hmmm4_4 Goood show kinda nice

I’m a Type-Moon fan, people joke about our timeline but it’s only confusing due to most things being set in their own universes to make it easier to tell stories, We have all the info and you don’t have to figure it the timeline out to get what’s going on.

4:48 Spider-Man at Freddy’s lol

This was a great video and a great view at the tapes because they are far more scarier than the games and i love it and it puts the animatronics in a whole new light

What makes the lore "complicated"? It's not knowing where a piece of information about a past event that happens before the game actually fits to the overarching story that is being told, and also how that information is presented. Lets take, for example, HW2's new teaser and the ending that came with it. The Secret of the Mimic teaser just shows us things that tease what will show up in said game (Hence, the "teaser"), but it also shows and connects the MXES machine to what happens in that game. There's a van and a reused MXES animation, before seeing the van speed off into the darkness. The problem is that we don't know who drives the van, when this happens and what it's supposed to tell us, this because of the connection to SOTM, which happens in 1979, yet we only see the MXES machine in RUIN, the latest game in the story. It makes this ending seem rather confusing, yet also super obvious. It can ne interpreted as Gregory and Vanessa using this van to take the MXES machine to the pizzaplex to make it keep the Mimic at bay. But it's because of that "when" that we don't know if that is the case. We don't even know where the machine is being taken to. That is the reason it is "complicated". Not because it actually is, but because it's far too ambiguous to draw out the simple conclusion it most likely has. Another great example is the Glitchtrap-Burntrap-Mimic debacle. The issue of miscommunication lead Steelwool to completely use these characters in the wrong way, making Burntrap a final villain when he was meant to be something else. But because that is his role now, the story needed to shape itself in a way that makes this mistake make sense, so now Burntrap is a Mimic version. And Glitchtrap is too apparently, despite there not being enough clues that could lead to that conclusion in any of the games leading up to SB or RUIN. The only way you could make this conclusion was by using the books that started coming out after SB released. I'm pretty sure Burntrap being Mimic IS a retcon, while Glitchtrap also being Mimic is more of a clarification than a retcon. All of this fails to address how all of these pieces of information end up connecting with each other seamlessly, and because of that, it got "complicated", when it was supposed to be a lot simpler. Glitchtrap was a corrupted Mimic version that ended up turning into Afton, essentially making him "come back". Burntrap was his new physical body, which came from a Mimic body that had caused a rampage before. Once Glitchtrap is defeated, Burntrap becomes the Mimic we see in RUIN. Lack of communication, ambiguous information, unclear canon, and disjointed information makes this "complicated", even if the result of all of that is a rather simple storyline.

I think Battington’s tapes are my favorite fan take on FNAF. I love how gritty and depressing it is, and I like that the animatronics are more realistic

HOW DO YOU NOT HAVE MORE SUBS???? My only criticism of this vid is that you are a bit quiet. Hope that you get big! Also I have a theory for the mainline fnaf games: The animatronics stuffed the children in the suits because phone guy states that the reason why they kill you because they think you are an endo without a suit, so they stuff you in.

100 sub duolingo iceberg

duolingo iceberg pls

cat

Miss the time Glitchtrap and Burntrap were speculated to be William afton, tho he may still be alive and come back very soon

I still find it weird that the Freddy's are folled by their own face

Here's my headcanon timeline (no books spinoffs or Security what ever the hell) 1: FNAF 4 2: FNAF 2 3: FNAF 1 4: FNAF 3 5 FNAF 5(Sister Location) 6 FNAF 6( Pizzaria Simulator) 7 FNAF 7(UCN)

Honestly I miss how FNAF 1-6 (more specific 1,2,3,4) had this sense of realiam and simplicity Evil disfunctional family Dead kids Evil family die in various accidents They and the kids now posses the animatronics BAM that's all I needed

William Afton should’ve been glitchtrap and I don’t care what people say not some AI not some mimic1 code just William glitchtrap should have been his demon

I might honestly be the only person who thinks the series is simple. ~Security Breach-ish era of games is a little complex given the whole fucking miscommunication issue, but still, that's a single era.

Nice! Have u heard of a game called The Indigo Parallel? It's like a trippy The Stanley Parable, check it out. I also subscribed to ur channel, peace!

This video deserves more acknowledgment

I like how fnaf 3 is the most rng based fnaf

Skill Issue

you know for a game with one animatronic you think he'd give him more pizzazz, instead of not able to see him half the time.

Fnaf 3 is very lore relevant, but beyond lore its pretty stale... at least fnaf 4 had cool gameplay mechanics and got me on my tippy toes while playing, unlike fnaf 3. But fnaf 3 is still, at the time, very important lore dropping.

fun vid <:

Underrated channel this video needs more views!

😡FNAF 3 IS SO GOOD AND DONT SAY THAT FNAF 3 IS BAD! 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

The appeal for FNAF games is the stressful yet scary atmosphere which maintains you focused and somewhat entertained with it: checking vents, winding the music box (FNAF 2), illuminating the animatronics and so on. However, this game has almost all of this, but fails because it doesn't add any new elements that we could consider as "fun", but just plain stress. I think only having one animatronic makes it less striking and more boring, and the hallucinations are the only thing that partly solves this, not completely (for being just that), though. If it had "scrap" versions of the rest of the characters, it would have been even scarier and more interesting to explore (character design and lore-wise) and therefore we wouldn't have criticism towards that aspect of the game.

getting?

Love it don't know how this only has 9 views! Keep it up

I love this franchise but (in my opinion) it DEFINITELY needs a reboot.

As someone who played it after all the patches, there's only one main flaw that I have seen. The post game. There's so much to do, but only one save station. This makes the post game turn into a constant cycle of go to a location, go to the entrance to the atrium, go to another location, go to the entrance of the atrium, go to another location . . . It makes the post game feel tedious rather than the fun open world exploration that it was clearly meant to be.

Is it fun?

nice vid

I blame the books

Poppy playtime on top no Ls

You just NOW recognized that?

“The LOOOOORE at this point is COOOOOMPLICATED!!!” - Matpat

The FNaF series should've really ended at the third game like it was supposed too. Scott Cawthon confirmed this in an interview with Dawko back in 2018 and in said interview Scott Cawthon stated that is was the fan reception toward the third game which is what irked him and so he made the fourth game in order to make another scary game in order to please the FNaF community and that got into the mess we are in today. The story and lore of the first three games definitely isn't perfect but it was at least it was somewhat grounded in terms of its story and lore and didn't become the mess that it is today.

There are two problems with FNAF. One is that there are two arcs, the FNAF games 1-4 and Steelwool version which makes FNAF 1-4 both existing and not existing (It is based on FNAF history). 2. The way they improve the lore is by "Shotgun method". Throw a bunch of lore bits, See what audience likes and built it from there. This was unlike Scott's Fnf 1-4 which he has a solid story from start to finish... Until it became popular and he had to continue it and put the ending in the box and lock it never to be opened again (familiar?)

fnaf story had became an incoherent mess once part 4 and sister location and the books came in

I sometimes think about the recent Game Theory FNAF video about that Choose Your Own Adventure book where the conclusion amounted to the commentator admitting that they have zero answers to parse the irregularities for the new information because while it's cool information, it also doesn't do anything meaningful. I don't watch every Game Theory FNAF video, maybe I missed one that does this, but I feel like it's saying something that Game Theory can't scrounge together any answer to the new information and threw the towel on figuring that out. I'll probably think about your comment on the fanbase "building our own story and not understanding the story". Cause like... yeah, at what point isn't this community doing that by now? With everything that's been coming out, has any of it ACTUALLY gotten us to a point where we can confidently say we can answer these things? Where's the line between something actually real in FNAF and fanfiction of what someone thinks is FNAF. While my problem with the FNAF Storyline amounts to suggesting the dumbest of ideas, FNAF's Storyline is basically like a stack of blocks. Every block is a concept or idea added to this franchise, and to me I feel like at some point they're gonna add a bad block that's gonna make this tower even less stable than it already is, and at some point they'll add a really bad block that's gonna topple the entire tower. This story is gonna get even more unexplainable and ridiculous than what it is now and this theoretical tower is gonna topple eventually when we get more concepts that are even more unanswerable than what's here.

I didn't seen the video, but no, send you a hug🤗

Just reboot fnaf with a simpler storyline

First! 🐻 Nicely done review, thanks 😊

I feel like the lore got so much more complicated after Sister Location tbh

FNAF Movie Lore is much simpler to understand than the FNAF game lore tbh

A thing that I think is overcomplicating it, is Steelwool either not knowing what they're doing (due to known miscommunications with Scott) or just don't know where it's worth to expand and in what way leading to unwanted mess. The books are.. I dunno, I give up, don't care anymore. It had its nice and helpful moments but then there're like a bajillion doppelganger plots for no reason (like, yeah, I get it, just stop, you're not helping)

There's a theory, that this is a secret Apartment Science experiment

The Stanley parable to me strikes the perfect balance between being hilarious and disturbing, my favourite example being the route where we find the calm room where the narrator seems to be truly happy and the only way to progress is for you to continually leap off a flight of stairs, the narrator begging for you to stop and the realty setting in that you are slowly and brutally trying to kill yourself just to spite the narrator would make the scene feel disturbing but the pure hilarity of repeatedly surviving the jump and the trek up getting slower and slower each time just kept me laughing

Is it scary? I couldnt stop laughing playing it.

I like your writing and I believe you have a future as a creator, but I'd argue that Stanley Parable is not an analog horror game, it's a comedy game first and foremost. Most would say that it's a pretty funny game, not really call it unnerving