Lunch with the Core 4 03 24
43:02
6 ай бұрын
Lunch with the Core 3 27 24
52:13
6 ай бұрын
Lunch with the Core 3 06 24
48:08
6 ай бұрын
Lunch with the Core 2 28 24
29:19
6 ай бұрын
Lunch with the Core 2 14 24
46:25
6 ай бұрын
Pollen Power 2023 Slideshow
7:58
7 ай бұрын
Computer services at the IGB
40:37
Improving DATA Workflows
43:22
Жыл бұрын
IGB Core Minflux Workshop
3:03:46
Жыл бұрын
The biomass distribution on Earth
54:31
Пікірлер
@metipallearuna223
@metipallearuna223 17 күн бұрын
Chirality is a hidden mirror-holy other handed orphan urchin automaton non machinery irredundant hole.
@Taichi7
@Taichi7 3 ай бұрын
If I got the ultra-low concentration, the first thing came into my mind would be 'Using the Gradient' --------------- Stochastic motion under the gradient Mathematical Physics, PhD
@drtimbradbury
@drtimbradbury 5 ай бұрын
Love to see data on how microbiome affects autoimmunity.
@Willy-hs7uu
@Willy-hs7uu 5 ай бұрын
Watched this just out of curiosity, what I found most interesting is how fast the diversity of your guy biome can bounce back after a major kill off, for example antibiotics. of course after a major "kill off" of beneficial flora, there is a window of opportunity for the bad guys to take root. there seems to be a lot of conflicting data on the microbiome, if certain strains are completely gone as some would say, how do they restore themselves? and here comes the other information that does not make sense, I have seen many "professionals" state that consuming pro biotics will NOT seed or be permanently established in the gut. so what gives? if certain strains of bacteria is really completely killed off, where does it come to restore the gut if not from by ingestion? you can't have it both ways. either our gut bacteria is not completely killed off and just remains hidden and temporarily non functional >or< ingesting bacteria from food / supplements does have the potential of seeding our gut.
@ДмитрийБурбовский
@ДмитрийБурбовский 6 ай бұрын
.#zZz#.⚡⬇️⬆️💀☢☣ЯДЕРНАЯ/ТРАНСПОРТНАЯ/ЦЕПОЧНАЯ Р.Н.К#.💀⚡🔥,МОГЛА ПРОИЗВОДИТЬ ВВОД И СИНТЕЗ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ - ТОЛЬКО ПО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОМУ/ЯДЕРНОМУ ЗАКРЫТИЮ СИСТЕМ ЭП/ВОЗВРАТА,ЯДЕРНОГО ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЯ ВЕЩЕСТВА КЛЕТОЧНОГО СЧЁТА МАТЕРИИ/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ!.ИБО ТОЛЬКО ЯДЕРНЫЙ/ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫЙ ПОСТУЛАТ МАТЕРИИ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ КЛЕТКИ - ЕСТЬ ЯДЕРНЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС ВВОДА ЭП,В ЯДЕРНЫЕ СИСТЕМЫ/ОТВЕТА СООТВЕТСТВИЯ,САМОГО ЯДЕРНОГО ПРОЦЕССА ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ ЭП-/К.Ц.П.ЭП.Д.М.В./💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥Я ОБ ЭТОМ ПИСАЛ НЕОДНОКРАТНО,ЧТО СИСТЕМА ЯДЕРНОГО ОТВЕТА КЛЕТКИ/Д.Н.К./,ПО СИНТЕЗУ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ ВИРУСНОГО/ПЛАЗМЕННОГО ЭП КОНТРОЛЯ💀⚡🔥,ПРОВОДИЛАСЬ С ЯДЕРНЫМ ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЕМ МОЛЛЕКУЛЯРНО/КИНЕТИЧЕСКОГО НАБОРА ЭП,НО УЖЕ ПО ЯДЕРНОМУ ЗАКРЫТИЮ ОТВЕТА -/К.Ц.П.ЭП.Д.М.В.К./💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥Т.К.САМ ЯДЕРНЫЙ ОТВЕТ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ - ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНО СВЯЗАН И ОПРЕДЕЛЁН,С ЯДЕРНЫМ/ГЕНОВЫМ ФОНОМ ГАЗА МАТЕРИИ ЭП!.ЭТО ЗНАЧИТ,ЧТО ВСЕ СИСТЕМЫ ЯДЕРНОГО УЧАСТИЯ И ЯДЕРНОГО ВВОДА ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ - ЯДЕРНО ПЕРЕМЕЩАЛИСЬ И ЯДЕРНО ЗАКРЫВАЛИСЬ,В СИСТЕМУ ПЛАЗМЕННО/УРАНОВОГО ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЯ ЭП,ПЛАНЕТАРНОГО СИНТЕЗА ЗЕМЛИ ЯДРА/СВЯЗИ!.ИМЕННО ПОЭТОМУ,ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОМУ/ЯДЕРНОМУ ПОСТУЛАТУ МАТЕРИИ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ,УРАНОВОЙ ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ БЕЛКА/СВЯЗИ КЛЕТОЧНОГО СИНТЕЗА НАЛОЖЕНИЯ - МОГЛО ПРОИСХОДИТЬ ТОЛЬКО ПО КОДОВОМУ/ЯДЕРНОМУ ЗАКРЫТИЮ СИСТЕМ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ,С ЯДЕРНЫМ ВВОДОМ ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ ЯДЕРНОГО КОНТРОЛЯ ЭП/ВОЗВРАТА!.ЭТО - СЛОЖНЕЙШАЯ/КВАНТОВАЯ/ЯДЕРНАЯ СИСТЕМА ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ СИНТЕЗА💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥⚫⚫⚫⚫💀💀💀💀💀⚡⚡⚡
@marwanshamseldin1049
@marwanshamseldin1049 7 ай бұрын
wow!!
@thejpooks
@thejpooks 7 ай бұрын
This video is waaaay too good to only have 275 views!
@ДмитрийБурбовский
@ДмитрийБурбовский 7 ай бұрын
.#zZz#.⚡⬆️⬇️💀☢☣ЯДЕРНАЯ ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ МАТЕРИИ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ,ПЛАНЕТАРНОГО СИНТЕЗА/ЗЕМЛИ ТРАНСПОРТА - ЭТО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ/ЯДЕРНАЯ СИСТЕМА ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ,ПО ВВОДУ/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ ЯДЕРНОГО ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЯ ЭП ВОЗВРАТА!.Т.Е.ЯДЕРНАЯ ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ МАТЕРИИ ЭП - ЭТО ЯДЕРНАЯ/КОДОВАЯ СИСТЕМА ВВОДА ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ,ГДЕ СИСТЕМА ЯДЕРНОГО ЗАКРЫТИЯ ПРОЦЕССОВ/ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ,СОСТАВЛЯЕТ ЯДЕРНЫЙ СЧЁТ/ЗАПОЛНЕНИЯ,САМОГО ЯДЕРНОГО ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ/ВОЗВРАТА,ВВОДА В АТОМНЫЙ КОМПЛЕКС МАТЕРИИ!,ИМЕННО ТАКИМ ОБРАЗОМ,ЯДЕРНО И ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНО СВЯЗЫВАЛСЯ,ВЕСЬ ПЛАЗМЕННО/УРАНОВЫЙ ТРАНСПОРТ ДЕЛЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ ЗЕМЛИ ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ!.В ТОМ ЧИСЛЕ И СИСТЕМА УРАНОВОЙ ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ БЕЛКА/СВЯЗИ,КЛЕТОЧНОГО СИНТЕЗА ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЭП!.💀⚡🔥ПОЭТОМУ,ЯДЕРНАЯ БИОЛОГИЯ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ СЧЁТА - ЕСТЬ ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ/ЯДЕРНАЯ СИСТЕМА ЗАКРЫТИЯ,ВНЕШНЕГО И ВНУТРЕННЕГО СИНТЕЗА ЭП,ПО ВВОДУ/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ СИСТЕМ КОНТРОЛЯ И КОРРЕКЦИИ/К.Ц.П.М.Д.ЭП.М./💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥,Т.К.ВВОДИЛСЯ САМ ГЕНОВЫЙ ФОН КОДА/Д.Н.К./КЛЕТКИ,ЧЕРЕЗ СУММАРНОЕ ЯДЕРНОЕ ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЕ ВВОДА,ВСЕГО МОЛЛЕКУЛЯРНО/КИНЕТИЧЕСКОГО СЧЁТА,ПЛАНЕТАРНОГО СИНТЕЗА ЗЕМЛИ ЭП!.ГОВОРЯ ОЧЕНЬ ПРОСТО,ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ЖИЗНИ КЛЕТОЧНОГО СИНТЕЗА/Д.Н.К./ - ЕСТЬ ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ/КОДОВАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ЯДЕРНОГО СЧЁТА ВВОДА/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ,Т.К.ТОЛЬКО ОЗВУЧЕННОЕ СМОГЛО УДЕРЖАТЬ САМ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ,В ПЛАЗМЕННО/УРАНОВОМ ПРЕВРАЩЕНИИ ГАЗА МАТЕРИИ СИНТЕЗА,ПО ВИРУСНОМУ/ПЛАЗМЕННОМУ ЭП КОНТРОЛЯ ВВОДА!.💀⚡🔥⚫⚫⚫⚫⚫💀💀💀💀💀⚡⚡⚡
@clementmariostlouis6686
@clementmariostlouis6686 Жыл бұрын
Could we say that RNA or DNA came first in light of covid 19 pandemics using the host `s ribosomes ?
@tigertiger1699
@tigertiger1699 Жыл бұрын
I got to 4 mins… hurt me head Damn interesting…🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@user-dn9vd9xg9p
@user-dn9vd9xg9p Жыл бұрын
If ya don't have the research in your state and no grants for various neuromuscular and genetic diseases, the patients remain untreated and physicians are as rare as our salamanders and red headed woodpeckers. So many symptoms are similar to others..... So if ya don't have the research grants for the various neuromuscular diseases...people suffer. What is the difference among all the neuromuscular diseases, lupus, MS, CMT, and the connective EDS? How is testing differentiated among these and more? If only the diagnosis are based on symptoms not genetic or mother testing then the decision is made by the doctor. And, if you have 2 doctors from 2 separate clinics, you will have two diagnoses. If the 2 doctors get are in the same clinic, they back up each other of the one diagnosis. Reality. . ... Docs just will not say anything that bucks the former doc's diagnosis if they work for the same employer which causes patients to continue to suffer due to misdiagnosis and wrong pharma treatments. Reality!
@user-dn9vd9xg9p
@user-dn9vd9xg9p Жыл бұрын
If a patient is only tested for CMT under a grant study and has the gene for CMT...... How does the research know if it really is or not CMT if other research is not done that may show results that are similar?
@user-dn9vd9xg9p
@user-dn9vd9xg9p Жыл бұрын
Speaking of steroids.... In our state, Why is Prednisone over-RXd now versus what used to be prescribed as Decadron. These meds are used for the same symptoms yet Prednisone seems to have a different affect on the patient. The patient is told they are the same medicine ingredients. However FDA ingredients active and inactive do not reflect what physicians are telling patients. Why? Prednisone seems to have some side effects that are not tolerated as well as Decadron. Why has Decadron been pushed out by local doctors? Is it because of $$$ rebates?
@user-dn9vd9xg9p
@user-dn9vd9xg9p Жыл бұрын
Could any of these changes be due to mRNA or approved rDNA generic drugs that were approved to be manufactured and distributed thru generics especially, supposedly, diabetic injection pharma? Correct? How do we know these rdna generic, mRNA or bio similar man-made drugs are not causing these problems?
@user-dn9vd9xg9p
@user-dn9vd9xg9p Жыл бұрын
This research is all and good....but from.what I have experienced personally and in my opinion, we have no truly knowledgeable doctors in Mississippi that is aware of CMT disease, the connective tissue disease, how to properly treat MS and even difficult to find good gastro doctors that seem to misdiagnose over and over. Our healthcare system has become a huge referral system with the gaslighting of patients and physician referral fees that tend to not stop. It's best to state you referred yourself if you can ...at least to lower your patient bill somewhat. Research is rarely passed to the medical community .... from scientists that research and research for years, rarely move the understanding and treatment, if known, of these diseases to physicians. Yet grants continue for research in the same medical and research entities whereas physicians work. It's two worlds.....Phd research vs MD knowledge. In addition, once grant research is done or even continuing , then the next step is usually to push new meds to test the research actually on the patients that have NOT been researched long enough and for high $ rebates to hospitals, research centers, pharmacists, etc. And sometimes offering payments to patients to participate in the research, AS the research. And, the meds may cause worse problems than the disease, hence class action recalls we see quite often later when meds are marketed to public to early. It's a pattern it seems that just doesn't quit. Scientists are studying for the life of their career many times to justify their existence, grant funding, high salaries, reputations and credentials, and big grants that flow in from the research and meds to these taxpaid billion dollar supported nonprofits. All about the money 🤑. They have become dependent upon grants. All in my opinions........
@LindaGodfrey-vb1cm
@LindaGodfrey-vb1cm Жыл бұрын
Wow! I can't believe these bacteria manage to live in the home of a sleeping giant! (I'm talking about the Yellowstone supervolcano when I say sleeping giant)
@isabellanievesthegaminggir6558
@isabellanievesthegaminggir6558 Жыл бұрын
Love the video
@carlosvila805
@carlosvila805 Жыл бұрын
La biología molecular le está pateando el trasero a Darwin
@gaurigupta5235
@gaurigupta5235 Жыл бұрын
was the problem related to metabolism and growth solved eventually?
@metipallearuna223
@metipallearuna223 Жыл бұрын
Glycine is the only amino acid with carbon asymmetry ,hence having no mirror image. Non synonymous,amino acid replacement in the Mis sense mutant ant is achiral, although it a amino acid is left handed optically active. Seeing it's mirror-image as non superimposable will tell us about revolution in evolution qjucgbua it's opposite.
@metipallearuna223
@metipallearuna223 Жыл бұрын
A real time video of, let's say for instance a mis-sense mutant of an ant moving on false pair of walking legs attached to the left antenna is anthropomorphic crystallization of the movement of tRNA attached to the incorrect information in the amino acid entering and exiting the RNA's pore animated as a movie in deciding the merits of the other RNA world helices independent of r n ases that would have been lost by not having catalytic functions.
@ahmedaly1070
@ahmedaly1070 Жыл бұрын
😢
@Raydensheraj
@Raydensheraj 2 жыл бұрын
I highly recommend the book "The tangled Tree" by David Quammen...who extensively goes into the life, character and science of Carl Woese and many of his close colleagues. Lynn Margulis and Dorian Sagan wrote books on Endosymbiosis and often highlight the work of Woese. Another book going into a bit of Woese's science is the bestseller by Ed Yong "I contain multitudes". David Quammen write also about Woese in an article I believe he wrote for "The Atlantic" when I remember right...
@Ephilates2024
@Ephilates2024 11 ай бұрын
Very interesting. Thank you. Carl Woese was my uncle’s professor and thesis adviser as an undergrad at Yale.
@SV-cg3sk
@SV-cg3sk 2 жыл бұрын
So are you isolating a phenotype ?
@asmaakterbhuiyan_shanu3951
@asmaakterbhuiyan_shanu3951 2 жыл бұрын
I understand phages are bacterial specific, so they can only attack by maintaining specificity. But, what about the bacterial CRISPR mechanism that integrates phage DNA on their spacer DNA (genome) and a later time when phages attack and can save themself from the phages? then, what would be the solution or I am thinking in the wrong way? Still, bacteria have developed their own mechanism to save themselves... Would that be possible to clarify?
@peters972
@peters972 2 жыл бұрын
22:30 rotation of over 30 A, one of the greatest in biology 26:38 animation of translation
@praptigogoi3849
@praptigogoi3849 2 жыл бұрын
Is there any research paper on this one?
@jabirmohddin7529
@jabirmohddin7529 2 жыл бұрын
Good explanation and story to simplify the complexity of microbial community
@invent183
@invent183 2 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/j3uZpaKKgKiHjJo Origin of Life is Consciousness and has been experimentally verified
@johnandrew2711
@johnandrew2711 2 жыл бұрын
NCMR Inventing Method book Discovery chapter Consciousness is the origin of life and has been experimentally verified.
@metipallearuna223
@metipallearuna223 17 күн бұрын
suosoenegomoh koot ssenuoisnoc litnu emit si CUTCU5
@seemaophk
@seemaophk 3 жыл бұрын
Very bfeuúi
@kennethbransford820
@kennethbransford820 3 жыл бұрын
Abiogenesis is pseudoscience evolutions Achilles heel. Proteins or amino acids via self assembling atoms has to be the first cause or starting point, For pseudoscience evolution to be true. Enzymes, or precisely sequenced coded amino acids, are specific molecules that are needed to speed up specific chemical reactions by a million fold or more. Aminolysis as I just learned about today, is the mechanism for binding polypeptide chains or amino acids together linearly which then fold into their complex geometrical shapes where there is only one solution for. Just one mistranslated letter of the twenty amino acids in the wrong slot and incorrect order causes cancer. And THIS becomes worse in orders of magnitude, since all of these folding protein molecules have to be able to work together, and FIT together and function together, in order for you to EXIST once again PROVING pseudoscience evolution IS a FALSE KNOWLEDGE. That is why there is no such thing as a partially built protein folding molecule. Most people don't know this. Believe me when I tell you, that all of the worlds scientists know about this, and the combinatorial numbers needed that is proving and making them more answerable for their actions. The pseudoscientists are just towing the line. Heard mentality and peer pressure is at play here. If you get out of line, you are blacklisted and labelled as a heretic. Spread the word. I am always talking notes and educating myself and have many journals of what I have learned. So many proofs, against pseudoscience evolution. === Evolution = Self Assembling Atoms = Impossible ===== Daniel 2:44
@davidgurarie6712
@davidgurarie6712 3 жыл бұрын
Who this drivel is directed at, Daniel and his ilk?
@kennethbransford820
@kennethbransford820 3 жыл бұрын
2:50 No way the entrance and exit tunnel was by accident. DESIGN is the only solution. ====== Evolution = Self Assembling Atoms = Impossible =====
@drewthermos3866
@drewthermos3866 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the vid. Curious of your thoughts, how can we know the long term effects on fertility, pregnancy and child's health if the first covid vaccine was given dec 2020 in the USA? Shouldn't we have at least 1 to 2 years out monitoring the mother and child for potential negative health issues? *I'm not anti vaccine, i just took a vaccine for HPV which took them roughly 60 years for them to say it was ok for myself (male and age) to take it. But it took them that long to ensure there would be (mostly) no negative affects
@IGBIllinois
@IGBIllinois 3 жыл бұрын
We asked Dr. Lutz and here's her reply! It is natural to think that this long wait is because that is how long it takes to know for sure if a vaccine is safe and to look for slow-emerging effects, including effects on fertility, pregnancy, and babies. But actually, in the history of vaccine development and use, the slowest occurring rare side effects occurred just weeks after vaccine delivery. That includes decades of testing for potential RNA and adenovirus vaccines like the approved COVID vaccines. Vaccine trials do usually last years because that is how long it takes to recruit enough people into the study and test to see if the vaccine really works. For example, the HPV vaccine was approved for females in 2006, and for males in 2009 (women were prioritized over men in testing and approval because their health risks from human papillomavirus infection is more severe). In those three years, researchers were able to recruit enough people and wait to until enough infections were detected in their control group to know whether there was a difference in infection rate between the vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. For the clinical trial of just one of the COVID vaccines that began in the summer of 2020, researchers were able to recruit about three times as many individuals in just a few weeks and see big differences in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in just a few months-because the pandemic greatly increased motivation to participate in such a trial, and the high rate of transmission meant that those differences appeared rapidly.
@asadmustafa2133
@asadmustafa2133 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this great video! Can you please teach us, how to prepare Input data (for ML) using Bioinformatics for Antimicrobial Resistance prediction.
@leonmichalski8220
@leonmichalski8220 3 жыл бұрын
Does any post with „evolution” have to attract religious weirdos? Firstly, a great lecture. Secondly, why you don’t have problems with the evidence for gravitational lensing, for example, but the emergence of cellular machineries is somehow „impossible” to explain in your minds? Why do you want ribsomomes to be „created by God” and refuse to see that they are still perfectly explained by our understanding of biochemistry?
@carlosvila805
@carlosvila805 Жыл бұрын
Hola!...creo que ese razonamiento es incorrecto...una cosa es las lentes gravitacionales y otra cosa es una máquina molecular que se autoensambla. Esta es una máquina presente en seres vivos. Las lentes gravitacionales y otras estructuras como agujeros negreos, etc, con su notable comlejidad también deberían ser objeto de análisis sobre su existencia...¿por que hay orden y organización en la naturaleza y no mas bien lo simple? ¿al azar por ensayo y error? ¿aleatoria, estocástica? sin un propósito. ¿O hay algo más aún no descubierto? sólo describimos máquinas y congeturamos cómo podrían haber originado pero aún no lo sabemos y no hace falta poner a Dioa o lo que sea...aún Saludos desde Buenos Aires
@devinsmith2843
@devinsmith2843 11 ай бұрын
You have to admit there’s a lot of hand waving. “This then does this” isn’t really an argument. Just an idea.
@Raydensheraj
@Raydensheraj 9 ай бұрын
​@@devinsmith2843So just quitting and proclaiming "my preferred version of invisible supernatural super being" did it....basta!!! Done. You believe this to be the better option than trying to actually understanding the natural material world via applying real empirical evidence based science?
@Raydensheraj
@Raydensheraj 9 ай бұрын
​@@carlosvila805Emergence is not random. Nether is evolution. And science is based on translating the laws and processes of the natural, material world into a scientific theory based on human language and human understanding. Of course it's incredibly hard to translate the emergence of certain natural processes into something that makes sense to us humans. We wouldn't even be where we are....with CRISPR, mRNA vaccines, understanding natural selection, endosymbiosis, transposons, how certain diseases are formed etc. Without the incredible collected scientific research by thousands of scientists....we would still be stuck with vitalism, creationism and other magical thinking that offer absolutely nothing to help us understand the material natural world....
@sedevacantist1
@sedevacantist1 3 жыл бұрын
This is a religion and not science. @ 2:35 this speaker reveals his insanity "to make something useful in size". A thing can be the size of the universe and still be useless. The insanity of this RNA world hypothesis is in believing meaningless strings of RNA contain information. Information is a separate thing from the physical thing that contains it. The misconceptions of the atheist are in believing information is a natural physical thing. A physical thing that contains real information is actually two things not one. For the atheist, abiogenesis is one thing so any repeating pattern in the physical world is considered to be information but that is not true.
@perverse_ince
@perverse_ince 2 жыл бұрын
You could have summed it up as "I disagree with your definition of Information"
@sedevacantist1
@sedevacantist1 2 жыл бұрын
@@perverse_ince I did and explained why. If I take your advice and just say (I disagree) then it would be nothing more than an opinion. The academics in this field get away with defining everything as information.
@metipallearuna223
@metipallearuna223 Жыл бұрын
If an RNA world really exists like in a PTC pore not one bit two of false walking ant legs is not quite impossible to find physically for entropy of mis-sense mutation.
@sedevacantist1
@sedevacantist1 Жыл бұрын
@@metipallearuna223 You need DNA to makes RNA. You need RNA to make proteins. You need Proteins to make DNA. Therefor you need all three from the start at the same time to start life.That doesn't include a lot of everything else, and the information to make and control the molecular machines. Darwinian evolution is dead, molecular biology killed it.
@metipallearuna223
@metipallearuna223 Жыл бұрын
@@sedevacantist1 Darwinian devolution or the opposite of evolution is exemplified in Mis -s ense mutation which requires altered DNA codon which is taken up by the ribosomes' rRNA and translated into a pair of false walking legs made of polypeptidea attached to the first left thoracic leg of the ant whose entrance into the left antenna is by making an entry site, from which both the shorter and longer polypeptide structures of the pair of false walking legs exit at different times .Therefore you need a mis-sense reading of the genetic code for translation mechanism to be completed and be incomplete without stop codons for such a condition. How does crystallography study for this condition satisfies your understanding of anthropomorphic crystallization of the movement in your observing movements of tRNA matching with altered codons create empirical evidence of DNA chemicals test in the RNA double helices?
@myopenmind527
@myopenmind527 3 жыл бұрын
I wish there were more interviews of Carl Woese but by all accounts he didn’t like to teach he like to do research and collaborate with others he respected. Those of us that never go to meet him will only know of him through his body of research and the stories told of himself be his team, colleagues and the collaborators with who he worked closed from laboratories from around the world.
@markmanning2921
@markmanning2921 3 жыл бұрын
you are starting with a false premise and using that false premise to prove itself and .... tell everyone you are not going to prove anything. Your attempting to disprove god PROVES you are not a scientist but a satanist.
@wolfgangouille
@wolfgangouille 3 жыл бұрын
He didn't even mention god, you are the one bringing it up. He just tries to understand the origin of the ribosome.
@markmanning2921
@markmanning2921 3 жыл бұрын
@@wolfgangouille the mere fact that he does not attribute the inner workings of the cells of every life form means he is denying gods work. it is mathematically impossible for every single protein required by one cell to just mysteriously POOF into existence and with ONE MISSING the cell dies or is horrendously dysfunctional. it has been said that it is more probable for a tornado to go through a junk yard and leave behind a fully functional 747 than for a single cell to happen by accident in the primordial mud.
@wolfgangouille
@wolfgangouille 3 жыл бұрын
@@markmanning2921 No one ever claimed that is how life started, except for creationists. You have to understand that the first self replicating structures on earth were very different from the simplest now-living organisms. You would not even consider it "life" today.
@markmanning2921
@markmanning2921 3 жыл бұрын
@@wolfgangouille show me evidence of this proto life you speak of. explain to me how any single cell can materialize out of primordial soup. the only way a cell can exist is with a staggeringly huge number of proteins and every single one of those is MANUFACTURED inside the cell. NO protein has ever been created outside of a living cell. those proteins require energy that is produced within the cell. without this ATP the cell dies. So.. your proto life would need TRILLIONS of accidental happenings all happening at the same time to produce the simplest cell possible. NO simple cell ever existed. You are in denial
@wolfgangouille
@wolfgangouille 3 жыл бұрын
@@markmanning2921 Why do you keep explaining how a modern cell functions, the whole point is that the first replicating structures which later evolved into cells were much much simpler than modern cells. Modern cells did not spontaneously form. We both agree this is not possible, so could we please move on ?
@johnnyllooddte3415
@johnnyllooddte3415 3 жыл бұрын
my boeing 747 developed by itself from mud too...ahahahaha
@Raydensheraj
@Raydensheraj 3 жыл бұрын
The refutation of this incredible naive argument can be found in many works of real mathematicians and even Christian De Duves Book Vital Dust from the 1980ies trashes the Airplane analogy. I highly suggest you go to your local library and get a couple books on Evolution, Geography, Neuroscience, Genetics etc and not make it a culture wars type of thing. And you don't have to add " hahahahaha" like a child at the end of every sentence. We get it...your the Authority in emergence of biological lifeforms and know all the answers. And you understand Science enough to reject it with mere Philosophical arguments. You can also give us ONE example of a Supernatural claim that can be falsified or tested and explain how a scientist can use Intelligent Design to make predictions that can be tested like= www.theguardian.com/science/lost-worlds/2013/oct/02/moth-tongues-orchids-darwin-evolution
@ivarvaw
@ivarvaw 3 жыл бұрын
An airplane is a perfect example of evolution. There wasn't a perfect 747 all of a sudden (and it's still not perfect, judging by the crashes lately...). We started with a very basic design, then a little more complex one. And now, 100 years later, we're getting somewhere. It wasn't perfectly designed and probably never will be.
@myopenmind527
@myopenmind527 3 жыл бұрын
There is a cure for your ignorance. 📚
@johnnyllooddte3415
@johnnyllooddte3415 3 жыл бұрын
super complexity from nothing.. these dna have more complexity and coded info them all super computers combined..and its random from nothing....ahahahaha
@markmanning2921
@markmanning2921 3 жыл бұрын
a complete disavowal of the laws of thermodynamics. satans minions working hard to disprove god.
@kennethbransford820
@kennethbransford820 3 жыл бұрын
@millionmanification I am all ways learning. Lord Kelvin said, “We are absolutely forced by science to believe with perfect confidence in a Directive Power-in an influence other than physical or dynamical or electrical forces . . . You will be forced by science into a belief in God.” The reason why most people believe in pseudoscience evolution is because of ignorance and lack of knowledge. It takes time to reason and come to the conclusion that pseudoscience evolution never happened. It is a false knowledge or pseudoscience. The combinatorial numbers are proving it never happened. The evidence always points to design as the only solution for the existence of your brain that is right now giving you the ability to think and to have CONSCIOUSNESS. For sure this was not by accident. No way that your brain came out of the dirt by accident just like the universe didn't come into existence by accident out of nothing , and a terraformed earth, that once was a ball of rock just like venus floating through the dead of space and being the same size as earth is considered to be earth's twin sister. === Evolution = Self Assembling Atoms = Impossible ====
@kennethbransford820
@kennethbransford820 3 жыл бұрын
@millionmanification Why did you delete my last comment? Not fair. See how people act when THEY don't like what they hear or what others say? They delete you or discredit you. ==== Evolution = Self Assembling Atoms = Impossible =====
@carlosvila805
@carlosvila805 Жыл бұрын
@@markmanning2921 Esto es erroneo...no hace falta poner a Dios...¿qué Dios? ¿Cristiano?¿Musulman?¿Indio?¿el de los pueblos originarios?..hay algo más..y el puro azar, no alcanza...información sin dirección no tiene ningún fundamento...
@johnnyllooddte3415
@johnnyllooddte3415 3 жыл бұрын
you actually believe this is all random...ahahahaha
@josealbertosalazarga
@josealbertosalazarga 3 жыл бұрын
NEW TITLE: RIBOSOME ORIGINS AND DESIGN... SOUNDS FAR BETTER TO ME
@pavel9652
@pavel9652 3 жыл бұрын
But the talk is not for those satisfied with ignorance.
@josealbertosalazarga
@josealbertosalazarga 3 жыл бұрын
@@pavel9652 Iam only satisfied with SCIENTIFIC TRUTH, not with garbage. Lest Keep in Sciencie.
@pavel9652
@pavel9652 3 жыл бұрын
@@josealbertosalazarga Hardly the truth, otherwise you wouldn't be making creationists comments.
@josealbertosalazarga
@josealbertosalazarga 3 жыл бұрын
@@pavel9652 Time will judge, With some open mind, leaving phylosophy out, We will see wich hypotesis is more REASONABLE, SCIENTIFIC AND ALIGN WITH EVIDENCE.
@pavel9652
@pavel9652 3 жыл бұрын
​@@josealbertosalazarga I am looking forward to see the ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance make another step back. The ID is not even a valid scientific hypothesis.
@jimwatchyyc
@jimwatchyyc 3 жыл бұрын
Found my way hear from reading David Quammen’s “The Tree of Life”. Interesting Institute!
@RD2564
@RD2564 3 жыл бұрын
Norman "Same Game" Pace ... "That was a real drag." OMG man, the 60's were a long time ago, turn a page already bud ...
@RD2564
@RD2564 3 жыл бұрын
Took 11 minutes to start the introduction for the talk ... TOO LONG.
@coalcreeker583
@coalcreeker583 3 жыл бұрын
Only a willfully blind person can’t see intelligent design here.
@patldennis
@patldennis 3 жыл бұрын
How does a supernatural designer with no properties interact with matter in order to manipulate it into RNA?
@coalcreeker583
@coalcreeker583 3 жыл бұрын
@@patldennis He created matter so he is able to interact with it. Matter isn’t self existent. He created RNA. And DNA. He designed and created all 40 billion miles of the DNA that is in your body. That’s enough to wrap around the earth around 2.5 million times. Even if I agreed with the idea of evolution, (and even then it would have to be intelligent evolution) there just isn’t the time needed for such incredible complexity to have evolved. As we learn even more about Ribosomes, DNA, RNA etc, I’m sure it will be even more complex and amazing than what we see now.
@patldennis
@patldennis 3 жыл бұрын
@@coalcreeker583 how does a supernatural entity interact with reality and remain supernatural?
@coalcreeker583
@coalcreeker583 3 жыл бұрын
@@patldennis You refer to God as supernatural. You infer He is outside of reality. He is supernatural in that He is so far above our ability to understand Him that “supernatural” is our best description of Him. I believe He even created time. He doesn’t exist outside of reality. He exists outside of time and outside of the physical universe. He enters into both time and the physical universe to interact with us (or reality as you refer to it). PS - and to love us even though we don’t deserve it.
@patldennis
@patldennis 3 жыл бұрын
@@coalcreeker583 do you know the difference btwn fact an assertion
@gwkdad
@gwkdad 3 жыл бұрын
"I'm going to talk about both and not solve either one". So sad that a man will spend a lifetime in search of answers to find out he is no closer to them then when he first began.
@MatterStorm1
@MatterStorm1 3 жыл бұрын
god bless people who do this, they make the grinding progress necessary to actually understand this world
@baraskparas
@baraskparas 3 жыл бұрын
Professor Woese’s paper on the aaRSs of bacteria and archaea being different phylogenetically is practically the only research revelation that proves the bacteria and archaea diverged long before the mythical LUCA. A true giant of science.
@patldennis
@patldennis 3 жыл бұрын
Mythical just like the nodes on any tree are mythical...are you trying to sound like a creationist?
@baraskparas
@baraskparas 3 жыл бұрын
@@patldennis On the contrary I believe in abiogenesis and molecular evolution leading to macroscopic evolution. LUCA to me represents the convergence in evolution of the genetic code and the ribosome.
@patldennis
@patldennis 3 жыл бұрын
@@baraskparas weird phrasing I guess
@baraskparas9559
@baraskparas9559 3 жыл бұрын
Foxy deserves a Nobel prize in chemistry for helping C Woese discover the Archaea. However the 30S subunit is the older of the 2 and the 50S represents an evolved 30S subunit. It is all spelled out in a book to be published on June 21 by Austin Macauley Publishers titled From Chemistry to Life on Earth.
@Raydensheraj
@Raydensheraj 9 ай бұрын
You mean a Nobel Prize for molecular biology?
@baraskparas9559
@baraskparas9559 9 ай бұрын
@@Raydensheraj There is no category for mol. biol. it comes under chemistry.