The original was much better than the remake.

A highly entertaining film, if somewhat cheesy in spots. It's miles better than the remake and its dreadful sequel. Vincent Price is masterful as always.

I think I have time to watch this. My mom's at the movies with her personal trainer again.

Para que pasan la cartelera y después se pone a boludear con la película, que estúpidos que son , por favor!!

Love it - more than any other, this is the film that got me to explore the vanishing remnants of silent film. Still relevant in today's "But what have you done lately" business model that is still present in today's media culture that views people as disposable commodities. A kudos to Billy Wilder for his writing - weird that a movie about silent cinema has such great dialog - almost as great as _All_ _About_ _Eve_ from the same year. Swanson delivers a master-class in all the acting techniques from early film, too, that somehow competes with the gripping script (eyes, mouth, hands, body positions - fascinating how they set the mood and move the story along. The cult of celebrity reached full-fledged maturity during the early 1920s with newspapers and radio carrying regular columns and pages of movie star coverage, as well as tons of magazines devoted to film celebrities. Swanson was a top-tier star who received all that kind of attention. And yeah, $10k was worth a LOT more than today - for comparison, her $20,000 1928-9 Isotta Fraschini limousine was the most expensive auto of its time (although what happened to it is unknown, a similar one is exhibited in Turin Italy). I believe the actress who played Betty Schaefer (Nancy Olsen) is still around and perhaps the last living member of the cast. She was nominated for Best Supporting Actress for her performance in this film. Nice to sit in on your conversation!

Wow was that boring.

I don't know how I get this, from a navy veteran I find alot of things funny

It is good to hear you both say that the movie is basically quite good, even if it did not resonate with you as much, I definitely can appreciate and understand seeing a movie and feeling/thinking that way...I have a very very similar opinion of Uncut Gems. I think one of you got it pretty much on the nose when you said that this movie is best for "book nerds who are into subs." Unfortunately, it seemed like a lot of what you both berated the movie for had to do with the USA being represented as the unequivocal "good guy" in the conflict with the USSR...but that seems to afflict many modern film watchers these days. I would be curious to know whether you guys grew up in the Cold War, or just after it ended...seems like the latter is the case. Just FYI...the gunfight happened in the missile room, not the reactor room...that's why there was a tube for each missile. And the US government absolutely did not think the Soviets had a real caterpillar drive because of this movie...or the book. But the "caterpillar drive" as described in the movie...with magnets pushing water through tubes...already did exist as a real thing in testing before Clancy wrote his book. And that gigantic Soviet missile sub also was a real thing...the only fictional part was the silent drive, but as the movie states, the Red October is only a little bit bigger than a "standard Typhoon"...and just for perspective the Soviet Typhoon carried 20 missiles while the US Ohio class is capable of carrying 24 missiles. Fun fact...the filmmakers messed up the design of the missile room...they made it just like the missile rooms on US subs, but the layout of the Soviet Typhoon class sub has a very different layout. US ballistic missile subs, like the Ohio class represented in Crimson Tide, have all their missile tubes accessed in one large missile compartment, but the Typhoon class has a separate missile space for each of the two rows of ten missile tubes...so the missile room in Red October should have had missiles down only one side of the room. You guys should both read the Clancy book...it has a lot less Ryan in it and a lot more of the characters you both indicated you would have like more of...like Jonesy the sonarman. You would also see how much the overall story had to be simplified to even get it to the point where it would work as a movie...a lot of plot points and information had to be left out of the film adaptation. In many cases, your issues with the pacing/length of the film had either to do with scenes that were basically chunks of exposition the audience needed to hear to understand the plot, or were much more important elements of the plot in the book that had to be reduced in the film for runtime. I don't want to spoil it, but a significant number of your complaints about the film are just the opposite in the book. LOL That game you want to play with Cold War subs 100 percent exists...it is called Cold Waters....made by KillerFish Games and available on Steam. They even have scenarios to recreate the same situation as in Hunt for Red October.

God, how I love this movie. I've seen it, maybe 20 times and it gets better every time I watch it.

Here before the channel blows up.

I'm confused. You both have beards but talk like 14-year-old girls. And the "chick from Scream" is Rose McGowan, and she DID play Stu's girlfriend. Lay off the edibles boys, and you might sound slightly less moronic.

We didn't talk about feet once.

One of the most fun things about seeing people react to 12 Angry Men for the first time, is the look of confusion that many people get when they recognize John Fiedler's voice as that of Piglet from Winnie the Pooh...oh, they make the oddest faces. LOL I wonder, did either of you have that moment of "WTF is Piglet doing in this movie?" 😜 You guys had an interesting discussion, as with Master and Commander, and I wanted to agree that not depicting there being any press attention to the trial of the boy was a bit of a misstep on the part of Lumet/the writers...at the very least maybe show a few reporters out front of the court house with the jurors walking down the steps after answering questions. My guess is it was omitted due to not having budget for the gaggle of reporters, or to keep the film as tight and short as possible...but you guys spotted something I have never thought of. I also wanted to comment on the remake that you were thinking about watching. To me, it is worth it to see the newer version to see how the actors in it handled the scenes, and compare/contrast that to the actors of the 1950s...look for the subtle differences and stuff like that. But it might be better to do that after watching this original version a couple more times? That brings up something that really piqued my curiosity...it seems like neither of you had ever seen this movie before watching it for this podcast? And now I am really curious what other 100 percent must see classic movies you two have never seen...so I guess I will just name a few that you should move to the top of your watchlist, if you have not seen them. Have you both seen? To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) Them! (1954) Forbidden Planet (1956) Gojira (1954) - definitely watch the original Japanese language version with subtitles Lawrence of Arabia (1962) The African Queen (1951) Inherit the Wind (1960) The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) Fantastic Voyage (1966) OK...10 seems enough for now...these are just some personal favorites that came to mind from the 1950s and 1960s....and yes, I like scifi a lot. LOL

First of all...since it seemed like them NOT showing scurvy was such a big deal, you should know that by the time the film is set in, the Royal Navy had figured out how to prevent the disease with 100 percent effectiveness by adding lemon juice to the crew's grog. In 1795, a Royal Navy vessel voyaged over 4 months at sea to India with absolutely ZERO cases of scurvy...so no scurvy being shown is 100 percent historically accurate. It was good that you both highly praised the film's historical accuracy, because that scurvy being prevented thing is part of why Master and Commander may well be the most historically accurate movie ever made...and that is impressive considering it is a fictional story. However, while I think you made some good points in your critique, it seems like 2 things were the cause of most of your issues with the movie...first, neither of you like Russell Crowe, it seems...and one of you seems to actively dislike him a lot...you were both really disdainful of his performance and the things written in to make him likeable. The other thing that made you guys critical of the film seemed to be some of the things they did in the movie to set it up as a franchise...and those two issues together seem to make you both dislike the friendship that Weir was trying to set up between Jack and the Doctor. The relationship between them is critical to the book series...that series is actually referred to as the "Aubrey-Maturin Series" after the last names of those 2 characters...and if there had been a sequel the plot line of the Doctor also being a spy for the British Admiralty would have been introduced. So the movie is working really hard to highlight the two of them as watchable characters, but also to establish their very deep friendship...hence the musical interludes that neither of you liked very much. There were definitely some things that you mentioned that I might disagree with because I have such a deep admiration for the movie, but that are almost surely valid critique from the majority of people who have not studied naval warfare in the Age of Sail as I have, so I will not give a long description of why each thing you commented on was in the film for specific reasons...I really do not want to be THAT pedantic. But just know that many of the things you said were a bit off to you about the movie do have really good and reasonable purposes for being in the movie that have to do with the adaptation from the books, or are due to the makers of the movie setting things up for more films about the Aubrey and Maturin characters. In closing...you guys may want to check out another Russel Crowe film that may change your thinking/feelings about him, that is if you have not seen it...Cinderella Man from 2005. It is a historical biopic about a real boxer made by Ron Howard and co-starring Renee Zellweger and Paul Giamatti...and I think it is a lesser known film but perhaps Crowe's best performance overall. And for an amazing example of a film about sailing ships at war from the past, check out Captain Horatio Hornblower from 1951, which is based on a book series by C.S. Forester, and starring the incredible Gregory Peck. Yikes...I did not think this would get so verbose...sorry to blather in so much, but I freely admit to being a fan of this film and I love talking about it with folks who are interested in it. I really liked listening to you guys talking about it, even when I thought you were wrong. LOL But for real, I think Peter Weir is a seriously underrated filmmaker, and that this movie is a bit of a masterpiece...and I think the more you guys learn about this movie and the more you watch it, the more you will come to adopt that same view. I definitely encourage you both to watch it again...and again and again and again LOL...and also check out another of Weir's films The Truman Show, if you have not seen it. And definitely let me know if anything I said makes you want to respond...the only thing I like more than talking about movies...is conversing about them. 👍

I feel like y'all are selling this movie short. Name a better historical naval war film. I loved the 2 main characters. I loved the authenticity. Honestly one of my favorite movies

Great flick! As a ufo-nut I love the attention to the struggle to learn how to communicate between alien civilizations. Not sure how true it is but I read that they invented an actual circular language for the movie.

I will always love the pride and prejudice with Jennifer Ehle and Colin Firth the best ❤

Please watch the miniseries! :)

Thank you Marry for joining us!! We do not know actors names. Also the movie was Split from 2016.

Loved that she didny wear a pair of drawers 😂😂

You guys are hard to listen to. Especially the guy with the black hair. Your voice & delivery is obnoxious,like a finger on a check board. Maybe he should do the kiss FM countdown. He's even too annoying for that job. He might be a nice guy but listening to his voice is so annoying I need a drink or a valium just from listening to him for 13 minutes now.😳🚬🍷🍸🍺🍾🔪💊

How can you not feel anything while watching POALOF???? One of the most emotional movies for me! A 100% cry watching for me

I saw this opening weekend with a bunch of friends... they all hated it! I absolutely loved it... and still do.

❤ Such a great film and fantastic book!

Wow!!!🙄

Lame review. Blucher is glue in German, get it?

Listened to this last night on Spotify. Really enjoyed it. Especially some of the in-depth analysis you guys did. I'm also a stern defender of the third act. If you guys are interested, I did a video on Sunshine on my channel where I did include some commentary about the third act. Mainly how it's quite effectively foreshadowed throughout the film.

Any plans for.... Sardar udham.... Movie?????

If u wanna see.... Serious stuff.... Watch sardar udham...... RRR is for kids....

Nightmare Comedy. That’s a solid TM. Edit: And yes to Jaws.

What's with the useless Intro??

You guys feeling some of the things as goofy or got weirded out after watching friendship montage, song etc... And getting a feeling that this movie is selfaware... The director didn't intend it to be selfaware... The director just intends everything in his movie to give as much entertainment as possible to the audience along with arising different kind of emotions in the audience by the time finish the movie. And he succeeds in that. The director fully invests the audience in the friendship of these two guys and in general majority of the audience fully got invested into the friendship as that friendship is the grounding for the entire movie no matter how over the top it gets in action scenes, the friendship is the one that grounds it in emotion and the emotional investment is the reason suspension of disbelief is achieved and audience actually end up cheering for the characters even though they r doing absurd stuff... (Ofc setups and payoffs also pay a major role in it). But ultimately the central conflict of the movie is friendship and their conflict and it is mainly a buddy film with a revolutionary aspect in a colonial India backdrop. Since you guys might be expecting something else from the montage/songs (as it's a new thing), you felt weird and didn't feel the same way, the general audience felt or what is the intended feeling in the audience.... Especially for the friendship part. And the songs themselves, it's not like narrating what's gonna happen and all,... But since you guys r reading the subtitles it might feel that way.... But in Indian cinema, the songs have a purpose of connecting the audience to a particular emotion... In a specific way and that emotion is evoked whenever the song plays again... Also, it makes the scene feel larger than life (like a theatre play if an epic classic kind of a thing) And the lyrics of the song actually enhances the experience of emotions and weight of the particular feeling in a scene (Even the tempo of the lyrics, the rhythm of the words, etc are designed to cater to this very purpose) ... Which is generally lost in translation. IMO, second half of the movie is the actual anchor of the movie as it gives the emotional weight to the entire character relations and conflicts setup sofar. The flashback is not a secondary plot but integral to the character Rama Raju, so the prolonged flashback recontexualises his character motivations, and character arc by impactfully grounding it his actions in emotions and what he has gone through, his emotional tolerance limit based on what he has gone through... (He had to live through the experience of not only tolerating the deaths of his mother and brother in front of his eyes.... And continue with his mission of shooting the invading British forces, fully determined in his promise to his father, but also kill his own father with his own hands to get ride the troops.) , all of which shows how far he can go for his mission and bear the burden without getting crushed by it... And Bheem's flogging scene gives emotional weight to the internal conflict inside Ram that is seen in his actions (like subtly trying to save his friend, by asking him again and again to surrender and pulling the chains to forcefully make him kneel so that he can be spared, or him stepping on Bheem's knees to make him kneel while subtly avoiding another British soilder who was about to hit Bheem on his knee... , Or Raju wiping a drop of tear from his eyes along with the blodd of Bheem that got sprayed on His face etc...).... And in this scene, coming to Bheem himself, he is embracing his identity as a tribal person of that Gond tribe who live in forests one with the nature... And mother nature trying to caress his face with a leaf which gives him courage to get determined and stand against oppression in his own way (singing). That particular region people have always had the habit of singing gfolk so gs for anything and every type of emotion be it joy, happiness, sad, angry, determination, elevating, admiration etc... And Bheem did the same thing... Express his emotion in his own indigenous way. And that very song and it's lyrics were the turning point of rising the revolutionary rage in the people around who immediately act upon it and that emotional surge is what changes the heart of Ram. And once fully emotionally charged in the audience and the motivations are fully understood, final confrontation... Of action ensues where things are taken to a step even further... In Ram's rescue scene and the climax. So, I feel that reprieve is necessary to establish stuff after the explosive first have to pick it back up immediately after charging the audience with emotions... And overall, in this movie, there are lots and lots and lots of symbolism everywhere... Not only plot wise,thematically but also hinting at Indian historical epics as well. And all across the movie there are countless setups and payoffs...which is also another thing that gives audience the satisfaction. And YES... THIS MOVIE IS WHAT A SUCCESSFUL LIVE ACTION ANIME MIGHT LOOK LIKE... If done right... The style of the storytelling is what makes it so entertaining, enjoyable, yet emotional and moving.... Just like any good anime.. The director S S Rajamouli is known for his maximalistic type of storytelling and he intends to have every small event backed with emotions. He says that he won't have an action scene if emotional weight is absent in it... and that emotion is what makes audience feel it with every fibre of their being and not just enjoy it like any other over the top action movie. And the music : songs and OSTs also complements the same... Which is given by the talented composer MM Keeravani. The Cinemaographer, VFX supervisor, editor, costumes and production designers : Senthil Kumar, Srinivas Mohan, Sreekar prasad, Rama Rajamouli and Sabu Cyril are all the unsung heros,behind the scenes for the movie.

If you really explore Indian cinema watch all this movies Tare jameen par Kantara Pari Tubbad 3 idiots Bhul bhulaiya Hera pheri Garam masala Kgf 1&2 Bahubali 1&2 Andhadhun Vicky donor Family man (ott) Sacred games (ott) Farzi(ott) Mirzapur (ott) Asur(ott) Panchayat 1&2 (ott) Tvf pitchers (ott) Sarfarosh Wasseypur 1&2 Dangal Mother india Kaithi Vikram Vikram vedha Three Jane tu ya Jane na Jindegi Na milegi dobara Gujarish Devdas Swedish Kaminey Uri Sardar udham Mashhan Bhagat Singh (by Ajay Devgan) Super30 Black Raghuvendra btech

Watch Sardar udham best movie

List of indian Cinema to watch : Bahubali 1 (ss rajammuli) Bahubali 2 (ss rajamuli) KGF 1 KGF 2 Andhadhund (this movie is nuts, twist till last) Bajrangi Bhaijaan Singham (indian chuk noris) (cop movie) Sardar udham Shreesha Bhul bhulaiya (horror mystery) Stree (horror mystery) 3 idiots Pk Dangal (wrestling epic) based on true story Ghajini (memory loss mans revenge) i Aparichit And there are many more Welcome to indian cenema

I guess that dub Netflix fiasco is all coz of the profit as number of Hindi speakers in India 691,347,193 and number of Telugu speakers in India 94,127,740. So Netflix opted to only take the Hindi dub and I guess Zee5 (?) took the original version. I myself prefer subtitles and no variation in sound and the lips 😅.

@53:00 This is a movie going experience in India kzbin.info/www/bejne/anqxZ319ds57osU&feature=shares

Stop interrupting te other guy.... it is irritating

Watch 1. lunch box 2.3 idiots 3.my name is ghan 4.pk 5.Dungal 6. suraraipotru

SARDAR UDHAM (2021) is the best bollywood movie ever made. IMDB 8.4. Mark my words you will not forget this movie. It will break your stereotype regarding indian movies that they are only song and dance and fun. It will change your top 10 movie of all times. Please WATCH it.

Watch 3 idiots movie, I am sure you will love it.. '3 idiots' movie (imdb:8.4 and rotten tomatoes 100%) (most loved Indian movie ever in India, China, south Korea and many Asian countries)

India has 20+ DIFFERENT film industries based on different languages/regions (1600+ languages/dialects) are spoken in India ... Also India overall produces avg 1800+ films per year . (that is more than twice of H0llywood) .. and EVERY TYPE/GENRE of film is made .. not just the typical stereotype musical/over-the-top that Westerners think of .. and B0llywood is NOT official name

20:43 .. "Slumd0g .." was NOT Indian movie .. Its a Br!tish movie based on IND .. many Indians hate that film for poor/exaggerated stereotype representation of IND. Imagine if RUS made movie abt USA. 32:30 .. I guess you forgot that Bheem & his pals are from JUNGLE TRIBE .. Bheem literally fights TIgers (who clawed his sk!n) .. and you are questioning his skin healing or anti-ven0m herb-making skills?

Yo this movie is so badass.. I didnt like hindi dub, the bg score was so engaging and the visual spectacle is charming af!! Indian cinema, need more of it!!

I hope you bust the bubble and explore more cinema horizona.. like 'Baahubali' by this director. try 'Andhadhun' 'the lunchbox' - and this are pure gems!!

Dude, most of the scenes like human pyramid, the Ram vs 2000 men something, all are real with maasive extras. And Indian cinema experince is awesome, the music-score blended in scenes, people here love cinema and we mostly prefer theatre and community viewing over OTTs. Just see YT videos of RRR in theatres, the fan base will shock you!

They had 2000 extras

It's so sad 1:30 minutes video but views people will understand

Interesting take on Plainview wanting a family. I didn’t get that the many times I’ve seen it. The kid was always used as a prop to make his brand more enticing to potential customers. We never see Plainview interested in romance whatsoever. But an interesting take regardless.

Paul Dano was already casted as a Sunday brother. The actor that played his brother dropped out at the last minute so Dano played his role as well, so it was just a set of twins then that went unaddressed in the movie for the most part. But I think they/PTA was happy to let that happen cuz it makes audiences wonder… probably about duality of man or something.