Had ook een hele dag gewerkt haha, was kapot. :P

@@Robinblitz ;) We hebben een Nederlandse org. Zijn van plan lawful te spelen zodra het belangrijk word. Wil je erbij?

@FuriousImp sorry, ik run al mijn eigen internationale org ;)

If it would be fake, there wouldn't be any progress with each and every playtest. As someone who took part in most of them, there is quite some progress each time. The reason testing happens is so that another 3.18 situation can be avoided.

Nope, not as far as I'm aware!

Unsure. They did a server meshing test earlier this year which then prompted them to rework the NMQ system into the RMQ system, which takes a lot of time. Since the tests resumed in August, it has mostly been tweaks of said system as well as trying to iron out any server-side crashes before continuing with 4.0 to PTU/LIVE. Mostly to avoid another 3.18 situation, which was unplayable for the first 3-4 months.

I don't have Evocati access, but from what I heard the 4.0 test went quite well, along with the jump point from Stanton to Pyro and back. It was working pretty well, although kinda hard of a minigame but that can be tweaked.

Well... Yes... But sooner than (hopefully) 2026.

I recall them saying a whiiile back that when going to 4.0, they wanted to start completely fresh from nothing.

It was a long time ago but plans may change, no one can tell you for certain

if the roadmap is correct it should come before we hit 2025

Roadmaps can change though. Plus Q4 2024 usually means Q1 next year. This has been the case for years as CIG takes a holiday break from Christmas until 10-15 January if memory serves me right.

Ey me too!

@@eric90000 Thank you!

Well... FPS Combat has always been my thing. 2000 hours in Tarkov really helps spotting targets haha.

Thank you thank you!

That is the biggest achievement of them all in this economy! Thanks! :)

Might have to wait patiently for a liiiiittle longer haha.

Thank you! Such a big milestone to hit!

Thanks a lot! Incredibly excited for the future!

Thanks! Just want to give back to the community. :)

Ey! Me too!

I feel like it'll be the other way around... 4.0 first then SQ42.

I got it from one of the unverified mercenary missions at a MicroTech distribution center. The NPCs there sometimes wear the Citadel armor.

@@Robinblitz I need to get it somehow haha. I used to have it a lot when we could still buy it in game but been sad when they removed it. Loved this video though. First time coming across your channel

@seano6656 Much appreciated! Gonna be streaming a whole lot more! And yeah, I used to buy them at Port Olisar, but now you can find them at the distribution centers of MicroTech. :)

@@Robinblitz thank you for the advice. If I can actually fly my ship. I will try it right now haha

@seano6656 No problem and good luck! o7

I fully get that. Felt that way, too, the past 2 years, but the fact that we're actually actively testing server meshing every week, gives me quite some hope still that we're at least seeing 4.0 in EVO or the PTU branch this year.

The only explanation for talking like public Server Meshing tests don't make this year very different from previous years is brainrot. 😐

This is a much needed update from CIG. And I'm glad Benoit understood the task!

Yeah we just weren't sure if the Deemer was able to fit behind it without getting shot up, so we wanted to try and take them out beforehand.

Maybe way to optimistic dude

@@domi06021988 Maybe not to LIVE, but 4.0 EVO or PTU I think is fairly doable.

I believe it will be ready late november

@@5ickBreeD As in, on LIVE? Or EVO/PTU?

Highly doubt it, I'd say 4.0 with server meshing V1 SOME TIME in 2025.

Yes.

I fully agree with you. It needs to be more than just a feature. What I noticed in the current PU is that it already is incredibly hard to kill a Hammerhead on your own, with two it's possible. What I think the main difference will be with engineering is that components can physically be damaged by ballistic weapons because they can penetrate armor. If say you get shot at in a Hornet by a Hammerhead with ballistic weapons, it will destroy your components, forcing you to back out. But if the Hornet damages components on a Hammerhead, the crew can repair them mid-fight. The Hornet pilot is forced to disengage because he cannot replace or repair his components mid-fight. I think survivability for big ships will go up quite a bit with this patch because you can maintain components mid-battle.

@@kuiguri Not entirely sure what the context was (timestamp)... Technically? Or cost?

With the 500 players test, my tram started going through half of ArcCorp lmao, flying through buildings. It was a wild ride.

I put a timestamp in the comments where the server meshing test starts. It came out of nowhere halfway through my normal stream, so I was a bit taken by surprise. The first part of the test was 1 server, 100 players. After that, they scaled to 3 servers, 500 players. After I ended my stream, they scaled up to 6 servers, 1000 players, but I missed that part sadly.

@@Robinblitz I appreciate that but having to tell people you put a timestamp in when server meshing started would indicate that no noticeable difference was apparent.

@@john6203 It's the struggle of KZbin streams sadly. I cannot cut it up into two separate parts as it was a livestream. Halfway through, I edited the title because the server meshing test started (out of nowhere) during the stream. In an attempt to let people know, I've pinned a start time for the server meshing test at the top of the comments to at least let people know who scroll down a little. It's all I can do I'm afraid.

@@Robinblitz I'm not criticizing your video at all, it's good for what it is. However, the much lauded and anticipated server meshing from CIG is indistinguishable against the background of the myriad of broken mechanics and bugs. Before anyone else says this, I know it's an Alpha I've known since 2014 when I first started playing it.

@@john6203 It depends. The 500 and 1000 players were not a success, no (maybe for CIG data wise). But when they scaled back to 350 players, it was very much playable and worked really well from what I heard. Currently working on a video about this test and what it (might) mean.

The start of the stream was just watching ISC and some PU gameplay. At 1:08:12 the Server Meshing test went live and so I joined. I edited the stream title halfway through because of this, but it stayed like this. Server Meshing test: 1:08:12

@yashik I mean... It's not as bad as the "bed sheet tech". But yeah, I do hope we're getting more animals quicker. The Kopion and birds kinda came out of nowhere too.

Thanks! Trying new things here in there in terms of content.

@@husniddin10 Thanks a lot!

Hey! Thanks for the info! I had to look through my PC given this was a mission I made on my old PC, but I did find the .miz file. There is however no mission description or anything because I made it just for the video, not with the intent to publicize it.

Yeah, the ground commited war crimes I had to take care of!

@@Robinblitz I would have believed you, if you had bellied the ground as you nearly did! I guess you're threat to slam the ground was enough to send it into submission!

@@jameslanning8405 It's mostly about sending a message.