын
Hi Eren, thanks for the video. I’m debating between the two 56mm. Can’t make my mind up about the WR… have you had issues with the old version in the rain? Would you take it out if it’s raining or its a total no go? Thanks
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
🙏🏼I mean, I've taken it out a couple times under light rain with an umbrella and it's been fine. If its been raining hard (before I picked up the WR) id take the 50f2 instead
@sergheivelescu7 күн бұрын
I literally bought today the old version for 300€ as you are an inspiration for me and love your style. As said in another comment, i purchased your presets and will try to inspire from your style and see what i can do 😄
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Huge thanks for the support 🙏🏼 £300 is a great price for the original, such a good lens
@malfunkt6 күн бұрын
I too just picked up a 56 1.2R. Happy 56th!
@michamilka7 күн бұрын
Great FOLO's man, I agree. I prefer the old version too!
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Thank you! The original has aged like fine wine
@Rumplestiltskin77 күн бұрын
So... is it the best Fuji lens?🤔
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
I think so, the 56 and the 35 are my favourites
@treharris16777 күн бұрын
Agreed! I sold the new for the old but will one day buy the new back. It's probably my favorite lens. Sharp but full of character.
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Tbh, WR aside, the original is pretty much just as good
@DanielMenn7 күн бұрын
Love your work so much! Will you edit pictures made from the community? Would love to see that
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Thank you! good idea, maybe Ill make an episode like that 🤔
@bartazare7 күн бұрын
Great video! ❤
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@thecooldude00717 күн бұрын
Lovely stuff 🙌🙌
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Thank you bro!
@oc2phish077 күн бұрын
I have the new version and am very pleased with its performance for my needs. I was lucky to get it though, as I paid for the new one but the dealer, a very well known, large company with a lot of branches here in the UK, tried to give me the old one saying that the two were identical. When I pointed out the WR designation they said that did not mean anything, and even when I pointed out the difference in filter size they were reluctant to give me the lens I had actually paid for. Eventually I made enough fuss for them to give me the right one claiming it was ‘a mistake’. Yeah, right! Needless to say I will never deal with them again.
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Of that is insane! I wonder who it was 👀
@oc2phish076 күн бұрын
@@erenjam I am so tempted to tell you. I made a formal complaint to their head office and got a mealy-mouthed apology but I am happy to leave it at that and ever since I have bought my kit at a different, smaller and much better dealer in a different town. Since my experience with the bad dealer I think I have spent £15,000.00p or so which they obviously lost out on.
@pifilos7 күн бұрын
First of all great shots. Old version owner here. In my opinion it has the best output of any other Fujifilm's lens. No complains at all, no reason to replace it. A bargain in the used market nowadays. A true classic/vintag-ish lens with autofocus, best of both worlds. However, I have tried the new one as well and it is a lovely piece of gear.
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Thank you! Totally agree
@TheZieloo6 күн бұрын
Weight, slow AF, purple fringing, easily catching flares just to name a few. Definitely not the best/most universal lens.
@pifilos6 күн бұрын
@@TheZieloo quoting "In my opinion it has the best output of any other Fujifilm's lens." so for me the points you mention aren't issues. I like its flare a lot, I intentionally introduce it in shots sometimes, fringing isn't an issue in PP. Weight is fine for an all-metal f/1.2 autofocus lens. AF again is ok even on my X-T2, let alone now that I use it on an X-T4. For someone else it might be a bad lens or not suitable. Fine by me. If someone wants to shoot sports with it at f/1.2 yeah it is probably the wrong lens for that.
@incharliewetrust7 күн бұрын
Have u tried the sigma 18 50mm?
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Yep, I really like it, will have a review out in the next couple weeks
@ernesto_creativo7 күн бұрын
Hi Eren, I appreciate your videos! My legendary lens with a lot of character is the old xf35mm 1.4. But for daily use I love the xf 16-80 and the 70-300. For street at night I use the new xf23,1.4,wr for great images.
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Thats a great set up!
@chromosound7 күн бұрын
Great video!!! Is it that hard to focus manually for video? I know it is not mechanical but i do focus manually on the 23mm. How is the focus breathing?
@erenjam7 күн бұрын
Thank you! Manual focus on fuji lenses is never fun, the ones with the scale made it a little better. For video its fine but I use manual / single point in video so don't experience any issues with breathing, even with the older lenses