Thank you for your comment and suggestion. I think 100 will be too much, I will definitely consider doing another tutorial on ChatGPT-4o cince it is faster and generates better results. And you are right I already tweaked the prompt and ChatGPT can give clickable links.

@@vugar_ibrahimov Systematic review with just 100 references is actually pretty small. My problem with AI tools, like chatPDF (which is supposed to use chatGPT inside) is this: I asked it to summarize 25 papers and it did 4 and then simply stopped. I had to paste the same prompt for each paper separately to get the job done.

I meant 100 is too much for any AI tool (for now), of course not for academic literature review. I would never ask any tool to give me the summary of 25 articles at once. They mostly miss the huge parts of the papers. I even trained a custom GPT for that and it failed to summarise multiple sources at once. And would never rely on the summary of multiple papers and I should check each result in a conventional way from the original source. The best and more safe scenario is just upload one article/paper, analyse, double check and then move to another one.

AI Assistant can summarise documents, but not fill in.

Thank you, for stopping by. Yes, agree, although they claim that they have 1% false positives I cannot trust it wholeheartedly. Humanisers are even worse, I would say.

Thank you, I will check it out.

Thank you, Samira. Glad that you liked this tutorial. Appreciate your kind words.

Hi, Perplexity is one of the bests in the market. But I would use it more for general research, but could be useful for initial academic research too, as a starting point. Scite is definitely one of my favorites and it is more dedicated one for academic research. Along with SciSpace and Litmaps. I like using AI tools in combination, no specific preference on one. Here is my tutorial on Perplexity kzbin.info/www/bejne/bHqxc4WsasiYfZo

@@vugar_ibrahimov Thank you!

Appreciate that, Samira.

Appreciate your comment. Yes, for now it works with PDFs in English. It processed my documents pretty well on my MacBook but I would never blindly rely on the results of it like any other AI tool since they all sometimes hallucinate. Some pros: it is cheaper than ChatPDF and less labourous thus you do not need to go elsewhere and upload document, huge time saver. Although it is not free from some flaws, it has huge potential since no new startup can compete with distribution of Adobe. Note: I am not affiliated.

Thank you, Samira, glad that you liked this tutorial.

Thank you, Samira, appreciate that

Thank you, Samira, glad that you liked it.

Yes, agree, Scite is more dedicated tool for academic purposes. But it only gives 7-day trial period. Here you can watch my tutorial on it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/q6W4ZJpjrpqsadE

No

You are welcome. Glad that you liked this video. I use Perplexity too.

As mentioned in the video, free for one week and then you can decide if you need to switch to pro.