It's not real. I made it myself from the Fahrenheit 11/9 trailer. I've followed him since 2004, read all his books, watched all his TV shows and films, and listened to all his podcasts. This is the first time I can ever recall him being dead wrong about the direction of the country. His 2002 "Bowling For Columbine" film brought up the very serious and recurring subject of gun violence and is still relevant today as we now have more mass shootings than total days of the year. He got booed off the acceptance stage at the 2003 Oscars two days after we invaded Iraq for calling out George Bush's illegal war. He not only predicted Trump's victory in 2016, he predicted how Trump won, by picking off the Rust Belt states. He predicted the blue Congressional wins in 2018, the Biden victory in 2020 and the absence of the media-predicted "red wave" in 2022. He's been warning all year long that Biden funding the genocide in Gaza would cause voters to stay home in Michigan or simply not support the Democratic candidate. What he got wrong was the women vote. We all got this one wrong. I'll never understand why everybody hates on him so much. Michael Moore is a national treasure and so unappreciated. I recommend you read his most recent book, "Here Comes Trouble."

Go find a safe space, snowflake. It's what really happened. Deal with it. Stern's attitude is exactly how most people felt after witnessing such horror. If you'd rather pretend America hasn't had a racist history, be my guest. Maybe when people hear what Stern said that day, they will understand how this country was so easily duped into invading Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with the attack. Let's just censor everything that's too offensive that way everybody is safe from the harsh realities of life.

@@911_In_Real_Time Please try not to be so reactionary. You could have made that point without airing so much of Stern's horrid content. You could have related the horror of these events without the constant footage of people jumping to their deaths, or the severed body parts. You wanna talk about snowflakes? How would you characterize your response to one person's honest criticism of your work? Pretty snowflake. In general I agree with your take on 9/11, here and on another of your videos (as I've posted). Your reaction here is pretty over-the-top. Pretty snowflake. Grow a pair and deal with reality. You're no Steven Spielberg. You're an amateur (as you say) who used a collection of other people's work to make a video, and you're having a hard time dealing with the slightest criticism.

@@911_In_Real_Time You can't take the slightest criticism, so I'm the snowflake? I agree with most of your opinions concerning the historical events, but your excessive resort to the macabre and your willingness to give even more air time to the hate is not good. You didn't need to spend so much time showing people jumping to their death, or their body parts. (There's a reason why most 9/11 filmmakers don't resort to that.) Can't you tolerate a bit of criticism? Maybe filmmaking isn't for you.

​ @beenaplumber8379 Maybe it isn't. How many films have you made, by the way? You called my film "sensationalist." Oxford defines that as "a person who presents stories in a way that is intended to provoke public interest or excitement, at the expense of accuracy." Cambridge Dictionary defines the adjective as "presenting information in a way that is shocking or exciting rather than serious, especially in newspapers, on television, etc." I don’t appreciate being compared to outlets like Fox News, the biggest amplifier of hate in this country and that's what set me off. For you to suggest that I give a platform to hate is the definition of "over-the-top". Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, those are your platformers of hate, people that not only give a microphone to the most hateful scum in America, but whole-heartedly and unapologetically agree with most of their rhetoric and profit from it. I made a brutally honest, historically contextual movie, nothing more. If I'd have done it your way, it would've just been another 9/11 documentary, of which there are an abundance and most of them are fantastic. I didn't want to make the same old, same old. My objective with this film was accuracy, honesty and an emotionally and factually comprehensive take on the entire day and from reading the responses, I succeeded. Based on your initial post, I'd say it struck the exact nerve I set out to hit with viewers. Of course 9/11 is a harsh topic. It's not supposed to make you feel safe or secure or warm inside. The trigger warning at the beginning was for people just like you, but you chose to ignore it and now you're slamming me, claiming I'm platforming racism. It's the real-time telling of the worst terrorist attack in history, not a fucking Disney movie. Not that I need to justify myself to you, but 9/11 is a subject I’ve always been passionate about that took me down a very dark path in life. I eventually got tired of all the BS conspiracy theories I kept hearing(some of which I used to push), so I decided to set the record straight by releasing something so raw and real, even the most fringe conspiracy nut would have trouble debunking it. Many people these days reject professionally made documentaries on 9/11 because they are perceived as 1) mainstream, 2) toned-down for the squeamish and 3) covering up the “truth”. That’s how “Loose Change” went on to become the first viral film on the internet in 2005. By your logic, holocaust victims should never be shown because it’s just too painful. When Emmett Till was beaten to death by racists in 1955, his mother insisted on an open-casket funeral to show everybody the horrific aftermath of his lynching as a cautionary tale to the dangers of hate. I wonder what would happen if we tried that with mass shooting victims? Sunlight is always the best disinfectant. When you censor reality, you give safe haven to the extremists by driving them underground into the dark corners of society and they eventually reappear stronger, more organized and more unhinged. People say "NEVER FORGET" and I couldn't agree more. A picture is worth a thousand words and my film never once takes the horrors of that day out of context. Racism took off like a rocket after 9/11 but you'd rather forget that harsh reality because, "something, something...Howard Stern sucks," the same broken record I've heard since I released this film. To be clear, I've never been a fan of Stern and he's done FAR MORE offensive things than his totally normal, real-time human reaction to the worst attack in our history. Just ask Eric "Mancow" Muller. "You are no Steven Spielberg" is not only hateful, it is a strawman argument as I've never said or thought anything close to that. In fact, until all the positive comments started rolling in, I was doubting it was any good because my mind was so exhausted after working tirelessly on the editing for a solid year. Since its release, all I have ever done is acknowledge the love and appreciation that my hard work earned. I challenge you to find one post where I compare myself to any accomplished documentary film maker or movie director. I've always stated that I'm an amateur filmmaker and that this is likely a "one and done" project. While we're on the topic of hate, I noticed you failed to comment on the Palestinians cheering in the streets, one of, if not, the most offensive images to come out of that day. If Howard Stern is so hateful, what does that make the people celebrating the live execution of thousands of people? Are they just misunderstood? I think Donald Trump‘s vile, ignorant rhetoric should be broadcast non-stop until the election so people NEVER FORGET just how close we are to fascism here in America, something even Kamala Harris is now warning about. It’s people like you, constantly crying about the offensive realities of life, attacking the messengers, and taking your eye off the real threats to this country that drive the crazies on the right to support someone like Trump, who, in their minds, “tells it like it is,” no matter what a blatant, self-serving liar he so obviously is. People don't need you acting as the moral police protecting them from the truth. Let them make up their own minds and stop with the virtue signaling already.

@@911_In_Real_Time It's not that you showed that content, it's that you showed so much of it and kept returning to it long after the point had been made. It's gratuitous. You pull focus from the point you're trying to make.

Thank you. If you're asking did UM ever make any episodes about 9/11, the answer is "yes". kzbin.info/www/bejne/a3fYpnlqoNSAr9k&pp=ygUmdW5zb2x2ZWQgbXlzdGVyaWVzIHNlYXNvbiAxMiBlcGlzb2RlIDM%3D

@@Jenna-ky7uw i recorded a few episodes on vhs but I don’t think i have any unreleased episodes that haven’t been uploaded to the UM KZbin channel.

@@911_In_Real_Time The FilmRise release are heavily edited and have missing content from the original airings. If your time and efforts allow consider uploading them .

Yeah, I dunno why some stories are missing. I think I remember a while back trying to upload the Tara Calico episode with that horrific polaroid of two kids bound and gagged in the back of a van and it got yanked for copyright.

@@911_In_Real_Time Different reasons like statue of limitations passed,people profiled/authorities requested, then suspects or evidence is now proven to be innocent/false,needs further restoration. You can try uploading to Internet Archive as the site is more lenient on copyright strike downs and add relevant word metadata to files. Once the site is up n running again, as a media archivist I know your aware the site is down to hackers

@@911_In_Real_Time For many reason like the statue of limitations has passed, authorities requested,suspects profiled now proven to be innocent/false.... Consider uploading to Internet Archive as the site is more lenient on copyright strikedowns,when the site is up n running again, as a media archivist you must be aware its down due to hackers

Wow, this really is turning into Yanny vs. Laurel 2.0. Funny thing is, now I'm not even sure what I hear and I've been listening to this stuff for 23 years.

@@911_In_Real_Time That's funny and an interesting comparison. I'm a pilot and used to listening to ATC. I hear it clear as day to be "Good flight" and that more closely matches the example of what she usually says. I see how someone could choose to hear as "Good luck," but it's not what she said. As they say, "Good luck" doesn't make sense contextually anyway. If you survey pilots who have listened to ATC for years, I would be surprised if any think the statement is "Good luck" unless specifically prompted to hear those specific words. I think it is the power of suggestion and I continue to program my head to avoid external influence and attempt to hear the truth even when listening to propaganda.